Propofol for Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients With Epilepsy on the Ketogenic Diet: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Propofol use is contraindicated in patients on ketogenic diet (KD) due to higher risk of propofol infusion syndrome (PIS). This study is intended to provide a descriptive analysis of our experience with propofol bolus and short infusions for anesthetic care in patients on the KD and to evaluate if any signs of PIS were observed. METHODS: All patients on the KD who underwent anesthesia with propofol between 2012 and 2022 were reviewed. Anesthetic encounters and charts were studied for type of surgical procedure; signs of PIS, including new cardiac arrhythmias, acidosis, or rhabdomyolysis in the periprocedural period; hypoglycemia; unplanned admissions within 24 hours of the procedure; if procedure was unexpectedly aborted; and increased seizure frequency within one week. RESULTS: We identified 65 patients, aged from one to 20 years who underwent 165 anesthetic encounters with propofol, of which 123 were boluses and 42 were infusions. In bolus dosing, the average dose was 2.8 mg/kg (0.7 to 12.8 ± 1.8 mg/kg). Of these, four encounters developed acidosis, one developed rhabdomyolysis, and one developed increased seizures. With infusions, the average infusion rate was 9 mg/kg/hour, with mean infusion duration of 83 minutes (10 to 352 ± 75 minutes). Of these, one developed acidosis and one increased seizures. No cases of PIS were identified. None of the adverse effects were attributed to propofol. CONCLUSIONS: Boluses and brief infusions of propofol for anesthetic use in patients on the KD did not cause PIS in our cohort.

Inaccuracies in Parental Reporting of Treated Epileptic Spasms: Both Under- and Over-Reporting.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of parental reporting of epileptic spasms (ES) after 14 days of appropriate medical therapy for new-onset ES by comparison with extended video electroencephalography (vEEG) monitoring results. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were identified from August 2019 to February 2021 with new-onset ES, confirmed on vEEG. Patients were initiated on appropriate treatment (high-dose steroids or vigabatrin). After two weeks of therapy, patients underwent overnight (18 to 24 hours) vEEG monitoring in the epilepsy monitoring unit. Parental reporting of presence or absence of ES on admission was compared with results of vEEG monitoring. RESULTS: The 58 patients ranged in age from three to 20 months (average 7.8 months). An underlying etiology was identified in 78%, whereas 22% patients had unknown etiology. The overall accuracy of parental reporting was 74% (43 of 58) when compared with results of vEEG within 14 to 18 days of starting therapy. Of these, 65% (28 of 43) reported ES resolution and 35% (15 of 43) reported continued ES. Of the 26% (15 of 58) families who were incorrect at two-week follow-up, 67% (10 of 15) reported resolution of ES. However, a minority of families, 33% (five of 15), who continued to report spasms clinically, were inaccurate. CONCLUSIONS: Although a majority of inaccurate parental reports at two weeks of treatment were due to unrecognized ES (a widely known phenomenon), a minority were conversely inaccurate due to persistent over-reporting of ES. This fact highlights the importance of correlating parental history with objective vEEG monitoring, to prevent inappropriate escalation of medication therapy.

An Initial Experience of Completion Hemispherotomy via Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: In carefully selected patients with medically refractory epilepsy, disconnective hemispherotomy can result in significant seizure freedom; however, incomplete disconnection can result in ongoing seizures and poses a significant challenge. Completion hemispherotomy provides an opportunity to finish the disconnection. We describe the use of magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal ablation (MRgLITT) for completion hemispherotomy. METHODS: Patients treated with completion hemispherotomy using MRgLITT at our institution were identified. Procedural and seizure outcomes were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Five patients (3 males) underwent six MRgLITT procedures (one child treated twice) for completion hemispherotomy at a median age of 6 years (range 1.8-12.9). Two children had hemimegalencephaly, two had Rasmussen encephalitis, and one had polymicrogyria. All five children had persistent seizures likely secondary to incomplete disconnection after their functional hemispherotomy. The mean time from open hemispherotomy to MRgLITT was 569.5 ± 272.4 days (median 424, range 342-1,095). One patient underwent stereoelectroencephalography before MRgLITT. The mean number of ablation targets was 2.3 ± 0.47 (median 2, range 2-3). The mean length of the procedure was 373 min ± 68.9 (median 374, range 246-475). Four of the five patients were afforded improvement in their neurocognitive functioning and speech performance after ablation, with mean daily seizure frequency at 1 year of 1.03 ± 1.98 (median 0, range 0-5). Two patients achieved Engel Class I outcomes at 1 year after ablation, one was Engel Class III, and two were Engel Class IV. The mean follow-up time was 646.8 ± 179.5 days (median 634, range 384-918). No MRgLITT-related complications occurred. Delayed retreatment (>1 year) occurred in three patients: one child underwent redo ablation and two underwent anatomic hemispherectomy. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the feasibility of a minimally invasive approach for completion hemispherotomy using MRgLITT. Delayed retreatment was needed in three patients; thus, further study of this technique with comparison to other surgical techniques is warranted.

