Taste-masked formulation of sodium phenylbutyrate (ACER-001) for the treatment of urea cycle disorders.

Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are a group of rare inherited metabolic diseases caused by a deficiency of one of the enzymes or transporters that constitute the urea cycle. Defects in these enzymes lead to acute accumulation (hyperammonemic crises, HAC) or chronically elevated levels (hyperammonemia) of ammonia in the blood and/or various tissues including the brain, which can cause persistent neurological deficits, irreversible brain damage, coma, and death. Ongoing treatment of UCDs include the use of nitrogen-scavenging agents, such as sodium phenylbutyrate (salt of 4-phenylbutyric acid; NaPBA) or glycerol phenylbutyrate (GPB). These treatments provide an alternative pathway for nitrogen disposal through the urinary excretion of phenylacetylglutamine. ACER-001 is a novel formulation of NaPBA with polymer coated pellets in suspension, which is designed to briefly mask the unpleasant bitter taste of NaPBA and is being developed as a treatment option for patients with UCDs. Four Phase 1 studies were conducted to characterize the bioavailability (BA) and/or bioequivalence (BE) of ACER-001 (in healthy volunteers) and taste assessment relative to NaPBA powder (in taste panelists). ACER-001 was shown to be bioequivalent to NaPBA powder under both fed and fasting conditions. Lower systemic exposure of phenylacetate (PAA) and phenylbutyrate (PBA) was observed when ACER-001 was administered with a high-fat meal relative to a fasting state suggesting that the lower doses of PBA administered under fasting conditions may yield similar efficacy with potentially fewer dose dependent adverse effects relative to higher doses with a meal. ACER-001 appeared to be adequately taste-masked, staying below the aversive taste threshold for the first 3 min after the formulation was prepared and remaining palatable when taken within 5 min.

Pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes in a clinical practice setting reduced A1C, postprandial glucose excursions, and weight.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of pramlintide therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes in a clinical practice setting. METHODS: In this open-label study, 166 insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes added pramlintide therapy (120 microg) during an initiation period in which mealtime insulin was reduced by 30-50%. Insulin doses were subsequently adjusted to optimize glycemic control. Endpoints included safety, as well as change in A1C, postprandial glucose, weight, insulin dose, and patient satisfaction following 6 months of pramlintide treatment. RESULTS: At 6 months, the change in A1C from baseline (8.3%) was -0.56% (P < 0.05; n = 59). Pramlintide treatment significantly reduced mean postprandial glucose excursions (P < 0.05) and weight (-2.8 kg; P < 0.05; n = 125). Glycemic benefits were achieved with lower mealtime insulin doses (-10.3%; P < 0.05; n = 104). Nausea, primarily mild to moderate, was reported by 29.5% of patients (severe nausea in 2.4%). Rates of severe hypoglycemia were low (0.04 events/patient-year). CONCLUSIONS: In this uncontrolled, open-label setting, pramlintide initiation while reducing mealtime insulin, followed by insulin dose optimization, resulted in improvements in postprandial glucose excursions and A1C. These improvements in glycemic control were accompanied by weight loss.

Pharmacokinetics of an oral drug (acetaminophen) administered at various times relative to subcutaneous injection of pramlintide in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Pramlintide, an adjunct treatment to mealtime insulin for patients with type 2 and type 1 diabetes, aids glycemic control by suppressing postprandial glucagon secretion, slowing gastric emptying, and enhancing satiety. Because gastric emptying affects oral medication absorption, this placebo-controlled, single-blind, crossover study examined the absorption of 1000 mg of acetaminophen elixir administered -2, -1, 0, +1, and +2 hours relative to pramlintide (120 microg) or 0 hours relative to placebo in 24 patients with type 2 diabetes. When acetaminophen administration occurred 0, +1, or +2 hours relative to pramlintide, the maximum observed plasma concentration of acetaminophen decreased 14% to 29%, and time to maximum observed plasma concentration increased by 0.8 to 1.2 hours compared with administration 0 hours relative to placebo. Pramlintide treatment slowed but did not alter the extent of acetaminophen absorption (area under the concentration-time curve). No serious adverse events or withdrawals were reported. Oral agents should be administered at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after pramlintide injection if rapid onset of action is required for efficacy.

Effect of adjunctive pramlintide treatment on treatment satisfaction in patients with type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of adjunctive pramlintide treatment on treatment satisfaction in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with intensive insulin regimens. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Intensively treated (multiple daily injection [MDI] or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII] pump therapy) patients with type 1 diabetes completed a study-specific treatment satisfaction questionnaire following 29 weeks of either placebo (n = 136) or pramlintide (n = 130) treatment in a double-blind, noninferiority pramlintide dose titration trial. End points included patient reported outcomes, their relationship to insulin treatment regimen, A1C, weight, and insulin use. RESULTS: Pramlintide-treated patients reported greater treatment satisfaction in most questionnaire responses. Treatment satisfaction was similar for pramlintide-treated patients regardless of intensive insulin regimens (MDI versus CSII). Mean A1C was reduced to a similar degree in both pramlintide- (-0.39 +/- 0.07%) and placebo-treated (-0.45 +/- 0.07%) patients. However, pramlintide treatment was associated with reductions in mean body weight (-1.50 +/- 0.33 kg; P < 0.0001) and mealtime insulin use (-19.05 +/- 5.17%; P < 0.005) over 29 weeks, while placebo treatment resulted in weight gain (1.28 +/- 0.25 kg) and a smaller reduction in mealtime insulin use (-2.20 +/- 3.33%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar reductions in A1C, pramlintide treatment resulted in greater treatment satisfaction compared with placebo treatment. This was independent of insulin delivery method.