SQUID magnetoneurography: an old-fashioned yet new tool for noninvasive functional imaging of spinal cords and peripheral nerves.

We are engaged in the development and clinical application of a neural magnetic field measurement system that utilizes biomagnetic measurements to observe the activity of the spinal cord and peripheral nerves. Unlike conventional surface potential measurements, biomagnetic measurements are not affected by the conductivity distribution within the body, making them less influenced by the anatomical structure of body tissues. Consequently, functional testing using biomagnetic measurements can achieve higher spatial resolution compared to surface potential measurements. The neural magnetic field measurement, referred to as magnetoneurography, takes advantage of these benefits to enable functional testing of the spinal cord and peripheral nerves, while maintaining high spatial resolution and noninvasiveness. Our magnetoneurograph system is based on superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) similar to the conventional biomagnetic measurement systems. Various design considerations have been incorporated into the SQUID sensor array structure and signal processing software to make it suitable for detecting neural signal propagation along spinal cord and peripheral nerve. The technical validation of this system began in 1999 with a 3-channel SQUID system. Over the course of more than 20 years, we have continued technological development through medical-engineering collaboration, and in the latest prototype released in 2020, neural function imaging of the spinal cord and peripheral nerves, which could also be applied for the diagnosis of neurological disorders, has become possible. This paper provides an overview of the technical aspects of the magnetoneurograph system, covering the measurement hardware and software perspectives for providing diagnostic information, and its applications. Additionally, we discuss the integration with a helium recondensing system, which is a key factor in reducing running costs and achieving practicality in hospitals.

Assessing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow using magnetoneurography.

OBJECTIVE: To measure neuromagnetic fields of ulnar neuropathy patients at the elbow after electrical stimulation and evaluate ulnar nerve function at the elbow with high spatial resolution. METHODS: A superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer system recorded neuromagnetic fields of the ulnar nerve at the elbow after electrical stimulation at the wrist in 16 limbs of 16 healthy volunteers and 21 limbs of 20 patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. After artifact removal, neuromagnetic field signals were processed into current distributions, which were superimposed onto X-ray images for visualization. RESULTS: Based on the results in healthy volunteers, conduction velocity of 30 m/s or 50% attenuation in current amplitude was set as the reference value for conduction disturbance. Of the 21 patient limbs, 15 were measurable and lesion sites were detected, whereas 6 limbs were unmeasurable due to weak neuromagnetic field signals. Seven limbs were deemed normal by nerve conduction study, but 5 showed conduction disturbances on magnetoneurography. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the magnetic field after nerve stimulation enabled visualization of neurophysiological activity in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow and evaluation of conduction disturbances. SIGNIFICANCE: Magnetoneurography may be useful for assessing lesion sites in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Impact of Preoperative Motor Status for the Positive Predictive Value of Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials Alerts in Thoracic Spine Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEP) in thoracic spine surgery and evaluate the impact of specific factors associated with positive predictive value (PPV). METHODS: One thousand hundred and fifty-six cases of thoracic spine surgeries were examined by comparing patient backgrounds, disease type, preoperative motor status, and Tc-MEP alert timing. Tc-MEP alerts were defined as an amplitude decrease of more than 70% from the baseline waveform. Factors were compared according to preoperative motor status and the result of Tc-MEP alerts. Factors that showed significant differences were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity was 91.9% and specificity was 88.4%. The PPV was significantly higher in the preoperative motor deficits group than in the preoperative no-motor deficits group for both high-risk (60.3% vs 38.3%) and non-high-risk surgery groups (35.1% vs 12.8%). In multivariate logistic analysis, the significant factors associated with true positive were surgical maneuvers related to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (odds ratio = 11.88; 95% CI: 3.17-44.55), resection of intradural intramedullary spinal cord tumor (odds ratio = 8.83; 95% CI: 2.89-27), preoperative motor deficit (odds ratio = 3.46; 95% CI: 1.64-7.3) and resection of intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor (odds ratio = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.16-7.8). The significant factor associated with false positive was non-attributable alerts (odds ratio = .28; 95% CI: .09-.85). CONCLUSION: Surgeons are strongly encouraged to use Tc-MEP in patients with preoperative motor deficits, regardless of whether they are undergoing high-risk spine surgery or not. Knowledge of PPV characteristics will greatly assist in effective Tc-MEP enforcement and minimize neurological complications with appropriate interventions.

