RESUMEN
Background: Right anterior mini thoracotomy (RAMT) for aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a minimally invasive procedure that avoids sternotomy. Herein, we report the outcomes of patients who underwent redo-cardiac via a RAMT approach for AVR. Methods: This case series reports the clinical outcomes of 14 consecutive redo operations, done in Calgary (Canada) and Gdansk (Poland) between 2020 and 2023. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and disabling stroke. Secondary outcomes included surgical times, hemodynamics, permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM), length of ICU and hospital stay, new post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF), post-operative blood transfusion, incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), rate of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and/or dialysis, and chest tube output in the first 12-hours after surgery. Results: Nine patients were male, and the mean age was 64.36 years. There were no deaths, while one patient had a disabling stroke postoperatively. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross clamp-times were 136â min and 90â min, respectively. Three patients needed a PPM, 3 patients needed blood transfusions, and 2 developed new onset POAF. Median lengths of ICU and hospital stays were 2 and 12 days, respectively. There was no incidence of paravalvular leak greater than trace and the average transvalvular mean gradient was 12.23â mmHg. Conclusion: The number of patients requiring redo-AVR is increasing. Redo-sternotomy may not be feasible for many patients. This study suggests that the RAMT approach is a safe alternative to redo-sternotomy for patients that require an AVR.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing lung transplantation are routinely managed with lifelong immunosuppression, which is associated with a heightened risk for infections. This study delves into the therapeutic challenges and strategies for managing lung transplant recipients (LTRs) infected with COVID-19 during long-term follow-up. METHODS: The was a case series analysis, among which nonstandard therapies consisting of targeted antibody treatment, antiviral drugs, or anti-interleukin-6 drugs were applied in patients after lung transplantation. Additional analysis of laboratory test results for systemic inflammation and imaging studies was also carried out. The study was limited to a dedicated COVID-19 center, commonly known as a temporary hospital, and included patients infected with COVID-19 in the late post-lung transplant period (home-related infection). RESULTS: Fifteen post-lung transplantation patients with current COVID-19 infection were treated with antibodies such as tocilizumab, casirivimab, imdevimab, and regdanvimab. Of these patients, 1 was given tocilizumab (7%), 8 casirivimab and imdevimab (53%), and 2 regdanvimab (13%). Of the 15 lung transplant recipients studied, 8 presented COVID-19-associated lung changes in computed tomography scans (53%). Common clinical manifestations included dyspnea, fever, and fatigue. Antiviral agents, like remdesivir, were employed in the remaining 4 cases (27%), and adjunctive therapies, such as corticosteroids and anticoagulants, were used selectively. All treated patients survived the infection without complications; the treatment proved effective and safe.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales , COVID-19 , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , AncianoRESUMEN
Anti-human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) sensitization in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) can significantly impact graft survival and patient outcomes. The global pandemic, induced by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, brought about numerous challenges in the medical sphere, including potential alterations in HLA immunization patterns among LTRs. A retrospective analysis of LTRs group transplanted from July 2018 to 1 March 2020 (pre-pandemic) was compared with patients transplanted from 1 March 2020 to December 2022 (during the pandemic). Totally 92 patients were controlled. Patients were also divided into 2 groups: vaccinated and non-vaccinated. The results of cytotoxic crossmatch, results of anti-HLA antibody testing, presence of DSA before and after transplantation, and early and late graft function were compared between groups. In the pandemic and vaccinated groups, an increase was observed in the number of positive crossmatch tests performed with a pool of B lymphocytes. However, the presence of dithiothreitol abolished the positive reaction in 90% of cases. We also observed an increased percentage of patients immunized based on the results of solid phase tests both in the pandemic group and in the group of patients who received vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It might be that the pandemic/vaccination has influenced the prevalence of anti-HLA immunization in LTRs. Further studies are essential to establish causative factors and develop targeted interventions for this population of patients.