RESUMEN
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) demonstrates favorable outcomes in the management of severe depressive disorders. ECT has been consistently associated with volumetric increases in the amygdala and hippocampus. However, the underlying mechanisms of these structural changes and their association to clinical improvement remains unclear. In this cross-sectional structural MRI study, we assessed the difference in amygdala subnuclei and hippocampus subfields in n = 37 patients with either unipolar or bipolar disorder immediately after eighth ECT sessions compared to (n = 40) demographically matched patients in partial remission who did not receive ECT (NoECT group). Relative to NoECT, the ECT group showed significantly larger bilateral amygdala volumes post-treatment, with the effect originating from the lateral, basal, and paralaminar nuclei and the left corticoamydaloid transition area. No significant group differences were observed for the hippocampal or cortical volumes. ECT was associated with a significant decrease in depressive symptoms. However, there were no significant correlations between amygdala subnuclei volumes and symptom improvement. Our study corroborates previous reports on increased amygdalae volumes following ECT and further identifies the subnuclei driving this effect. However, the therapeutic effect of ECT does not seem to be directly related to structural changes in the amygdala.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether treatment early after onset in bipolar disorder may improve the long-term illness course. The early intervention in affective disorders (EIA) randomised controlled trial found that 2-years treatment in a specialised mood disorder clinic combining evidence-based pharmacological treatment with group psychoeducation improved clinical outcomes compared with standard treatment in patients with bipolar disorder discharged after their 1st, 2nd, or 3rd hospital admission. We aimed to assess the 16 years long-term outcomes after randomisation of the participants in the EIA trial. METHODS: Data were obtained by linking nation-wide Danish population-based registers. All 158 participants of the EIA trial (Trial Registration Number NCT00253071) were followed from time of randomisation (2005-2009) to end of study (31 December 2021). The primary outcome was risk of psychiatric readmission. Secondary outcomes were total admissions and costs, medication use, intentional self-harm or suicide attempt or suicide, and socio-economic measures. RESULTS: The absolute mean risk of psychiatric readmission was 49.3% in the intervention group and 59.8% in the control group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (b = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.26 to 0.047, p = 0.18). Compared with the control group, patients in the intervention group had numerically fewer total admission days (mean (SD) 44 (77) versus 62 (109)), lower total cost of psychiatric hospital admissions and hospital-based outpatient visits (mean (SD) 22,001 (36793) euros versus 29,822 (52671) euros) and higher use of lithium and antipsychotics, but the differences were not statistically significant. Fewer patients in the intervention group had an event of intentional self-harm or suicide attempt or suicide during follow-up (OR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.15-0.40, p < 0.001) compared with the control group and more patients in the intervention group used antiepileptics (OR 2.21, 95% CI: 1.08-4.60, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Analyses of very long-term outcomes of the EIA trial may potentially indicate a beneficial effect of the intervention at the long term but were likely underpowered to detect a more subtle effect and for most outcomes the differences between groups were not statistically significant.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Dinamarca , Intervención Médica Temprana/métodos , Intervención Médica Temprana/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Autodestructiva/terapia , Conducta Autodestructiva/epidemiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicoterapia de Grupo/métodos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: While mood instability is strongly linked to depression, its ramifications remain unexplored. In patients diagnosed with unipolar depression (UD), our objective was to investigate the association between mood instability, calculated based on daily smartphone-based patient-reported data on mood, and functioning, quality of life, perceived stress, empowerment, rumination, recovery, worrying and wellbeing. METHODS: Patients with UD completed daily smartphone-based self-assessments of mood for 6 months, making it possible to calculate mood instability using the Root Mean Squared Successive Difference (rMSSD) method. A total of 59 patients with UD were included. Data were analyzed using mixed effects regression models. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant association between increased mood instability and increased perceived stress (adjusted model: B: 0.010, 95% CI: 0.00027; 0.021, p = 0.044), and worrying (adjusted model: B: 0.0060, 95% CI: 0.000016; 0.012, p = 0.049), and decreased quality of life (adjusted model: B: -0.0056, 95% CI: -0.011; -0.00028, p = 0.039), recovery (adjusted model: B: -0.032, 95% CI: -0.0059; -0.00053, p = 0.019) and wellbeing. There were no statistically significant associations between mood instability and functioning, empowerment, and rumination (p's >0.09). CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the significant influence of mood instability on patients' daily lives. Identification of mood fluctuations offer potential insights into the trajectory of the illness in these individuals.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo , Calidad de Vida , Teléfono Inteligente , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Afecto , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Empoderamiento , Ansiedad/psicología , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Rumiación CognitivaRESUMEN
