A national survey on the medical physics workload of external beam radiotherapy in Japan†.

Several staffing models are used to determine the required medical physics staffing, including radiotherapy technologists, of radiation oncology departments. However, since Japanese facilities tend to be smaller in scale than foreign ones, those models might not apply to Japan. Therefore, in this study, we surveyed workloads in Japan to estimate the optimal medical physics staffing in external beam radiotherapy. A total of 837 facilities were surveyed to collect information regarding radiotherapy techniques and medical physics specialists (RTMPs). The survey covered facility information, staffing, patient volume, equipment volume, workload and quality assurance (QA) status. Full-time equivalent (FTE) factors were estimated from the workload and compared with several models. Responses were received from 579 facilities (69.2%). The median annual patient volume was 369 at designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs) and 252 across all facilities. In addition, the median FTE of RTMPs was 4.6 at DCCHs and 3.0 at all sites, and the average QA implementation rate for radiotherapy equipment was 69.4%. Furthermore, advanced treatment technologies have increased workloads, particularly in computed tomography simulations and treatment planning tasks. Compared to published models, larger facilities (over 500 annual patients) had a shortage of medical physics staff. In very small facilities (about 140 annual patients), the medical physics staffing requirement was estimated to be 0.5 FTE, implying that employing a full-time medical physicist would be inefficient. However, ensuring the quality of radiotherapy is an important issue, given the limited number of RTMPs. Our study provides insights into optimizing staffing and resource allocation in radiotherapy departments.

Establishing quality indicators to comprehensively assess quality assurance and patient safety in radiotherapy and their relationship with an institution's background.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quality indicators (QIs) for radiotherapy have been proposed by several groups, but no study has been conducted to correlate the implementation of indicators specific to patient safety over the course of the clinical process with an institution's background. An initial large-scale survey was conducted to understand the implementation status of QIs established for quality assurance and patient safety in radiotherapy and the relationship between implementation status and an institutions' background. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Overall, 68 QIs that were established by this research team after a pilot survey were used to assess structures and processes for quality assurance and patient safety. Data on the implementation of QIs and the institutions' backgrounds were obtained from designated cancer care hospitals in Japan. RESULTS: Overall, 284 institutions (72 %) responded and had a median QI achievement rate of 60.8 %. QIs with low implementation rates, such as the implementation of an error reporting system and establishment of a quality assurance department, were identified. The QI achievement rate and scale of the institution were positively correlated, and the achievement rate of all QIs was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in institutions capable of advanced treatments, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and those with a quality assurance department. CONCLUSION: A large-scale survey on QIs revealed their implementation and relationship with a facility's background. QIs that require improvement were identified, and that these QIs might be effective in providing advanced medical care to many patients.

Comparison of Late Toxicity After Whole-pelvis Versus Prostate-only VMAT for Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate whether whole-pelvis (WP) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is associated with increased late toxicity compared with prostate-only (PO) VMAT in patients with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants comprised 384 consecutive patients treated with definitive VMAT to 78 Gy in 39 fractions from July 2011 to August 2016. Of these, 183 patients received PO-VMAT and 201 patients received initial WP-VMAT to 46.8 Gy in 26 fractions using a simultaneous integrated boost technique. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were prospectively scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 49 months (range=16-88 months) in the PO-VMAT group and 52 months (range=10-85 months) in the WP-VMAT group. Frequencies of Grade 3 late GI and GU toxicities were ≤3% across both groups. No patients experienced Grade 4+ toxicity. Cumulative incidences of Grade 2+ late GI and GU toxicities were similar between PO- and WP-VMAT groups (p=0.508 and p=0.838, respectively). Five-year cumulative incidences of Grade 2+ late GI and GU toxicities were 12.2% and 6.6% for the PO-VMAT group and 12.3% and 8.9% for the WP-VMAT group, respectively. CONCLUSION: WP-VMAT did not increase late GI and GU toxicities. This suggests that concerns about increasing toxicity profile are insufficient reason for omitting WPRT for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Assessment of using a gamma index analysis for patient-specific quality assurance in Japan.

