Acute Lower Extremity Fracture Management in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: 2022 Delphi Consensus Recommendations.

Our objective was to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the treatment of acute lower extremity fractures in persons with a chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: Information from a previous systematic review that addressed lower extremity fracture care in persons with an SCI as well as information from interviews of physical and occupational therapists, searches of the literature, and expert opinion were used to develop this CPG. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to determine the quality of evidence and the strength of the recommendations. An overall GRADE quality rating was applied to the evidence. Conclusions: Individuals with a chronic SCI who sustain an acute lower extremity fracture should be provided with education regarding the risks and benefits of operative and nonoperative management, and shared decision-making for acute fracture management should be used. Nonoperative management historically has been the default preference; however, with the advent of greater patient independence, improved surgical techniques, and advanced therapeutics and rehabilitation, increased use of surgical management should be considered. Physical therapists, kinesiotherapists, and/or occupational therapists should assess equipment needs, skills training, and caregiver assistance due to changes in mobility resulting from a lower extremity fracture. Therapists should be involved in fracture management as soon as possible following fracture identification. Pressure injuries, compartment syndrome, heterotopic ossification, nonunion, malunion, thromboembolism, pain, and autonomic dysreflexia are fracture-related complications that clinicians caring for patients who have an SCI and a lower extremity fracture may encounter. Strategies for their treatment are discussed. The underlying goal is to return the patient as closely as possible to their pre-fracture functional level with operative or nonoperative management.

The effect of a single early high-dose vitamin D supplement on fracture union in patients with hypovitaminosis D: a prospective randomised trial.

AIMS: To evaluate the effect of a single early high-dose vitamin D supplement on fracture union in patients with hypovitaminosis D and a long bone fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2011 and August 2013, 113 adults with a long bone fracture were enrolled in a prospective randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Their serum vitamin D levels were measured and a total of 100 patients were found to be vitamin D deficient (< 20 ng/ml) or insufficient (< 30 ng/mL). These were then randomised to receive a single dose of vitamin D3 orally (100 000 IU) within two weeks of injury (treatment group, n = 50) or a placebo (control group, n = 50). We recorded patient demographics, fracture location and treatment, vitamin D level, time to fracture union and complications, including vitamin D toxicity. Outcomes included union, nonunion or complication requiring an early, unplanned secondary procedure. Patients without an outcome at 15 months and no scheduled follow-up were considered lost to follow-up. The t-test and cross tabulations verified the adequacy of randomisation. An intention-to-treat analysis was carried out. RESULTS: In all, 100 (89%) patients had hypovitaminosis D. Both treatment and control groups had similar demographics and injury characteristics. The initial median vitamin D levels were 16 ng/mL (interquartile range 5 to 28) in both groups (p = 0.885). A total of 14 patients were lost to follow-up (seven from each group), two had fixation failure (one in each group) and one control group patient developed an infection. Overall, the nonunion rate was 4% (two per group). No patient showed signs of clinical toxicity from their supplement. CONCLUSIONS: Despite finding a high level of hypovitaminosis D, the rate of union was high and independent of supplementation with vitamin D3. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1520-5.

Posterior iliac offset: description of a new radiological measurement of sacroiliac joint instability.

The purpose of this study was to describe the radiological characteristics of a previously unreported finding: posterior iliac offset at the sacroiliac joint and to assess its association with pelvic instability as measured by initial displacement and early implant loosening or failure. Radiographs from 42 consecutive patients with a mean age of 42 years (18 to 77; 38 men, four women) and mean follow-up of 38 months (3 to 96) with Anteroposterior Compression II injuries, were retrospectively reviewed. Standardised measurements were recorded for the extent of any diastasis of the pubic symphysis, widening of the sacroiliac joint, static vertical ramus offset and a novel measurement (posterior offset of the ilium at the sacroiliac joint identified on axial CT scan). Pelvic fractures with posterior iliac offset exhibited greater levels of initial displacement of the anterior pelvis (anterior sacroiliac widening, pubic symphysis diastasis and static vertical ramus offset, p < 0.001,0.034 and 0.028, respectively). Pelvic fractures with posterior ilium offset also demonstrated higher rates of implant loosening regardless of fixation method (p = 0.05). Posterior offset of the ilium was found to be a reliable and reproducible measurement with substantial inter-observer agreement (kappa = 0.70). Posterior offset of the ilium on axial CT scan is associated with greater levels of initial pelvic displacement and early implant loosening.