Role of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Traumatic Spinal Injury Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective multicenter observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the role of transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring during traumatic spinal injury surgery, the timing of TcMEP alerts, and intervention strategies to avoid intraoperative neurological complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Intraoperative neuromonitoring, including TcMEP monitoring, is commonly used in high-risk spinal surgery to predict intraoperative spinal cord injury; however, little information is available on its use in traumatic spinal injury surgery. METHODS: The TcMEP monitoring data of 350 consecutive patients who underwent traumatic spinal injury surgery (mean age, 69.3 y) between 2017 and 2021 were prospectively reviewed. In this study, a TcMEP amplitude reduction ≥70% was established as a TcMEP alert. A rescue case was defined as a case with the recovery of TcMEP amplitudes after certain procedures and without postoperative neurological complications. RESULTS: Among the 350 patients who underwent traumatic spinal injury surgery (TcMEP derivation rate 94%), TcMEP monitoring revealed seven true-positive (TP) (2.0%), three rescues (0.9%; rescue rate 30%), 31 false-positive, one false-negative, and 287 true-negative cases, resulting in 88% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 18% positive predictive value, and 99% negative predictive value. The TP rate in patients with preoperative motor deficits was 2.9%, which was higher than that in patients without preoperative motor deficits (1.1%). The most common timing of TcMEP alerts was during decompression (40%). During decompression, suspension of surgery with intravenous steroid injection was ineffective (rescue rate, 0%), and additional decompression was effective. CONCLUSION: Given the low prevalence of neurological complications (2.3%) and the low positive predictive value (18.4%), single usage of TcMEP monitoring during traumatic spinal injury surgery is not recommended. Further efforts should be made to reduce FP alert rates through better interpretation of multimodal Intraoperative neuromonitorings and the incorporation of anesthesiology to improve the positive predictive value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Factors influencing the long-term outcomes of instrumentation surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a post-hoc analysis of a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar spinal canal stenosis caused by degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is one of the most common indications for spinal surgery. However, the factors that influence its long-term (>10 years) outcomes remain unknown. DESIGN: This is a post-hoc analysis of a prospective randomized study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine factors that influence the long-term outcomes of instrumentation surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis due to degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients aged ≤75 years with single L4/5 level lumbar canal stenosis caused by degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis prospectively underwent instrumentation surgery at two hospitals between May 1, 2003, and April 30, 2012; the final follow-up examination was on May 20, 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: The following data were collected: modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, JOA score recovery rate, visual analog scale (VAS) score for lower back and leg pain, and scores from eight short-form 36 (SF-36) subscales preoperatively and at the final follow-up examination. METHODS: Spearman's correlation analysis and univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to examine preoperative factors that affect the JOA score recovery rate in patients who underwent instrumentation surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level due to degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients who underwent instrumentation surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and had a long-term follow-up period were included. Of these, 25 and 17 underwent posterolateral fusion and Graf stabilization, respectively. The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 12.5 years. Spearman's correlation analysis revealed that the long-term recovery rate was correlated with the preoperative VAS score for low back pain. In the univariate regression analysis, sex, preoperative VAS score for low back pain, and the SF-36 general health score were significantly associated with the long-term recovery rate. Meanwhile, the multiple stepwise regression analysis identified the preoperative VAS score for low back pain as an independent predictor of the long-term recovery rate. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the preoperative VAS score for low back pain as an independent predictor of the long-term recovery rate following instrumentation surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Therefore, when performing posterolateral fusion or Graf stabilization for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, attention should be paid to the intensity of preoperative low back pain and considerations should be given to whether these procedures can improve the patient's symptoms in the long term.

