RESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-2238-3153.].
RESUMEN
Introduction: Adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) should include an aromatase inhibitor (AI). Especially patients with a high recurrence risk might benefit from an upfront therapy with an AI for a minimum of five years. Nevertheless, not much is known about the patient selection for this population in clinical practice. Therefore, this study analyzed the prognosis and patient characteristics of postmenopausal patients selected for a five-year upfront letrozole therapy. Patients and Methods: From 2009 to 2011, 3529 patients were enrolled into the adjuvant phase IV PreFace clinical trial (NCT01908556). Postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive BC patients, for whom an upfront five-year therapy with letrozole (2.5 mg/day) was indicated, were eligible. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and safety in relation to patient and tumor characteristics were assessed. Results: 3297 patients started letrozole therapy. The majority of patients (n = 1639, 57%) completed the five-year treatment. 34.5% of patients continued with endocrine therapy after the mandated five-year endocrine treatment. Five-year DFS rates were 89% (95% CI: 88-90%) and five-year OS rates were 95% (95% CI: 94-96%). In subgroup analyses, DFS rates were 83%, 84% and 78% for patients with node-positive disease, G3 tumor grading, and pT3 tumors respectively. The main adverse events (any grade) were pain and hot flushes (66.8% and 18.3% of patients). Conclusions: The risk profile of postmenopausal BC patients selected for a five-year upfront letrozole therapy showed a moderate recurrence and death risk. However, in subgroups with unfavorable risk factors, prognosis warrants an improvement, which might be achieved with novel targeted therapies.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Screening for iron deficiency, which affects a significant proportion of the population, is a burning issue in the health care system. AIM: The aim of the authors was to examine whether low mean cell hemoglobin concentration measured by automated hematology analyzers is a suitable screening parameter for iron deficiency. METHOD: The data for this study included a total of 247,705 complete blood counts and 10,840 tests with different parameters of iron metabolism. Patients were evaluated at Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital during a period of 30 months between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2015. Low cell hemoglobin values were analyzed with iron metabolism parameters measured simultaneously. RESULTS: A total of 830 patients whose iron metabolism parameters were measured simultaneously had low mean cell hemoglobin (<28pg). Of the 830 patients, 679 (82%) had both low mean cell hemoglobin and iron deficiency, while in 126 hemodialysed patients (15%), 8 patients with myelofibrosis, and 5 patients with rheumatic arthritis had low mean cell hemoglobin without iron deficiency. In the remaining 6 patients the cause of low mean cell hemoglobin or iron deficiency was not identified. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings the authors conclude that mean cell hemoglobin may be a reliable screening marker for iron deficiency.
