Can researchers trust ICD-10 coding of medical comorbidities in orthopaedic trauma patients?

Objectives: The 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) coding system may prove useful to orthopaedic trauma researchers to identify and document populations based on comorbidities. However, its use for research first necessitates determination of its reliability. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of electronic medical record (EMR) ICD-10 coding of nonorthopaedic diagnoses in orthopaedic trauma patients relative to the gold standard of prospective data collection. Design: Nonexperimental cross-sectional study. Setting: Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients/Participants: Two hundred sixty-three orthopaedic trauma patients from 2 prior prospective studies from September 2018 to April 2022. Intervention: Prospectively collected data were compared with EMR ICD-10 code abstraction for components of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), obesity, alcohol abuse, and tobacco use (retrospective data). Main Outcome Measurements: Percent agreement and Cohen's kappa reliability. Results: Percent agreement ranged from 86.7% to 96.9% for all CCI diagnoses and was as low as 72.6% for the diagnosis "overweight." Only 2 diagnoses, diabetes without end-organ damage (kappa = 0.794) and AIDS (kappa = 0.798) demonstrated Cohen's kappa values to indicate substantial agreement. Conclusion: EMR diagnostic coding for medical comorbidities in orthopaedic trauma patients demonstrated variable reliability. Researchers may be able to rely on EMR coding to identify patients with diabetes without complications or AIDS. Chart review may still be necessary to confirm diagnoses. Low prevalence of most comorbidities led to high percentage agreement with low reliability. Level of Evidence: Level 1 diagnostic.

Skin Antisepsis before Surgical Fixation of Extremity Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating surgical-site infection have had conflicting results with respect to the use of alcohol solutions containing iodine povacrylex or chlorhexidine gluconate as skin antisepsis before surgery to repair a fractured limb (i.e., an extremity fracture). METHODS: In a cluster-randomized, crossover trial at 25 hospitals in the United States and Canada, we randomly assigned hospitals to use a solution of 0.7% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol (iodine group) or 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine group) as preoperative antisepsis for surgical procedures to repair extremity fractures. Every 2 months, the hospitals alternated interventions. Separate populations of patients with either open or closed fractures were enrolled and included in the analysis. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection, which included superficial incisional infection within 30 days or deep incisional or organ-space infection within 90 days. The secondary outcome was unplanned reoperation for fracture-healing complications. RESULTS: A total of 6785 patients with a closed fracture and 1700 patients with an open fracture were included in the trial. In the closed-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 77 patients (2.4%) in the iodine group and in 108 patients (3.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 1.00; P = 0.049). In the open-fracture population, surgical-site infection occurred in 54 patients (6.5%) in the iodine group and in 60 patients (7.3%) in the chlorhexidine group (odd ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.27; P = 0.45). The frequencies of unplanned reoperation, 1-year outcomes, and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with closed extremity fractures, skin antisepsis with iodine povacrylex in alcohol resulted in fewer surgical-site infections than antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol. In patients with open fractures, the results were similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; PREPARE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03523962.).

Early Results of Orthopaedic Trauma and Anemia: Conservative Versus Liberal Transfusion Strategy.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether it is safe to use a conservative packed red blood cell transfusion hemoglobin threshold (5.5 g/dL) compared with a liberal transfusion threshold (7.0 g/dL) for asymptomatic patients with musculoskeletal-injured trauma out of the initial resuscitative period. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, nonblinded, randomized study done at three level 1 trauma centers. One hundred patients were enrolled. One patient was inappropriately enrolled, withdrawn from the study, and excluded from analysis leaving 99 patients (49 liberal and 50 conservative) with 30-day follow-up. After initial resuscitation, patients were enrolled and randomized to either a liberal or a conservative transfusion strategy. This strategy was followed throughout the index hospitalization. The primary outcome of the study was infection. Superficial infection was defined as clinical diagnosis of cellulitis or other superficial infection treated with oral antibiotics only. Deep infection was defined as clinical diagnosis of fracture-related infection requiring IV antibiotics and/or surgical débridement. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were successfully followed for 30 days with 100% follow-up during this time. Seven infections (14%) occurred in the liberal group and none in the conservative group ( P < 0.01). Five deep infections (10%) occurred in the liberal group and none in the conservative group ( P = 0.03). Three superficial infections (6%) occurred in the liberal and none in the conservative group, which was not a significant difference ( P = 0.1). No difference was observed in length of stay between groups. DISCUSSION: Transfusing young healthy asymptomatic patients with orthopaedic trauma for hemoglobin <7.0 g/dL increases the risk of infection. No increased risk of anemia-related complications was identified with a conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL. DATA AVAILABILITY AND TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Data are available on request. IRB protocol number is 1402557771. This study was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02972593. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2, unblinded prospective randomized multicenter study.

Orthopaedic Trauma and Anemia: Conservative versus Liberal Transfusion Strategy: A Prospective Randomized Study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether it is safe to use a conservative packed red blood cell transfusion hemoglobin (Hgb) threshold (5.5 g/dL) compared with a liberal transfusion threshold (7.0 g/dL) for asymptomatic musculoskeletal injured trauma patients who are no longer in the initial resuscitative period. METHODS: Design: Prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. SETTING: Three level 1 trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients aged 18-50 with an associated musculoskeletal injury with Hgb less than 9 g/dL or expected drop below 9 g/dL with planned surgery who were stable and no longer being actively resuscitated were randomized once their Hgb dropped below 7 g/dL to a conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL versus a liberal threshold of 7.0 g/dL. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Postoperative infection, other post-operative complications and Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment scores obtained at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year were compared for liberal and conservative transfusion thresholds. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients completed 1 year follow-up. There was a significant association between a liberal transfusion strategy and higher rate of infection (P = 0.01), with no difference in functional outcomes at 6 months or 1 year. This study was adequately powered at 92% to detect a difference in superficial infection (7% for liberal group, 0% for conservative, P < 0.01) but underpowered to detect a difference for deep infection (14% for liberal group, 6% for conservative group, P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: A conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL in an asymptomatic young trauma patient with associated musculoskeletal injuries leads to a lower infection rate without an increase in adverse outcomes and no difference in functional outcomes at 6 months or 1 year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The 1-Year Economic Impact of Work Productivity Loss Following Severe Lower Extremity Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Severe lower extremity trauma among working-age adults is highly consequential for returning to work; however, the economic impact attributed to injury has not been fully quantified. The purpose of this study was to examine work and productivity loss during the year following lower extremity trauma and to calculate the economic losses associated with lost employment, lost work time (absenteeism), and productivity loss while at work (presenteeism). METHODS: This is an analysis of data collected prospectively across 3 multicenter studies of lower extremity trauma outcomes in the United States. Data were used to construct a Markov model that accumulated hours lost over time due to lost employment, absenteeism, and presenteeism among patients from 18 to 64 years old who were working prior to their injury. Average U.S. wages were used to calculate economic loss overall and by sociodemographic and injury subgroups. RESULTS: Of 857 patients working prior to injury, 47.2% had returned to work at 1 year. The average number of productive hours of work lost was 1,758.8/person, representing 84.6% of expected annual productive hours. Of the hours lost, 1,542.3 (87.7%) were due to working no hours or lost employment, 71.1 (4.0%) were due to missed hours after having returned, and 145.4 (8.3%) were due to decreased productivity while working. The 1-year economic loss due to injury totaled $64,427/patient (95% confidence interval [CI], $63,183 to $65,680). Of the 1,758.8 lost hours, approximately 88% were due to not being employed (working zero hours), 4% were due to absenteeism, and 8% were due to presenteeism. Total productivity loss was higher among older adults (≥40 years), men, those with a physically demanding job, and the most severe injuries (i.e., those leading to amputation as well as Gustilo type-IIIB tibial fractures and type-III pilon/ankle fractures). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe lower extremity trauma carry a substantial economic burden. The costs of lost productivity should be considered when evaluating outcomes.

Patient-Specific Precision Injury Signatures to Optimize Orthopaedic Interventions in Multiply Injured Patients (PRECISE STUDY).

