Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure between patients with primary aldosteronism and other forms of hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a potentially curable cause of hypertension associated with worse cardiovascular prognosis than blood pressure-matched essential hypertension (EH). Effective targeted treatment for PA is available with the greatest benefit seen if treatment is started early, prior to the development of end-organ damage. However, PA is currently substantially under-diagnosed. The standard screening test for PA, the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR), is performed infrequently in both primary and tertiary care. In contrast, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is frequently utilized in the assessment of hypertension. The aim of this study was to compare ABPM parameters in hypertensive patients with and without PA, in order to identify features of ABPM associated with PA that can prompt screening. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with PA (n = 55) were identified from a tertiary clinic specializing in the management of endocrine causes of hypertension whilst the controls (n = 389) were consecutive patients with hypertension but without a known diagnosis of PA who were referred for ABPM. RESULTS: In this study, PA patients were younger and had higher 24-h, day, and night-time blood pressure compared with controls despite similar number of antihypertensive medications. However, there was no significant difference in nocturnal dipping or day-night blood pressure variability between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: An elevated ambulatory blood pressure in patients on multiple antihypertensives could suggest underlying PA but in the absence of other distinguishing features, ABPM could not reliably differentiate PA from other forms of hypertension. Routine biochemical screening for PA remained the most reliable way of detecting this treatable secondary cause of hypertension.

Clinical Utility of Stress Echocardiography in Remote Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Populations: A 10-Year Study in Central Australia.

BACKGROUND: Remote Central Australia has a large Indigenous population and a significant burden of cardiovascular disease. Stress echocardiography has been previously validated as a useful investigation for long-term prognostication. However, there are no prior studies assessing its utility in remote or Indigenous populations. METHOD: Consecutive individuals undergoing stress echocardiography in Central Australia between 2007 and 2017 were included. Stress echocardiography was performed and reported via standard protocols. Individuals were followed up for all-cause mortality. RESULTS: One-thousand and eight patients (1,008) (54% Indigenous Australian) were included. After a mean follow-up of 3.5±2.4 years, 54 (5%) patients were deceased. Overall, 797 (79%) patients had no abnormalities during rest or stress echocardiography, with no difference according to ethnicity (p>0.05). In patients with a normal test, annual mortality averaged 1.3% over 5 years of follow-up, with annual mortality significantly higher in Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous individuals (1.8% vs 0.6% respectively). In those with an abnormal test, annual mortality was 4.4% vs 1.3% in Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals respectively. Increasing age, Indigenous ethnicity and cardiometabolic comorbidities were associated with mortality in univariate analyses (p<0.05 for all). In multivariate models, only chronic kidney disease remained predictive of mortality, with other associations (including Indigenous ethnicity) becoming attenuated. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report on the use of stress echocardiography in a remote or Indigenous population. A normal stress echocardiogram in remote Indigenous individuals was able to identify a lower risk group of patients in this setting. Although Indigenous individuals with a normal test still had a higher annual rate of mortality compared to non-Indigenous individuals, this association appeared to be mediated by cardiometabolic comorbidities.

Epicardial and subcutaneous adipose tissue in Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals: Implications for cardiometabolic diseases.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is prevalent in Indigenous populations who exhibit significant differences in body fat composition. While excess regional adiposity can be partially inferred from clinical measurements, noninvasive imaging allows for direct quantification of specific fat depots. Epicardial fat is a visceral adipose tissue that has been strongly associated with cardiometabolic disease in other populations. However, this ectopic fat depot has yet to be characterized in Indigenous populations. METHODS: We studied 100 individuals matched for ethnicity (Indigenous Australian and Caucasian descent), age, gender, and body mass index. Epicardial and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes was quantified with computed tomography. Associations of ethnicity and adiposity measures were assessed using linear regression. RESULTS: Indigenous individuals had significantly greater epicardial fat volumes compared to non-Indigenous individuals (95.8±37.5 vs 54.1±27.6cm3, p<0.001). In contrast, subcutaneous fat volumes were comparable in Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous individuals (22.1±15.1 vs 20.3±13.5cm3, p=0.54). Sequential adjustment for age, gender, comorbidities, biochemical parameters, and medication use did not attenuate the association between Indigenous ethnicity and greater epicardial fat volume in multivariable models (B=43.0, p<0.001). Furthermore, this association did not materially change with the inclusion of various adiposity measures, such as body mass index, subcutaneous adipose tissue, or weight. CONCLUSIONS: Indigenous individuals have significantly greater epicardial fat, but similar subcutaneous fat volumes, compared to non-Indigenous individuals. This finding extends previous observations on body fat composition differences in these individuals, and supports the possibility that epicardial fat and other visceral adipose depots may be contributing to the greater burden of cardiovascular disease in Indigenous populations.

Prevalence and predictors of erectile dysfunction in adult male outpatient clinic attendees in Johor, Malaysia.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a serious global burden that affects men as well as their partners. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of ED among male outpatient clinic attendees in Johor, Malaysia. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of Malaysian men aged ≥ 18 years attending two major outpatient clinics in Johor Bahru and Segamat in Johor, Malaysia, between 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2016. Subjects were chosen via simple random sampling and 400 patients were recruited. The study instrument was a survey form that consisted of three sections: sociodemographic and comorbid profile, validated English and Malay versions of the 15-item International Index of Erectile Function, and the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of self-reported ED was 81.5%. The prevalence of ED according to severity was as follows: mild (17.0%), mild to moderate (23.8%), moderate (11.3%) and severe (29.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that ED was associated with increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 4.023, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.633-9.913), Indian as compared to Malay ethnicity (OR 3.252, 95% CI 1.280-8.262), secondary as compared to tertiary education (OR 2.171, 95% CI 1.203-3.919), single as compared to married status (OR 6.119, 95% CI 2.542-14.734) and stress (OR 4.259, 95% CI 1.793-10.114). CONCLUSION: ED has significant prevalence and severity among adult male outpatient clinic attendees in Johor. Increasing age, Indian ethnicity, lower educational level, singlehood and stress were significant predictors of ED.