Evidence suggests a role for low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of peripheral markers of inflammation and oxidative stress in children and adolescents under 20 years of age with bipolar disorder. We searched PubMed, Embase and psycINFO and performed random effects meta-analysis calculating standardized mean differences (SMD) of marker levels between patients with bipolar disorder and healthy control individuals. Ten studies comprising a total of 418 patients with bipolar disorder and 3017 healthy control individuals were included. The levels of C-Reactive Protein were higher in patients with bipolar disorder compared with healthy individuals (SMD 0.53; 95â¯%CI: 0.33-0.74; I2 = 0â¯%). For other biomarkers there were no statistically significant differences between groups. Findings were limited by a low number of studies and participants and methodological issues in the included studies. More and larger studies using rigorous methodology are needed to establish the role of inflammation and oxidative stress in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Trastorno Bipolar , Inflamación , Estrés Oxidativo , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/sangre , Trastorno Bipolar/metabolismo , Trastorno Bipolar/fisiopatología , Estrés Oxidativo/fisiología , Niño , Adolescente , Biomarcadores/sangre , Inflamación/metabolismo , Inflamación/sangre , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This exploratory study investigated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) synaptic protein biomarkers in bipolar disorder (BD), aiming to highlight the neurobiological basis of the disorder. With shared cognitive impairment features between BD and Alzheimer's disease, and considering increased dementia risk in BD patients, the study explores potential connections. METHODS: Fifty-nine well-characterized patients with BD and thirty-seven healthy control individuals were examined and followed for one year. Synaptic proteins encompassing neuronal pentraxins (NPTX)1, NPTX2, and NPTX-receptor, 14-3-3 protein family epsilon, and zeta/delta, activating protein-2 complex subunit beta, synucleins beta-synuclein and gamma-synuclein, complexin-2, phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1, rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha, and syntaxins 1B and 7 were measured in CSF using a microflow liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring set-up. Biomarker levels were compared between BD and HC and in BD before, during, and after mood episodes. RESULTS: The synaptic proteins revealed no statistically significant differences between BD and HC, neither at baseline, one-year follow-up, or in terms of changes from baseline to follow-up. Moreover, the CSF synaptic protein levels in patients with BD were unaltered compared to baseline when they stabilized in euthymia following an affective episode and at one-year follow-up. LIMITATION: It is uncertain what the CSF biomarker concentrations reflect since we yet do not know the mechanisms of release of these proteins, and we are uncertain of what increased or decreased levels reflect. CONCLUSION: This first-ever investigation of a panel of CSF protein biomarkers of synaptic dysfunction in patients with BD and HC individuals found no statistically significant differences cross-sectionally or longitudinally.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Trastorno Bipolar , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Femenino , Masculino , Biomarcadores/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Adulto , Sinapsis , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso/líquido cefalorraquídeoRESUMEN
Current evidence for pharmacological treatment of mania during hospitalisation is insufficient as there are no larger well-designed randomised trials of comparative medical treatments of mania during inpatient stays. Moreover, there is considerable variation in pharmacological medication in clinical practice during hospitalisation for mania. Based on a hospital data overview, a systematic search of the literature and a three-day consensus meeting, this narrative review proposed an algorithm for optimised pharmacological treatment of mania during hospitalisation and its subsequent scientific evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Hospitalización , Manía , Humanos , Manía/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the neural underpinnings of emotional cognition subgroups in recently diagnosed patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and change over time over a 15-month follow-up period. METHODS: Patients and healthy controls (HC) underwent emotional and nonemotional cognitive assessments and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at the baseline (BD n = 87; HC n = 65) and at 15-month follow-up (BD n = 44; HC n = 38). Neural activity during emotion reactivity and regulation in response to aversive pictures was assessed during fMRI. Patients were clustered into subgroups based on their emotional cognition and, with HC, were compared longitudinally on cognition and neural activity during emotion reactivity and regulation. RESULTS: Patients were optimally clustered into two subgroups: Subgroup 1 (n = 40, 46%) was characterized by heightened emotional reactivity in negative social scenarios, which persisted over time, but were otherwise cognitively intact. This subgroup exhibited stable left amygdala hyper-activity over time during emotion reactivity compared to subgroup 2. Subgroup 2 (n = 47, 54%) was characterized by global emotional cognitive impairments, including stable difficulties with emotion regulation over time. During emotion regulation across both time points, this group exhibited hypo-activity in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Additionally, patients in subgroup 2 had poorer nonemotional cognition, had more psychiatric hospital admissions and history of psychotic episodes than those in subgroup 1. CONCLUSIONS: Broad impairments in emotional cognition in approximately half of BD patients and associated nonemotional cognitive deficits may originate from insufficient recruitment of prefrontal resources, contributing to poorer clinical outcomes.
