Comparison of guidewires for successful cannulation of biliary stenosis and targeting of biliary branches in ERCP.

Background and study aims Guidewires play a crucial role in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The ability to pass through stenosis, and the ability to seek the desired biliary branch are particularly important. In this study, we aimed to compare these specific abilities in various guidewires by using a bile duct model. Patients and methods Seven 0.025-inch angle-type guidewires (VisiGlide2, Fielder 25, EndoSelector, NaviPro, Jagwire Plus, RevoWave DualMaster, and J-WIRE prologue ST) were evaluated. To compare these, a bile duct silicone model was prepared. The time from the entry of the guidewire into the common bile duct with the stenosis to the emergence of the guidewire from the common bile duct after reaching two target intrahepatic bile duct branches was measured. Results VisiGlide 2 and Fielder 25 were the fastest guidewires, whereas Jagwire Plus was the slowest. Conclusions In this study, a guidewire with a tip deflection height of approximately 9 mm and a hydrophilic coating length of 7 to 8 cm achieved the fastest completion time for the course. In clinical practice, it is important to consider the performance required in various scenarios and to select the most appropriate guidewire. The results of this model test, which focused on the time required to complete the course around the model, can serve as a foundation for guidewire selection. This method holds potential utility in future guidewire development.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction that could not be diagnosed with Rome IV: a case report.

A 30-year-old female patient presented with monthly episodes of severe intermittent upper abdominal pain, especially after consuming fatty meals. Over a period of 5 years, she visited the emergency department 21 times due to the intensity of the pain. Although the pain appeared consistent with biliary pain, both blood and imaging tests showed no abnormalities. Despite not meeting the Rome IV criteria, we suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). To further investigate, we conducted hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS), which revealed a clear delay in bile excretion. With the patient's informed consent, we performed endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and as of 10 months later, there have been no recurrences. This case demonstrates an instance of SOD that could not be diagnosed using the Rome IV criteria alone but was successfully identified through HBS. It underscores the possibility of hidden cases of SOD among patients who regularly experience severe epigastric pain, where routine blood or imaging tests may not provide a diagnosis. HBS may be a useful non-invasive test in confirming the presence of previously undiagnosed SOD. As SOD can be easily treated with EST, updating the current diagnostic criteria to include such types of SOD should be considered in the future.

Comparison of Fork-tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity-matched analysis.

Objectives: There is no unanimity regarding the most appropriate needle to use for an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). To date, new types of FNB needles have been designed, including the Fork-tip and Franseen needles. This study primarily aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and histological quality between the use of the Franseen and Fork-tip needles in EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic lesions. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 147 patients at our center for solid pancreatic lesions, 75 of whom underwent EUS-FNB using a 22-G Franseen needle, and 72 using a 22-G Fork-tip needle, from December 2019 to September 2021. The present study conducted a propensity-matched analysis and confounder adjustment. Results: The diagnostic accuracy of the Fork-tip group (93.3%, 42/45) was the same as that of the Franseen group. For the core tissue and blood scores, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.58, 0.25) between the two groups. The rate of changes in the operator from that of a trainee to an expert was less in the Fork-tip group (4.4%, 2/45) than in the Franseen group (15.6%, 7/45), but not significantly different (p = 0.16). Conclusions: In both groups, the diagnostic accuracy and histological quality were not significantly different. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the rate of operator changes. As both needles are useful, the choice of using either of them is equally good.

Factors affecting complete stone extraction in the initial procedure in short type single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with Roux-en-Y gastrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stone extraction in patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastrectomy using short-type single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) and to clarify the factors affecting complete stone extraction in the initial procedure. METHODS: The data of patients with Roux-en-Y gastrectomy who underwent endoscopic stone extraction using short SBE between September 2011 and January 2022 was analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 85 patients were scheduled to undergo stone extraction. 77 patients were intended stone extraction after successful biliary cannulation. The complete stone extraction success in the initial procedure, overall complete stone extraction success including repeated procedures, and adverse event rates were 68.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.2%-77.9%), 87.1% (95% CI, 78.0%-93.4%), and 8.2% (95% CI, 3.4%-16.2%), respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that bile duct diameter affected the success of complete stone extraction after successful biliary cannulation in the initial procedure (odds ratio 0.53, 95% CI, 0.30-0.94, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Stone extraction in patients with Roux-en-Y gastrectomy using short SBE was effective. Patients with a large diameter bile duct required several sessions for complete stone extraction, suggesting that more dedicated devices are warranted for patients with surgically altered anatomy.

