RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with thoracic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) often undergo extensive surgical decompression to avoid functional decline. Though limited in scope, scales including the revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) are used to stratify surgical risk to predict perioperative morbidity. This study uses the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) to predict outcomes following transpedicular decompression/fusion for high-grade MESCC. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent transpedicular decompression and fusion for MESCC (baseline demographics, spinal instability neoplastic score, preoperative and postoperative Bilsky scores, primary cancer type, and RCRI). Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), intraoperative estimated blood loss, readmission/reoperation within 90 days of index surgery, 90-day mortality, and posthospitalization disposition. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients were included in our study. Ninety percent of patients' lesions were Bilsky 2 or greater. Increasing frailty, measured by mFI-5, was a significant predictor of increased LOS (P < 0.01) and 90-day mortality (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis adjusting for sex, body mass index , and age still showed statistical significance (P < 0.05). MFI-5 was not a significant predictor of readmission/reoperation within 90 days or estimated blood loss. Age - not mFI-5 or RCRI - was a significant predictor for posthospitalization nonhome disposition (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The mFI-5 can serve as a useful predictor of outcomes after transpedicular decompression and fusion for thoracic MESCC as it can account for the patient's frailty. Our study demonstrated the mFI-5 as a predictor of LOS and 90-day mortality. These results provide a background to both understanding and integrating frailty into decision-making in MESCC.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Fragilidad , Compresión de la Médula Espinal , Vértebras Torácicas , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Tiempo de Internación , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Postoperative C5 palsy (C5P) is a known complication in cervical spine surgery. However, its exact pathophysiology is unclear. The authors aimed to provide a review of the current understanding of C5P by performing a comprehensive, systematic review of the existing literature and conducting a critical appraisal of existing evidence to determine the risk factors of C5P. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE (January 1, 2019, to July 2, 2021), EMBASE (inception to July 2, 2021), and Cochrane (inception to July 2, 2021) databases was conducted. Preestablished criteria were used to evaluate studies for inclusion. Studies that adjusted for one or more of the following factors were considered: preoperative foraminal diameter (FD) at C4/5, posterior spinal cord shift at C4/5, preoperative anterior-posterior diameter (APD) at C4/5, preoperative spinal cord rotation, and change in C2-7 Cobb angle. Studies were rated as good, fair, or poor based on the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Random effects meta-analyses were done using methods outlined by Cochrane methodologists for pooling of prognostic studies. Overall quality (strength) of evidence was based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methods for prognostic studies. The protocol for this review was published on the PROSPERO (CRD264358) website. RESULTS: Of 303 potentially relevant citations of studies, 12 met the inclusion criteria set a priori. These works provide moderate-quality evidence that preoperative FD substantially increases the odds of C5P in patients undergoing posterior cervical surgery. Pooled estimates across 7 studies in which various surgical approaches were used indicate that the odds of C5P approximately triple for each millimeter decrease in preoperative FD (OR 3.05, 95% CI 2.07-4.49). Preoperative APD increases the odds of C5P, but the confidence is low. Across 3 studies, each using different surgical approaches, each millimeter decrease in preoperative APD was associated with a more than 2-fold increased odds of C5P (pooled OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.69-3.73). Confidence that there is an association with postoperative C5P and posterior spinal cord shift, change in sagittal Cobb angle, and preoperative spinal cord rotation is very low. CONCLUSIONS: The exact pathophysiological process resulting in postoperative C5P remains an enigma but there is a clear association with foraminal stenosis, especially when performing posterior procedures. C5P is also related to decreased APD but the association is less clear. The overall quality (strength) of evidence provided by the current literature is low to very low for most factors. Systematic review registration no.: CRD264358 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).
