RESUMEN
A 60-year-old male patient had alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. Three months prior, he had undergone an exchange of pancreatic duct stents. In December 201X-1, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography (CT) scan results showed a caput pancreatic mass and common bile duct dilatation. We considered that it was because of chronic pancreatitis and decided to follow up by imaging studies. Further, in March 201X, a CT scan result revealed worsening of the mass and bile duct dilation. We assessed the mass by endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration. Histological findings revealed to an interstitial tissue infiltrated by several neutrophils and plasma cells and abscess-forming inflammation like sulfur granule. The mass was improved by antibiotic administration for 6 months.
Asunto(s)
Actinomicosis , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Actinomicosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Actinomicosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico , Endosonografía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conductos Pancreáticos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
There is limited evidence supporting the usefulness of endoscopic retrograde pancreatic drainage (ERPD) for symptomatic pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stenosis (sPJS). We examined the usefulness of ERPD for sPJS. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 10 benign sPJS patients. A forward-viewing endoscope was used in all sessions. Following items were evaluated: technical success, adverse events, and clinical outcome of ERPD. The technical success rate was 100% (10/10) in initial ERPD; 9 patients had a pancreatic stent (no-internal-flap: n = 4, internal-flap: n = 5). The median follow-up was 920 days. Four patients developed recurrence. Among them, 3 had a stent with no-internal-flap in initial ERPD, the stent migrated in 3 at recurrence, and a stent was not placed in 1 patient in initial ERPD. Four follow-up interventions were performed. No recurrence was observed in 6 patients. None of the stents migrated (no-internal-flap: n = 1, internal-flap: n = 5) and no stents were replaced due to stent failure. Stenting with no-internal-flap was associated with recurrence (p = 0.042). Mild adverse events developed in 14.3% (2/14). In conclusions, ERPD was performed safely with high technical success. Recurrence was common after stenting with no-internal-flap. Long-term stenting did not result in stent failure.Clinical trial register and their clinical registration number: Nos. 58-115 and R2-9.