SUMMARY: Optimal timing and procedure selection that define staged treatment strategies can affect outcomes dramatically and remain an area of major debate in the treatment of multiply injured orthopaedic trauma patients. Decisions regarding timing and choice of orthopaedic procedure(s) are currently based on the physiologic condition of the patient, resource availability, and the expected magnitude of the intervention. Surgical decision-making algorithms rarely rely on precision-type data that account for demographics, magnitude of injury, and the physiologic/immunologic response to injury on a patient-specific basis. This study is a multicenter prospective investigation that will work toward developing a precision medicine approach to managing multiply injured patients by incorporating patient-specific indices that quantify (1) mechanical tissue damage volume; (2) cumulative hypoperfusion; (3) immunologic response; and (4) demographics. These indices will formulate a precision injury signature, unique to each patient, which will be explored for correspondence to outcomes and response to surgical interventions. The impact of the timing and magnitude of initial and staged surgical interventions on patient-specific physiologic and immunologic responses will be evaluated and described. The primary goal of the study will be the development of data-driven models that will inform clinical decision-making tools that can be used to predict outcomes and guide intervention decisions.

Age and socioeconomic status affect access to telemedicine at an urban level 1 trauma center.

OBJECTIVES: Despite clinical and economic advantages, routine utilization of telemedicine remains uncommon. The purpose of this study was to examine potential disparities in access and utilization of telehealth services during the rapid transition to virtual clinic during the coronavirus pandemic. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Outpatient visits (in-person, telephone, virtual-Doxy.me) over a 7-week period at a Level I Trauma Center orthopaedic clinic. INTERVENTION: Virtual visits utilizing the Doxy.me platform. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accessing at least 1 virtual visit ("Virtual") or having telephone or in-person visits only ("No virtual"). METHODS: All outpatient visits (in-person, telephone, virtual) during a 7-week period were tracked. At the end of the 7-week period, the electronic medical record was queried for each of the 641 patients who had a visit during this period for the following variables: gender, ethnicity, race, age, payer source, home zip code. Data were analyzed for both the total number of visits (n = 785) and the total number of unique patients (n = 641). Patients were identified as accessing at least 1 virtual visit ("Virtual") or having telephone or in-person visits only ("No virtual"). RESULTS: Weekly totals demonstrated a rapid increase from 0 to greater than 50% virtual visits by the third week of quarantine with sustained high rates of virtual visits throughout the study period. Hispanic and Black/African American patients were able to access virtual care at similar rates to White/Caucasian patients. Patients of ages 65 to 74 and 75+ accessed virtual care at lower rates than patients ≤64 (P = .003). No difference was found in rates of virtual care between payer sources. A statistically significant difference was found between patients from different zip codes (P = .028). CONCLUSION: A rapid transition to virtual clinic can be performed at a level 1 trauma center, and high rates of virtual visits can be maintained. However, disparities in access exist and need to be addressed.

Single-Stage Treatment of Fracture-related Infections.

SUMMARY: Fracture-related infections (FRIs) remain a significant problem. Many approach FRI cases in a staged fashion, focusing on infection eradication initially and fracture union during subsequent procedures. The literature quotes high success rates with this strategy. However, associated patient morbidity and economic impact are noteworthy. A single-stage FRI treatment, using an antibiotic-coated locked intramedullary nail, also exists. This video details low-cost, antibiotic-coated locked intramedullary nail fabrication in the operating room alongside preliminary results using this technique for acute FRI and septic nonunion treatment.

Effect of Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Operatively Treated High-risk Tibia Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Despite the widespread use of systemic antibiotics to prevent infections in surgically treated patients with fracture, high rates of surgical site infection persist. Objective: To examine the effect of intrawound vancomycin powder in reducing deep surgical site infections. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial enrolled adult patients with an operatively treated tibial plateau or pilon fracture who met the criteria for a high risk of infection from January 1, 2015, through June 30, 2017, with 12 months of follow-up (final follow-up assessments completed in April 2018) at 36 US trauma centers. Interventions: A standard infection prevention protocol with (n = 481) or without (n = 499) 1000 mg of intrawound vancomycin powder. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a deep surgical site infection within 182 days of definitive fracture fixation. A post hoc comparison assessed the treatment effect on gram-positive and gram-negative-only infections. Other secondary outcomes included superficial surgical site infection, nonunion, and wound dehiscence. Results: The analysis included 980 patients (mean [SD] age, 45.7 [13.7] years; 617 [63.0%] male) with 91% of the expected person-time of follow-up for the primary outcome. Within 182 days, deep surgical site infection was observed in 29 of 481 patients in the treatment group and 46 of 499 patients in the control group. The time-to-event estimated probability of deep infection by 182 days was 6.4% in the treatment group and 9.8% in the control group (risk difference, -3.4%; 95% CI, -6.9% to 0.1%; P = .06). A post hoc analysis of the effect of treatment on gram-positive (risk difference, -3.7%; 95% CI, -6.7% to -0.8%; P = .02) and gram-negative-only (risk difference, 0.3%; 95% CI, -1.6% to 2.1%; P = .78) infections found that the effect of vancomycin powder was a result of its reduction in gram-positive infections. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with operatively treated tibial articular fractures at a high risk of infection, intrawound vancomycin powder at the time of definitive fracture fixation reduced the risk of a gram-positive deep surgical site infection, consistent with the activity of vancomycin. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02227446.