PURPOSE: The Task Group 218 (TG-218) report was published by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine in 2018, recommending the appropriate use of gamma index analysis for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA). The paper demonstrates that PSQA for radiotherapy in Japan appropriately applies the gamma index analysis considering TG-218. MATERIALS/METHODS: This survey estimated the acceptance state of radiotherapeutic institutes or facilities in Japan for the guideline using a web-based questionnaire. To investigate an appropriate PSQA of the facility-specific conditions, we researched an optimal tolerance or action level for various clinical situations, including different treatment machines, clinical policies, measurement devices, staff or their skills, and patient conditions. The responded data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and multidimensional scaling (MDS). The PCA focused on factor loading values of the first contribution over 0.5, whereas the MDS focused on mapped distances among data. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 148 facilities that use intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which accounted for 42.8% of the probable IMRT use in Japan. This survey revealed the appropriate application of the following universal criteria for gamma index analysis from the guideline recommendation despite the facility-specific variations (treatment machines/the number of IMRT cases/facility attributes/responded [representative] expertise or staff): (a) 95% pass rate, (b) 3% dose difference and 2-mm distance-to-agreement, and (c) 10% threshold dose. Conditions (a)-(c) were the principal components of the data by the PCA method and were mapped in a similar distance range, which was easily clustered from other gamma index analytic factors by the MDS method. Conditions (a)-(c) were the universally essential factors for the PSQA in Japan. CONCLUSION: We found that the majority of facilities using IMRT in each region of Japan complied with the guideline and conducted PSQA with deliberation under the individual facility-specific conditions.

Error Detectability of Isodose Volumes as ROIs in Prostate Intensity-modulated RT QA.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the quality of error detectability with a three-dimensional verification system using isodose volumes as regions of interest (ROIs) in quality assurance (QA) of intensity-modulated radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment plans with four types of intentional errors were created from the data of 20 patients with localized prostate cancer. These plans underwent QA using the three-dimensional verification system. The datasets of another 30 cases without inserted errors were assessed as controls. The ROIs used in the evaluations were those used in our conventional method (planning target volume, rectum, and bladder). The isodose volume method (5%, 50% and 95% isodose volume) and the error detection rates (measurement above the tolerance values, as set from the other 30 cases) were assessed and compared. RESULTS: There was significantly higher multileaf collimator systematic closed error detectability with the isodose volume method compared to the conventional method (A-side 0.2 mm: p=0.005, A-side 0.35 mm: p=0.002, B-side 0.2 mm: p=0.001 and B-side 0.35 mm: p=0.010). There were no error types for which the error detection rate of the isodose volume method was lower than that of the conventional method. CONCLUSION: The isodose volume method was able to evaluate the irradiated ROIs that could be delineated, and improved error detectability. This method has the potential to provide a wider margin of safety in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Radiation protection in radiological imaging: a survey of imaging modalities used in Japanese institutions for verifying applicator placements in high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Institutional imaging protocols for the verification of brachytherapy applicator placements were investigated in a survey study of domestic radiotherapy institutions. The survey form designed by a free on-line survey system was distributed via the mailing-list system of the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Survey data of 75 institutions between August 2019 and October 2019 were collected. The imaging modalities used were dependent on resources available to the institutions. The displacement of a brachytherapy applicator results in significant dosimetric impact. It is essential to verify applicator placements using imaging modalities before treatment. Various imaging modalities used in institutions included a computed tomography (CT) scanner, an angiography X-ray system, a multi-purpose X-ray system and a radiotherapy simulator. The median total exposure time in overall treatment sessions was $\le$75 s for gynecological and prostate cancers. Some institutions used fluoroscopy to monitor the brachytherapy source movement. Institutional countermeasures for reducing unwanted imaging dose included minimizing the image area, changing the imaging orientation, reducing the imaging frequency and optimizing the imaging conditions. It is worth noting that half of the institutions did not confirm imaging dose regularly. This study reported on the usage of imaging modalities for brachytherapy in Japan. More caution should be applied with interstitial brachytherapy with many catheters that can lead to potentially substantial increments in imaging doses for monitoring the actual brachytherapy source using fluoroscopy. It is necessary to share imaging techniques, standardize imaging protocols and quality assurance/quality control among institutions, and imaging dose guidelines for optimization of imaging doses delivered in radiotherapy should be developed.

[Introduction of Quality Indicators into Radiotherapy Departments in Japan].