RESUMEN
Comprehensive knowledge of factors causing and sustaining functional impairment in patients with affective disorders is warranted. The aim is to investigate associations between clinical factors (such as affective symptoms) and personal factors (such as personality traits, coping strategies, and childhood trauma experiences) on functioning and improvement of functioning in patients with affective disorders. This exploratory study includes data from 103 patients with bipolar disorder and unipolar depressive disorder. Clinician-rated functioning was assessed at baseline using the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST), and performance-based functioning was assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Data on clinical and personal factors were collected at baseline. Personal factors were measured by the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPQ), Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Pearson correlations and multiple linear regression models were used to analyse the association of clinical and personal factors with baseline functioning (FAST) and to identify predictors of improvement in functioning (AMPS) from baseline to follow-up. At baseline, greater depressive symptom severity, the personality trait neuroticism, emotional coping, and childhood trauma all correlated with poorer functioning (higher FAST scores). In multiple linear regression models, depression severity, emotional coping and childhood trauma were significant predictors of poorer functioning. More childhood trauma was a predictor of less functional improvement measured by AMPS at 6-month follow-up. In conclusion, maladaptive coping styles and depressive symptoms contribute to functional impairment in patients with affective disorders, while childhood trauma has a negative impact on long-term functional outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Relatives of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) often experience emotional burden with stress and depressive symptoms that again increase the likelihood of destabilization and relapses in the patient. The effects of group-based psychoeducation have not been investigated in large-scale real-world settings. We are currently conducting a large-scale real-world randomized controlled parallel group trial (RCT) to test whether group-based psychoeducation for 200 relatives to patients with BD improves mood instability and other critical outcomes in relatives and the corresponding patients with BD. METHODS: The trial is designed as a two-arm, parallel-group randomized trial with a balanced randomization 1:1 to either group-based psychoeducation or a waiting list for approximately 4 months and subsequent group-based psychoeducation. The primary outcome measure is mood instability calculated based on daily smartphone-based mood self-assessments. Other relevant outcomes are measured, including patients' reported outcomes, assessing self-assessed burden, self-efficacy, and knowledge about BD. DISCUSSION: This protocol describes our currently ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) that aims at investigating group-based psychoeducation as an intervention for relatives of individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BD). The study is the first large-scale real-world RCT to focus on a relatively short intervention of psychoeducation (6 sessions of 2 h each) in a large group of relatives (approximately 30 participants per group). With this focus, we wish to test an intervention that is feasible to implement in real-life psychiatric settings with limited budgets and time. It is also the first study to use mood instability in relatives as the primary outcome measure and to investigate whether mood instability and other affective symptoms in patients and relatives covary. It could be considered as limitations, that the trial is not blinded and does not include long-term follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06176001. Registered on 2023-12-19. The study is approved by the data agency (P-2021-809). The project was allowed to be initiated without permission from the Scientific Ethical Committees for the Capital Region, because it according to section 1, paragraph 4 of the Committee Act was not defined as a health scientific intervention study (case number 21063013).
