RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Improvements in intensive care in the last few decades have shifted the focus from mortality to quality of life of survivors as a more important outcome measure. Allocation of public resources towards intensive care is an important challenge for healthcare administrators. This challenge is made more arduous in resource limited countries like India. Thus, it is imperative to consider patient centerd outcomes and resource utilisation to guide allocation of funds. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life of long-term survivors, and to perform cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. METHODS: Data was retrieved from the records and included age, gender, admission diagnosis, length of ICU stay and mortality. Costing methodology used was top down approach. Quality of life was assessed by SF 36 scoring which was done with personal interview and telephonically. Cost-effectiveness analysis was done on the basis of years of life added. Cost utility was done by QALY gained. RESULTS: A total of 1232 adult patients were admitted in the period with 758 (61%) being successfully discharged from ICU with a mortality rate of 39%. Out of 758, we could contact 113 (15%) patients. 86 patients were alive at the time of contact who could fill the forms for quality of life. The patients discharged from ICU had scores almost similar to the general population. Lesser scores were noted in physical functioning and general health perceptions, though this difference was not statistically significant. The life years gained were significantly more in younger patients. The cost per life gained was more in patients aged more than 50 years compared to those who were younger. CONCLUSION: The quality of life after survival from ICU is as good as in the general population. The intensive care provided in our ICU is cost effective. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Mishra SB, Poddar B et al, Quality of Life After Intensive Care Unit Discharge in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India: Cost Effectiveness Analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(3):122-126.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Community-acquired gram-negative bacillary meningitis is rare to occur without preexisting conditions like trauma, organ dysfunction, and immunocompromised state, and very few case reports with Escherichia coli have been described in literature till now. Presence of ventriculitis along with meningitis makes the incidence further sparse. CASE PRESENTATION: A review of literature identified a total of only 45 community-acquired E. coli meningitis from 1945 till to date. Here, we have described a case of community-acquired E. coli meningitis with ventriculitis in an adult with past history of completely repaired CSF leak secondary to trauma nearly 23 years ago, without current radiological evidence of persistent CSF leak and therefore described as spontaneously acquired. Post-contrast T1 images of MRI were suggestive of subtle ependymal enhancement of ventricles, and patient was treated in lines of ventriculitis. Initial CSF was suggestive of acute pyogenic meningitis, and the organism grown was pan-sensitive E. coli. Patient was treated with antibiotics according to the culture sensitivity pattern and was given a prolonged course of 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy in view of ventriculitis. CONCLUSION: Community-acquired E. coli meningitis with possible ventriculitis in adults is described as a rare entity and is likely to be underrated and under-recognized.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) for breast surgery reduces acute and chronic postoperative pain. Using ultrasound for administering the block makes it easier, with its administration at multiple levels decreasing the number of unblocked segments. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single- vs double-level ultrasound-guided TPVB in patients undergoing total mastectomy with axillary clearance under general anesthesia. DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Recovery room and operation theater. PATIENTS: Sixty ASA I and II patients, aged 18 to 60 years, who were scheduled to undergo total mastectomy with axillary clearance under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either single- (group S) or double-level (group D) ultrasound-guided TPVB at T4 or at T2 and T5 levels, respectively, using 0.3 mL/kg of 0.5% ropivacaine. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measure was 24-hour analgesic consumption, and secondary outcomes included number of segments blocked, postoperative pain scores, time to first request for rescue analgesic, and any side effects. RESULTS: The mean total amount of rescue analgesic given in group S was 175.3 ± 70 mg and in group D was 115.7 ± 48 mg (P = .002). Median number of segments showing less sensation to pinprick was 3 in group S and 4 in group D (P < .001). The mean time to first request for rescue analgesic was 533 ± 124 minutes in group S and was 611 ± 214 minutes in group D (P = .118). CONCLUSION: Patients receiving double-level TPVB had significantly less 24-hour analgesic consumption in the postoperative period than those in the single-level TPVB group. This could be due to decreased pain sensation to pinprick in significantly greater number of segments in the double-level TPVB group.