This study investigates the quality indicators (QIs) of medical care that are expected to be introduced to radiotherapy departments in Japan and evaluates whether the QIs reflect the characteristics of the treatment facilities. For this purpose, a questionnaire survey was administered to radiotherapy treatment facilities in Japan. A consensus of early QI candidates was obtained from the panel members. The characteristics identified in the candidate QIs were subdivided into 140 items covering 27 domains of medical-care contents in radiotherapy departments. These 140 items were compiled into a questionnaire, which was administered to 15 treatment facilities in Japan. The primary results indicated that 36 items in five domains are useful QI contents. The secondary findings indicated that the provision of advanced radiotherapy to several patients, the waiting time, and the radiotherapy initiated depend on the manpower of the departmental staff.

[Summary of the Report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of Risk Analysis Methods to Radiation Therapy Quality Management].

In 2016, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) has published a report of task group (TG) 100 with a completely new concept, entitled "application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management." TG-100 proposed implementation of risk analysis in radiotherapy to prevent harmful radiotherapy accidents. In addition, it enables us to conduct efficient and effective quality management in not only advanced radiotherapy such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy but also new technology in radiotherapy. It should be noted that treatment process in modern radiotherapy is absolutely more complex and it needs skillful staff and adequate resources. TG-100 methodology could identify weakness in radiotherapy procedure through assessment of failure modes that could occur in overall treatment processes. All staff in radiotherapy have to explore quality management in radiotherapy safety.

Inter-planner variation in treatment-plan quality of plans created with a knowledge-based treatment planning system.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify the inter-planner variation of plan quality in knowledge-based plans created by nine planners. METHODS: Five hypofractionated prostate-only (HPO) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans and five whole-pelvis (WP) VMAT plans were created by each planner using a knowledge-based planning (KBP) system. Nine planners were divided into three groups of three planners each: Senior, Junior, and Beginner. Single optimization with only priority modification for all objectives was performed to stay within the dose constraints. The coefficients of variation (CVs) for dosimetric parameters were evaluated, and a plan quality metric (PQM) was used to evaluate comprehensive plan quality. RESULTS: Lower CVs (<0.05) were observed at dosimetric parameters in the planning target volume for both HPO and WP plans, while the CVs in the rectum and bladder for WP plans (<0.91) were greater than those for HPO plans (<0.17). The PQM values of HPO plans for Cases1-5 (average ±â€¯standard deviation) were 41.2 ±â€¯7.1, 40.9 ±â€¯5.6, and 39.9 ±â€¯4.6 in the Senior, Junior, and Beginner groups, respectively. For the WP plans, the PQM values were 51.9 ±â€¯6.3, 47.5 ±â€¯4.3, and 40.0 ±â€¯6.6, respectively. The number of clinically acceptable HPO and WP plans were 13/15 and 11/15 in the Senior group, 13/15 and 10/15 plans in the Junior group, and 8/15 and 2/15 plans in the Beginner group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Inter-planner variation in the plan quality with RapidPlan remains, especially for the complicated VMAT plans, due to planners' heuristics.

Comparison of patient-specific intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance for the prostate across multiple institutions.

AIM: To evaluate the success of a patient-specific intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) practice for prostate cancer patients across multiple institutions using a questionnaire survey. BACKGROUND: The IMRT QA practice involves different methods of dose distribution verification and analysis at different institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two full-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan and 7 fixed-gantry IMRT plan with DMLC were used for patient specific QA across 22 institutions. The same computed tomography image and structure set were used for all plans. Each institution recalculated the dose distribution with fixed monitor units and without any modification. Single-point dose measurement with a cylindrical ionization chamber and dose distribution verification with a multi-detector or radiochromic film were performed, according to the QA process at each institution. RESULTS: Twenty-two institutions performed the patient-specific IMRT QA verifications. With a single-point dose measurement at the isocenter, the average difference between the calculated and measured doses was 0.5 ±â€¯1.9%. For the comparison of dose distributions, 18 institutions used a two or three-dimensional array detector, while the others used Gafchromic film. In the γ test with dose difference/distance-to-agreement criteria of 3%-3 mm and 2%-2 mm with a 30% dose threshold, the median gamma pass rates were 99.3% (range: 41.7%-100.0%) and 96.4% (range: 29.4%-100.0%), respectively. CONCLUSION: This survey was an informative trial to understand the verification status of patient-specific IMRT QA measurements for prostate cancer. In most institutions, the point dose measurement and dose distribution differences met the desired criteria.

