Activity of irinotecan and temozolomide in the presence of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase inhibition in neuroblastoma pre-clinical models.

BACKGROUND: The combination of temozolomide (TMZ) and irinotecan is a regimen used in neuroblastoma patients with recurrent disease. O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) may have a function in resistance to TMZ. Using neuroblastoma pre-clinical models, we determined whether the inhibition of MGMT by O(6)-benzylguanine (O6-BG) could enhance the anti-tumour activity of TMZ and irinotecan. METHODS: The cytotoxicity of TMZ and irinotecan, either alone or in combination, was measured in five neuroblastoma cell lines in the presence or absence of O6-BG with a fluorescence-based cell viability assay (DIMSCAN). Anti-tumour activity was measured in three neuroblastoma xenograft models. RESULTS: MGMT mRNA and protein were expressed in 9 out of 10 examined cell lines. Pretreatment of cells with 25 µM O6-BG decreased MGMT protein expression and enhanced The TMZ cytotoxicity by up to 0.3-1.4 logs in four out of five tested cell lines. TMZ (25 mg kg(-1) per day for 5 days every 3 weeks for four cycles) did not significantly improve mice survival, whereas the same schedule of irinotecan (7.5 mg kg(-1) per day) significantly improved survival (P<0.0001) in all three xenograft models. Combining O6-BG and/or TMZ with irinotecan further enhanced survival. CONCLUSION: Our in vitro and in vivo findings suggest that irinotecan drives the activity of irinotecan and TMZ in recurrent neuroblastoma. Inhibitors of MGMT warrant further investigation for enhancing the activity of regimens that include TMZ.

Loss of p53 function confers high-level multidrug resistance in neuroblastoma cell lines.

Neuroblastomas can acquire a sustained high-level drug resistance during chemotherapy and especially myeloablative chemoradiotherapy. p53 mutations are rare in primary neuroblastomas, but a loss of p53 function could play a role in multidrug resistance. We determined p53 function by measuring induction of p21 and/or MDM2 proteins in response to melphalan (L-PAM) in seven L-PAM-sensitive and 11 L-PAM-resistant neuroblastoma cell lines. p53 was functional in seven/seven drug-sensitive but in only 4/11 drug-resistant cell lines (P = 0.01). In four of the seven cell lines lacking p53 function, mutations of p53 were detected by the microarray GeneChip p53 Assay and automated sequencing, whereas six cell lines with functional p53 had no evidence of p53 mutations. All of the cell lines with wild-type (wt) p53 showed a strong transactivation of the p53-HBS/CAT reporter gene, whereas the four cell lines with mutant p53 failed to transactivate p53 HBS/CAT. Overexpression of MDM2 protein (relative to p53 functional lines) was seen in two p53-nonfunctional cell lines with wt p53; one showed genomic amplification of MDM2. Nonfunctional and mutated p53 was detected in a resistant cell line, whereas a sensitive cell line derived from the same patient before treatment had functional and wt p53. Loss of p53 function was selectively achieved by transduction of human papillomavirus 16 E6 (which degrades p53) into two drug-sensitive neuroblastoma cell lines with intact p53, causing high-level drug resistance to L-PAM, carboplatin, and etoposide. These data obtained with neuroblastoma cell lines suggest that the high-level drug resistance observed in some recurrent neuroblastomas is attributable to p53 mutations and/or a loss of p53 function acquired during chemotherapy. If confirmed in patient tumor samples, these data support development of p53-independent therapies for consolidation and/or salvage of recurrent neuroblastomas.

Buthionine sulfoximine and myeloablative concentrations of melphalan overcome resistance in a melphalan-resistant neuroblastoma cell line.

