Single-operator duodenoscope-assisted cholangioscopy is an effective alternative in the management of choledocholithiasis not removed by conventional methods, including mechanical lithotripsy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The widespread use of cholangioscopy in the management of difficult choledocholithiasis has been limited by the need for two expert operators. This report describes the use of a technique of single-operator duodenoscope-assisted cholangioscopy (SODAC) in the successful management of 75 patients with choledocholithiasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The single-operator technique, allowing simultaneous control of both the duodenoscope and cholangioscope, was prospectively studied between June 1999 and June 2001 in the diagnosis and treatment of choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: A total of 109 SODAC procedures were conducted in 75 patients to manage choledocholithiasis. The indications were: firstly, SODAC-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) of stones in which conventional methods, including mechanical lithotripsy, had not been successful (52 SODAC procedures in 26 patients); and secondly, direct visualization of the biliary tree after cholangiography to assess the presence of stones (57 SODAC procedures in 49 patients). The locations and numbers of the stones, but not their size, were predictive of the number of SODAC-guided lithotripsy sessions required. All of the patients were free of stones at the end of the study period, and no complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Single-operator SODAC-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy was effective in the treatment of difficult cases of choledocholithiasis in which conventional methods had previously failed. The technique may allow increased use of cholangioscopy in the management of choledocholithiasis.

Treatment of bleeding colonic diverticula by endoscopic band ligation: an in-vivo and ex-vivo pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Angiographic and surgical therapy are standards of care for persistent diverticular bleeding. Colonoscopic intervention using epinephrine injection, multipolar electrocautery, and placement of an Endoclip has not gained widespread acceptance due to concerns about complications,and the widespread management of severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding by surgeons and interventional radiologists. The utility of colonoscopic band ligation for control of diverticular bleeding was evaluated both in vivo and ex vivo. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Endoscopic band ligation of diverticula was performed on surgical resection specimens and in patients with actively bleeding colonic diverticula. RESULTS: In the in-vivo study, active diverticular bleeding was completely controlled in four patients by endoscopic band ligation. In two cases, a visible vessel was seen on the everted and banded diverticulum. Procedure time ranged from 45 to 140 min. The total lengths of hospital stays for the four patients were 2, 6, 14, and 35 days. The long hospital stays (> 7 days)were associated with non-gastrointestinal co-morbidity. There were no acute complications of band ligation. No rebleeding or need for surgery occurred during a follow-up period of 12 months in any of the patients. In the ex-vivo study, 11 diverticula were successfully everted and banded in five of nine surgical specimens (one right colon and four left colons). Mucosa was identified in all of the "banded" segments. Ten of 11 ligated diverticula revealed evidence of blood vessels or submucosal tissue. The presence of subserosal fat was suggested in three of the 11 "banded" segments, and none of the ex-vivo ligated diverticula contained muscularis propria or serosal involvement. There was no evidence of perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Both in-vivo and ex-vivo data suggest that endoscopic band ligation may be a safe and effective therapy for actively bleeding colonic diverticula.

The use of EUS to diagnose malignant portal venous system invasion by pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: CT scanning and mesenteric angiography are insensitive tests diagnosing vascular invasion by pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been proposed as an alternative. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of specific EUS criteria for diagnosing malignant invasion of the branches of the portal venous system have not been determined. METHODS: This is a prospective blinded evaluation of EUS and angiography to diagnose malignant invasion of the portal venous system by pancreatic cancer in 45 patients, 28 of whom underwent surgery. Surgical staging was used as the gold standard for determining the accuracy of EUS and angiography. RESULTS: Four EUS criteria were studied and the overall accuracy rates were as follows: irregular venous wall (87%), loss of interface (78%), proximity of mass (73%), and size (39%). Although "irregular venous wall" was the most accurate, it suffered from a low sensitivity rate (47%) because of its relative inability to detect superior mesenteric vein invasion (sensitivity of 17%). The angiographic criteria had accuracy rates of 73% to 90% with low sensitivity rates (20% to 77%). The clean resection rate was 86% when all tests were used, 78% if EUS was used without angiography, and 60% if only angiography was used. CONCLUSION: EUS is highly sensitive for detecting portal and splenic vein invasion by pancreatic cancer, but may be insensitive for superior mesenteric vein involvement.

Embolization of an hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Vascular injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy can occur in an analogous fashion to biliary injuries, with potential laceration, transection, and occlusion of blood vessels. A patient presented with symptomatic hemobilia 1 month following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and was found to have a right hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm which communicated with the common bile duct. This was successfully embolized with several embolic agents, resulting in rapid resolution of all signs and symptoms. The patient has been free of symptoms during a follow-up period of 1 year. A brief discussion of hepatic artery pseudoaneurysms is presented.

Placement of a feeding button ("one-step button") as the initial procedure.

The procedure of choice for enteral feeding access is now percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Standard PEG tubes have the disadvantages of clogging, stomal enlargement, and external bulkiness. Button replacement tubes can covert the more cumbersome PEG tubes to low external profile devices. A procedure and an early experience is described for placement of a button as a single-step procedure. This procedure is an over-the-wire, "push" procedure. Sixty-nine buttons were placed, 47 (61%) for neurologic reasons and 22 (32%) for cancer and other reasons. In 49 of the 69 (71%), there was no difficulty at all with insertion, and in only two (3%) could the button not be placed. Complications were assessed at 48 h and at 3 wk. No complications were found in 61 (90%). In only two patients (3%) were there serious complications (gastro-colon-cutaneous fistula and "peritonitis"). The One-Step Button represents a rapid, safe procedure for the placement of a low-profile PEG with its attendant advantages.