Effectiveness of a multi-loop traction device for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection performed by trainees: a pilot study.

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a difficult procedure, and its introduction to trainees has been debated. Although the criteria for performing colorectal ESD vary among institutions, it is often allowed after gaining experience performing surgeries in animals and upper gastrointestinal ESD. This pilot study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of ESD performed by trainees using the multi-loop traction device (MLTD group) and those of conventional ESD performed by experts (control group). It also aimed to determine whether the MLTD can be used to safely introduce colorectal ESD to trainees. We included 26 colorectal ESD patients (13 in the MLTD group and 13 in the control group) treated at our hospital from October to December 2021. There were no significant differences in the procedure time (50 min vs. 30 min), dissection speed (19.9 mm2/min vs. 28.7 mm2/min), and intraoperative perforation (0% vs. 0%) of the two groups. Furthermore, the rate of ESD self-completion in the MLTD group was 100%. Therefore, the use of the MLTD allowed the safe introduction of colorectal ESD, even among endoscopists with no experience performing colorectal ESD. Consequently, the use of the MLTD may replace animal and upper gastrointestinal ESD when introducing colorectal ESD to trainees.

Competence development of trainees performing short-type single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the trainees' practice and learning curve in short-type single-balloon enteroscopy (short SBE)-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA) and determine how to train these trainees. METHODS: The data of short SBE-assisted ERCP procedures between September 2011 and June 2021 were analyzed. RESULTS: Three trainees and 180 cases were included in the analysis. Each trainee performed 60 cases between April 2016 and June 2021. The trainees' completion rate was 73.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.8-80.1%). Adverse events occurred in 5.0% of cases (95% CI, 2.3-9.3%). The trainee who experienced colonoscopy and ERCP the most achieved better outcomes of enteroscopy success (reaching the target site) and trainee's completion rates than those of the others (P = .03 and .02, respectively). The learning curve for trainee's completion showed a significant improvement after 60 cases (P = .001). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that Roux-en-Y reconstruction was the factor affecting trainees' completion failure. CONCLUSIONS: Short SBE-assisted ERCP trainees has a substantial learning curve. If trainees do not have much experience with colonoscopy and ERCP procedures, it may be beneficial for them to start performing short SBE-assisted ERCP procedures on non-Roux-en-Y reconstruction cases.

Endoscopic closure using an over-the-scope clip for pancreatobiliary endoscopy-related large gastrointestinal perforation (with video).

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for pancreatobiliary diseases require advanced techniques. We usually use an oblique-viewing endoscope in such procedures. Sometimes, tumor invasion causes gastrointestinal strictures. Crossing a stricture using an oblique-viewing endoscope is more difficult than using a forward-viewing scope. Therefore, the frequency of scope perforation is higher than other endoscopic procedures. Although surgical repair for gastrointestinal perforations caused by endoscopes has been performed, patients with pancreatobiliary diseases are often elderly and in poor general condition; therefore, patients are hesitant to undergo surgical treatments. Recently, the usefulness of over-the-scope clipping (OTSC) as a minimally invasive rescue method has also been reported. In this study, we report cases of successful endoscopic closure using OTSC for gastrointestinal perforations caused by endoscopes in ERCP and EUS-related procedures. After those procedures, all cases showed no abnormalities in blood tests or symptoms, and emergency surgery was successfully avoided. Thus, endoscopic closure using OTSC for pancreatobiliary endoscopy-related gastrointestinal perforations is safe and effective. However, OTSC requires some expertise. A good assessment of defect size and careful insertion of the scope using OTSC attached to the upper esophagus are needed to avoid clip migration or disinsertion and esophageal tears. Therefore, endoscopic closure using OTSC could be the first choice of treatment for pancreatobiliary endoscopy-related gastrointestinal perforations. We should be familiar with its indication and perform it carefully and rapidly.