BACKGROUND: Alkylator resistance contributes to treatment failure in high-risk neuroblastoma. Buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) can deplete glutathione and synergistically enhance in vitro sensitivity to the alkylating agent melphalan (L-PAM) for many neuroblastoma cell lines, but optimal use of this combination needs to be defined because clinical responses have been less frequent and not durable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors established and characterized a neuroblastoma cell line (CHLA-171) from a patient who died of progressive disease after treatment with BSO and low-dose L-PAM. RESULTS: CHLA-171 lacks MYCN amplification, expresses PGP (P-glycoprotein) 9.5 RNA, and shows cell surface antigen expression (human leukocyte antigen class I weakly positive, but HSAN 1.2 (hybridoma, SAN 1.2) and anti-GD2 (anti-ganglioside GD2 antibody) strongly positive) characteristic of neuroblastoma cell lines. Twenty-four hours of BSO treatment (0-1,000 micromol/L) maximally depleted CHLA-171 glutathione to 36% of baseline. The cytotoxic response of CHLA-171 to BSO and L-PAM, alone and in combination, was measured by digital image microscopy (DIMSCAN) over a range of drug concentrations and compared with drug levels obtained in the patient during BSO/L-PAM therapy. As single agents, CHLA-171 was highly resistant to L-PAM (LD90 = 42 micromol/L; peak plasma concentration in the patient equals 3.9 micromol/L) and moderately resistant to BSO (LD90 = 509 micromol/L; steady-state concentration in the patient equals 397 micromol/L). Treatment with a 10:1 (BSO:L-PAM) fixed ratio combination synergistically overcame resistance (3-4 logs of cell kill, combination index <1) at clinically achievable levels of BSO (100-400 micromol/L) and levels of L-PAM (10-40 micromol/L) clinically achievable only with hematopoietic stem cell support. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro results obtained for CHLA-171 suggest that BSO/L-PAM therapy may be optimally effective for drug-resistant neuroblastoma using myeloablative doses of L-PAM.

p53 mutations and loss of p53 function confer multidrug resistance in neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Neuroblastomas often acquire sustained drug resistance during therapy. Sensitivities to carboplatin, etoposide, or melphalan were determined for 18 neuroblastoma cell lines; eight were sensitive and ten were resistant. As p53 mutations are rare in neuroblastomas studied at diagnosis, we determined if acquired p53 mutations and loss of function conferred multidrug resistance. RESULTS: Loss of p53 function (p53-LOF), defined as a failure to induce p21 and/or MDM2 in response to melphalan, was seen in 1/8 drug-sensitive and 6/10 drug-resistant cell lines. In four cell lines p53-LOF was associated with mutations in the DNA binding region of p53, while three cell lines with LOF and four cell lines with functional p53 had no evidence of p53 muta-tions. Nonfunctional and mutated p53 was detected in one resistant cell line, while a sensitive cell line derived from the same patient prior to treatment had functional and wild type (wt) p53. We transfected HPV 16 E6 (which mediates degradation of p53, causing LOF) into two drug-sensitive neuroblastoma cell lines with functional p53. LC(90) values of HPV 16 E6 transfected cell lines were 3-7-fold (melphalan), 8-109-fold (carboplatin), and 2-158-fold (etoposide) greater than that of LXSN-transfected controls. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that some neuroblastomas acquire p53 mutations during therapy, which is associated with a loss of p53 function, and can confer high-level multidrug resistance.

Multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1) expression in neuroblastoma cell lines and primary tumors.

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURE: MRP1 expression by neuroblastomas was evaluated by Northern blot analysis in 21 cell lines and 90 primary untreated tumors. Cytotoxicity assay in cell lines was performed for five anticancer drugs used in treating neuroblastoma. RESULTS: MRP1 expression did not correlate with drug resistance or with MYCN RNA expression in cell lines. MRP1 expression was higher in drug-sensitive cell lines established after chemotherapy relative to cell lines at diagnosis, but highly drug-resistant cell lines showed low MRP1 expression. Positive expression of MRP1 RNA in primary tumors was associated with a poorer survival relative to MRP1-negative tumors. However, MRP1 expression levels did not correlate with age, stage, MYCN amplification, or MYCN expression, and higher MRP1 expression was not associated with a worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In neuroblastoma, positive MRP1 RNA expression at diagnosis has prognostic significance, but high drug resistance is conferred by mechanisms other than MRP1.

Synergism of buthionine sulfoximine and melphalan against neuroblastoma cell lines derived after disease progression.

BACKGROUND: Despite intensive-alkylator based regimens, >50% of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) die from recurrent disease that is probably due, in part, to acquired alkylator resistance. PROCEDURE: Using buthionine sulfoximine (BSO)-mediated, glutathione (GSH) depletion to modulate melphalan (L-PAM) resistance, we examined six NB cell lines established after progressive disease following either standard chemotherapy, BSO/L-PAM therapy, or myeloablative therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). RESULTS: Four of the six cell lines (three p53-nonfunctional and one p53-functional) showed high-level L-PAM resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed ratio analysis demonstrated BSO/L-PAM synergy (combination index >1) for all cell lines tested. In L-PAM-resistant cell lines, the minimal cytotoxicity observed for BSO combined with nonmyeloablative concentrations of L-PAM was markedly enhanced (>4 logs total cell kill) when BSO was combined with myeloablative concentrations of L-PAM. In alkylator-resistant NB, the optimal use of BSO may require dose escalation of L-PAM to levels requiring AHSCT.

