Leveraging Off-Target Reads in Panel Sequencing for Homologous Recombination Repair Deficiency Screening in Tumor.

Targeted tumor only sequencing has become a standard practice in cancer diagnostics. This study aims to develop an approach for robust copy number variant calling in tumor samples using only off-target region (OTR) reads. We also established a clinical use case for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score estimation (HRDest) using the sum of telomeric-allelic imbalance and large-scale state transition scores without the need for loss of heterozygosity information. A strong correlation was found between HRD score and the sum of telomeric-allelic imbalance + large-scale state transition in The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort (ρ = 0.99, P < 2.2 × 10-16) and in a clinical in-house cohort of 34 tumors (ρ = 0.9, P = 5.1 × 10-13) comparing whole-exome sequencing and targeted sequencing data. HRDest scores from 1086 clinical cases were compared with The Cancer Genome Atlas data set. There were no significant differences in HRD score distribution within the analyzed tumor types. As a control, commercially available HRD standards were also sequenced, and the HRDest scores obtained from the OTR reads were well within the HRD reference range provided by the manufacturer. In conclusion, OTR reads of tumor-only panel sequencing can be used to determine genome-wide copy number variant profiles and to approximate HRD scores.

High Concordance of Different Assays in the Determination of Homologous Recombination Deficiency-Associated Genomic Instability in Ovarian Cancer.

PURPOSE: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have shown promising clinical results in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Analysis of biomarker subgroups consistently revealed higher benefits for patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). The test that is most often used for the detection of HRD in clinical studies is the Myriad myChoice assay. However, other assays can also be used to assess biomarkers, which are indicative of HRD, genomic instability (GI), and BRCA1/2 mutation status. Many of these assays have high potential to be broadly applied in clinical routine diagnostics in a time-effective decentralized manner. Here, we compare the performance of a multitude of alternative assays in comparison with Myriad myChoice in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). METHODS: DNA from HGSOC samples was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of cases previously run with the Myriad myChoice assay, and GI was measured by multiple molecular assays (CytoSNP, AmoyDx, Illumina TSO500 HRD, OncoScan, NOGGO GISv1, QIAseq HRD Panel and whole genome sequencing), applying different bioinformatics algorithms. RESULTS: Application of different assays to assess GI, including Myriad myChoice, revealed high concordance of the generated scores ranging from very substantial to nearly perfect fit, depending on the assay and bioinformatics pipelines applied. Interlaboratory comparison of assays also showed high concordance of GI scores. CONCLUSION: Assays for GI assessment not only show a high concordance with each other but also in correlation with Myriad myChoice. Thus, almost all of the assays included here can be used effectively to assess HRD-associated GI in the clinical setting. This is important as PARPi treatment on the basis of these tests is compliant with European Medicines Agency approvals, which are methodologically not test-bound.

The pregnancy-associated protein glycodelin as a potential sex-specific target for resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer has been shown to be targetable by novel immunotherapies which reactivate the immune system and enable tumor cell killing. However, treatment failure and resistance to these therapies is common. Consideration of sex as a factor influencing therapy resistance is still rare. We hypothesize that the success of the treatment is impaired by the presence of the immunosuppressive pregnancy-associated glycoprotein glycodelin that is expressed in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We demonstrate that the glycan pattern of NSCLC-derived glycodelin detected by a lectin-based enrichment assay highly resembles amniotic fluid-derived glycodelin A, which is known to have immunosuppressive properties. NSCLC-derived glycodelin interacts with immune cells in vitro and regulates the expression of genes associated with inflammatory and tumor microenvironment pathways. In tumor microarray samples of patients, high glycodelin staining in tumor areas results in an impaired overall survival of female patients. Moreover, glycodelin colocalizes to tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells and pro-tumorigenic M2 macrophages. High serum concentrations of glycodelin prior to immunotherapy are associated with a poor progression-free survival (p < 0.001) of female patients receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors. In summary, our findings suggest that glycodelin not only is a promising immunological biomarker for early identification of female patients that do not benefit from the costly immunotherapy, but also represents a promising immunotherapeutic target in NSCLC to improve therapeutic options in lung cancer.