Asunto(s)
Parálisis , Médula Espinal , Humanos , Parálisis/cirugía , Médula Espinal/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Pronóstico , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Análisis Multivariante , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodosRESUMEN
Thoracic disc herniations (TDH) are uncommon compared to cervical and lumbar disc herniations. Surgical treatment of TDH can be challenging due to the anatomical constraints and the high risk of morbidity due to proximity to the thoracic spinal cord. Moreover, the selection of appropriate surgical approach depends on various factors such as the size and location of disc herniation within the spinal canal, spinal level, presence or absence of calcification, degree of spinal cord compression, and familiarity with various approaches by the treating surgeon. While there is agreement that posterolateral approaches can be used to treat posterolateral and central soft disc herniation, there is a lack of consensus on the best surgical approach for central calcified and giant calcified TDH where an anterior approach is perceived as the best option. There is increasing evidence that support the safety and efficacy of posterolateral approaches even for central calcified and giant calcified TDH. This review highlights the evolution of surgical management for TDH based on the past and current literature and the author's experience at his institution.
Asunto(s)
Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral , Compresión de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , DiscectomíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While the indication for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) may influence the expected postoperative course, there is limited data comparing how length of stay (LOS) and disposition for patients with myelopathy differ from those with radiculopathy. This study aimed to compare LOS and discharge disposition, in patients undergoing ACDF for cervical radiculopathy versus those for myelopathy. METHODS: A retrospective review of all adult ACDF cases between 2013 and 2019 was conducted analyzing sex, age, race, comorbidities, level of surgery, myelopathy measures when applicable, complications, dysphagia, hospital LOS, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were included in the study with 73 patients undergoing an ACDF for radiculopathy and 84 for myelopathy. Univariate analysis determined older age (p < 0.01), male sex (p = 0.03), presence of CKD (p < 0.01) or COPD (p = 0.01), surgery at C3/4 level (p = 0.01), and indication (p < 0.01) as predictors for a discharge to either acute rehabilitation or a skilled nursing facility rather than to home. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated age and indication as the only independent predictors of disposition, with home disposition being more likely with decreased age (OR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.86-0.98) and radiculopathy as the diagnosis (OR 6.72, 95 % CI 1.22- 37.02). CONCLUSIONS: Myelopathic patients, as compared to those with radiculopathy at presentation, had significantly longer LOS, increased dysphagia, and were more often discharged to a facility. Understanding these two distinct populations as separate entities will streamline the pre and post-surgical care as the current DRG codes and ICD 10 PCS do not differentiate the expected post-operative course in patients undergoing ACDF for myelopathy versus radiculopathy.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Radiculopatía , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal , Fusión Vertebral , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Radiculopatía/cirugía , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Discectomía , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugíaRESUMEN
Degenerative spondylolisthesis is a common cause of low back pain and resultant disability in the adult population. The causes of degenerative spondylolisthesis are not entirely understood, though a combination of anatomic and lifestyle factors likely contributes to the development of this pathology. Here, we report a case of a 38-year-old female presenting with low back pain and right lower extremity radiculopathy, found to have degenerative L5-S1 spondylolisthesis, which we postulate developed in part due to the sagittal orientation of her L5-S1 facet joints bilaterally.
Asunto(s)
Neurilemoma , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Región Lumbosacra , Neurilemoma/cirugía , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report the safety and efficacy of posterolateral approach for thoracic disc herniation (TDH) via a consecutive clinical case series of 30 central thoracic disc herniations that were all operated through a posterolateral approach. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with symptomatic TDH who underwent surgical intervention from 2016 to 2021. A total of 23 patients comprising 30 central TDH were included in the study. Age, gender, location of the lesion, preoperative and post-operative Frankel and Nurick scores, surgical approach and instrumented vertebrae, and length of stay were recorded. FINDINGS: 23 patients with an average age of 62 were included in the study. 30 of the 32 symptomatic TDH were centrally located. 8/32 TDH were calcified while 24/32 TDH were non-calcified. Unilateral and bilateral transpedicular approach was used in the treatment of 12/32 and 10/32 disc herniations respectively. A transfacet-pedicle sparing approach was used in 10/32 disc herniations. 