Diagnostic and functional outcomes of adjustment disorder in U.S. active duty service members.

BACKGROUND: Adjustment disorder (AD) is a commonly diagnosed psychiatric disorder. However, little is known about its course, predictors of its diagnostic outcomes, or its association with functional impairment. Our primary aim was to examine diagnostic transitions of service members with an incident AD diagnosis (IADx) to one of three states: 1) another psychiatric diagnosis, 2) chronic AD, or 3) no psychiatric diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included predictors of diagnostic course and functional outcomes associated with follow-up diagnoses. METHODS: Health records of a random sample of 10,720 service members with an IADx were analyzed using multinomial logit regression and hazard rate model with competing risks. RESULTS: IADx transitions were 24.3 % to another psychiatric diagnosis, 8.9 % with chronic AD, and 43.7 % without a diagnosis. Nearly a quarter (23.1 %) separated from service. Deployment was the strongest predictor of transitioning to another diagnosis. Those who transitioned to another diagnosis separated at an increased rate and with more adverse outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Diagnostic findings are based on data in the electronic health record, and we could not specifically identify the stressor that precipitated an AD diagnosis. These findings describe the course of AD in military personnel and may not generalize to civilians. CONCLUSIONS: AD, as initially diagnosed, represents a heterogeneous disorder with an enduring impact across the military career for a considerable proportion of service members. As an early indicator of more severe psychiatric outcomes, an IADx may signal an opportunity for early intervention and screening, particularly in service members with a history of deployment.

Outcomes and prognosis of adjustment disorder in adults: A systematic review.

Adjustment disorder (AD) is one of the most commonly diagnosed mental health disorders and is generally conceptualized to be mild and short-lived. Despite the frequent use of AD in clinical settings, little is known about the prognosis of this condition. Our goal was to systematically review research on a range of AD outcomes in order to provide a broad characterization of AD prognosis. We conducted searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. We included 31 cohort or randomized controlled trials with a total of 1,385,358 participants. Many patients maintained an AD diagnosis or were diagnosed with another mental health disorder months to years after initial diagnosis. Patients with AD tended to show symptom improvement at higher rates and to utilize less treatment than did patients with other disorders. AD-diagnosed groups experienced subsequent development of numerous physical conditions, such as infection, cancers, Parkinson's disease, and cardiovascular events, at higher rates than did control groups. Results were mixed regarding suicidality and occupational impairment. We rated most studies as having a moderate risk of bias. Based on limited findings, AD appears to progress as a milder disorder than do other disorders, but it not uncommonly transitions to more severe mental health states and may predict the development of future health issues, both mental and physical. Future prospective research that conforms to prognosis study guidelines is needed to better understand the course of this common disorder.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of adjustment disorders in adults.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of adjustment disorder is common in clinical practice, yet there is lack of research on the etiology and epidemiology of adjustment disorders. The goal of this systematic review was to evaluate predictors of adjustment disorders in adults. METHODS: We conducted systematic searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. We included 70 studies that examined thirteen theoretically-derived and predefined predictors of adjustment disorders with a total of 3,449,374 participants. RESULTS: We found that female gender, younger age, unemployed status, stress, physical illness and injury, low social support, and a history of mental health disorders predicted adjustment disorders. Most of these predictors differentiated individuals with adjustment disorders from individuals with no mental health disorders. Participants with adjustment disorders were more likely to have experienced accidents than were those with posttraumatic stress disorder but were less likely to have experienced assaults and abuse, neglect, and maltreatment. More research is needed to identify factors that differentiate adjustment disorders from other mental health disorders. LIMITATIONS: Because very few studies adjusted for confounders (e.g., demographic variables, mental health histories, and a variety of stressors), it was not possible to identify independent associations between predictors and adjustment disorders. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a number of factors that predicted adjustment disorders compared to no mental health diagnosis. The majority of studies were rated as moderate or high in risk of bias, suggesting that more rigorous research is needed to confirm the relationships we detected.

Adjustment disorders: A research gaps analysis.