First-line immunotherapy for lung cancer with MET exon 14 skipping and the relevance of TP53 mutations.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET exon 14 skipping (METΔ14ex) remains controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 110 consecutive METΔ14ex NSCLC patients receiving first-line chemotherapy (CHT) and/or immunotherapy (IO) in 10 German centers between 2016-2022 were analyzed. RESULTS: Combined CHT-IO was given to 35/110 (32%) patients, IO alone to 43/110 (39%), and CHT to 32/110 (29%) upfront. Compared to CHT, CHT-IO showed longer progression-free survival (median PFS 6 vs. 2.5 months, p = 0.004), more objective responses (ORR 49% vs. 28%, p = 0.086) and numerically longer overall survival (OS 16 vs. 10 months, p = 0.240). For IO monotherapy, OS (14 vs. 16 months) and duration of response (26 vs. 22 months) were comparable to those of CHT-IO. Primary progressive disease (PD) was more frequent with IO compared to CHT-IO (13/43 vs. 3/35, p = 0.018), particularly for never-smokers (p = 0.041). Higher PD-L1 TPS were not associated with better IO outcomes, but TP53 mutated tumors showed numerically improved ORR (56% vs. 32%, p = 0.088) and PFS (6 vs. 3 months, p = 0.160), as well as longer OS in multivariable analysis (HR=0.54, p = 0.034) compared to their wild-type counterparts. Any second-line treatment was administered to 35/75 (47%) patients, with longer survival for capmatinib or tepotinib compared to crizotinib (PFS 10 vs. 3 months, p = 0.013; OS 16 vs. 13 months, p = 0.270). CONCLUSION: CHT-IO is superior to CHT, and IO alone also effective for METΔ14ex NSCLC, especially in the presence of TP53 mutations and independent of PD-L1 expression, but never-smokers are at higher risk of primary PD.

Genomic heterogeneity at baseline is associated with T790M resistance mutations in EGFR-mutated lung cancer treated with the first-/second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

This study analyzed whether extended molecular profiling can predict the development of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene T790M mutation, which is the most frequent resistance alteration in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after treatment with the first-/second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR inhibitors (tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs]), but only weakly associated with clinical characteristics. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on pretreatment tumor tissue with matched normal samples from NSCLC patients with (n = 25, detected in tissue or blood rebiopsies) or without (n = 14, negative tissue rebiopsies only) subsequent EGFR p.T790M mutation after treatment with 1G/2G EGFR TKI. Several complex genetic biomarkers were assessed using bioinformatic methods. After treatment with first-line afatinib (44%) or erlotinib/gefitinib (56%), median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.1 and 33.7 months, respectively. Clinical and tumor genetic characteristics, including age (median, 66 years), sex (74% female), smoking (69% never/light smokers), EGFR mutation type (72% exon 19 deletions), and TP53 mutations (41%) were not significantly associated with T790M mutation (p > 0.05). By contrast, complex biomarkers including tumor mutational burden, the clock-like mutation signature SBS1 + 5, tumor ploidy, and markers of subclonality including mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity, subclonal copy number changes, and median tumor-adjusted variant allele frequency were significantly higher at baseline in tumors with subsequent T790M mutation (all p < 0.05). Each marker alone could predict subsequent development of T790M with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72-0.77, but the small number of cases did not allow confirmation of better performance for biomarker combinations in leave-one-out cross-validated logistic regression (AUC 0.69, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.87). Extended molecular profiling with WES at initial diagnosis reveals several complex biomarkers associated with subsequent development of T790M resistance mutation in NSCLC patients receiving first-/second-generation TKIs as the first-line therapy. Larger prospective studies will be necessary to define a forecasting model.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of osimertinib in non-small cell lung cancer and short bowel syndrome: A case report.

