Open Medial Meniscotibial Ligament Repair With Concomitant Open Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Brace Augmentation.

The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is the most commonly injured ligament in the knee. Historically, nonsurgical management for these injuries has been favored for a majority of grade I-III sprains, particularly femoral-based. However, when coupled with other injuries such as meniscotibial ligament tears or distal Stener type avulsion tears, early surgical management for these cases is recommended. This will allow for stabilization and protection of the meniscus in addition to preventing residual valgus laxity, especially related to more severe Stener-like avulsions of the superficial MCL that can be seen with meniscotibial ligament tears. Utilizing an open approach, meniscotibial repair with suture anchors with internal brace augmentation for the MCL repair can provide a strong final construct, and a safe and fast recovery.

Arthroscopic Bone Block Cerclage Suture Fixation of Fresh Distal Tibial Allograft for Anterior Glenoid Reconstruction.

Glenoid bone loss in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability poses a unique challenge to treating surgeons. Various bone block procedures have been used to reconstruct the glenoid, including autologous coracoid transfer, iliac crest autograft, distal clavicle autograft, and distal tibia allograft. Distal tibia allograft has been increasingly used because of its advantages over autologous graft sources. Having started out as an open procedure, glenoid reconstruction with distal tibia allograft has now found its way to evolving into an arthroscopic procedure. Various techniques have been devised for arthroscopic distal tibia allograft fixation, including screw, suture anchor, and suture button. This technical note describes an arthroscopic distal tibia allograft fixation technique, using a transglenoid parallel drill guide and 2 cerclage tape sutures that are fastened using a tensioner. This technique provides strong graft fixation while avoiding the potential complications and technical challenges of metal screw fixation.

All-Arthroscopic Bone Grafting and Primary Fixation of a Medial Femoral Condyle Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesion.

Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions poses a significant challenge for orthopaedic surgeons and can cause debilitating limitations on the activity of patients. Timing of intervention, surgical technique, and selection of graft when needed are all key elements of treatment that need to be considered carefully and discussed with patients. Primary fixation of an OCD fragment with intact subchondral bone has been shown to be beneficial in some cases. There is limited literature, however, on how to approach large chondral lesions in young patients without a large subchondral base attached to the fragment. Treatment of large OCD lesions of the knee with an all-arthroscopic approach provides several benefits, including limited dissection for exposure, improved ability to assess the stability of the OCD lesion during articulation after fixation, and an expedited recovery compared to an open approach. The purpose of this technical note is to detail a technique of performing an all-arthroscopic bone grafting and primary fixation of a medial femoral condyle OCD lesion.

Meniscus Allograft Transplantation With Bone Plugs Using Knotless All-Suture Anchors and Cortical Button Suspensory Fixation.

Meniscus allograft transplantation can be successful for treatment of meniscal deficiency using a number of transplant techniques. In this Technical Note, we describe a double bone plug medial meniscus allograft transplantation technique that uses knotless all-suture anchors with cortical-button suspensory fixation. This technique maintains the reported advantages for bone-plug fixation while mitigating the risk for meniscal root damage, facilitating easier bone plug insertion and seating, expanding tensioning capabilities, and preventing soft-tissue irritation from suture knot stacks.

Factors affecting biomechanical strength of Latarjet constructs: A systematic review and meta-regression.

BACKGROUND: The Latarjet procedure reduces recurrent glenohumeral instability but has potential hardware and graft complications. The procedure has been modified to use various screw types as well as suture buttons. Biomechanical studies have evaluated the effect of these implants on construct strength. With varying results it is unclear whether there is an optimal implant to use. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of human cadaveric biomechanical studies evaluating Latarjet ultimate failure load. Two independent reviewers screened articles and included them after full text review. Additional factors including implants used, graft orientation, cortices engaged, drill diameter, and screw characteristics were recorded. Meta-regression was performed on the 145 specimens from eight studies that met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Screw fixation resulted in a 396.8 N (95% CI, 149.8-643.7) N higher ultimate failure load against shear stresses than suture buttons (p = 0.002). There were no differences between implants for ultimate failure load against tensile forces. Tensile strength was significantly affected by drill diameter with each millimeter of increase reducing the mean ultimate failure load by 127.4 N (95% CI, 41.2-213.6) N (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that using screw fixation and minimizing drill diameter can obtain the maximum ultimate failure load against both shear and tensile forces in a Latarjet construct.

Detection of Surgical Wrap Defects in the Operating Room Setting.

Surgical site infection is a challenging complication that places a significant burden on the patient and the health care system. Emphasis is being placed on the prevention and treatment of surgical site infections. We evaluated the accuracy of identifying surgical wrap defects based on defect size, location, and operating room staff experience. Forty sterilization wraps were divided into 4 separate groups based on the size of the puncture defects created. Defects measuring 1.2 mm, 3.7 mm, and 6.8 mm were compared with a control group of surgical wraps with no defects. Defects were randomly placed on an inner or outer line with circumference of 7 cm or 14 cm, respectively. Twenty operating room staff of varying levels of experience evaluated each wrap for defects. The detection rates for the 1.2-mm, 3.7-mm, and 6.8-mm wraps and the wraps with no defects were 3%, 73%, 80%, and 99%, respectively. A significant difference was seen between the detection rates for the small defects vs all other size defects. No significant difference was seen in detection rate based on the location of defects. The detection rate was higher among staff members with greater than 1 year of experience vs those with less than 1 year of experience. Sterilization wrap defects of all sizes went undetected at very high rates. Small defects of 1.2 mm, which have been shown to allow bacterial contamination, were missed 97% of the time. Operating room staff with more experience detected more defects than those with less than 1 year of experience. Wrap defects may be a source of bacterial contamination that may frequently go unnoticed. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(6):735-e738.].

Biomechanical Effects of Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) are performed with the intention to restore native knee kinematics after ACL tears. There continue to be varying results as to the difference in kinematics between combined and isolated procedures, including anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation (IR). PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the kinematic changes of a combined ACLR/ALLR versus isolated ACLR and to assess the effects of different fixation techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 human cadaveric biomechanical studies evaluating combined ACLR/ALLR versus isolated ACLR and their effects on ATT and IR in 149 specimens. The primary outcomes were ATT and IR. Secondary outcomes included graft type and size as well as fixation methods such as type, angle, tension, and position of fixation. Meta-regression was used to examine the effect of various cofactors on the resulting measures. RESULTS: Compared with isolated ACLR, combined ACLR/ALLR decreased ATT and IR by 0.01 mm (95% CI, -0.059 to 0.079 mm; P = .777) and 1.64° (95% CI, 1.30°-1.98°; P < .001), respectively. Regarding ACLR/ALLR, increasing the knee flexion angle and applied IR force led to a significant reduction in IR (P < .001 and P = .044, respectively). There was also a significant reduction in IR in combined procedures with semitendinosus ALL graft, higher flexion fixation angles, and tension but no change in IR with differing femoral fixation points (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .268, respectively). Multivariate meta-regression showed that the use of tibial-sided suture anchor fixation significantly reduced IR (P < .001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a combined ACLR/ALLR procedure significantly decreases IR compared with isolated ACLR, especially at higher knee flexion angles. Semitendinosus ALL graft, fixation at higher knee flexion, increased tensioning, and tibial-sided interference screw fixation in ALLR may help to further reduce IR.