Modalities and techniques used for stereotactic radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and image-guided radiotherapy: A 2018 survey by the Japan Society of Medical Physics.

Over the last several decades, there have been great advances in radiotherapy with the development of new technologies and modalities, and radiotherapy trends have changed rapidly. To comprehend the current state of radiotherapy in Japan, the QA/QC 2016-2017 Committee of the Japan Society of Medical Physics set up an intensity-modulated radiotherapy/image-guided radiotherapy (IMRT/IGRT) working group and performed a Web-based survey to show the current status of radiotherapy in Japan. The Web-based questionnaire, developed using Google Forms, contained 42 items: 7 on stereotactic radiotherapy implementation, 4 on IMRT, 24 on IGRT, and 7 on respiratory motion management. The survey was conducted from 17 January to 9 March of 2018; in total, 335 institutions provided data. The results show that volumetric modulated arc therapy was used at a level comparable to that of static gantry IMRT. For IGRT, machine-integrated computed tomography (CT), including kilovoltage or megavoltage cone-beam CT and megavoltage CT, was used at many institutions in conjunction with target-based image registration. For respiratory motion management, breath holding was the most commonly used technique. Our hope is that multi-institutional surveys such as this one will be conducted periodically to elucidate the current status of radiotherapy and emerging developments in this field. If our questionnaire was distributed worldwide, in the same format, then global trends in radiotherapy could be better understood.

Bowel and urinary quality of life after whole-pelvic versus prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare bowel and urinary health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between prostate-only (PO) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and whole-pelvis (WP) VMAT in patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 234 patients treated with definitive VMAT to 78 Gy in 39 fractions were enrolled. Of these, 108 patients received PO-VMAT and 126 patients received initial WP-VMAT to 46.8 Gy in 26 fractions using a simultaneous integrated boost technique. HRQOL was prospectively assessed before radiation therapy (baseline), and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). RESULTS: Baseline HRQOL scores did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No significant between-group differences in HRQOL change from baseline were observed for all bowel and urinary EPIC domains. The proportion of patients showing a clinically relevant decrease in bowel and urinary HRQOL scores from baseline was similar between the groups throughout the follow-up period. An analysis of individual HRQOL items showed that patients undergoing WP-VMAT were more likely to report moderate/big problems with bloody stools (P = .039) and overall bowel problems (P = .008) than those undergoing PO-VMAT at 12 months. There was no significant between-group difference in any individual items at 24 months, however. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel and urinary HRQOL is largely similar for patients receiving PO-VMAT and WP-VMAT during 24 months of follow-up, with the only differences seen in responses to specific bowel HRQOL items at 12 months.

Minimizing dose variation from the interplay effect in stereotactic radiation therapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy for lung cancer.

It is important to improve the magnitude of dose variation that is caused by the interplay effect. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the number of breaths (NBs) to the dose variation for VMAT-SBRT to lung cancer. Data on respiratory motion and multileaf collimator (MLC) sequence were collected from the cases of 30 patients who underwent radiotherapy with VMAT-SBRT for lung cancer. The NBs in the total irradiation time with VMAT and the maximum craniocaudal amplitude of the target were calculated. The MLC sequence complexity was evaluated using the modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv). Static and dynamic measurements were performed using a cylindrical respiratory motion phantom and a micro ionization chamber. The 1 standard deviation which were obtained from 10 dynamic measurements for each patient were defined as dose variation caused by the interplay effect. The dose distributions were also verified with radiochromic film to detect undesired hot and cold dose spot. Dose measurements were also performed with different NBs in the same plan for 16 patients in 30 patients. The correlations between dose variations and parameters assessed for each treatment plan including NBs, MCSv, the MCSv/amplitude quotient (TMMCSv), and the MCSv/amplitude quotient × NBs product (IVS) were evaluated. Dose variation was decreased with increasing NBs, and NBs of >40 times maintained the dose variation within 3% in 15 cases. The correlation between dose variation and IVS which were considered NBs was shown stronger (R2  = 0.43, P < 0.05) than TMMCSv (R2  = 0.32, P < 0.05). The NBs is an important factor to reduce the dose variation. The patient who breathes >40 times during irradiation of two partial arcs VMAT (i.e., NBs = 16 breaths per minute) may be suitable for VMAT-SBRT for lung cancer.

