Patterns, outcomes, and preventability of clinically manifest drug-drug interactions in older outpatients: a subgroup analysis from a 6-year-long observational study in North India.

Older adults are vulnerable to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Evidence on clinically manifest DDIs in older outpatients is scanty. The present study aims to report clinically manifest DDIs, their risk factors, and preventive measures. A subgroup analysis of a 6-year (2015-2021) long prospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in North India. Older outpatients with ADRs constituted the study participants. Among 933 ADRs reported in 10,400 patient registrations, clinically manifest DDIs were involved in 199 (21.3%). DDIs accounted for 29.9%, 26.5%, and 21.3% of drug-related metabolic, vascular, and nervous system disorders, respectively. Movement disorders (n = 18), hypotension (n = 16), and hypoglycemia (n = 15) were the most common manifestations. Eighty-six percent of DDIs were of the pharmacodynamic type, and 13.1% were immune-mediated. Around 35% of DDIs resulted in hospitalization, with hyponatremia, movement disorder, and renal impairment as the common reasons. Older adults with Parkinsonism, infection, coronary artery disease, neuropsychiatric disease, and diabetes mellitus, respectively, had 3.28, 2.85, 1.97, 1.76, and 1.80 times higher odds of DDIs. Those receiving ≥ 10 drugs had 5.31 times higher odds of DDIs compared to individuals receiving 1-4 drugs. "Avoiding the causative drug," "optimal monitoring of the patient," and "start-low and go-slow" policy together could prevent 85% of DDIs. In conclusion, every fifth case of ADRs and nearly one third of ADR-related hospitalizations in older adults are related to DDIs. Movement disorder, hypotension, and hypoglycemia are the common manifestations. A holistic approach with drug omission, optimal patient monitoring, and slow titration of therapy can prevent significant DDIs in older adults.

Long-Term Safety Analysis of the BBV152 Coronavirus Vaccine in Adolescents and Adults: Findings from a 1-Year Prospective Study in North India.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Evidence on the long-term safety of COVID-19 vaccines is scarce. Here, in continuation of our previously published results on short-term safety, we provide data on the long-term safety of the BBV152 vaccine in adolescents and adults. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted from January 2022 to August 2023. Adolescents and adults receiving the BBV152 vaccine were interviewed telephonically about long-term adverse events of special interest (AESIs) after 1 year of vaccination. Risk factors of AESIs and AESIs persistent for at least 1 month were identified. RESULTS: Out of 1024 individuals enrolled, 635 adolescents and 291 adults could be contacted during the 1-year follow-up. Viral upper respiratory tract infections were reported by 304 (47.9%) adolescents and 124 (42.6%) adults in this period. New-onset skin and subcutaneous disorders (10.5%), general disorders (10.2%), and nervous system disorders (4.7%) were the common AESIs in adolescents. General disorders (8.9%), musculoskeletal disorders (5.8%), and nervous system disorders (5.5%) were the common AESIs in adults. Menstrual abnormalities were noticed in 4.6% of female participants. Ocular abnormalities and hypothyroidism were observed in 2.7% and 0.6% of participants, respectively. Among serious AESIs (1%), stroke and Guillain-Barre syndrome were identified in 0.3% and 0.1% of participants, respectively. Among adolescents, female individuals, those with a history of allergy and post-vaccination typhoid were respectively at 1.6, 2.8, and 2.8 times higher risk of AESIs. The majority of the AESIs persisted at the 1-year follow-up. Female individuals, adolescents with pre-vaccination COVID-19, those with co-morbidities, and those with post-vaccination typhoid had respectively 1.6, 2, 2.7, and 3.2 times higher odds of persistent AESIs. Adults with co-morbidities had more than 2 times higher odds of AESIs and persistent AESIs. CONCLUSIONS: The patterns of AESIs developing after BBV152 differed from those reported with other COVID-19 vaccines as well as between adolescents and adults. With the majority of AESIs persisting for a significant period, extended surveillance of COVID-19-vaccinated individuals is warranted to understand the course and outcomes of late-onset AESIs. Serious AESIs might not be uncommon and necessitate enhanced awareness and larger studies to understand the incidence of immune-mediated phenomena post-COVID-19 vaccination. The relationship of AESIs with sex, co-morbidities, pre-vaccination COVID-19, and non-COVID illnesses should be explored in future studies.