Adjustment disorders are among the most commonly diagnosed mental health disorders in both civilian and military clinical settings. Despite their high prevalence, adjustment disorders have received little research attention. The many gaps in our understanding of this group of disorders hinder the development of adequate, evidence-based treatment protocols. This study utilizes a systematic methodology to identify and prioritize research gaps in adjustment disorders. We used authoritative source reports to identify gaps in research domains from foundational science to services research. Subject-matter experts conducted literature searches to substantiate and refine research gaps, and stakeholders assessed the importance and impact of this work for researchers and policy-makers. We identified 254 possible research-needs statements, which were ultimately reduced to 11 final, prioritized research gaps. Two gaps addressed prevention and screening and three addressed treatment and services research. Six gaps addressed foundational science, epidemiology, and etiology research domains, highlighting the need for basic research. Until some of the basic science questions are resolved (e.g., diagnostic clarity, valid screening, and assessment measures) about adjustment disorders, we may not be able to develop adequate evidence-based interventions for the disorders, and it will be difficult to understand the trajectory of these disorders throughout treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Women in combat: The effects of combat exposure and gender on the incidence and persistence of posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis.

Recent expansions in the roles of women in combat have prompted increased interest in the psychological toll combat exposure may have on female service members as compared to males. This study examined the interactive effects of gender and combat exposure on transitions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnostic status (presence or absence of PTSD diagnosis). We used administrative data of 20,000 U.S. Army soldiers whose combat exposure was assessed after return from deployment between January 1, 2008 and June 30, 2014; soldiers' PTSD diagnostic status was determined using International Classification of Diseases-9 diagnoses at four time points separated by 12 months. We used a mixed-effects logit transition model to examine the effects of combat and gender on incidence, persistence, and prevalence of PTSD diagnosis. Incidence and prevalence of PTSD diagnosis were higher among women, but persistence of PTSD diagnosis was higher in men. Higher rates of new PTSD diagnosis among women were not dependent on combat exposure, suggesting that other types of trauma may be responsible for increased rates among women. Gender differences in prevalence and persistence of PTSD diagnosis were greater among combat-exposed soldiers than among those not exposed to combat. Men maintained a PTSD diagnosis over longer periods of time than women suggesting greater PTSD persistence, and this pattern was particularly pronounced among soldiers exposed to combat. These results have implications for the recent policy changes and gender-based prevention strategies, and suggest that women in combat roles may be no more vulnerable to PTSD than are their male counterparts. Though the gender differences were small, they are indicative of healthcare utilization patterns that may be important for prevention and that warrant further exploration.

Typologies of Combat Exposure and Their Effects on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression Symptoms.

The present study identified distinct classes of U.S. military service members based on their combat experiences and examined mental health outcomes and longitudinal growth curves of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression symptoms associated with each class. Participants were 551 active duty service members who screened positive for PTSD and/or depression based on DSM-IV-TR criteria. All participants completed the Combat Experiences Scale at baseline as well as PTSD and depression measures at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. A latent class analysis identified four classes of service members based on their combat experiences: limited exposure, medical exposure, unit exposure, and personal exposure. Service members in the personal exposure class were characterized by a distinct mental health profile: They reported a higher level of PTSD symptoms at baseline and a higher prevalence of traumatic brain injury and PTSD diagnoses during the course of the study. The limited exposure class was more likely to receive diagnoses of depression and adjustment disorders. All classes except the medical exposure class demonstrated a slight decrease in PTSD and depression symptoms over time. However, participants in the limited exposure class had a larger decrease in PTSD and depression symptoms earlier in care but did not demonstrate superior long-term symptom improvements at 12 months compared to the other groups. These results inform PTSD development models and have implications for the screening and clinical management of combat-exposed service members.