Dosimetric comparison of RapidPlan and manually optimized plans in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated whether RapidPlan based plans (RP plans) created by a single optimization, are usable in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: We used 51 previously administered VMAT plans to train a RP model. Thirty RP plans were created by a single optimization without planner intervention during optimization. Differences between RP plans and clinical manual optimization (CMO) plans created by an experienced planner for the same patients were analyzed (Wilcoxon tests) in terms of homogeneity index (HI), conformation number (CN), D95%, and D2% to planning target volume (PTV), mean dose, V50Gy, V70Gy, V75Gy, and V78Gy to rectum and bladder, monitor unit (MU), and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) sequence complexity. RESULTS: RP and CMO values for PTV D95%, PTV D2%, HI, and CN were significantly similar (p<0.05 for all). RP mean dose, V50Gy, and V70Gy to rectum were superior or comparable to CMO values; RP V75Gy and V78Gy were higher than in CMO plans (p<0.05). RP bladder dose-volume parameter values (except V78Gy) were lower than in CMO plans (p<0.05). MU values were RP: 730±55MU and CMO: 580±37MU (p<0.05); and MLC sequence complexity scores were RP: 0.25±0.02 and CMO: 0.35±0.03 (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RP plans created by a single optimization were clinically acceptable in VMAT for patient with prostate cancer. Our simple model could reduce optimization time, independently of planner's skill and knowledge.

Optimal bladder volume at treatment planning for prostate cancer patients receiving volumetric modulated arc therapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate optimal bladder volumes at treatment planning (TP) in prostate cancer patients who undergo volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: To determine the minimum value, 122 patients were classified into 6 groups according to the bladder volume at TP: <100 mL (group 1), 100-149 mL (group 2), 150-199 mL (group 3), 200-249 mL (group 4), 250-299 mL (group 5), and ≥300 mL (group 6). Bladder volumes receiving more than 70 Gy (V70Gy) and V50Gy were calculated in each subgroup and compared with the bladder dose-volume constraints specified in our institution. To determine the maximum value, 64 patients who underwent uniform nursing interventions were classified into the same 6 groups. Bladder volumes on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were measured once weekly during treatment, for a total of 8 measurements. Relative bladder volumes (bladder volume on CBCT image [mL]/bladder volume at TP [mL] × 100%) were evaluated in each of the 6 subgroups. RESULTS: The upper bounds of the 95% confidence intervals of the mean V70Gy and V50Gy values in group 1 exceeded the dose constraints at our institution. The mean relative bladder volumes were 104%, 91%, 77%, 81%, 63%, and 59% in groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. The institutional criterion of 70% for the mean relative bladder volume was achieved in groups 1-4, but it could not be achieved in groups 5-6. Therefore, the patients in groups 2-4 met both institutional dose constraints for the bladder at TP and the institutional criterion for the mean relative bladder volume during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal bladder volumes at TP were between 100 and 250 mL in this setting. Nursing intervention needs to be implemented before treatment planning to ensure that patients achieve the optimal bladder volume range.

Comparison of dosimetric parameters and acute toxicity after whole-pelvic vs prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy with daily image guidance for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare dosimetric parameters and acute toxicity rates between whole-pelvic (WP) and prostate-only (PO) volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 224 consecutive patients treated with definitive VMAT to 78 Gy in 39 fractions were enrolled. Of these, 119 patients received initial WP VMAT at 46.8 Gy in 26 fractions using a simultaneous integrated boost technique, and 105 patients received PO VMAT. Image-guided radiotherapy was practised with daily cone beam CT. RESULTS: The mean rectal dose, the rectal volume receiving ≥30 Gy (V30Gy), rectal V50Gy, the mean bladder dose, bladder V30Gy and bladder V50Gy were significantly increased in the WP group (p < 0.05 each); however, the rectal V70Gy did not differ between groups (p = 0.101), and the bladder V70Gy was significantly lower in the WP group (p = 0.029). The WP group experienced a significantly increased frequency of acute grade 2 diarrhoea relative to the PO group (5.9% vs 0%; p = 0.015). No differences were seen between the WP and PO groups in terms of acute grade 2 proctitis (10.1% vs 6.7%; p = 0.360) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity (12.6% vs 10.5%; p = 0.620). CONCLUSION: Despite larger rectum and bladder volumes at low- and medium-dose levels, WP VMAT resulted in no significant increase in acute proctitis or GU toxicity when compared with PO VMAT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study demonstrates that whole-pelvic radiotherapy has comparable acute toxicity to those observed with prostate-only radiotherapy when VMAT with daily image guidance is used.

