A review of simulation applications in temporal bone surgery.

BACKGROUND: Temporal bone surgery is a technically challenging and high-risk procedure in an anatomically complex area. Safe temporal bone surgery emphasizes a consummate anatomic understanding and technique development that requires the guidance of an experienced otologic surgeon and years of practice. Temporal bone simulation can augment otologic surgical training and enable rehearsal of surgical procedures. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to provide an updated review of temporal bone simulation platforms and their uses. DATA SOURCES: PubMed literature search. Search terms included temporal bone, temporal bone simulation, virtual reality (VR), and presurgical planning and rehearsal. DISCUSSION: Various simulation platforms such as cadaveric bone, three-dimensional (3D) printed models, and VR simulation have been used for temporal bone surgery training. However, each simulation method has its drawbacks. There is a need to improve upon current simulation platforms to enhance surgical training and skills assessment, as well as a need to explore other clinically significant applications of simulation, such as preoperative planning and rehearsal, in otologic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There is no replacement for actual surgical experience, but high-fidelity temporal bone models such as those produced with 3D printing and computer simulation have emerged as promising tools in otolaryngologic surgery. Improvements in the fidelity of both 3D printed and VR simulators as well as integration of a standardized assessment format would allow for an expansion in the use of these simulation platforms in training and assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Atlas-based segmentation of temporal bone surface structures.

PURPOSE: To develop a time-efficient automated segmentation approach that could identify surface structures on the temporal bone for use in surgical simulation software and preoperative surgical training. METHODS: An atlas-based segmentation approach was developed to segment the tegmen, sigmoid sulcus, exterior auditory canal, interior auditory canal, and posterior canal wall in normal temporal bone CT images. This approach was tested in images of 20 cadaver bones (10 left, 10 right). The results of the automated segmentation were compared to manual segmentation using quantitative metrics of similarity, Mahalanobis distance, average Hausdorff distance, and volume similarity. RESULTS: The Mahalanobis distance was less than 0.232 mm for all structures. The average Hausdorff distance was less than 0.464 mm for all structures except the posterior canal wall and external auditory canal for the right bones. Volume similarity was 0.80 or greater for all structures except the sigmoid sulcus that was 0.75 for both left and right bones. Visually, the segmented structures were accurate and similar to that manually traced by an expert observer. CONCLUSIONS: An atlas-based approach using a deformable registration of a Gaussian-smoothed temporal bone image and refinements using surface landmarks was successful in segmenting surface structures of temporal bone anatomy for use in pre-surgical planning and training.