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) following extensive intestinal resection is often characterized by impaired absorption of orally administered drugs, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). We report the case of a patient with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with 80 mg/day of the TKI osimertinib who achieved partial response of the tumour, but was subsequently subjected to a double-barrelled jejunostomy due to ileus. Due to the development of SBS after the bypass surgery, plasma concentrations of osimertinib were monitored using mass spectrometry. The therapeutic drug monitoring confirmed a malabsorption of osimertinib in the patient (108 ng/mL, which is below the 5th percentile of the expected plasma concentration) and was useful to guide adjustments of TKI dosing in order to achieve adequate blood levels (161 ng/mL after increase of the dose to 120 mg/day) in order to maintain tumour control.

Current challenges and practical aspects of molecular pathology for non-small cell lung cancers.

The continuing evolution of treatment options in thoracic oncology requires the pathologist to regularly update diagnostic algorithms for management of tumor samples. It is essential to decide on the best way to use tissue biopsies, cytological samples, as well as liquid biopsies to identify the different mandatory predictive biomarkers of lung cancers in a short turnaround time. However, biological resources and laboratory member workforce are limited and may be not sufficient for the increased complexity of molecular pathological analyses and for complementary translational research development. In this context, the surgical pathologist is the only one who makes the decisions whether or not to send specimens to immunohistochemical and molecular pathology platforms. Moreover, the pathologist can rapidly contact the oncologist to obtain a new tissue biopsy and/or a liquid biopsy if he/she considers that the biological material is not sufficient in quantity or quality for assessment of predictive biomarkers. Inadequate control of algorithms and sampling workflow may lead to false negative, inconclusive, and incomplete findings, resulting in inappropriate choice of therapeutic strategy and potentially poor outcome for patients. International guidelines for lung cancer treatment are based on the results of the expression of different proteins and on genomic alterations. These guidelines have been established taking into consideration the best practices to be set up in clinical and molecular pathology laboratories. This review addresses the current predictive biomarkers and algorithms for use in thoracic oncology molecular pathology as well as the central role of the pathologist, notably in the molecular tumor board and her/his participation in the treatment decision-making. The perspectives in this setting will be discussed.

Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR): practical implementation of annex I in pathology.

BACKGROUND: Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR) imposes several conditions on pathology departments that develop and use in-house in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IH-IVDs). However, not all of these conditions need to be implemented immediately after the IVDR entered into force on 26 May 2022. Based on an amending regulation of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, the requirements for IH-IVDs will be phased in. Conformity with the essential safety and performance requirements of annex I must be ensured from May 2022. OBJECTIVES: With this article, we would like to present the practical implementation of the currently valid conditions for IH-IVDs at the Institute of Pathology at the University Hospital of Heidelberg, in order to provide possible assistance to other institutions. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the intensive work on the requirements for IH-IVDs, several guidance documents and handouts provide orientation for the implementation and harmonisation of the requirements for healthcare institutions mentioned in Article 5 (5). Exchange in academic network structures is also of great importance for the interpretation and practical implementation of the IVDR. For university and nonuniversity institutions, ensuring conformity with the IVDR represents a further challenge in terms of personnel and time, in addition to the essential tasks of patient care, teaching and research and the further development of methods for optimal and targeted diagnostics, as well as the maintenance of the constantly evolving quality management system.

[Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR): practical implementation of annex I in pathology]. / Die Verordnung (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) in der Praxis: Umsetzung von Anhang I in der Pathologie.

BACKGROUND: Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR) imposes several conditions on pathology institutes that develop and use in-house in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IH-IVDs). However, not all of these conditions need to be implemented immediately after the IVDR entered into force on 26 May 2022. Based on an amending regulation of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, the requirements for IH-IVDs will be phased in. Conformity with the essential safety and performance requirements of annex I must be ensured from May 2022. OBJECTIVES: With this article, we would like to present the practical implementation of the currently valid conditions for IH-IVDs at the Institute of Pathology at the University Hospital of Heidelberg, in order to provide possible assistance to other institutions. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the intensive work on the requirements for IH-IVDs, several guidance documents and handouts provide orientation for the implementation and harmonisation of the requirements for healthcare institutions mentioned in Article 5 (5). Exchange in academic network structures is also of great importance for the interpretation and practical implementation of the IVDR. For university and nonuniversity institutions, ensuring conformity with the IVDR represents a further challenge in terms of personnel and time, in addition to the essential tasks of patient care, teaching and research and the further development of methods for optimal and targeted diagnostics, as well as the maintenance of the constantly evolving quality management system.