Current Trends in Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring: A Survey Analysis among Japanese Expert Spine Surgeons.

Introduction: Although intraoperative spinal neuromonitoring (IONM) is recommended for spine surgeries, there are no guidelines regarding its use in Japan, and its usage is mainly based on the surgeon's preferences. Therefore, this study aimed to provide an overview of the current trends in IONM usage in Japan. Methods: In this web-based survey, expert spine surgeons belonging to the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research were asked to respond to a questionnaire regarding IONM management. The questionnaire covered various aspects of IONM usage, including the preferred modality, operation of IONM, details regarding muscle-evoked potential after electrical stimulation of the brain (Br(E)-MsEP), and need for consistent use of IONM in major spine surgeries. Results: Responses were received from 134 of 186 expert spine surgeons (response rate, 72%). Of these, 124 respondents used IONM routinely. Medical staff rarely performed IONM without a medical doctor. Br(E)-MsEP was predominantly used for IONM. One-third of the respondents reported complications, such as bite injuries caused by Br(E)-MsEP. Interestingly, two-thirds of the respondents did not plan responses to alarm points. Intramedullary spinal cord tumor, scoliosis (idiopathic, congenital, or neuromuscular in pediatric), and thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament were representative diseases that require IONM. Conclusions: IONM has become an essential tool in Japan, and Br(E)-MsEP is a predominant modality for IONM at present. Although we investigated spine surgeries for which consistent use of IONM is supported, a cost-benefit analysis may be required.

Efficacy of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Intra- and Extramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter prospective study. OBJECTIVES: Although intramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) and extramedullary SCT (EMSCT) surgeries carry high risk of intraoperative motor deficits (MDs), the benefits of transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring are well-accepted; however, comparisons have not yet been conducted. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of TcMEP monitoring during IMSCT and EMSCT resection surgeries. METHODS: We prospectively reviewed TcMEP monitoring data of 81 consecutive IMSCT and 347 EMSCT patients. We compared the efficacy of interventions based on TcMEP alerts in the IMSCT and EMSCT groups. We defined our alert point as a TcMEP amplitude reduction of ≥70% from baseline. RESULTS: In the IMSCT group, TcMEP monitoring revealed 20 true-positive (25%), 8 rescue (10%; rescue rate 29%), 10 false-positive, a false-negative, and 41 true-negative patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 80%. In the EMSCT group, TcMEP monitoring revealed 20 true-positive (6%), 24 rescue (7%; rescue rate 55%), 29 false-positive, 2 false-negative, and 263 true-negative patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 90%. The most common TcMEP alert timing was during tumor resection (96% vs. 91%), and suspension surgeries with or without intravenous steroid administration were performed as intervention techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative MD rates in IMSCT and EMSCT surgeries using TcMEP monitoring were 25% and 6%, and rescue rates were 29% and 55%. We believe that the usage of TcMEP monitoring and appropriate intervention techniques during SCT surgeries might have predicted and prevented the occurrence of intraoperative MDs.

Efficacy of D-Wave Monitoring Combined With the Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials in High-Risk Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter cohort study. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to clarify the efficacy of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), especially in transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials (TES-MEPs) with spinal cord-evoked potentials after transcranial stimulation of the brain (D-wave) in the detection of reversible spinal cord injury in high-risk spinal surgery. METHODS: We reviewed 1310 patients who underwent TES-MEPs during spinal surgery at 14 spine centers. We compared the monitoring results of TES-MEPs with D-wave vs TES-MEPs without D-wave in high-risk spinal surgery. RESULTS: There were 40 cases that used TES-MEPs with D-wave and 1270 cases that used TES-MEPs without D-wave. Before patients were matched, there were significant differences between groups in terms of sex and spinal disease category. Although there was no significant difference in the rescue rate between TES-MEPs with D-wave (2.0%) and TES-MEPs (2.5%), the false-positivity rate was significantly lower (0%) in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group. Using a one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis, 40 pairs of patients from the two groups were selected. Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the matched groups. In the score-matched analysis, one case (2.5%) in both groups was a case of rescue (P = 1), five (12.5%) cases in the TES-MEPs group were false positives, and there were no false positives in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: TES-MEPs with D-wave in high-risk spine surgeries did not affect rescue case rates. However, it helped reduce the false-positivity rate.

