PARENTAL AWARENESS OF THE DANGERS OF FOREIGN BODY INHALATION IN CHILDREN.

Background: The presence of a foreign body in the airways is a life-threatening condition and thus a medical emergency that requires timely diagnosis and treatment. If not recognized, it can lead to a number of serious complications. It is of the utmost importance to raise public awareness and educate parents and other caregivers on all aspects of this topic. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study aimed to investigate parental awareness of the dangers of foreign body aspiration. To determine the current level of knowledge of the parents, a 14- question questionnaire was designed and filled out by parents of children under 5 years of age referred for their regular check- ups. Results: The results show that majority of parents know that inhaling a foreign body is a potentially life-threatening condition and recognize which objects have a potential to cause foreign body aspiration. 36.9% of respondents said they knew what the symptoms of foreign body aspiration were, however only 15.6% offered a complete answer. 59.6% of the respondents could not specify the right course of action in case FBA occurred. 2% responded accurately. No statistically significant correlation was found between the number of children in the family nor the age and the sex of the parents and the level of knowledge about the aspiration of foreign bodies. Conclusion: This study indicates that parents are insufficiently informed on recognizing foreign body aspiration symtoms as well as providing first aid. Media-assisted campaigns and the internet are potential sources of easily accessible educational material.

Risks and benefits of local anesthesia versus general anesthesia in tonsillectomy.

PURPOSE: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in otorhinolaryngology. Modern general anesthetic techniques have reduced surgical risks, but performing the procedure under local anesthesia may still offer significant benefit for both the patient and surgeon. This study analyzed the risks and benefits of performing tonsillectomies under local anesthesia. METHODS: This is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study analyzing postoperative bleeding rates as a primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were duration of surgery, consumption of analgesics and total surgery cost. RESULTS: The study enrolled 1112 patients undergoing tonsillectomy, with 462 (41.5%) patients treated under general and 650 (58.5%) patients treated under local anesthesia. There were 12 postoperative bleeding incidents in in the local anesthesia group and 9 cases of postoperative bleeding in the general anesthesia group. No significant differences based on gender regarding quantity of intraoperative bleeding or patient age were observed between the patients undergoing local versus general anesthesia. However, significant differences were noted between the groups in analgesic consumption, (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.001), duration of operating room stay (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.001), duration of surgery (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.001) and cost of surgery (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative bleeding is not dependent on type of anesthesia. The results suggest that tonsillectomy performed under local anesthesia is a safe alternative to tonsillectomy under general anesthesia, with significant reduction of cost and duration of surgery.