Burnout, grit and resilience among Jordanian orthopedic surgeons: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Burnout is a serious issue that affects physicians more than the general population; however, those with higher levels of grit and resilience have been shown to experience lower levels of burnout. The primary aim was to determine the prevalence of burnout among Jordanian orthopedic surgeons, explore its risk factors, and investigate the relationship between burnout and grit and resilience. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study targeting a total of 180 orthopedic surgeons attending the yearly Jordanian National Orthopedic Conference (JNOC). Non-random sampling (i.e., convenience) was utilized to recruit participants. The abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory, short grit scale, and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale were used. Scores were examined using the Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis H, and Spearman's rho tests, of which results were corrected using the Bonferroni method. RESULTS: Among 135 respondents, 62.2% were specialists and 37.8% were residents. About 52.0% practiced in public hospitals. Approximately 69.0% worked for more than 50 h weekly. The prevalence of burnout among all participants was 45.2% with more frequency among residents (66.7%). Burnout and the participants' grit and resilience showed an inverse relationship (ρ = -0.441 and ρ = -0.312, respectively). Age (ρ = 0.337), number of children (ρ = 0.245), and years of experience (ρ = 0.331) were positively correlated with grit. The median score for grit was higher in physicians who had or are having their residency outside Jordan (p < 0.001). Age (ρ = 0.233) and years of experience (ρ = 0.269) were positively correlated with resilience. CONCLUSION: Jordanian orthopedic surgeons face significant rates of burnout. Institutional efforts should be taken to detect and prevent burnout in addition to enhancing the grit and resilience among orthopedic professionals.

Staples versus sutures wound closure in hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare two methods of wound skin closure-staples versus vertical mattress nylon sutures-in patients undergoing primary total hip (THR) and total knee replacements (TKR). The comparison was for wound complications as a primary outcome, and satisfaction of patient and nurse as secondary outcomes. METHOD: A prospective cohort study was conducted at an academic teaching hospital. All the patients who were admitted for either primary THR or TKR from September 2018 to September 2019 were included. Revision surgeries, patients >85 years of age, and those who were on steroid therapy were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups (staples and sutures) to compare the two methods of wound closure. Patients in each group were assessed for characteristics such as age, sex, weight, height, comorbidities, smoking status, postoperative wound complications, reoperation and patient/nurse satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients met the inclusion criteria. In the staples group (n=50), 26 patients underwent THR while 24 patients underwent TKR. In the sutures group (n=50), 23 patients underwent THR and 27 patients underwent TKR. Overall, there was no significant difference between the two groups (staples versus sutures) in terms of wound complications (p=0.401), patient satisfaction (p=0.357) and nurse satisfaction (p=0.513). Further analysis compared THR and TKR subgroups (THR staples versus THR sutures and TKR staples versus TKR sutures). The results showed no significant difference between the staples and sutures subgroups of THR and TKR in terms of wound complications, patient satisfaction and nurse satisfaction. CONCLUSION: In THR and TKR, there was no significant difference between either vertical mattress nylon sutures or staples primary skin closure in terms of wound complications and patient satisfaction in this study. The decision on wound closure method should be based on the availability of resources in the institution/country.

Fingertip Injuries and Amputations: A Review of the Literature.

The fingertip is defined as the part of the digit distal to the insertion of the extensor and flexor tendons on the distal phalanx. Devastating injuries to the hand occur every year that lead fingertip amputations in thousands of people. The highest incidence rates are usually seen in children less than five years old and in adults over the age of 65. There are various presentations of injury that may end up with post-traumatic fingertip amputation, including lacerations, avulsions, and crush injuries. The fingertip is vital for sensation, as it has a high concentration of sensory receptors, and hence the restoration of sensation is the most important focus of treatment. The three main goals of treatment are the restoration of sensation and durability in the tip and assuring proper bone support to allow for nail growth. Many complications can arise after fingertip amputation, including delayed wound healing, nail deformities with poor aesthetics, hypersensitivity, residual pain, cold intolerance, scar retraction, flexion contractures, chronic ulceration, infection, and flap loss. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of the anatomy of the fingertip, the presentation of fingertip injuries and their management, and complications that might arise after surgery.

Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Case of Successful Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare dermatological disease in which patients suffer from skin fragility and blisters. One of the major complications is the development of skin infections, which may preclude surgical intervention. We present a case of a 49-year-old female with a past medical history of EB, who presented to the emergency department (ED) with right groin pain of one-hour duration after falling on her right side. The patient underwent a successful open reduction and internal fixation for her right hip without complications. Over the course of three months after the procedure, she experienced worsening of the pain accompanied by skin necrosis and total collapse of the femoral head. Subsequent total hip replacement surgery was performed using a cementless (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) prosthesis and fixated via cannulated screws. To decrease the risk of infection, IV cefazolin was given as a prophylactic antibiotic preoperatively. Vancomycin IV and imipenem/cilastatin IV were given for four days postoperatively. We made sure that our patient is experiencing the least possible pain by giving sufficient analgesics after the surgery. We used morphine, paracetamol, and gabapentin for pain control. For 25 days after the surgery, the patient did not complain of any pain. Upon follow-up, sutures were removed, and no surgical wound infection, rashes, or lacerations were noted. We encourage orthopedic surgeons dealing with patients suffering from dermatological conditions with fragile skin such as EB and decreased level of activity that requires total hip arthroplasty to proceed with the surgical intervention after considering adequate infection control to improve quality of life.