Risk factors for recurrence and regrowth of spinal schwannoma.

BACKGROUND: Spinal schwannoma recurs after initial surgery at a rate of 4%-6%, with known risk factors including subtotal resection, multilevel involvement, large tumor size, and malignant histopathology. This study examined risk factors for schwannoma recurrence and residual tumor regrowth. METHODS: Sixty-five patients who underwent resection of spinal schwannoma in our department between July 2010 and December 2018 and were followed up for more than 1 year were retrospectively analyzed for age, sex, follow-up duration, imaging and surgical data, recurrence, reoperation, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores before and 1 year after surgery. Patients with postoperative recurrence or residual tumor regrowth of >10% at the final visit (R+ group) were compared with patients without recurrence or regrowth (R- group). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze concurrent effects of risk factors on recurrence and regrowth. RESULTS: The 65 patients (mean age 52.4 years at surgery) had schwannomas involving cervical (n = 14), thoracic (n = 25), and lumbar (n = 26) spinal levels. Mean follow-up duration was 58 months. Location was intradural in 65%, extradural in 17%, and both intradural and extradural in 18%. There were 4 recurrences (6.2%), and the mean interval between surgery and recurrence was 18.8 months. Seven patients (10.8%) experienced regrowth. Comparing group R+ (n = 11) and group R- (n = 54), univariate analysis showed significant differences in Sridhar tumor classification, giant tumor (Sridhar classification II, IVb, and V), left-right and cranial-caudal tumor size, largest diameter, operative time, blood loss, subtotal resection, reoperation, fusion surgery, and follow-up duration. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed giant tumor (Sridhar classification types II, IVb, and V) as an independent risk factor for recurrence and regrowth. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review of 65 consecutive patients with spinal schwannoma in a single institution demonstrated that 16.9% had recurrence or regrowth, demonstrating that this potential risk should be kept in mind.

Detailed magnetoelectric analysis of a nerve impulse propagation along the brachial plexus.

OBJECTIVE: To visualize impulse conduction along the brachial plexus through simultaneous electromagnetic measurements. METHODS: Neuromagnetic fields following median nerve stimulation were recorded above the clavicle with a superconducting quantum interference device biomagnetometer system in 7 healthy volunteers. Compound nerve action potentials (CNAPs) were obtained from 12 locations. Pseudocolor maps of equivalent currents reconstructed from magnetic fields and isopotential contour maps were superimposed onto X-ray images. Surface potentials and current waveforms at virtual electrodes along the brachial plexus were compared. RESULTS: In magnetic field analysis, the leading axonal current followed by a trailing backward current traveled rostrally along the brachial plexus. The spatial extent of the longitudinal intra-axonal currents corresponded to the extent of the positive-negative-positive potential field reflecting transmembrane volume currents. The peaks and troughs of the intra-axonal biphasic current waveforms coincided with the zero-crossings of triphasic CNAP waveforms. The amplitudes of CNAPs and current moments were linearly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstructed neural activity in magnetic field analysis visualizes not only intra-axonal currents, but also transmembrane volume currents, which are in good agreement with the surface potential field. SIGNIFICANCE: Magnetoneurography is a novel non-invasive functional imaging modality for the brachial plexus whose performance can surpass that of electric potential measurement.

