RESUMEN
Qualitative interviews show a wide range of cough triggers and sensations in patients with refractory chronic cough. Knowledge of these may help us manage this complicated and impactful condition. https://bit.ly/41k9Ot5.
RESUMEN
Chronic cough (CC; ≥8 weeks in duration) is a common and burdensome feature of respiratory diseases. The understanding of cough has progressed significantly in recent years, albeit largely in refractory (unexplained) chronic cough (RCC) in the absence of other respiratory conditions. The prevalence of CC in respiratory diseases is poorly described, but estimates have been reported: asthma (8-58%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; 10-74%), bronchiectasis (82-98%), interstitial lung disease (ILD; 50-89%) and sarcoidosis (3-64%). CC in respiratory conditions generally predicts impaired health status and more severe disease. It is associated with increased symptom burden and disease severity in asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis and ILD, higher exacerbation frequency in asthma and bronchiectasis, and increased mortality and lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Physiologically, heightened cough reflex sensitivity (CRS) has been reported and postulated to be mechanistic in isolated RCC. Cough reflex hypersensitivity (CRH) has also been reported in asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis, ILD and sarcoidosis. Unlike recent advances in isolated RCC, there are limited studies and understanding of central cough neuropathways in other respiratory conditions. Of note, dysfunctional central voluntary cough suppression neuropathways and physiology were observed in isolation in RCC; cough suppression is preserved in COPD. Understanding in the mechanism of RCC cannot be simply extrapolated to other respiratory conditions. The restricted understanding of cough mechanisms in these conditions has limited cough-specific therapeutic options in this context. There is currently an unmet need to expand our understanding of cough in chronic respiratory conditions, both in order to improve the quality of life of patients, and to improve knowledge of cough in general. This review aims to describe the prevalence, impact, pathophysiology and management of CC in asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis, ILD and sarcoidosis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) scale is a self-reported, single-item categorical scale that is increasingly used when assessing chronic cough (CC). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish validity, repeatability, and responsiveness of the PGI-S scale in CC and use the scale to define discrete categories of severity when measured with other commonly used patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools. METHODS: Consecutive patients with CC completed the PGI-S scale, cough severity and urge to cough visual analog scales (VAS), and cough-specific health status Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at a clinic visit. Validity, repeatability, and responsiveness were assessed, and threshold scores for PRO severity categories determined. RESULTS: A total of 482 participants completed the assessments; the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 57 (46-67) years, 71% were female, and the median (IQR) duration of cough was 48 (24-120) months. They reported a median (IQR) PGI-S score of 3 (3-4; moderate severity), cough severity VAS of 57 (31-75) mm, urge to cough VAS of 62 (40-81) mm, and LCQ of 11.5 (8.7-14.4). There were strong associations between PGI-S scores and cough severity VAS (ρ = 0.81), urge to cough VAS (ρ = 0.73), and LCQ (ρ = -0.73) (all P < .001). Repeatability of the PGI-S scale was high (n = 77); the intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) was 0.85 (0.77-0.91) (P < .001). The PGI-S scale was responsive in participants with a treatment response (P < .001). The suggested PRO thresholds to define severe cough are ≥61 mm (cough severity VAS), ≥71 mm (urge to cough VAS), and ≤10 (LCQ). CONCLUSION: The PGI-S scale is a simple and valid tool that characterizes cough severity and is repeatable and responsive in CC. The proposed categorical severity thresholds for VAS and LCQ can provide intuitive meaning for patients and clinicians.