A treatment-planning comparison of three beam arrangement strategies for stereotactic body radiation therapy for centrally located lung tumors using volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

The purpose of this study was to determine appropriate beam arrangement for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of patients with centrally located lung tumors. Fifteen consecutive patients with centrally located lung tumors treated at our institution were enrolled. For each patient, three VMAT plans were generated using two coplanar partial arcs (CP VMAT), two non-coplanar partial arcs (NCP VMAT), and one coplanar full arc (Full VMAT). All plans were designed to deliver 70 Gy in 10 fractions. Target coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OARs) were compared across techniques. PTV coverage was almost identical for all approaches. The whole lung V10Gy was significantly lower with CP VMAT plans than with NCP VMAT plans, whereas no significant differences in the mean lung dose, V5Gy, V20Gy or V40Gy were observed. Full VMAT increased mean contralateral lung V5Gy by 12.57% and 9.15% when compared with NCP VMAT and CP VMAT, respectively. Although NCP VMAT plans best achieved the dose-volume constraints for mediastinal OARs, the absolute differences in dose were small when compared with CP VMAT. These results suggest that partial-arc VMAT may be preferable to minimize unnecessary exposure to the contralateral lung, and use of NCP VMAT should be considered when the dose-volume constraints are not achieved by CP VMAT.

Whole-pelvic volumetric-modulated arc therapy for high-risk prostate cancer: treatment planning and acute toxicity.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate dosimetric quality and acute toxicity of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and daily image guidance in high-risk prostate cancer patients. A total of 100 consecutive high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with definitive VMAT with prophylactic whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) were enrolled. All patients were treated with a double-arc VMAT plan delivering 52 Gy to the prostate planning target volume (PTV), while simultaneously delivering 46.8 Gy to the pelvic nodal PTV in 26 fractions, followed by a single-arc VMAT plan delivering 26 Gy to the prostate PTV in 13 fractions. Image-guided RT was performed with daily cone-beam computed tomography. Dose-volume parameters for the PTV and the organs at risk (OARs), total number of monitor units (MUs) and treatment time were evaluated. Acute toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. All dosimetric parameters met the present plan acceptance criteria. Mean MU and treatment time were 471 and 146 s for double-arc VMAT, respectively, and were 520 and 76 s for single-arc VMAT, respectively. No Grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was reported. Acute Grade 2 proctitis, diarrhea, and genitourinary toxicity occurred in 12 patients (12%), 6 patients (6%) and 13 patients (13%), respectively. The present study demonstrated that VMAT for WPRT in prostate cancer results in favorable PTV coverage and OAR sparing with short treatment time and an acceptable rate of acute toxicity. These findings support the use of VMAT for delivering WPRT to high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Change in dose distribution of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy during treatment for lung tumor.

PURPOSE: We investigated the changes in dose distribution of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) during lung tumor treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had undergone planning for radical radiotherapy were selected for study. Computed tomography (CT) examination was performed at two time intervals during the course of conformal radiotherapy: t0 Gy at the time of planning and t40 Gy at 40 Gy of treatment. We transferred all the planned beam data at t0 Gy to each t40 Gy CT image. The isodose distribution was recalculated at time t40 Gy for the same beam characteristics. Variations in volumes and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed and compared for lung, gross target volume (GTV), and planning target volumes (PTV) between t0 Gy and t40 Gy. A paired t-test was performed to compare the DVH between t0 Gy and t40 Gy. RESULTS: The mean minimum doses for t40 y GTV, and PTV were lower than t0 y. However, there was no significant difference between t0 Gy and t40 Gy (p=0.493, 0.378, respectively). There was a patient whose minimum doses of GTV and PTV were decreased and who had notable improvement of lobar atelectasis after 40 Gy of radiotherapy. Comparison of the percent volume of received dose exceeding 20 Gy (V20) and the mean dose for the total lung revealed that t40 Gy was larger than to Gy (p=0.013, 0.012). CONCLUSION: Incorporation of the time factor into 3D treatment planning is mandatory for frequent reiteration of treatment planning during treatment periods. Clearly, more work in this area should be considered.