The Utility of Transcranial Stimulated Motor-Evoked Potential Alerts in Cervical Spine Surgery Varies Based on Preoperative Motor Status.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective multicenter observational study. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the validity of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEP) in cervical spine surgery and identify factors associated with positive predictive value when Tc-MEP alerts are occurred. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The sensitivity and specificity of Tc-MEP for detecting motor paralysis are high; however, false-positives sometimes occur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors examined Tc-MEP in 2476 cases of cervical spine surgeries and compared patient backgrounds, type of spinal disorders, preoperative motor status, surgical factors, and the types of Tc-MEP alerts. Tc-MEP alerts were defined as an amplitude reduction of more than 70% from the control waveform. Tc-MEP results were classified into two groups: false-positive and true-positive, and items that showed significant differences were extracted by univariate analysis and detected by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity was 66% (segmental paralysis: 33% and lower limb paralysis: 95.8%) and specificity was 91.5%. Tc-MEP outcomes were 33 true-positives and 233 false-positives. Positive predictive value of general spine surgery was significantly higher in cases with a severe motor status than in a nonsevere motor status (19.5% vs . 6.7%, P =0.02), but not different in high-risk spine surgery (20.8% vs . 19.4%). However, rescue rates did not significantly differ regardless of motor status (48% vs . 50%). In a multivariate logistic analysis, a preoperative severe motor status [ P =0.041, odds ratio (OR): 2.46, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.03-5.86] and Tc-MEP alerts during intradural tumor resection ( P <0.001, OR: 7.44, 95% CI: 2.64-20.96) associated with true-positives, while Tc-MEP alerts that could not be identified with surgical maneuvers ( P =0.011, OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.073-0.71) were associated with false-positives. CONCLUSION: The utility of Tc-MEP in patients with a preoperative severe motor status was enhanced, even in those without high-risk spine surgery. Regardless of the motor status, appropriate interventions following Tc-MEP alerts may prevent postoperative paralysis.

Transcranial Motor-evoked Potentials for Intraoperative Nerve Root Monitoring During Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: This study clarified the uses and limitations of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) for nerve root monitoring during adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgeries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Whether Tc-MEPs can detect nerve root injuries (NRIs) in ASD surgeries remains controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively analyzed neuromonitoring data from 14 institutions between 2017 and 2020. The subjects were ASD patients surgically treated with posterior corrective fusion using multichannel Tc-MEPs. An alert was defined as a decrease of ≥70% in the Tc-MEP's waveform amplitude from baseline, and NRI was considered as meeting the focal Tc-MEP alerts shortly following surgical procedures with postoperative nerve root symptoms in the selected muscles. RESULTS: A total of 311 patients with ASD (262 women and 49 men) and a mean age of 65.5 years were analyzed. Tc-MEP results revealed 47 cases (15.1%) of alerts, including 25 alerts after 10 deformity corrections, six three-column osteotomies, four interbody fusions, three pedicle screw placements or two decompressions, and 22 alerts regardless of surgical maneuvers. Postoperatively, 14 patients (4.5%) had neurological deterioration considered to be all NRI, 11 true positives, and three false negatives (FN). Two FN did not reach a 70% loss of baseline (46% and 65% loss of baseline) and one was not monitored at target muscles. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that risk factors of NRI were preexisting motor weakness ( P <0.001, odds ratio=10.41) and three-column osteotomies ( P =0.008, odds ratio=7.397). CONCLUSIONS: Nerve root injuries in our ASD cohort were partially predictable using multichannel Tc-MEPs with a 70% decrease in amplitude as an alarm threshold. We propose that future research should evaluate the efficacy of an idealized warning threshold (e.g., 50%) and a more detailed evoked muscle selection, in reducing false negatives.