19/23 (82.6%) of the patients had improvement in Nurick score while 12/23 (52.2%) patients had improvement in their Frankel scores. The average length of stay was 4.5 days. No major complications were encountered. All patients underwent a short-segment instrumented construct with no need for revision surgery for thoracic disc herniation, worsening myelopathy, or instrumentation failure. CONCLUSIONS: 83% of the patients who underwent a transfacet or transpedicular decompression for the treatment of symptomatic TDH had improvement in their myelopathy with no neurological deterioration in any of the patients. Given the familiarity and low morbidity associated with a transfacet or transpedicular approach, posterolateral-based approaches remains an excellent alternative for surgical management of majority of the patients with thoracic disc herniations.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Discectomía/métodos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Calcinosis/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértebras Torácicas/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Lumbar synovial cysts (LSC) are one of the manifestations of spinal degenerative cascade. Spinal stenosis or presence of instability in these patients can lead to various symptoms and surgery is indicated following failure of non-operative management for symptomatic synovial cysts. Surgery when performed consists of either decompression with resection of cyst with our without fusion. The efficacy and complications of minimally invasive techniques using tubular retractors (microscopic or endoscopic) in comparison to traditional open techniques remain to be studied. METHODS: A comprehensive search of different databases was performed to retrieve studies describing the use of minimal invasive techniques using tubular retractors (both microscopic and endoscopic) in patients with LSC. Meta-analysis with subgroup analysis and metaregression was done. RESULTS: Twenty articles were selected for the systematic review and meta-analysis with total of 388 patients. Eighty-six percent of patients (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 80-90%) had favorable outcome as per Macnab's criteria (excellent and good outcome) with the pooled standard mean difference between preoperative and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) being -4.44 (95% CI -8.78 to -0.10, p-value=0.0474, I2 82%). The pooled percentage change in visual analogue scale (VAS) after surgery was 76.5% (95% CI 66.9-84%, I2 82%). The pooled proportion of incidental durotomies, cyst recurrence and patients requiring operation being 8% (95% CI 5-11%, I2 0%), 4% (95% CI 2-7%, I2 0%,) and 5% (95% CI 3-9%) respectively. Studies were homogeneous with an I2 value of 0%. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the outcome rates or complication rates between the microscopic and endoscopic subgroups. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive techniques for the resection of LSC is a safe and effective alternative to traditional surgical approaches with no difference between the microscopic and endoscopic approaches.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Quiste Sinovial/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Thoracic dumbbell tumors are relatively uncommon neoplasms that arise from the neurogenic elements. Surgical resection can be challenging as the tumor involves both the spinal canal and thoracic cavity. Historically, thoracotomy and laminectomy were utilized for the resection of these tumors. Although single-stage removal of such tumors has been described recently, there is no prior description of a total minimally invasive single-stage resection of a thoracic dumbbell ganglioneuroma. The current report describes a completely minimally invasive surgical resection for such a tumor performed using the posterior minimally invasive tubular approach to resect the intraspinal component with ligation of the T2 nerve root in conjunction with robotic-assisted thoracoscopic resection of the extraforaminal, intrathoracic component of the tumor. This report illustrates the safety and utility of a completely minimally invasive endoscopic resection of a thoracic dumbbell tumor that can potentially obviate the morbidity associated with open surgical resections for such tumors.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Traumatic injury to the spine can be a complex diagnostic and therapeutic entity often with devastating consequences. Outside of the isolated vertebral column injury costs; annual costs associated with spinal cord injury (SCI) are estimated to exceed $9.7 billion. OBJECTIVE: To identify the 100 most-cited articles on spine trauma. METHODS: The Thomson Reuters Web of Science citation indexing service was queried. The articles were sorted by times cited in descending order. Two independent reviewers reviewed the article titles and abstracts to identify the top 100 most-cited articles. RESULTS: The top 100 articles were found to be cited between 108 (articles #99-100) and 1595 times (article #1). The most-cited basic science article was cited 340 times (#12 on the top 100 list). The oldest article on the top 100 list was from 1953 and most recent from 2012. The number of patients, when applicable, in a study ranged from 9 (article #34) to 34,069 (article #5). Top 100 articles were published in 41 different journals with a wide range of specialities and fields most commonly multidisciplinary. Basic science research encompassed 34 of the 100 articles on the list. CONCLUSIONS: We present the 100 most-cited articles in spinal trauma with emphases on important contributions from both basic science and clinical research across a wide range of authors, specialties, patient populations, and countries. Recognizing some of the most important contributions in the field of spinal trauma may provide insight and guide future work.