[Efferent pupillary defects : Anisocoria and impaired light reaction]. / Efferente Pupillenstörungen : Anisokorie und gestörte Lichtreaktion.

Efferent pupillary defects are caused by problems of sympathetic or parasympathetic innervation or structural iris changes presenting as anisocoria or impaired pupillary light reaction. This overview describes the diagnostic steps for evaluating efferent pupillary disorders and outlines further steps of work-up.

[The German Acanthamoeba keratitis register: Initial results of a multicenter study]. / Das Deutsche Akanthamöbenkeratitis-Register : Erste Ergebnisse einer multizentrischen Erhebung.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In September 2011 the cornea section of the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) established the first German Acanthamoeba keratitis registry. The data of this multicenter survey are being collected, compiled and evaluated at the Department of Ophthalmology at the Saarland University. The aim of this article is to present an intermediate report. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 172 eyes with Acanthamoeba keratitis were collected during the last 10 years. For this interim report we actually evaluated 121 eyes (60.2 % female patients, average age 41.3 years) and collected the following data: date of onset of symptoms, date and method of diagnosis, initial diagnosis, anamnestic data, clinical symptoms and signs at diagnosis and during follow-up, conservative and surgical therapy. Criteria for inclusion in the Acanthamoeba registry was the established diagnosis of an Acanthamoeba keratitis with at least one of the methods described in this article. RESULTS: Acanthamoeba keratitis could be histologically proven in 55.3 % of the cases, via PCR in 25.6 %, with confocal microscopy in 20.4 % and using in vitro cultivation in 15.5 %. Clinical symptoms and signs in Acanthamoeba keratitis were pain in 67.0 %, ring infiltrates in 53.4 %, pseudodendritiform epitheliopathy in 11.7 % and keratoneuritis in 5.8 %. In 47.6 % of the cases the initial diagnosis was herpes simplex virus keratitis followed by bacterial keratitis in 25.2 % and fungal keratitis in 3.9 %. Acanthamoeba keratitis was the correct initial diagnosis in only 23.2 % of cases. The average time period between first symptoms and diagnosis was 2.8 ± 4.0 months (range 0-23 months). A triple therapy with Brolene® Lavasept® and antibiotic eye drops at least 5 ×/day was used in 54.5 % of eyes (n = 66). Penetrating keratoplasty was performed in 40.4 %, in 18 cases in combination with cryotherapy of the cornea. The mean graft diameter was 7.9 ± 1.1 mm (range 3.5-11.0 mm). The final visual acuity (Snellen visual acuity chart at 5 m) was comparable in the two groups of eyes with (5/40 ± 5/25) and without (5/32 ± 5/25) keratoplasty. CONCLUSION: Acanthamoeba keratitis is a rare and often very late diagnosed disease and two thirds of the cases were initially misdiagnosed. The early recognition of the typical symptoms is crucial for the prognosis of the disease. All ophthalmological departments in Germany are invited to submit further data of all confirmed cases (berthold.seitz@uks.eu), whether retrospectively or prospectively in order to generate an adequate standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach for this potentially devastating disease.

[Glaucoma screening by means of pupil campimetry]. / Glaukomerkennung mittels der Pupillenkampimetrie.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to find out if pupillographic assessment of the visual field by means of pupil campimetry can identify glaucomatous visual field defects and as such be used for glaucoma screening purposes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 20 patients with open angle glaucoma and 30 healthy persons were examined by means of pupil campimetry. All glaucoma patients had a glaucomatous visual field defect in at least one eye. The stimulus pattern consisted of 17 white-light stimuli which were presented within the 30° visual field, particularly in the Bjerrum region. The stimulus diameter was 6°. Each stimulus was presented for 200 ms and the interval between the stimuli was 1800 ms. Three stimulus intensities (16.4 cd/m2; 27.1 cd/m2 and 40.5 cd/m2) were tested. The individual pupil light reaction (PLR) amplitudes at all examined locations in the visual field, their sums and partial sums were compared between both groups by the two-sided two-sample t test. The diagnostic performance of the method in glaucoma diagnosis was evaluated by ROC curves (receiver operating characteristics). RESULTS: The average PLR at all locations in the visual field was reduced in glaucoma patients compared to healthy persons. The sums of the PLR were reduced in glaucoma patients as well. Significant differences in the PLR were found especially in the central and paracentral visual fields. The best AUC values (area under the curve) were reached with the highest stimulus intensity, the highest AUC value overall was 0.769. CONCLUSION: Although the difference in PLR between glaucoma patients and the control group was significant, the reached AUC values fell short of being ideal for screening purposes. A surprising finding was that the most central pupil response was reduced by the same amount as that in the Bjerrum region.