Assessing carpal tunnel syndrome with magnetoneurography.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the neuromagnetic fields of carpal tunnel syndrome patients after electrical digital nerve stimulation and evaluate median nerve function with high spatial resolution. METHODS: A superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer system was used to record neuromagnetic fields at the carpal tunnel after electrical stimulation of the middle digital nerve in 10 hands of nine patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. The patients were diagnosed based on symptoms (numbness, tingling, and pain) supported by a positive Phalen or Tinel sign. A novel technique was applied to remove stimulus-induced artifacts, and current distributions were calculated using a spatial filter algorithm and superimposed on X-ray. RESULTS: In 6 of the 10 hands, the amplitude of the inward current waveform attenuated to <70% or the nerve conduction velocity was <40 m/s. The results of conventional nerve conduction studies were normal for two of these six hands. All four hands that could not be diagnosed by magnetoneurography had severe carpal tunnel syndrome superimposed on peripheral neuropathy secondary to comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Technical improvements enabled magnetoneurography to noninvasively visualize the electrophysiological nerve activity in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Magnetoneurography may have the potential to contribute to the detailed diagnosis of various peripheral nerve disorders.

Magnetoneurography as a novel functional imaging technique for the ulnar nerve at the elbow.

OBJECTIVE: To visualize the neural activity of the ulnar nerve at the elbow using magnetoneurography (MNG). METHODS: Subjects were asymptomatic volunteers (eight men and one woman; age, 26-53 years) and a male patient with cubital tunnel syndrome (age, 54 years). The ulnar nerve was electrically stimulated at the left wrist and evoked magnetic fields were recorded by a 132-channel biomagnetometer system with a superconducting quantum interference device at the elbow. Evoked potentials were also recorded and their correspondence to the evoked magnetic fields was evaluated in healthy participants. RESULTS: Evoked magnetic fields were successfully recorded by MNG, and computationally reconstructed currents were able to visualize the neural activity of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. In the affected arm of the patient, reconstructed intra-axonal and inflow currents attenuated and decelerated around the elbow. Latencies of reconstructed currents and evoked potentials were correspondent within an error of 0.4 ms in asymptomatic participants. CONCLUSIONS: Neural activity in the ulnar nerve can be visualized by MNG, which may be a novel functional imaging technique for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, including cubital tunnel syndrome. SIGNIFICANCE: MNG permits visualization of evoked currents in the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel.

Comparison of decompression, decompression plus fusion, and decompression plus stabilization: a long-term follow-up of a prospective, randomized study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar canal stenosis due to degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is one of the most common indications for lumbar spinal surgery. However, from a long-term perspective, it is still unclear which of these procedures should be performed: decompression, decompression plus fusion, or decompression plus stabilization. PURPOSE: This study aimed to present the long-term results of a randomized controlled trial of surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a long-term follow-up of a previously reported randomized controlled trial. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients aged ≤75 years with single L4/5 level lumbar canal stenosis caused by degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were enrolled at two hospitals from May 1, 2003, to April 30, 2012; the final follow-up was on May 20, 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: The following data were collected: modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score for lower back pain, leg pain, and numbness, and scores from eight Short-Form 36 (SF-36) subscales preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, 5 years postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. METHODS: Patients were randomized to undergo decompression alone, decompression plus fusion, or decompression plus stabilization. The primary outcome measure was the change in VAS for lower back pain with secondary outcomes including the modified JOA score, VAS for leg pain, VAS for leg numbness, eight SF-36 subscale scores, and occurrence of reoperation at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Among 85 patients who were randomized, 66 responded to the current survey. The mean follow-up period was 12.3 years. The VAS score for low back pain improvement was not significantly different between the decompression and fusion groups at the mean follow-up of 12.3 years. Of the 12 secondary outcomes, 8 showed no significant difference between decompression and fusion, 12 showed no significant difference between decompression and stabilization, and 10 showed no significant difference between fusion and stabilization. CONCLUSIONS: Although additional instrumentation surgery did not significantly improve low back pain at the mean follow-up of 12.3 years compared with decompression alone, fusion surgery provided clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, and mental health compared with decompression alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000028114.