Spanish Abstracts by Asociación Chilena de Estrés Traumático (ACET) Tipologías de Exposición a Combate y sus Efectos en el Trastorno de Estrés Postraumático y Síntomas Depresivos. EXPERIENCIAS TRAUMÁTICAS DE COMBATE, TEPT Y DEPRESIÓN El presente estudio identificó clases distintivas de miembros del servicio militar de los EEUU basados en sus experiencias de combate y examinó los resultados en salud mental y las curvas de crecimiento longitudinal del Trastorno de Estrés Postraumático (TEPT) y síntomas depresivos asociados con cada clase. Los participantes fueron 551 miembros en servicio activo que resultaron positivo para TEPT y/o depresión basado en los criterios DSM-IV-R. Todos los participantes completaron la Escala de Experiencias de Combate así como también medidas de TEPT y Depresión, al inicio y a los 3, 6 y 12 meses de seguimiento. Un análisis de grupos latente identificó cuatro clases de miembros del servicio basados en sus experiencias de combate: exposición limitada, exposición médica, exposición de la unidad, y exposición personal. Los miembros del servicio en el grupo de exposición personal se caracterizaron por un perfil distintivo de salud mental: Ellos reportaron, al inicio, niveles más altos de síntomas de TEPT y prevalencias más altas de diagnósticos de lesión traumática cerebral y TEPT durante el curso del estudio. El grupo de exposición limitada tuvo mayor probabilidad de recibir los diagnósticos de depresión y trastorno de adaptación. Todos los grupos, excepto el grupo de exposición médica, demostraron una leve disminución en los síntomas de TEPT y depresión con el tiempo. Sin embargo, los participantes en el grupo de exposición limitada tuvieron una disminución mayor en síntomas de TEPT y depresión al inicio de la atención, pero no demostraron una mejoría mayor de los síntomas a largo plazo a los 12 meses en comparación con los otros grupos. Estos resultados sirven de base para los modelos de desarrollo de TEPT y tienen implicaciones para la detección y manejo clínico de los miembros en servicio expuestos a combate.

Discrepancies in diagnostic records of military service members with self-reported PTSD: Healthcare use and longitudinal symptom outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The study compared healthcare utilization and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom trajectories of active duty service members (ADSM) with self-reported PTSD based on whether they had a PTSD diagnosis in the electronic health record (EHR). METHODS: ADSM meeting study criteria for self-reported PTSD (N = 470) were grouped according to EHR-PTSD diagnostic status. Participants completed PTSD symptom assessments over a 12 month period. We used log binomial regression and linear mixed model to examine predictors of receiving an EHR-PTSD diagnosis and to analyze healthcare utilization and symptom trajectories based on diagnostic status. RESULTS: Thirty percent of ADSM with study-identified PTSD had an EHR-PTSD diagnosis. Combat exposure and PTSD severity predicted EHR-PTSD diagnosis. ADSM without the diagnosis were more likely to have an adjustment disorder diagnosis. Participants with an EHR-PTSD diagnosis utilized more healthcare and reported worse PTSD symptoms over 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest providers are more likely to record PTSD diagnoses for more severe, complex cases. While less severe cases may be less likely to receive a PTSD diagnosis, they may still access and benefit from care. Findings have implications for use of EHRs to describe health patterns and inform practices and policy in the Military Health System.

Identifying research gaps in substance use disorder: A systematic methodology and prioritized list.

Background: This paper presents a new methodology for identifying and prioritizing research gaps, contributing to the nascent literature on systematic ways to identify research gaps. Objectives: The goal of this paper is to report on a gaps analysis of substance use disorder (SUD) research. Based on input from Military Health System stakeholders, we selected the following subtopics as priorities: alcohol use disorder (AUD) and comorbid conditions, prescription opioids, and novel synthetic drugs (NSDs), including synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic cathinones, novel synthetic opioids, and e-cigarette use. Methods: Statements of research needs were extracted from authoritative source reports. A work group of 13 subject matter experts then supplemented, consolidated, and refined the statements. Support for each statement was rated based on predetermined metrics to produce a list of high-priority potential research gaps. Work group members searched both published and ongoing research literature to determine whether these potential gaps were sufficiently addressed in the literature. Finally, to prioritize the gaps, work group members rated them on a set of metrics. Results: The work group reduced 175 statements of research needs to a list of 18 final prioritized gaps: nine for AUD, four for prescription opioids, and five for NSDs. For each topic, we present a prioritized list of gaps. Conclusions: This paper describes a method to identify and prioritize research gaps relevant to military and civilian research and presents the prioritized SUD gaps. Our methodology and findings can inform policy makers, researchers, and funding agencies as they consider investments in future research.

The Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths as an Outcome Measure in Community Mental Health: Factor Analysis and a Validation of the Short Form.

The goal of the study was to create a short-form measure based on the child and adolescent needs and strengths assessment tool. The measure was designed to be short and easy to use, relevant to youth treated in community-based mental health settings, useful for both treatment planning and program evaluation, and psychometrically valid. Factor analyses of the chosen items revealed two mental health factors and four functioning factors. The mental health factors included internalization and externalization, and the functioning factors included family, social, caregiver, and educational functioning. In support of validity, internalization and externalization subscales distinguished between clients diagnosed with internalizing and externalizing disorders and correlated with caregiver and self-report scores on the Youth Outcome Questionnaire.