Can the laser-cut covered self-expandable metallic stent be the first choice for patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction? (with video).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether laser-cut covered self-expandable metallic stents (LC-CSEMSs) can be the first choice for patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO). METHODS: Patients with unresectable DMBO who received LC-CSEMS (September 2014-December 2020) or braided CSEMS (B-CSEMS) (July 2013-December 2020) placement for biliary drainage were enrolled. Outcomes, including endoscopic CSEMS removal, of LC-CSEMSs and B-CSEMSs were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 124 patients received LC-CSEMSs placement, and 121 B-CSEMSs. Technical success, clinical success, and procedure-related adverse event rates with LC-CSEMSs were 100%, 96.8%, and 6.5%, respectively, and 100%, 95.9%, and 5.8%, respectively, for B-CSEMSs, with no significant difference (P > .99, .75, and >.99, respectively). The recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rates with LC-CSEMSs and B-CSEMSs were 9.7% (12/124) and 13.2% (16/121), respectively (P = .43). The median time to RBO with LC-CSEMSs and B-CSEMSs was 198 (interquartile range [IQR], 124-244) days and 191 (IQR, 106-271) days (P = .41). The endoscopic removal success rates of LC-CSEMSs and B-CSEMSs were 88.9% (8/9) and 90% (9/10) (P > .99), although there were a small number of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The non-inferiority of LC-CSEMSs was proven. LC-CSEMSs can be considered as the first choice for patients with unresectable DMBO.

Current Status of Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in Patients with Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction.

Distal malignant biliary obstruction is caused by various malignant diseases that require biliary drainage. In patients with operable situations, preoperative biliary drainage is required to control jaundice and cholangitis until surgery. In view of tract seeding, endoscopic biliary drainage is the first choice. Since neoadjuvant therapies are being developed, the time to surgery is increasing, especially in pancreatic cancer cases. Therefore, it requires long stent patency. Recently, preoperative biliary drainage using self-expandable metal stents has been reported as a useful modality to secure long stent patency. In patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction, self-expandable metal stent is the first choice for maintaining long stent patency. Although there are many comparison studies between a covered and an uncovered self-expandable metal stent, their use is still controversial. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage has been performed as an alternative treatment. The clinical success and stent patency are favorable. We should take into consideration that both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage have advantages and disadvantages and chose the drainage method depending on the patient's situation or the expertise of the endoscopist. Here, we discuss the current status of endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction.

A retrospective cohort study of factors influencing long procedure times in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes and factors influencing colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with a long procedure time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective study, we included 1,100 patients with 1,199 lesions who underwent colorectal ESD between April 2016 and December 2020. ESD was performed using an advanced system knife for lesions >20 mm. An S-O clip was used as the traction device. The long-time group (LP; procedure time >120 min) and normal-time group (NP; procedure time <120 min) were compared. RESULTS: The procedure times were 166.86 and 44.72 min in the LP and NP groups, respectively. The completion rate was higher in the NP group (96.5% vs. 83.5%, p = .001); the completed lesions were resected en bloc. Multivariate analysis revealed 18.8% and 7.8% of submucosal fibrosis in the LP and NP groups, respectively (odds ratio [OR] = 2.410, p = .026). Compared to the NP group, the LP group presented larger maximum lesion sizes and higher rates of R1 resection, and traction device use. Time to introduction of traction device use was longer in the LP than in the NP group (126.05 vs. 21.72 min; p < .001). Fibrosis tends to occur cecal lesions (OR 2.436, p = .011) and laterally spreading tumor-non-granular-pseudo-depressed (LST-NG-PD) (OR 2.6181, p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Lesion size and fibrosis were factors associated with a long procedure time in colonic ESD. For fibrotic lesions (LST-NG-PD and cecal lesions), it is necessary to consider early use of traction devices and advisable to plan a strategy for the use of traction devices.

Adrenocortical Carcinoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a very poor prognosis. A 77-year-old man underwent imaging studies due to poorly controlled hypertension, which revealed a mass measuring 43 mm in diameter near the left adrenal gland. There were no findings indicative of pheochromocytoma. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was performed for the preoperative pathological evaluation, and the findings indicated a possibility of ACC. Based on these results, curative surgery was performed. If the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is excluded, then EUS-FNA for adrenal lesions is relatively safe. It can also be used for the preoperative diagnosis of ACC.

Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Biopsy Device for Lymphadenopathy.

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of benign and malignant lymphadenopathy is important for determining the appropriate treatment and prognosis. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with a conventional needle compared to endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with a Franseen needle for diagnosing lymphadenopathy. METHODS: Patients who underwent EUS-FNA or EUS-FNB for mediastinal or abdominal lymphadenopathy between July 2013 and August 2020 were enrolled in the study. The outcomes between EUS-FNA patients (July 2013 to January 2017; 22-gauge conventional needle; Group A) and EUS-FNB patients (February 2017 to August 2020; 22-gauge Franseen needle; Group B) were compared. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients (Group A: 83; Group B: 71) were analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy (differentiating between malignant and benign lesions) was 88.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79.2-93.3%) in Group A and 95.8% (95% CI, 88.3-98.8%) in Group B. Group B had high diagnostic accuracy, but there was no difference between the groups (p = 0.14). Group B had significantly fewer passes (median 2, interquartile range (IQR): 2-4) than Group A (median 3, IQR: 3-4) (p < 0.001). No procedural adverse events occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Although the diagnostic accuracy between the groups was not statistically significant, EUS-FNB with a Franseen needle provided high diagnostic accuracy and required fewer passes to establish a diagnosis. Thus, EUS-FNB is useful for diagnosing lymphadenopathy.

Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions, Subepithelial Lesions, and Lymph Nodes Using Endoscopic Ultrasound.

Currently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become widely accepted and has considerable advantages over computed tomography (CT) and other imaging modalities, given that it enables echostructure assessment in lesions with <1 cm diameter and permits high resolution imaging. EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) provides consistent results under ultrasound guidance and has been considered more effective compared to CT- or ultrasound-guided lesion biopsy. Moreover, complication rates, including pancreatitis and bleeding, have been extremely low, with <1% morbidity and mortality rates, thereby suggesting the exceptional overall safety of EUS-TA. The aggressive use of EUS for various lesions has been key in facilitating early diagnosis and therapy. This review summarizes the diagnostic ability of EUS for pancreatic solid lesions, subepithelial lesions, and lymph nodes where it is mainly used. EUS has played an important role in diagnosing these lesions and planning treatment strategies. Future developments in EUS imaging technology, such as producing images close to histopathological findings, are expected to further improve its diagnostic ability. Moreover, tissue acquisition via EUS is expected to be used for precision medicine, which facilitates the selection of an appropriate therapeutic agent by increasing the amount of tissue collected and improving genetic analysis.

Recent Advances of Interventional Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Endoscopic Ultrasound for Patients with Surgically Altered Anatomy.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered to be the gold standard for diagnosis and interventions in biliopancreatic diseases. However, ERCP in patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA) appears to be more difficult compared to cases with normal anatomy. Since the production of a balloon enteroscope (BE) for small intestine disorders, BE had also been used for biliopancreatic diseases in patients with SAA. Since the development of BE-assisted ERCP, the outcomes of procedures, such as stone extraction or drainage, have been reported as favorable. Recently, an interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), such as EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), has been developed and is available mainly for patients with difficult cases of ERCP. It is a good option for patients with SAA. The effectiveness of interventional EUS for patients with SAA has been reported. Both BE-assisted ERCP and interventional EUS have advantages and disadvantages. The choice of procedure should be individualized to the patient's condition or the expertise of the endoscopists. The aim of this review article is to discuss recent advances in interventional ERCP and EUS for patients with SAA.

Diagnostic Process Using Endoscopy for Biliary Strictures: A Narrative Review.

The diagnostic process for biliary strictures remains challenging in some cases. A broad differential diagnosis exists for indeterminate biliary strictures, including benign or malignant lesions. The diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures requires a combination of physical examination, laboratory testing, imaging modalities, and endoscopic procedures. Despite the progress of less invasive imaging modalities such as transabdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopy plays an essential role in the accurate diagnosis, including the histological diagnosis. Imaging findings and brush cytology and/or forceps biopsy under fluoroscopic guidance with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are widely used as the gold standard for the diagnosis of biliary strictures. However, ERCP cannot provide an intraluminal view of the biliary lesion, and its outcomes are not satisfactory. Recently, peroral cholangioscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration have been reported as useful for indeterminate biliary strictures. Appropriate endoscopic modalities need to be selected according to the patient's condition, the lesion, and the expertise of the endoscopist. The aim of this review article is to discuss the diagnostic process for indeterminate biliary strictures using endoscopy.

Pancreatic Hamartoma Difficult to Diagnose Preoperatively.

Abdominal ultrasonography in a 70-year-old woman showed a hypoechoic mass, 14 mm in diameter, in the pancreatic body. Computed tomography showed a mass with contrast effect in the pancreatic body. Test results for endocrine factors or tumor markers were normal. The initial consideration was nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Over 8 years of monitoring, the tumor diameter increased to 18 mm, until pancreatic tumor enucleation was performed. The postoperative diagnosis was pancreatic hamartoma, a rare type of benign pancreatic tumor. The preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic hamartoma is difficult, but consideration must be given to the possibility of hamartoma when encountering pancreatic tumors.