Efficacy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Using Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Prospective Multicenter Study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective multicenter observational study. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the efficacy of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc(E)-MEPs) in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) surgery by comparing cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and investigate the timing of Tc(E)-MEPs alerts and types of interventions affecting surgical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although CSM and OPLL are the most commonly encountered diseases of DCM, the benefits of Tc(E)-MEPs for DCM remain unclear and comparisons of these two diseases have not yet been conducted. METHODS: We examined the results of Tc(E)-MEPs from 1176 DCM cases (840 CSM /336 OPLL) and compared patients background by disease, preoperative motor deficits, and the type of surgical procedure. We also assessed the efficacy of interventions based on Tc(E)-MEPs alerts. Tc(E)-MEPs alerts were defined as an amplitude reduction of more than 70% below the control waveform. Rescue cases were defined as those in which waveform recovery was achieved after interventions in response to alerts and no postoperative paralysis. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity was 57.1%, and sensitivity was higher with OPLL (71.4%) than with CSM (42.9%). The sensitivity of acute onset segmental palsy including C5 palsy was 40% (OPLL/CSM: 66.7%/0%) whereas that of lower limb palsy was 100%. The most common timing of Tc(E)-MEPs alerts was during decompression (63.16%), followed by screw insertion (15.79%). The overall rescue rate was 57.9% (OPLL/CSM: 58.3%/57.1%). CONCLUSION: Since Tc(E)-MEPs are excellent for detecting long tract injuries, surgeons need to consider appropriate interventions in response to alerts. The detection of acute onset segmental palsy by Tc(E)-MEPs was partially possible with OPLL, but may still be difficult with CSM. The rescue rate was higher than 50% and appropriate interventions may have prevented postoperative neurological complications.Level of Evidence: 3.

Transcranial Motor-evoked Potential Alert After Supine-to-Prone Position Change During Thoracic Ossification in Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) during supine-to-prone position change for thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Supine-to-prone position change might be a risk of spinal cord injury in posterior decompression and fusion surgeries for T-OPLL. METHODS: The subjects were 145 patients with T-OPLL surgically treated with posterior decompression and fusion using Tc-MEPs in 14 institutes. Tc-MEPs were monitored before surgery from supine-to-prone position and intraoperatively in seven institutes and only intraoperatively in the other seven institutes because of disapproval of the anesthesia department. In cases of Tc-MEP alert after position change, we adjusted the cervicothoracic posture. When the MEP did not recover, we reverted the position to supine and monitored the Tc-MEPs in supine position. RESULTS: There were 83 and 62 patients with/without Tc-MEP before position change to prone (group A and B). The true-positive rate was lower in group A than group B, but without statistical significance (8.4% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.12). In group A, five patients who had Tc-MEP alert during supine-to-prone position change were all female and had larger body mass index values and upper thoracic lesions. Among the patients, three underwent surgeries after cervicothoracic alignment adjustment, and two had postponed operations to 1 week later with halo-vest fixation because of repeated Tc-MEP alerts during position change to prone. The Tc-MEP alert at exposure was statistically more frequent in group B than in group A ( P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Tc-MEP alert during position change is an important sign of spinal cord injury due to alignment change at the upper thoracic spine. Tc-MEP monitoring before supine-to-prone position change was necessary to prevent spinal cord injury in surgeries for T-OPLL.

Characteristics of Tc-MEP Waveforms for Different Locations of Intradural Extramedullary Tumors: A Prospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: To examine transcranial motor-evoked potential (Tc-MEP) waveforms in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in surgery for intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumors, focused on the characteristics for cervical, thoracic, and conus lesions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: IDEM tumors are normally curable after resection, but neurological deterioration may occur after surgery. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring using Tc-MEPs during surgery is important for timely detection of possible neurological injury. METHODS: The subjects were 233 patients with IDEM tumors treated surgically with Tc-MEP monitoring at 9 centers. The alarm threshold was ≥70% waveform deterioration from baseline. A case with a Tc-MEP alert that normalized and had no new motor deficits postoperatively was defined as a rescue case. A deterioration of manual muscle test score ≥1 compared to the preoperative value was defined as postoperative worsening of motor status. RESULTS: The 233 patients (92 males, 39%) had a mean age of 58.1 ±â€Š18.1 years, and 185 (79%), 46 (20%), and 2 (1%) had schwannoma, meningioma, and neurofibroma. These lesions had cervical (C1-7), thoracic (Th1-10), and conus (Th11-L2) locations in 82 (35%), 96 (41%), and 55 (24%) cases. There were no significant differences in preoperative motor deficit among the lesion levels. Thoracic lesions had a significantly higher rate of poor baseline waveform derivation (0% cervical, 6% thoracic, 0% conus, P < 0.05) and significantly more frequent intraoperative alarms (20%, 31%, 15%, P < 0.05). Use of Tc-MEPs for predicting neurological deficits after IDEM surgery had sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 89%; however, the positive predictive value was low. CONCLUSION: Poor derivation of waveforms, appearance of alarms, and worse final waveforms were all significantly more frequent for thoracic lesions. Thus, amplification of the waveform amplitude, using multimodal monitoring, and more appropriate interventions after an alarm may be particularly important in surgery for thoracic IDEM tumors.Level of Evidence: 3.