Nivolumab and ipilimumab in recurrent or refractory cancer of unknown primary: a phase II trial.

Cancer of unknown primary has a dismal prognosis, especially following failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. 10-20% of patients have a high tumor mutational burden (TMB), which predicts response to immunotherapy in many cancer types. In this prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter Phase II trial (EudraCT 2018-004562-33; NCT04131621), patients relapsed or refractory after platinum-based chemotherapy received nivolumab and ipilimumab following TMBhigh vs. TMBlow stratification. Progression-free survival (PFS) represented the primary endpoint; overall survival (OS), response rates, duration of clinical benefit and safety were the secondary endpoints. The trial was prematurely terminated in March 2021 before reaching the preplanned sample size (n = 194). Among 31 evaluable patients, 16% had a high TMB ( > 12 mutations/Mb). Overall response rate was 16% (95% CI 6-34%), with 7.7% (95% CI 1-25%) vs. 60% (95% CI 15-95%) in TMBlow and TMBhigh, respectively. Although the primary endpoint was not met, high TMB was associated with better median PFS (18.3 vs. 2.4 months) and OS (18.3 vs. 3.6 months). Severe immune-related adverse events were reported in 29% of cases. Assessing on-treatment dynamics of circulating tumor DNA using combined targeted hotspot mutation and shallow whole genome sequencing as part of a predefined exploratory analysis identified patients benefiting from immunotherapy irrespective of initial radiologic response.

Multicentric pilot study to standardize clinical whole exome sequencing (WES) for cancer patients.

A growing number of druggable targets and national initiatives for precision oncology necessitate broad genomic profiling for many cancer patients. Whole exome sequencing (WES) offers unbiased analysis of the entire coding sequence, segmentation-based detection of copy number alterations (CNAs), and accurate determination of complex biomarkers including tumor mutational burden (TMB), homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), and microsatellite instability (MSI). To assess the inter-institution variability of clinical WES, we performed a comparative pilot study between German Centers of Personalized Medicine (ZPMs) from five participating institutions. Tumor and matched normal DNA from 30 patients were analyzed using custom sequencing protocols and bioinformatic pipelines. Calling of somatic variants was highly concordant with a positive percentage agreement (PPA) between 91 and 95% and a positive predictive value (PPV) between 82 and 95% compared with a three-institution consensus and full agreement for 16 of 17 druggable targets. Explanations for deviations included low VAF or coverage, differing annotations, and different filter protocols. CNAs showed overall agreement in 76% for the genomic sequence with high wet-lab variability. Complex biomarkers correlated strongly between institutions (HRD: 0.79-1, TMB: 0.97-0.99) and all institutions agreed on microsatellite instability. This study will contribute to the development of quality control frameworks for comprehensive genomic profiling and sheds light onto parameters that require stringent standardization.

[Molecular tumor diagnostics as the driving force behind precision oncology]. / Molekulare Tumordiagnostik als Triebfeder der Präzisionsonkologie.

Molecular pathological diagnostics plays a central role in personalized oncology and requires multidisciplinary teamwork. It is just as relevant for the individual patient who is being treated with an approved therapy method or an individual treatment attempt as it is for prospective clinical studies that require the identification of specific therapeutic target structures or complex biomarkers for study inclusion. It is also of crucial importance for the generation of real-world data, which is becoming increasingly important for drug development. Future developments will be significantly shaped by improvements in scalable molecular diagnostics, in which increasingly complex and multi-layered data sets must be quickly converted into clinically useful information. One focus will be on the development of adaptive diagnostic strategies in order to be able to depict the enormous plasticity of a cancer disease over time.

Analysis of rare fusions in NSCLC: Genomic architecture and clinical implications.