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Familia/psicología , Afecto , Psicoterapia de Grupo/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Autoeficacia , Adulto , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Cuidadores/psicología , Cuidadores/educación , FemeninoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a significant contribution of genetic factors to the etiology of bipolar disorder (BD). Unaffected first-degree relatives of patients (UR) with BD are at increased risk of developing mental disorders and may manifest cognitive impairments and alterations in brain functional and connective dynamics, akin to their affected relatives. METHODS: In this prospective longitudinal study, resting-state functional connectivity was used to explore stable and progressive markers of vulnerability i.e. abnormalities shared between UR and BD compared to healthy controls (HC) and resilience i.e. features unique to UR compared to HC and BD in full or partial remission (UR n = 72, mean age = 28.0 ± 7.2 years; HC n = 64, mean age = 30.0 ± 9.7 years; BD patients n = 91, mean age = 30.6 ± 7.7 years). Out of these, 34 UR, 48 BD, and 38 HC were investigated again following a mean time of 1.3 ± 0.4 years. RESULTS: At baseline, the UR showed lower connectivity values within the default mode network (DMN), frontoparietal network, and the salience network (SN) compared to HC. This connectivity pattern in UR remained stable over the follow-up period and was not present in BD, suggesting a resilience trait. The UR further demonstrated less negative connectivity between the DMN and SN compared to HC, abnormality that remained stable over time and was also present in BD, suggesting a vulnerability marker. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate the coexistence of both vulnerability-related abnormalities in resting-state connectivity, as well as adaptive changes possibly promoting resilience to psychopathology in individual at familial risk.
RESUMEN
Background: Lipids influence brain function and mental health. Understanding the role of apolipoproteins in affective disorders could provide valuable insights and potentially pave the way for novel therapeutic approaches. Methods: We examined the apolipoprotein E genotype and ApoE-levels, lipid profiles, and the correlation with cognition in 204 monozygotic (MZ) twins with unipolar or bipolar disorder in remission or partial remission (affected, AT), their unaffected co-twins (high-risk, HR), and twins with no personal or family history of affective disorder (low-risk, LR). Results: The APOE genotype was not associated with affective disorders. No significant group differences in ApoE levels were found between the three risk groups. Post hoc analysis group-wise comparisons showed higher ApoE levels in the AT than HR twins and in the concordant AT twin pairs relative to the discordant twin pairs. Within the discordant twin pairs, higher ApoE levels were observed in the affected twins (AT = 39.4 mg/L vs. HR = 36.8 mg/L, p = 0.037). Limitations: The present study could benefit from a larger sample size. We did not assess dietary habits. Conclusions: The results did not support our main hypothesis. However, exploratory post hoc analysis suggests a role for plasma ApoE and triglycerides in affective disorders. Future research is needed.
RESUMEN
Bipolar disorder (BD) is often accompanied by persistent cognitive impairment. However, screening for cognitive impairment in the clinic is challenged by a lack of consensus on screening procedures. This study assesses cognitive impairment prevalence and screening feasibility in alignment with the International Society for Bipolar Disorder Targeting Cognition Task Force recommendations. Between January 2022 and May 2023, 136 newly diagnosed BD outpatients were assessed with the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry after 15-20 months of specialised care at the Copenhagen Affective Disorder Clinic. Cognitive impairment patterns and associations with cognitive complaints, perceived stress, and functioning were examined. Most screened patients (73 %) achieved full or partial remission, with 51 % being cognitively normal, 38 % showing global impairments, and 11 % displaying selective impairments. Among remitted patients, 56 % were cognitively normal, while 31 % and 13 % exhibited global or selective impairments, respectively. Both objectively impaired patient groups reported more subjective cognitive difficulties than those who were cognitively normal. The globally impaired group also demonstrated poorer functioning, more depressive symptoms and lower quality of life than cognitively normal patients. Across all patients, lower cognitive performance correlated with more cognitive complaints, lower functioning, lower quality of life, and more depressive symptoms. Cognitive screenings were relatively easily implementable, involving only a 1.5 h session including mood ratings, feedback and cognitive strategy discussion. The study highlights the clinical relevance and feasibility of cognitive screenings in BD patients, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions given frequent cognitive impairment in clinically stable individuals.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Disfunción Cognitiva , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Disfunción Cognitiva/psicología , Pacientes Ambulatorios/psicología , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida/psicologíaRESUMEN