Dopaminergic Drugs and Valproate-associated Refractory Hyponatremia Over Levosulpiride-induced Parkinsonism in an Elderly Female Patient When Deprescribing was the Only Therapy

INTRODUCTION: Prescribing cascade is a condition in which a drug administered to a patient causes an adverse reaction that is misinterpreted as a new condition, resulting in the addition of a new drug. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we report the case of an elderly female patient who suffered from metabolic, neurologic, and urinary consequences of a prescribing cascade of antiemetic, antiepileptic, and dopaminergic drugs. While levosulpiride caused Parkinsonian symptoms, the dopaminergic drugs and valproate caused refractory hyponatremia followed by altered sensorium, and clidinium contributed to urinary retention. CONCLUSION: The case highlights the need to be vigilant for adverse consequences of the prescribing cascade, especially for antiemetic drugs, such as levosulpiride, because of its propensity to induce extrapyramidal reactions in older patients. In cases of refractory hyponatremia, a trial of de-challenge of valproate and dopaminergic drugs should be considered. The identification and removal of the culprit drugs can rescue the patient from a disabling cycle of adverse drug reactions.

Should Glucokinase be Given a Chance in Diabetes Therapeutics? A Clinical-Pharmacological Review of Dorzagliatin and Lessons Learned So Far.

Despite advances in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), one-third of patients with diabetes do not achieve the desired glycemic goal. Considering this inadequacy, many agents that activate glucokinase have been investigated over the last two decades but were withdrawn before submission for marketing permission. Dorzagliatin is the first glucokinase activator that has been granted approval for T2DM, only in China. As overstimulation of glucokinase is linked with pathophysiological disturbances such as fatty liver and cardiovascular issues and a loss of therapeutic efficacy with time. This review aims to highlight the benefits of glucokinase activators vis-à-vis the risks associated with chronic enzymatic activation. We discuss the multisystem disturbances expected with chronic activation of the enzyme, the lessons learned with glucokinase activators of the past, the major efficacy and safety findings with dorzagliatin and its pharmacological properties, and the status of other glucokinase activators in the pipeline. The approval of dorzagliatin in China was based on the SEED and the DAWN trials, the major pivotal phase III trials that enrolled patients with T2DM with a mean glycosylated hemoglobin of 8.3-8.4%, and a mean age of 53-54.5 years from multiple sites in China. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes, cardiac diseases, organ dysfunction, and a history of severe hypoglycemia were excluded. Both trials had a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase of 24 weeks followed by an open-label phase of 28 weeks with dorzagliatin. Drug-naïve patients with T2DM with a disease duration of 11.7 months were enrolled in the SEED trial while the DAWN trial involved patients with T2DM with a mean duration of 71.5 months and receiving background metformin therapy. Compared with placebo, the decline in glycosylated hemoglobin at 24 weeks was more with dorzagliatin with an estimated treatment difference of - 0.57% in the SEED trial and - 0.66% in the DAWN trial. The desired glycosylated hemoglobin (< 7%) was also attained at more than two times higher rates with dorzagliatin. The glycemic improvement was sustained in the SEED trial but decreased over 52 weeks in the DAWN trial. Hyperlipidemia was observed in 12-14% of patients taking dorzagliatin versus 9-11% of patients receiving a placebo. Additional adverse effects noticed over 52 weeks with dorzagliatin included an elevation in liver enzymes, hyperuricemia, hyperlacticacidemia, renal dysfunction, and cardiovascular disturbances. Considering the statistically significant improvement in glycosylated hemoglobin with dorzagliatin in patients with T2DM, the drug may be given a chance in treatment-naïve patients with a shorter disease history. However, with the waning therapeutic efficacy witnessed in patients with long-standing diabetes, which was also one of the potential concerns with previously tested molecules, extended studies involving patients with chronic and uncontrolled diabetes are needed to comment upon the long-term therapeutic performance of dorzagliatin. Likewise, evidence needs to be generated from other countries, patients with organ dysfunction, a history of severe hypoglycemia, cardiac diseases, and elderly patients before extending the use of dorzagliatin. Apart from monitoring lipid profiles, long-term safety studies of dorzagliatin should involve the assessment of serum uric acid, lactate, renal function, liver function, and cardiovascular parameters.