Is Immediate Weight-Bearing Safe After Single Implant Fixation of Elderly Distal Femur Fractures?

OBJECTIVES: To compare early complications in elderly patients with extra-articular distal femur fractures (DFFs) allowed to weight-bear as tolerated (WBAT) immediately versus patients prescribed initial touchdown weight-bearing (TDWB). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 academic trauma center. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-five patients 60 years or older who underwent surgical fixation of an extra-articular DFF, including the OTA/AO fracture classification of 33-A1-3, and periprosthetic fractures with a stable knee prosthesis (Lewis and Rorabeck type I or II) with at least 6 months follow-up. INTERVENTION: Immediate WBAT or TDWB after surgical fixation of an extra-articular DFF with either an intramedullary nail or locked plate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a major adverse event within the first 6 months, defined as (1) early fixation failure or change in alignment leading to reoperation, (2) nonunion, or (3) deep infection. Secondary outcomes included postoperative inpatient length of stay, discharge disposition (secondary facility vs. home), malunion, mortality, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: The rate of early adverse events requiring reoperation was similar between the WBAT group (6, 10.7%) and the TDWB group (15, 19.0%; P = 0.23). There was no difference between groups with respect to length of stay, discharge disposition, malunion, and patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports allowing carefully selected elderly patients, based on surgeon preference, to immediately weight-bear after operative fixation of an extra-articular DFF regardless of implant choice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Predictors of Improved Early Clinical Outcomes After Elective Implant Removal.

OBJECTIVES: To determine preoperative factors predictive of improvement in pain and function after elective implant removal. We hypothesized that patients undergoing orthopaedic implant removal to relieve pain would have significant improvements in both pain and function. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-nine patients were enrolled after consenting for orthopaedic implant removal to address residual pain. One hundred sixty-three were available for 3-month follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Preoperative and postoperative outcome measures including Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were compared. Preoperative scores, surgeon prediction of pain improvement, and palpable implants were analyzed as predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: Median PROMIS physical function and pain interference scores and visual analogue scale significantly improved by 6, 8, and 2 points, respectively (P < 0.001 for all). Worse preinjury scores predicted improvement in respective postoperative outcomes (P < 0.001 for all). Surgeon prediction of improvement was associated with improved PROMIS pain interference (P = 0.005), patient subjective assessment of pain improvement (P = 0.03), and subjective percent of pain remaining at 3 months (P = 0.02). Implant superficial palpability was not predictive for any postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary indication for implant removal in this population was pain relief, many patients also had a clinically relevant improvement in physical function. In addition, patients who start with worse global indices of pain and function are more likely to improve after implant removal. This suggests that implant-related pain directly contributes to global dysfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Significant Improvement in the Value of Surgical Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fractures Through Surgeon Practice Standardization.

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether cost-based decisions to improve the value of surgical care (quality:cost ratio) affect patient outcomes. Our hypothesis was that surgeon-directed reductions in surgical costs for tibial plateau fracture fixation would result in similar patient outcomes, thus improving treatment value. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study with retrospective control data. Surgically treated tibial plateau fractures from 2013 to October 2014 served as a control (group 1). Material costs for each case were calculated. Practices were modified to remove allegedly unnecessary costs. Next, cost data were collected on similar patients from November 2014 through 2015 (group 2). Costs were compared between groups, analyzing partial articular and complete articular fractures separately. Minimum follow-up (f/u) was 1-year. Outcomes data collected include Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) and pain interference domains, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, visual analog pain scale, infection, nonunion, unplanned return to surgery, demographics, injury characteristics, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Group 1 included 57 partial articular fractures and 57 complete articular fractures. Group 2 included 37 partial articular fractures and 32 complete articular fractures. Median cost of partial articular fractures decreased from $1,706 to $1,447 (P = 0.025), and median cost of complete articular fractures decreased from $2,681 to $2,220 (P = 0.003). Group 1 had 55 patients who consented to clinical f/u, and group 2 had 39. Median PROMIS PF score was 40 for group 1 and was 43 for group 2 (P = 0.23). There were no significant differences between the groups for any clinical outcomes, demographics, injury characteristics, or comorbidities. Median f/u in group 1 was 31 months compared with 15 months in group 2 (P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: We have demonstrated that surgeons can improve value of surgical care by reducing surgical costs while maintaining clinical outcomes.

