Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Spine Surg ; 33(4): 146-149, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31436561

RESUMEN

The instrumentation of C2 is technically challenging given the anatomic complexity of the upper cervical spine. Although the placement of C2 pedicle screws may be safer than transarticular screw placement, the inconsistent location of the transverse foramen and vertebral artery precludes placement of such screws in up to 26% of patients. In cases where vertebral artery anatomy prevents the safe placement of a pedicle screw, a pars screw is an excellent alternative. However, pars screws must stop short of the vertebral foramen, limiting the typical length of these screws to only 14-18 mm. The associated purchase and rigidity are compromised compared with the pedicle screw. A modified C2 fixation technique was developed by our group which we have named the C2 "parsicle" screw reflecting the hybrid nature of the screw incorporating aspects of pars and pedicle screw fixation.


Asunto(s)
Articulación Atlantoaxoidea/cirugía , Vértebra Cervical Axis/cirugía , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Tornillos Pediculares , Arteria Vertebral , Diseño de Equipo , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Fusión Vertebral/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA