RESUMEN
Introduction: Traditional normative Likert-type evaluations of faculty teaching have several drawbacks, including lack of granular feedback, potential for inflation, and the halo effect. To provide more meaningful data to faculty on their teaching skills and encourage educator self-reflection and skill development, we designed and implemented a milestone-based faculty clinical teaching evaluation tool. Methods: The evaluation tool contains 10 questions that assess clinical teaching skills with descriptive milestone behavior anchors. Nine of these items are based on the Stanford Faculty Development Clinical Teaching Model and annual Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) resident survey questions; the tenth was developed to address professionalism at our institution. The tool was developed with input from residency program leaders, residents, and the faculty development committee and piloted with graduate medical education learners before implementation. Results: More than 7,200 faculty evaluations by learners and 550 faculty self-evaluations have been collected. Learners found the form easy to use and preferred it to previous Likert-based evaluations. Over the 2 years that faculty self-evaluations have been collected, their scores have been similar to the learner evaluation scores. The feedback provided faculty with more meaningful data on teaching skills and opportunities for reflection and skill improvement and was used in constructing faculty teaching skills programs at the institutional level. Discussion: This innovation provides an opportunity to give faculty members more meaningful teaching evaluations and feedback. It should be easy for other institutions and programs to implement. It leverages a familiar milestone construct and incorporates important ACGME annual resident survey information.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Docentes Médicos/normas , Retroalimentación , Estudiantes/psicología , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While both patients and physicians identify communication of bad news as an area of great challenge, the factors underlying this often complex task remain largely unknown. Emotional intelligence (EI) has been positively correlated with good general communication skills and successful leadership, but there is no literature relating EI to the delivery of bad news. PURPOSE: Our objectives were to determine: 1) performance of first-year pediatric residents in the delivery of bad news in a standardized patient (SP) setting; and 2) the role of EI in these assessments. Our hypothesis was that pediatric trainees with higher EI would demonstrate more advanced skills in this communication task. METHODS: Forty first-year residents participated. Skill in bad news delivery was assessed via SP encounters using a previously published assessment tool (GRIEV_ING Death Notification Protocol). Residents completed the Emotional and Social Competency Inventory (ESCI) as a measure of EI. RESULTS: Residents scored poorly on bad news delivery skills but scored well on EI. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated moderate to substantial inter-rater reliability among raters using the delivering bad news assessment tool. However, no correlation was found between bad news delivery performance and EI. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that first-year pediatric residents have inadequate skills in the delivery of bad news. In addition, our data suggest that higher EI alone is not sufficient to effectively deliver death news and more robust skill training is necessary for residents to gain competence and acquire mastery in this important communication domain.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Inteligencia Emocional , Internado y Residencia , Pediatría/educación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Simulación de Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infants may present to the emergency department (ED) with vague complaints worrisome to parents and may initially appear well, despite serious underlying pathology. Whereas sepsis and nonaccidental trauma are high on most providers' diagnostic considerations, we report a case representative of a worrisome trend secondary to the refusal of parenteral vitamin K at birth leading to significant neurologic sequelae. CASE REPORT: A 10-week-old boy presented to the ED with gradual increase in fussiness for 2 weeks and new onset of blood flecks in the stool on the day of presentation. Careful physical examination revealed a pale-appearing infant, leading to diagnostic evaluation demonstrating profound anemia and intracranial bleeding. The patient was diagnosed with late-onset vitamin K-deficient bleeding (VKDB) secondary to parental refusal of the vitamin K shot at birth. Why Should Emergency Physicians be Aware of This? Emergency Medicine providers need to add this serious treatable disease into their diagnostic consideration for fussy infants, infants with unexplained bruising or bleeding, or infants with new-onset seizures. Rapid identification of VKDB can lead to prompt treatment and halt the rapid progression of symptoms. Emergency Medicine providers should ask all parents if their infant received parenteral vitamin K in the newborn period, especially if they are exclusively breastfed or born out of the hospital.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento , Sangrado por Deficiencia de Vitamina K/diagnóstico , Vitamina K/administración & dosificación , Anemia/etiología , Lactancia Materna , Hematoma Subdural/etiología , Humanos , Lactante , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Masculino , Sangrado por Deficiencia de Vitamina K/complicaciones , Sangrado por Deficiencia de Vitamina K/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patients and physicians identify communication of bad news as a skill in need of improvement. Our objectives were to measure change in performance of first-year pediatric residents in the delivery of bad news after an educational intervention and to measure if changes in performance were sustained over time. METHODS: Communication skills of 29 residents were assessed via videotaped standardized patient (SP) encounters at 3 time points: baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention. Educational intervention used was the previously published "GRIEV_ING Death Notification Protocol." RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated substantial inter-rater agreement with the assessment tool. Performance scores significantly improved from baseline to immediate post-intervention. Performance at 3 months post-intervention showed no change in two subscales and small improvement in one subscale. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that breaking bad news is a complex and teachable skill that can be developed in pediatric residents. Improvement was sustained over time, indicating the utility of this educational intervention. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This study brings attention to the need for improved communication training, and the feasibility of an education intervention in a large training program. Further work in development of comprehensive communication curricula is necessary in pediatric graduate medical education programs.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Comunicación , Internado y Residencia , Pediatría/educación , Adulto , Curriculum , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Evaluación Educacional , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Médicos , Revelación de la VerdadRESUMEN
The application of the best practices of teaching adults to the education of adults in medical education settings is important in the process of transforming learners to become and remain effective physicians. Medical education at all levels should be designed to equip physicians with the knowledge, clinical skills, and professionalism that are required to deliver quality patient care. The ultimate outcome is the health of the patient and the health status of the society. In the translational science of medical education, improved patient outcomes linked directly to educational events are the ultimate goal and are best defined by rigorous medical education research efforts. To best develop faculty, the same principles of adult education and teaching adults apply. In a systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education, the use of experiential learning, feedback, effective relationships with peers, and diverse educational methods were found to be most important in the success of these programs. In this article, we present 5 examples of applying the best practices in teaching adults and utilizing the emerging understanding of the neurobiology of learning in teaching students, trainees, and practitioners. These include (1) use of standardized patients to develop communication skills, (2) use of online quizzes to assess knowledge and aid self-directed learning, (3) use of practice sessions and video clips to enhance significant learning of teaching skills, (4) use of case-based discussions to develop professionalism concepts and skills, and (5) use of the American Academy of Pediatrics PediaLink as a model for individualized learner-directed online learning. These examples highlight how experiential leaning, providing valuable feedback, opportunities for practice, and stimulation of self-directed learning can be utilized as medical education continues its dynamic transformation in the years ahead.