Reliability of International Classification of Disease-9 Versus International Classification of Disease-10 Coding for Proximal Femur Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center.

INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services proposed that transitioning from the 9th to the 10th revision of the International Classification of Disease (ICD) would provide better data for research. This study sought to determine the reliability of ICD-10 compared with ICD-9 for proximal femur fractures. METHODS: Available imaging studies from 196 consecutively treated proximal femur fractures were retrospectively reviewed and assigned ICD codes by three physicians. Intercoder reliability (ICR) was calculated. Collectively, the physicians agreed on what should be the correct codes for each fracture, and this was compared with coding found in the medical and billing records. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in ICR for both ICD-9 and ICD-10 exact coding, which were both unreliable. Less specific coding improved ICR. ICD-9 general coding was better than ICD-10. Electronic medical record coding was unreliable. Billing codes were also unreliable, yet ICD-10 was better than ICD-9. DISCUSSION: ICD-9 and ICD-10 lack reliability in coding proximal femur fractures. ICD-10 results in data that are no more reliable than those found with ICD-9. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I diagnostic.

Association Between 6-Week Postdischarge Risk Classification and 12-Month Outcomes After Orthopedic Trauma.

Importance: Numerous studies have demonstrated that long-term outcomes after orthopedic trauma are associated with psychosocial and behavioral health factors evident early in the patient's recovery. Little is known about how to identify clinically actionable subgroups within this population. Objectives: To examine whether risk and protective factors measured at 6 weeks after injury could classify individuals into risk clusters and evaluate whether these clusters explain variations in 12-month outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective observational study was conducted between July 16, 2013, and January 15, 2016, among 352 patients with severe orthopedic injuries at 6 US level I trauma centers. Statistical analysis was conducted from October 9, 2017, to July 13, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: At 6 weeks after discharge, patients completed standardized measures for 5 risk factors (pain intensity, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, alcohol abuse, and tobacco use) and 4 protective factors (resilience, social support, self-efficacy for return to usual activity, and self-efficacy for managing the financial demands of recovery). Latent class analysis was used to classify participants into clusters, which were evaluated against measures of function, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and self-rated health collected at 12 months. Results: Among the 352 patients (121 women and 231 men; mean [SD] age, 37.6 [12.5] years), latent class analysis identified 6 distinct patient clusters as the optimal solution. For clinical use, these clusters can be collapsed into 4 groups, sorted from low risk and high protection (best) to high risk and low protection (worst). All outcomes worsened across the 4 clinical groupings. Bayesian analysis shows that the mean Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment dysfunction scores at 12 months differed by 7.8 points (95% CI, 3.0-12.6) between the best and second groups, by 10.3 points (95% CI, 1.6-20.2) between the second and third groups, and by 18.4 points (95% CI, 7.7-28.0) between the third and worst groups. Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrates that during early recovery, patients with orthopedic trauma can be classified into risk and protective clusters that account for a substantial amount of the variance in 12-month functional and health outcomes. Early screening and classification may allow a personalized approach to postsurgical care that conserves resources and targets appropriate levels of care to more patients.

Intramedullary Nailing of Periarticular Fractures.

Plate fixation has historically been the preferred surgical treatment method for periarticular fractures of the lower extremity. This trend has stemmed from difficulties with fracture reduction and concerns of inadequate fixation with intramedullary implants. However, the body of literature on management of periarticular fractures of the lower extremities has expanded in recent years, indicating that intramedullary nailing of distal femur, proximal tibia, and distal tibia fractures may be the preferred method of treatment in some cases. Intramedullary nailing reliably leads to excellent outcomes when performed for appropriate indications and when potential difficulties are recognized and addressed.