Epileptic spasms in CDKL5 deficiency disorder: Delayed treatment and poor response to first-line therapies.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the treatment response of infantile-onset epileptic spasms (ES) in CDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD) vs other etiologies. METHODS: We evaluated patients with ES from the CDKL5 Centers of Excellence and the National Infantile Spasms Consortium (NISC), with onset from 2 months to 2 years, treated with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), oral corticosteroids, vigabatrin, and/or the ketogenic diet. We excluded children with tuberous sclerosis complex, trisomy 21, or unknown etiology with normal development because of known differential treatment responses. We compared the two cohorts for time to treatment and ES remission at 14 days and 3 months. RESULTS: We evaluated 59 individuals with CDD (79% female, median ES onset 6 months) and 232 individuals from the NISC database (46% female, median onset 7 months). In the CDD cohort, seizures prior to ES were common (88%), and hypsarrhythmia and its variants were present at ES onset in 34%. Initial treatment with ACTH, oral corticosteroids, or vigabatrin started within 1 month of ES onset in 27 of 59 (46%) of the CDD cohort and 182 of 232 (78%) of the NISC cohort (p < .0001). Fourteen-day clinical remission of ES was lower for the CDD group (26%, 7/27) than for the NISC cohort (58%, 106/182, p = .0002). Sustained ES remission at 3 months occurred in 1 of 27 (4%) of CDD patients vs 96 of 182 (53%) of the NISC cohort (p < .0001). Comparable results were observed with longer lead time (≥1 month) or prior treatment. Ketogenic diet, used within 3 months of ES onset, resulted in ES remission at 1 month, sustained at 3 months, in at least 2 of 13 (15%) individuals with CDD. SIGNIFICANCE: Compared to the broad group of infants with ES, children with ES in the setting of CDD often experience longer lead time to treatment and respond poorly to standard treatments. Development of alternative treatments for ES in CDD is needed.

Epilepsy Surgery in Young Children With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: A Novel Hybrid Multimodal Surgical Approach.

BACKGROUND: Surgery has become integral in treating children with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-related drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). OBJECTIVE: To describe outcomes of a multimodal diagnostic and therapeutic approach comprising invasive intracranial monitoring and surgical treatment and compare the complementary techniques of open resection and magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy. METHODS: Clinical and radiographic data were prospectively collected for pediatric patients undergoing surgical evaluation for TSC-related DRE at our tertiary academic hospital. Seizure freedom, developmental improvement, and Engel class were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (20 females) underwent treatment in January 2016 to April 2019. Thirty-five underwent phase II invasive monitoring with intracranial electrodes: 24 stereoencephalography, 9 craniotomy for grid/electrode placement, and 2 grids + stereoencephalography. With the multimodal approach, 33/38 patients (87%) achieved >50% seizure freedom of the targeted seizure type after initial treatment; 6/9 requiring secondary treatment and 2/2 requiring a third treatment achieved >50% freedom. The median Engel class was II at last follow-up (1.65 years), and 55% of patients were Engel class I/II. The mean age was lower for children undergoing open resection (2.4 vs 4.9 years, P = .04). Rates of >50% reduction in seizures (86% open resection vs 88% laser interstitial thermal therapy) and developmental improvement (86% open resection vs 83% magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy) were similar. CONCLUSION: This hybrid approach of using both open surgical and minimally invasive techniques is safe and effective in treating DRE secondary to TSC. Clinical trials focused on treatment method with longer follow-up are needed to determine the optimal candidates for each approach and compare the treatment modalities more effectively.

Extent of EEG monitoring for detecting epileptic spasms.