OBJECTIVES: Molecular diagnosis for targeted therapies has been improved significantly in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in recent years. Here we report on the prevalence of rare fusions in NSCLC and dissect their genomic architecture and potential clinical implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, n = 5554 NSCLC patients underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) for combined detection of oncogenic mutations and fusions either at primary diagnosis (n = 5246) or after therapy resistance (n = 308). Panels of different sizes were employed with closed amplicon-based, or open assays, i.e. anchored multiplex PCR (AMP) and hybrid capture-based, for detection of translocations, including "rare" fusions, defined as those beyond ALK, ROS1, RET and <0.5 % frequency in NSCLC. RESULTS: Rare fusions involving EGFR, MET, HER2, BRAF and other potentially actionable oncogenes were detected in 0.5% (n = 26) of therapy-naive and 2% (n = 6) TKI-treated tumors. Detection was increased using open assays and/or larger panels, especially those covering >25 genes, by approximately 1-2% (p = 0.001 for both). Patient characteristics (age, gender, smoking, TP53 co-mutations (56%), or mean tumor mutational burden (TMB) (4.8 mut/Mb)) showed no association with presence of rare fusions. Non-functional alterations, i.e. out-of-frame or lacking kinase domains, comprised one-third of detected rare fusions and were significantly associated with simultaneous presence of classical oncogenic drivers, e.g. EGFR or KRAS mutations (p < 0.001), or use of larger panels (frequency of non-functional among the detected rare fusions 57% for 25+ gene- vs. 12% for smaller panels, p < 0.001). As many rare fusions were identified before availability of targeted therapy, mean survival for therapy-naïve patients was 23.8 months, comparable with wild-type tumors. CONCLUSION: Approximately 1-2% of advanced NSCLC harbor rare fusions, which are potentially actionable and may support diagnosis. Routine adoption of broad NGS assays capable to identify exact fusion points and potentially retained protein domains can increase the yield of therapeutically relevant molecular information in advanced NSCLC.

Is iron deficiency caused by BMPR2 mutations or dysfunction in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients?

Iron deficiency is common in idiopathic and heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension patients (I/HPAH). A previous report suggested a dysregulation of the iron hormone hepcidin, which is controlled by BMP/SMAD signaling involving the bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2 (BMPR-II). Pathogenic variants in the BMPR2 gene are the most common cause of HPAH. Their effect on patients' hepcidin levels has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to assess whether iron metabolism and regulation of the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin was disturbed in I/HPAH patients with and without a pathogenic variant in the gene BMPR2 compared to healthy controls. In this explorative, cross-sectional study hepcidin serum levels were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We measured iron status, inflammatory parameters and hepcidin modifying proteins such as IL6, erythropoietin, and BMP2, BMP6 in addition to BMPR-II protein and mRNA levels. Clinical routine parameters were correlated with hepcidin levels. In total 109 I/HPAH patients and controls, separated into three groups, 23 BMPR2 variant-carriers, 56 BMPR2 noncarriers and 30 healthy controls were enrolled. Of these, 84% had iron deficiency requiring iron supplementation. Hepcidin levels were not different between groups and corresponded to the degree of iron deficiency. The levels of IL6, erythropoietin, BMP2, or BMP6 showed no correlation with hepcidin expression. Hence, iron homeostasis and hepcidin regulation was largely independent from these parameters. I/HPAH patients had a physiologically normal iron regulation and no false elevation of hepcidin levels. Iron deficiency was prevalent albeit independent of pathogenic variants in the BMPR2 gene.

Accurate tumor purity determination is critical for the analysis of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD).

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a predictive marker for response to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in ovarian carcinoma. HRD scores have entered routine diagnostics, but the influence of algorithms, parameters and confounders has not been analyzed comprehensively. A series of 100 poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma samples was analyzed using whole exome sequencing (WES) and genotyping. Tumor purity was determined using conventional pathology, digital pathology, and two bioinformatic methods. HRD scores were calculated from copy number profiles determined by Sequenza and by Sclust either with or without fixed tumor purity. Tumor purity determination by digital pathology combined with a tumory purity informed variant of Sequenza served as reference method for HRD scoring. Seven tumors had deleterious mutations in BRCA1/2, 12 tumors had deleterious mutations in other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, 18 tumors had variants of unknown significance (VUS) in BRCA1/2 or other HRR genes, while the remaining 63 tumors had no relevant alterations. Using the reference method for HRD scoring, 68 tumors were HRD-positive. HRDsum determined by WES correlated strongly with HRDsum determined by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays (R = 0.85). Conventional pathology systematically overestimated tumor purity by 8% compared to digital pathology. All investigated methods agreed on classifying the deleterious BRCA1/2-mutated tumors as HRD-positive, but discrepancies were observed for some of the remaining tumors. Discordant HRD classification of 11% of the tumors was observed comparing the tumor purity uninformed default of Sequenza and the reference method. In conclusion, tumor purity is a critical factor for the determination of HRD scores. Assistance by digital pathology helps to improve accuracy and imprecision of its estimation.

