Successful Treatment of Sepsis-Induced Cardiomyopathy with Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping: A Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy is cardiac dysfunction in sepsis that sometimes results in reduced cardiac output. Inotropic agents are recommended in patients with sepsis and cardiac dysfunction. Here, we present a case of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy that was resistant to inotropes and was successfully treated with intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP). We also reviewed the literature on similar cases of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy treated with IABP. CASE REPORT A 40-year-old woman with fever and hypotension was admitted to a university hospital. Laboratory test results showed elevated inflammatory markers and cardiac markers, such as creatinine kinase-MB and troponin T. Echocardiography revealed severe left ventricular hypokinesis, and cardiac monitoring revealed a low cardiac output. The patient received antimicrobials, vasopressors, and dobutamine; however, her circulatory status did not respond to these treatments. IABP was introduced 7 h after admission and dramatically increased her blood pressure and cardiac output, resulting in the reduction of vasopressor and dobutamine doses. The patient survived without any IABP-related complications. The literature review of 11 cases of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy treated with IABP shows consistent results with the presented case in terms of positive effects of IABP on circulatory status and cardiac function, resulting in a reduction of inotropes. CONCLUSIONS Some sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy cases with reduced left ventricular function may not respond to inotropes. IABP would be a treatment option for these patients because of its positive effects on cardiac and circulatory functions.

Complement Activation in Human Sepsis is Related to Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

INTRODUCTION: In human sepsis, little is known about the relationships between complement activation and the clinical characteristics of sepsis, including disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), interventions, and prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with sepsis admitted from November 2016 to December 2018 were included. We used the plasma levels of soluble C5b-9 (SC5b-9) as a marker of complement activation. We compared the clinical characteristics and complement components between patients with and without DIC. We also compared the clinical characteristics and each DIC parameter across quartile groups for the SC5b-9 value. RESULTS: Forty-nine sepsis patients were eligible. Thirty-four patients developed DIC, and eight patients died. The median (interquartile range) SC5b-9 value was 342 (261-501) ng/mL. Compared with patients without DIC, patients with DIC showed lower C3 levels (mean, 95.7 vs. 70.4 mg/dL, P < 0.01) and higher SC5b-9 levels (median, 287 vs. 400 ng/mL, P = 0.01). Patients were stratified by SC5b-9 quartile (ng/mL: low: < 260, moderate: 260-342, high: 343-501, highest: > 501). The mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score varied across these groups (P = 0.02). In the high and highest groups, many more patients received vasopressors and developed DIC. In the highest group, the coagulation parameters were severe, and thrombocytopenia was prolonged. In-hospital mortality tended to be high (33%) in the highest group. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of complement activation is related to DIC, severity, intensive interventions, and mortality. Further studies are needed to confirm the usefulness of SC5b-9 for stratifying sepsis patients.

The Additive Effect of Atropine Sulfate during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-hospital Non-traumatic Cardiac Arrest Patients with Non-shockable Rhythm.

Objective The updated guidelines of 2015 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) do not recommend the routine use of atropine for cardiopulmonary arrest. Methods The study population included out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with non-shockable rhythm who were encountered at a Japanese community hospital between October 1, 2012 and April 30, 2017. Results At the outcome, the epinephrine with atropine and epinephrine-only groups had a similar survival rate to that at hospital admission (28.7% vs. 26.7%: p=0.723). The odds ratio (OR) for the survival to hospital admission after the administration of atropine with epinephrine was 1.33 (95% CI 1.09-1.62; p<0.01), while that after the administration of epinephrine was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.55-0.74, p<0.01). The ORs for the survival to hospital admission for patients with pulseless electrical activity in the epinephrine-alone group and the atropine with epinephrine group were 0.62 (95% CI 0.49-0.78; p<0.01) and 1.35 (95% CI 0.99-1.83; p=0.06), respectively, and those for such patients with asystole in the epinephrine-alone group and the atropine with epinephrine group were 0.64 (95% CI 0.53-0.76; p<0.01) and 1.39 (95% CI 1.10-1.77; p<0.01), respectively. The OR for the survival to hospital admission after the administration of atropine sulfate (1 mg) was 2.91 (95% CI 1.49-5.67; p<0.01), while that for the survival to hospital admission after the administration of 0, 2 and ≥3 mg atropine sulfate was 0.38 (95% CI 0.29-0.50; p<0.01), 1.54 (95% CI 0.58-4.08; p=0.38) and 0.23 (95% CI 0.09-0.60; p<0.01), respectively. Conclusion The addition of atropine (within 2 mg) following epinephrine was a comprehensive independent predictor of the survival to hospital admission for non-shockable (especially asystole) OHCA adults.