Use of Occult Blood Detection Cards for Real-Time PCR-Based Diagnosis of Schistosoma Mansoni Infection.

BACKGROUND: In Schistosoma mansoni infection, diagnosis and control after treatment mainly rely on parasitological stool investigations which are laborious and have limited sensitivity. PCR methods have shown equal or superior sensitivity but preservation and storage methods limit their use in the field. Therefore, the use of occult blood detection cards (fecal cards) for easy sampling and storage of fecal samples for further PCR testing was evaluated in a pilot study. METHODOLOGY: Stool specimens were collected in a highly endemic area for S. mansoni in Ethiopia and submitted in an investigator-blinded fashion to microscopic examination by Kato-Katz thick smear as well as to real-time PCR using either fresh frozen stool samples or stool smears on fecal cards which have been stored at ambient temperature for up to ten months. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Out of 55 stool samples, 35 were positive by microscopy, 33 and 32 were positive by PCR of frozen samples and of fecal card samples, respectively. When microscopy was used as diagnostic "gold standard", the sensitivity of PCR on fresh stool was 94.3% (95%-CI: 86.6; 100) and on fecal cards 91.4% (95%-CI: 82.2; 100). CONCLUSIONS: The use of fecal cards proved to be a simple and useful method for stool collection and prolonged storage prior to PCR based diagnosis of S. mansoni infection. This technique may be a valuable approach for large scale surveillance and post treatment assessments.

Long-term serologic follow-up of blood donors with biologic false reactivity on an anti-human T-cell lymphotropic virus Types I and II chemiluminescent immunoassay and implications for donor management.

BACKGROUND: This study reports the results of the long-term serologic follow-up of blood donors who gave an index biologic false-reactive (BFR) result on an anti-human T-lymphotropic virus Types I and II (HTLV-I and -II) chemiluminescent immunoassay (ChLIA). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All allogeneic whole-blood and apheresis donors who gave an index BFR result on a HTLV-I and -II ChLIA between May 10, 1997, and December 31, 2004, were included in the study. Donors were followed up for an additional 2 years until December 31, 2006. RESULTS: A total of 332 donors gave an index BFR donation during the study period. Donors were divided into five groups based on results of donations subsequent to the index BFR donation: 89 (26.8%) donors gave only nonreactive donations subsequent to the index BFR result, 56 (16.9%) donors gave only BFR donations, 43 (13.0%) gave one or more subsequent BFR donations before giving only nonreactive donations, 59 (17.8%) donors gave intermittent BFR and nonreactive donations, and 85 (25.6%) donors gave no further donations during the study period. The estimated mean duration of biologic false reactivity from the time of the index BFR donation in donors who gave only a single BFR result was 7.0 (1.4-42.75) months and 23.3 (4.1-92.25) months in those donors who gave several BFR results before giving nonreactive donations. Modeling of the data indicated that notification and deferral of donors after two consecutive BFR donations would result in the deferral of 143 of 332 (43.1%) of donors with an index BFR result while allowing donors to give three BFR results would reduce the number of deferred donors to 74 of 332 (22.3%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that although biologic false reactivity is usually transient, the time for resolution is variable. Allowing donors to give two or three BFR results before notification and deferral is one strategy that would substantially reduce the number of donors requiring deferral.

Anti-HCV confirmatory testing of voluntary blood donors: comparison of the sensitivity of two immunoblot assays.

BACKGROUND: In this study, the sensitivity of two commercially available anti-HCV immunoblot assays (HCV Western blot (Wellcozyme] and RIBA 3.0 SIA [RIBA-3, Chiron]) was compared in a voluntary blood donor population. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Four groups of donor samples were retrospectively tested in this study. Groups 1 and 2 were donor samples that gave positive or indeterminate band patterns, respectively, when originally tested on the HCV Western blot between 1994 and 1998. These samples were tested on the RIBA 3.0. Donor samples in Groups 3 and 4 were originally tested on RIBA-3 during 1998 and 1999 and gave positive or indeterminate blot results, respectively. In this study these two groups were tested on the HCV Western blot. Samples with discrepant results on the two immunoblot assays were selected for genotyping or serotyping. RESULTS: The two immunoblots showed similar sensitivity to the core and NS5 proteins. However, of 35 samples positive on Western blot or RIBA-3, the Western blot failed to detect NS4 in 14 samples compared with only 5 for RIBA-3. As well, the Western blot failed to detect NS3 in 6 samples compared to 2 for RIBA-3. Five (27.8%) of 18 samples that were Western blot indeterminate due to core reactivity showed an additional NS3 band on RIBA-3. Of the samples with additional NS3 and/or NS4 reactivity on RIBA-3 that were genotyped or serotyped, all were HCV type 3. CONCLUSIONS: Western blot and RIBA-3 showed similar sensitivity to the HCV core and NS5 proteins. However, RIBA-3 showed greater sensitivity to both NS3 and NS4 compared to the Western blot. The reduced sensitivity of the Western blot to the NS3 and NS4 proteins was observed with HCV type 3 samples.