Spatial profiling of the microenvironment reveals low intratumoral heterogeneity and STK11-associated immune evasion in therapy-naïve lung adenocarcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: Intratumoral heterogeneity was found to be a significant factor causing resistance to lung cancer therapies, including immune checkpoint blockade. Lesser is known about spatial heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its association with genetic properties of the tumor, which is of particular interest in the therapy-naïve setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed multi-region sampling (2-4 samples per tumor; total of 55 samples) from a cohort of 19 untreated stage IA-IIIB lung adenocarcinomas (n = 11 KRAS mutant, n = 1 ERBB2 mutant, n = 7 KRAS wildtype). For each sample the expression of 770 immunooncology-related genes was analyzed using the nCounter platform, while the mutational status was determined by hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) using a large panel covering more than 500 genes. RESULTS: Global unsupervised analyses revealed clustering of the samples into two groups corresponding to a 'hot' or 'cold' immunologic tumor contexture based on the abundance of immune cell infiltrates. All analyzed specific immune cell signatures (ICsig) showed a significantly higher intertumoral than intratumoral heterogeneity (p < 0.02), as most of the analyzed cases (14/19) showed a very homogenous spatial immune cell profile. PD-L1 exhibited a significantly higher intertumoral than intratumoral heterogeneity (p = 1.03e-13). We found a specific association with 'cold' TME for STK11 (11/14, p < 0.07), but not KRAS, TP53, LRP1B, MTOR, U2AF1 co-mutations, and validated this finding using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data. CONCLUSION: Early-stage lung adenocarcinomas show considerable intertumoral, but limited intratumoral heterogeneity, which is clinically highly relevant as assessment before neoadjuvant treatment is based on small biopsies. STK11 mutations are specifically associated with a 'cold' TME, which could affect the efficacy of perioperative immunotherapy.

Homogenous TP53mut-associated tumor biology across mutation and cancer types revealed by transcriptome analysis.

TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancer. While no TP53-targeting drugs have been approved in the USA or Europe so far, preclinical and clinical studies are underway to investigate targeting of specific or all TP53 mutations, for example, by restoration of the functionality of mutated TP53 (TP53mut) or protecting wildtype TP53 (TP53wt) from negative regulation. We performed a comprehensive mRNA expression analysis in 24 cancer types of TCGA to extract (i) a consensus expression signature shared across TP53 mutation types and cancer types, (ii) differential gene expression patterns between tumors harboring different TP53 mutation types such as loss of function, gain of function or dominant-negative mutations, and (iii) cancer-type-specific patterns of gene expression and immune infiltration. Analysis of mutational hotspots revealed both similarities across cancer types and cancer type-specific hotspots. Underlying ubiquitous and cancer type-specific mutational processes with the associated mutational signatures contributed to explaining this observation. Virtually no genes were differentially expressed between tumors harboring different TP53 mutation types, while hundreds of genes were over- and underexpressed in TP53mut compared to TP53wt tumors. A consensus list included 178 genes that were overexpressed and 32 genes that were underexpressed in the TP53mut tumors of at least 16 of the investigated 24 cancer types. In an association analysis of immune infiltration with TP53 mutations in 32 cancer subtypes, decreased immune infiltration was observed in six subtypes, increased infiltration in two subtypes, a mixed pattern of decreased and increased immune cell populations in four subtypes, while immune infiltration was not associated with TP53 status in 20 subtypes. The analysis of a large cohort of human tumors complements results from experimental studies and supports the view that TP53 mutations should be further evaluated as predictive markers for immunotherapy and targeted therapies.