Contemporary outcomes for branch renal artery repair.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to provide an updated description of demographics, technical details, and clinical outcomes of 101 consecutive branch renal artery repairs in 98 patients using cold perfusion. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective analysis branch renal artery reconstructions was performed between 1987 and 2019. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly Caucasian (80.6%) women (74.5%) with a mean age of 46.8 ± 15.3 years. The mean preoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 170.4 ± 33.0 mm Hg and 99.2 ± 19.9 mm Hg, respectively, requiring a mean of 1.6 ± 1.1 antihypertensive medications. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was 84.0 ± 25.3 mL/min. Most patients (90.2%) were not diabetic and never smokers (68%). Treated pathology included aneurysm (87.4%) and stenosis (23.3%) with histology demonstrating fibromuscular dysplasia (44.4%), dissection (5.1%), and degenerative not otherwise specified (50.5%). The right renal arteries were most frequently treated (44.2%), with a mean of 3.1 ± 1.5 branches involved. Reconstruction was accomplished using bypass in 90.3% of cases using aortic inflow in 92.7% and a saphenous vein conduit in 92%. Branch vessels served as outflow in 96.9% and syndactylization of branches was used to decrease the number of distal anastomoses in 45.3% of repairs. The mean number of distal anastomoses was 1.5 ± 0.9. Postoperatively, the mean systolic blood pressure improved to 137.9 ± 20.8 mm Hg (mean decrease of 30.5 ± 32.8 mm Hg; P < .0001) and the mean diastolic blood pressure improved to 78.4 ± 12.7 mm Hg (mean decrease of 20.1 ± 20.7 mm Hg; P < .0001) with patients requiring a mean of 1.4 ± 1.0 antihypertensive medications (mean decrease of 0.2 ±1.0 medications; P = .048). The postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was 89.1 mL/min (mean increase of 4.1 mL/min; P = .08). The mean length of stay was 9.0 ± 5.8 days and 96.1% of patients were discharged home. The mortality rate was 1% (one patient with liver failure) and the major morbidity rate was 15%. There were five infectious complications (pneumonia, Clostridium difficile, and wound infection) and five patients required return to the operating room (one for nephrectomy, one for bleeding, two for thrombosis, and one for second trimester pregnancy loss requiring dilation and curettage and splenectomy). One patient required temporary dialysis owing to graft thrombosis. Two patients developed arrhythmias. No patients suffered a myocardial infarction, stroke, or limb loss. After 30 days, follow-up data were available for 82 bypasses. At this time, three reconstructions were no longer patent. Intervention was required to retain patency for five bypasses. After 1 year, patency data were available for 61 bypasses and five were no longer patent. Of the five grafts with loss of patency, two underwent intervention in attempt to maintain patency, which subsequently failed. CONCLUSIONS: Repair of renal artery pathology involving the branches can be performed with short- and long-term technical success and significant prospect of decreasing an elevated blood pressure. The operations required to fully address the presenting pathology are often quite complex involving multiple distal anastomoses and consolidation of small secondary branches. The procedure carries a small but significant risk of major morbidity and mortality.

Focus group study of factors relevant to treatment decisions and experiences among patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend shared decision-making for treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD), which requires understanding of patient perspectives and preferences. We conducted a focus group study of patients with symptomatic PAD to identify factors important and relevant to treatment choices, and to characterize aspects of the health care process that contribute to positive vs negative experiences apart from the specific treatment(s) received. METHODS: Participants were recruited from an academic medical center over 2 years using a purposeful sampling approach based on a clinical diagnosis of symptomatic PAD (either claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia [CLTI]) confirmed by the abnormal ankle or toe brachial index. Focus groups were led by a nonphysician moderator, consisted of 5 to 12 participants, and were conducted separately for patients with CLTI and claudication. Audio recordings converted to verbatim transcripts were used for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients (26 with CLTI and 25 with claudication) were enrolled and participated in focus groups. Major themes identified related to treatment preferences and decisions included specific interventions under consideration, the chance of technical success versus failure, anticipated degree of symptom improvement, outcome durability, and risk. Major themes related to the process of care included decision-making input, provider communication and trust, the timeline from diagnosis to definitive treatment, and compartmentalized care (including different venues of care). CONCLUSIONS: The results provide insights into patient preferences, perspectives, and experiences related to PAD treatment. These observations can be used to inform patient-centered approaches to shared decision-making, communication, and assessment of PAD treatment outcomes.

Longitudinal evaluation of neurobehavioral outcomes after carotid revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Carotid revascularization, including carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS), is performed for stroke risk reduction but may also impact cognitive function. Cognitive outcomes observed after carotid revascularization have been inconsistent, and mechanistic relationships with procedural factors are poorly understood. To further explore associations between carotid revascularization and cognitive outcomes, a prospective longitudinal evaluation was conducted of patients undergoing elective CEA or CAS for hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary carotid artery revascularization for hemodynamically significant stenosis were evaluated with neurologic and neuropsychological testing at baseline and at 1 and 6 months after revascularization. A subgroup of patients was also studied with baseline and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Outcomes included neurologic or neuropsychological deficits and imaging findings (including quantitative assessment of cerebral blood flow). RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent carotid revascularization with both preoperative and postoperative neurologic and neuropsychological testing; preoperative and postoperative MRIs were also performed on eight patients. Five of 16 treated carotid lesions (31%) were considered symptomatic, and severity of carotid stenosis was 60-79% for 6 of 16 lesions and 80% or more in all others. A single perioperative neurologic deficit was identified; all other patients (15/16) had no abnormalities detected by neurologic examination. Neuropsychological testing identified new postoperative deficits in 3 patients (19%), among whom 2 had a normal neurologic examination at all time points, whereas 1 had clinical evidence of stroke. Quantitative analysis of mean cerebral blood flow revealed postrevascularization increases for both gray matter (48.6 ± 13.9 mL per 100 g/min vs 75.3 ± 70.8 mL per 100 g/min) and white matter (31.8 ± 10.6 mL per 100 g/min vs 55.2 ± 30.1 mL per 100 g/min)(P = 0.04). New postoperative MRI foci of restricted diffusion were identified in 2 patients, both of whom had no neurologic or neuropsychological deficit. Among patients with postoperative neuropsychological deficits, MRI revealed globally increased cerebral perfusion without new postoperative abnormalities in 2 of 3. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between carotid revascularization and cognitive function is complex, and cognitive deficits may occur in the presence of increased cerebral perfusion without detectable embolization.