Costs and Complications of Single-Stage Fixation Versus 2-Stage Treatment of Select Bicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the differences in costs and complications in patients with bicondylar tibial plateau (BTP) fractures treated with 1-stage definitive fixation compared with 2-stage fixation after initial spanning external fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients with OTA/AO 41-C (Schatzker 6) BTP fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation. INTERVENTION: Definitive treatment with open reduction internal fixation either acutely (1 stage) or delayed after initial spanning external fixation (2 stage). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Wound healing complications, implant costs, hospital charges, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), reoperation, nonunion and infection. RESULTS: One hundred five patients were identified over a three-year period, of whom 52 met the inclusion criteria. There were 28 patients in the 1-stage group and 24 patients in the 2-stage group. Mean follow-up was 21.8 months, and 87% of patients had at least 12 months of follow-up. The mean number of days to definitive fixation was 1.2 in the 1-stage group and 7.8 in the 2-stage group. There were no differences between groups with respect to wound healing or any other surgery-related complications. Functional outcomes PROMIS were similar between groups. Mean implant cost in the 2-stage group was $10,821 greater than the 1-stage group, mostly because of the costs of external fixation. Median hospital inpatient charges in the 2-stage group exceeded the 1-stage group by more than $68,000 for all BTP fractures and by $61,000 for isolated BTP fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Early single-stage treatment of BTP fractures is cost-effective and is not associated with a higher complication rate than 2-stage treatment in appropriately selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Locking Plate Fixation in a Series of Bicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures Raises Treatment Costs Without Clinical Benefit.

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes and costs between locking and nonlocking (NL) constructs in the treatment of bicondylar tibial plateau (BTP) fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 academic trauma center. PATIENTS: All patients who presented with complete articular, BTP fractures OTA/AO 41-C and Schatzker VI between 2013 and 2015 were screened (n = 112). Patients treated with a mode of fixation other than plate-and-screw were excluded. Fifty-six patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included in the analysis. INTERVENTION: Operative fixation of BTP fractures with locking (n = 29) or NL (n = 27) implants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Implant cost, patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS physical function and pain interference), clinical, and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: There were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to demographics, injury characteristics, radiographic outcomes (change in alignment), or clinical outcomes (PROMIS, reoperation, nonunion, and infection). Implant costs were significantly greater in the locking group compared with the NL group (mean L, $4453; mean NL, $2569; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated improved value of treatment (less cost with no difference in clinical outcome) with NL implants for BTP fractures when dual-plate fixation strategies are performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Costs and Radiographic Outcomes of Rotational Ankle Fractures Treated by Orthopaedic Surgeons With or Without Trauma Fellowship Training.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the radiographic outcomes and surgical costs of surgically treated rotational ankle fractures in our health system between providers who had completed a trauma fellowship and those who had not. METHODS: We grouped patients into those treated by trauma-trained orthopaedic surgeons (TTOS) and non-trauma-trained orthopaedic surgeons (NTTOS). We graded the quality of fracture reductions and calculated implant-related costs of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 208 fractures met the inclusion criteria, with 119 in the TTOS group and 89 in the NTTOS group. Five patients lost reduction during the follow-up period. The adequacy of fracture reduction at final follow-up did not differ (P = 0.29). The median surgical cost was $2,940 for the NTTOS group and $1,233 for the TTOS group (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: We found no notable differences in radiographic outcomes between the TTOS and NTTOS groups. Cost analysis demonstrated markedly higher implant-related costs for the NTTOS group, with the median surgical cost being more than twice that for the TTOS group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Insertion-related pain with intramedullary nailing.

The use of intramedullary nails for the treatment of long bone fractures has become increasingly frequent over the last decade with gradually expanding indications and technological advances. Improved biomechanics relative to plates and less direct fracture exposure are some of the potential benefits of intramedullary nails. However, persistent insertion-related pain is common and may limit satisfactory long term outcomes. The etiologies of this phenomenon remain unclear. Proposed theories for which there is a growing body of supporting evidence include hardware prominence, suboptimal nail entry points leading to soft tissue irritation and structural compromise, local heterotrophic ossification, implant instability with persistent fracture micromotion, and poorly defined insertional strain. Many factors that lead to insertion-related pain are iatrogenic, and careful attention to detail and refined surgical techniques will optimize outcomes.