Indometacin as prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification after the operative treatment of fractures of the acetabulum.

Our study was designed to compare the effect of indometacin with that of a placebo in reducing the incidence of heterotopic ossification in a prospective, randomised trial. A total of 121 patients with displaced fractures of the acetabulum treated by operation through a Kocher-Langenbeck approach was randomised to receive either indometacin (75 mg) sustained release, or a placebo once daily for six weeks. The extent of heterotopic ossification was evaluated on plain radiographs three months after operation. Significant ossification of Brooker grade III to IV occurred in nine of 59 patients (15.2%) in the indometacin group and 12 of 62 (19.4%) receiving the placebo. We were unable to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of severe heterotopic ossification with the use of indometacin when compared with a placebo (p = 0.722). Based on these results we cannot recommend the routine use of indometacin for prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification after isolated fractures of the acetabulum.

The floating shoulder: clinical and functional results.

BACKGROUND: Displaced ipsilateral fractures of the clavicle and the glenoid neck are a complex injury pattern that is usually the result of high-energy trauma. The treatment of these injuries is controversial, as good results have been reported with both operative and nonoperative treatment. METHODS: Nineteen patients who had sustained a displaced fracture of the glenoid neck with an ipsilateral clavicular fracture or acromioclavicular separation (floating shoulder) were retrospectively evaluated. The treatment was nonoperative in twelve patients and operative in seven. At the time of final follow-up, standard radiographs were made and all patients were examined by a physical therapist and either a fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon or an orthopaedic traumatologist. In addition, each patient responded to three different validated objective functional outcome measures: the Short Form-36, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Scale, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. Isokinetic strength-testing was performed, and strength in internal and external rotation was compared with that of the uninvolved shoulder. The main outcome measures included fracture-healing, functional outcome, patient satisfaction, and muscular strength. RESULTS: With regard to range of motion, only the amount of forward flexion was found to be significantly greater in the operatively treated group (p = 0.03). The operatively treated shoulders were found to be weaker in external rotation at 300 degrees /sec and weaker in internal rotation at 180 degrees /sec. When normalized to hand dominance, however, the numbers were too small to identify any significant difference. There was no significant difference between groups with regard to the three functional outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Good results may be seen both with and without operative treatment. Therefore, we cannot universally recommend operative treatment for a double disruption of the superior suspensory shoulder complex. Treatment must be individualized for each patient.

Distal biceps ruptures. A followup of Boyd and Anderson repair.

Twenty-one distal biceps ruptures in 20 patients were treated during a 10-year period. All patients were men with an average age of 47 years (range, 37-70 years). Long term results (average, 44 months) were assessed using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcomes questionnaire, isokinetic testing of elbow flexion and supination (strength and endurance), and patient satisfaction. Measurements of range of motion revealed diminished forearm rotation in four of 21 (19%) elbows and diminished flexion in one of 21 (5%). Isokinetic testing revealed 10 of 21 (48%) elbows had weakness of supination versus three of 21 (14%) for flexion. Deficits in endurance included eight of 21 (38%) elbows for supination and seven of 21 (33%) for flexion. Seven complications occurred in seven patients for a 35% complication rate. Heterotopic ossification was the most common complication, occurring in three patients. One of these patients also had a synostosis. All patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcomes questionnaire. Twelve patients had an excellent outcome, eight had a good outcome, and no patient had a fair or poor outcome. These results correlated closely with the patients' own subjective assessments of their satisfaction with the procedure. Despite diminished strength and endurance and a high rate of complications, patient satisfaction was excellent and functional outcome was good.