Assessment of thoracic spinal cord electrophysiological activity through magnetoneurography.

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive and detailed visualization of electrophysiological activity in the thoracic spinal cord through magnetoneurography. METHODS: In five healthy volunteers, magnetic fields around current flowing in the thoracic spinal cord after alternating unilateral and synchronized bilateral sciatic nerve stimulation were measured using a magnetoneurograph system with superconductive quantum interference device biomagnetometers. The current distribution was obtained from the magnetic data by spatial filtering and visualized by superimposing it on the X-ray image. Conduction velocity was calculated using the peak latency of the current waveforms. RESULTS: A sufficiently high magnetic signal intensity and signal-to-noise ratio were obtained in all participants after synchronized bilateral sciatic nerve stimulation. Leading and trailing components along the spinal canal and inward components flowing into the depolarization site ascended to the upper thoracic spine. Conduction velocity of the inward current in the whole thoracic spine was 42.4 m/s. CONCLUSIONS: Visualization of electrophysiological activity in the thoracic spinal cord was achieved through magnetoneurography and a new method for synchronized bilateral sciatic nerve stimulation. Magnetoneurography is expected to be a useful modality in functional assessment of thoracic myelopathy. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first report to use magnetoneurography to noninvasively visualize electrophysiological activity in the thoracic spinal cord in detail.

Comparison of intraoperative neuromonitoring accuracies and procedures associated with alarms in anterior versus posterior fusion for cervical spinal disorders: A prospective multi-institutional cohort study.

A prospective multicenter cohort study. To clarify the differences in the accuracy of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcE-MEPs) and procedures associated with the alarms between cervical anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Neurological complications after TcE-MEP alarms have been prevented by appropriate interventions for cervical degenerative disorders. The differences in the accuracy of TcE-MEPs and the timing of alarms between cervical ASF and PSF noted in the existing literature remain unclear. Patients (n = 415) who underwent cervical ASF (n = 171) or PSF (n = 244) at multiple institutions for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, spinal injury, and others were analyzed. Neurological complications, TcE-MEP alarms defined as a decreased amplitude of ≤70% compared to the control waveform, interventions after alarms, and TcE-MEP results were compared between the 2 surgeries. The incidence of neurological complications was 1.2% in the ASF group and 2.0% in the PSF group, with no significant intergroup differences (P-value was .493). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and rate of rescue were 50.0%, 95.2%, 99.4%, and 1.8%, respectively, in the ASF group, and 80.0%, 90.9%, 99.5%, and 2.9%, respectively, in the PSF group. The accuracy of TcE-MEPs was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P-value was .427 in sensitivity, .109 in specificity, and .674 in negative predictive value). The procedures associated with the alarms were decompression in 3 cases and distraction in 1 patient in the ASF group. The PSF group showed Tc-MEPs decreased during decompression, mounting rods, turning positions, and others. Most alarms went off during decompression in ASF, whereas various stages of the surgical procedures were associated with the alarms in PSF. There were no significant differences in the accuracy of TcE-MEPs between the 2 surgeries.