Cross-resistance of topoisomerase I and II inhibitors in neuroblastoma cell lines.

PURPOSE: We have previously shown that neuroblastomal cell lines established from patients after intensive chemotherapy show sustained resistance to various drugs and especially high resistance to etoposide (up to 51 times higher than a clinically achievable level). To determine whether topoisomerase I inhibitors (topotecan and CPT- 11) are effective against etoposide-resistant neuroblastomas, we studied the response to topotecan and the active metabolite of CPT-11 (SN-38) in 19 cell lines with a spectrum of sensitivities to etoposide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The panel included cell lines established at diagnosis and after disease progression either during induction chemotherapy or after myeloablative therapy supported with bone marrow transplantation. Cytotoxicities of topotecan, SN-38, and etoposide were determined using a microplate digital image microscopy (DIMSCAN) assay with a 4-log dynamic range. RESULTS: All six etoposide-resistant cell lines were resistant to topotecan and SN-38 (resistance defined as LC90 higher then clinically achievable levels for the drug). Significant cross-resistance by Pearson's correlation analysis (r > or = 0.6) occurred between topotecan + etoposide, topotecan + SN-38, and etoposide + SN-38. CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan and CPT-11 do not have significant activity against most etoposide-resistant neuroblastoma cell lines and this suggests that agents other than topoisomerase inhibitors should be explored for the treatment of recurrent neuroblastomas.

Drug resistance patterns of human neuroblastoma cell lines derived from patients at different phases of therapy.

To determine whether neuroblastomas acquire a sustained drug-resistant phenotype from exposure to chemotherapeutic agents given to patients in vivo, we studied neuroblastoma cell lines established at different points of therapy: six at diagnosis before therapy (DX), six at progressive disease during induction therapy (PD-Ind), and five at relapse after intensive chemoradiotherapy and bone marrow transplantation (PD-BMT). Cells were maintained in the absence of drug selective pressure. Dose-response curves of melphalan, cisplatin, carboplatin, doxorubicin, and etoposide for the cell line panel were determined by measuring cytotoxicity with a 96-well-plate digital imaging microscopy (DIMSCAN) microassay. Drug resistance of cell lines progressively increased with the intensity of therapy delivered in vivo. The greatest resistance was seen in PD-BMT cell lines: IC90 values in PD-BMT cell lines were higher than clinically achievable drug levels by 1-37 times for melphalan, 1-9 times for carboplatin, 25-78 times for cisplatin, 6-719 times for doxorubicin, and 3-52 times for etoposide. Genomic amplification of MYCN did not correlate with resistance. Cross-resistance by Pearson correlation (r > or = 0.6) was observed between: (a) cisplatin + doxorubicin; (b) carboplatin + cisplatin, etoposide, or melphalan; (c) etoposide + cisplatin, melphalan, or doxorubicin. These data indicate that during therapy, neuroblastomas can acquire resistance to cytotoxic drugs because of the population expansion of tumor cells possessing stable genetic or epigenetic alterations that confer resistance.

Drug resistance in human neuroblastoma cell lines correlates with clinical therapy.

To determine if neuroblastoma acquires a sustained drug-resistant phenotype from patient exposure to therapy, we studied neuroblastoma cell lines established at different points of therapy: at diagnosis prior to therapy, at progressive disease after induction therapy and at relapse after intensive chemoradiotherapy and bone marrow transplantation (post-BMT). Melphalan, cisplatin, carboplatin, doxorubicin, and etoposide cytotoxicities were determined by DIMSCAN assay. Drug resistance progressively increased with therapy and 3/5 post-BMT lines showed high resistance to most drugs. IC 90s 37, 78, 719 and 256 times higher than clinically achievable drug levels were obtained in post-BMT cell lines for melphalan, cisplatin, doxorubicin and etoposide, respectively. Resistance correlated with the therapies patients received: considerable etoposide and doxorubicin resistance (> 1000-fold resistance) was seen in cell lines obtained from patients treated with these drugs. These cell lines indicate that neuroblastoma acquires resistance to cytotoxic drugs that is probably due to stable genetic alterations occurring during therapy.