INTRODUCTION: Epileptic spasms (ES) are the ictal manifestation of West syndrome. Due to poor interrater reliability in diagnosing hypsarrhythmia, identification of ES - ideally on video EEG monitoring - is important to start proper treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed inpatient video EEG recordings of 42 patients with new onset ES and calculated the time needed to capture the first ES, along with time to first sleep epoch, among other data. RESULTS: The average time to capture ES was 188.36 min with a 95 percent confidence interval from 116.95 to 259.76 min. The average onset of sleep occurred at 30.8 min with 95% Confidence interval between 19.9 and 41.9 min. There was no significant correlation between duration of symptoms and etiology and the time needed to detect first spasm on EEG. CONCLUSIONS: Routine or short duration EEGs are not sufficient to capture ES in most patients. 4-5-hour VEEG monitoring duration should be considered to capture ictal data in patients suspected of having ES.

A multidisciplinary approach and consensus statement to establish standards of care for Angelman syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare neurogenetic disorder present in approximately 1/12,000 individuals and characterized by developmental delay, cognitive impairment, motor dysfunction, seizures, gastrointestinal concerns, and abnormal electroencephalographic background. AS is caused by absent expression of the paternally imprinted gene UBE3A in the central nervous system. Disparities in the management of AS are a major problem in preparing for precision therapies and occur even in patients with access to experts and recognized clinics. AS patients receive care based on collective provider experience due to limited evidence-based literature. We present a consensus statement and comprehensive literature review that proposes a standard of care practices for the management of AS at a critical time when therapeutics to alter the natural history of the disease are on the horizon. METHODS: We compiled the key recognized clinical features of AS based on consensus from a team of specialists managing patients with AS. Working groups were established to address each focus area with committees comprised of providers who manage >5 individuals. Committees developed management guidelines for their area of expertise. These were compiled into a final document to provide a framework for standardizing management. Evidence from the medical literature was also comprehensively reviewed. RESULTS: Areas covered by working groups in the consensus document include genetics, developmental medicine, psychology, general health concerns, neurology (including movement disorders), sleep, psychiatry, orthopedics, ophthalmology, communication, early intervention and therapies, and caregiver health. Working groups created frameworks, including flowcharts and tables, to help with quick access for providers. Data from the literature were incorporated to ensure providers had review of experiential versus evidence-based care guidelines. CONCLUSION: Standards of care in the management of AS are keys to ensure optimal care at a critical time when new disease-modifying therapies are emerging. This document is a framework for providers of all familiarity levels.

Epilepsy: Epileptic Syndromes and Treatment.

Epilepsy can now be diagnosed even in the presence of one unprovoked seizure or if the diagnosis of an epilepsy syndrome can be made. Epilepsy syndromes represent a specific set of seizure types and electroencephalographic and imaging features that tend to have age-dependent features, triggers, and prognosis. Epilepsy syndromes are the third and final level of epilepsy diagnosis, after classification of seizure and epilepsy types. Some epilepsy syndromes are self-limiting and pharmacoresponsive and others are pharmacoresistant and associated with poor developmental outcomes (epileptic and developmental encephalopathy). Features and management of 7 common age-dependent pediatric epilepsy syndromes are described.

Evaluation of the child with acute ataxia: a systematic review.

Evaluation of acute ataxia in a child poses a dilemma for the clinician in determining the extent and timing of initial screening tests. This article reviews the evidence concerning the diagnostic yield of commonly ordered tests in evaluating the child with acute ataxia. The literature revealed the following frequencies of laboratory screening abnormalities in children with acute ataxia: CT (∼2.5%), MRI (∼5%), lumbar puncture (43%), EEG (42%), and toxicology (49%). In most studies, abnormalities detected by these screening tests were nondiagnostic. There are insufficient data to assess yields of testing for autoimmune disorders or inborn errors of metabolism. A toxicology screen should be considered in all children presenting with acute ataxia. Neuroimaging should be considered in all children with new onset ataxia. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis has limited diagnostic specificity unless clinically indicated. Studies to examine neurophysiology testing did have sufficient evidence to support their use. There is insufficient evidence to establish a role for autoantibody testing or for routine screening for inborn error of metabolism in children presenting with acute ataxia. Finally, in a child presenting with ataxia and opsoclonus myoclonus, urine catecholamine testing for occult neuroblastoma is recommended. Nuclear scan may be considered, however, there is insufficient evidence for additional body imaging.