Bipolar disorder is associated with increased rates of many physical disorders, but the effects of medication are unclear. We systematically investigated the associations between sustained use of first line maintenance agents, lithium versus lamotrigine and valproate, and the risk of physical disorders using a nation-wide population-based target trial emulation covering the entire 5.9 million inhabitants in Denmark. We identified two cohorts. Cohort 1: patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder prior to first purchase (N = 12.607). Cohort 2: all 156.678 adult patients who had their first ever purchase (since 1995) of either lithium, lamotrigine or valproate between 1997 and 2021 regardless of diagnosis. Main analyses investigated the effect of sustained exposure defined as exposure for all consecutive 6-months periods during a 10-year follow-up. Outcomes included a diagnosis of incident stroke, arteriosclerosis, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, myxedema, osteoporosis, dementia, Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease and cancer (including subtypes). In both Cohorts 1 and 2, there were no systematic statistically significant differences in associations between sustained use of lithium versus lamotrigine and valproate, respectively, and any physical disorder, including subtypes of disorders, except myxedema, for which exposure to lithium increased the absolute risk of myxedema with 7-10 % compared with lamotrigine or valproate. In conclusion, these analyses emulating a target trial of "real world" observational register-based data show that lithium does not increase the risk of developing any kind of physical disorders, except myxedema, which may be a result of detection bias.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Trastorno Bipolar , Lamotrigina , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Lamotrigina/efectos adversos , Lamotrigina/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/efectos adversos , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Compuestos de Litio/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Litio/uso terapéutico , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversos , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Persistent cognitive impairment is frequent across bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD), highlighting an urgent need for pro-cognitive treatments. AIM: This study investigated effects of erythropoietin (EPO) on cognitive impairment and dorsal prefrontal cortex (dPFC) activity in affective disorders. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, cognitively impaired patients with remitted BD or MDD received 1 weekly recombinant human EPO (40,000 IU/mL) or saline infusion for a 12-week period. Assessments were conducted at baseline, after 2 weeks of treatment (week 3), immediately after treatment (week 13) and at 6-months follow-up. Participants underwent functional MRI during performance on a n-back working memory (WM) task at baseline and week 3, and for a subgroup 6 weeks post-treatment (week 18). The primary outcome was a cognitive composite score at week 13, whereas secondary outcomes comprised sustained attention and functioning. WM-related dPFC activity was a tertiary outcome. RESULTS: Data were analysed for 101 of the 103 included patients (EPO, n = 58; saline, n = 43). There were no effects of EPO over saline on any cognitive or functional outcomes or on WM-related dPFC activity. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of treatment-related changes in cognition and neural activity was unexpected and contrasts with multiple previous preclinical and clinical studies. It is possible that the lack of effects resulted from a recent change in the manufacturing process for EPO. Nevertheless, the findings support the validity of dPFC target engagement as a biomarker model for pro-cognitive effects, according to which treatments that do not improve cognition should not modulate dPFC activity. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: EudraCT no.: 2016-004023-24; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03315897.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Eritropoyetina , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Trastornos del Humor/tratamiento farmacológico , Eritropoyetina/farmacología , Eritropoyetina/uso terapéutico , Disfunción Cognitiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Cognición , Corteza Prefrontal , Resultado del Tratamiento , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The emerging use of biomarkers in research and tailored care introduces a need for information about the association between biomarkers and basic demographics and lifestyle factors revealing expectable concentrations in healthy individuals while considering general demographic differences. METHODS: A selection of 47 biomarkers, including markers of inflammation and vascular stress, were measured in plasma samples from 9876 Danish Blood Donor Study participants. Using regression models, we examined the association between biomarkers and sex, age, Body Mass Index (BMI), and smoking. RESULTS: Here we show that concentrations of inflammation and vascular stress biomarkers generally increase with higher age, BMI, and smoking. Sex-specific effects are observed for multiple biomarkers. CONCLUSION: This study provides comprehensive information on concentrations of 47 plasma biomarkers in healthy individuals. The study emphasizes that knowledge about biomarker concentrations in healthy individuals is critical for improved understanding of disease pathology and for tailored care and decision support tools.
Blood-based biomarkers are circulating molecules that can help to indicate health or disease. Biomarker levels may vary depending on demographic and lifestyle factors such as age, sex, smoking status, and body mass index. Here, we examine the effects of these demographic and lifestyle factors on levels of biomarkers related to activation of the immune system and cardiovascular stress. Measurements of 47 different proteins were performed on blood samples from nearly 10,000 healthy Danish blood donors. Measurement data were linked with questionnaire data to assess effects of lifestyle. We found that immune activation and vascular stress generally increased with age, BMI, and smoking. As these measurements are from healthy blood donors they can serve as a reference for expectable effects and inflammation levels in healthy individuals. Knowledge about the healthy state is important for understanding disease progression and optimizing care.
RESUMEN
Excessive oxidative stress-generated nucleoside damage seems to play a key role in bipolar disorder (BD) and may present a trait phenomenon associated with familial risk and is one of the putative mechanisms explaining accelerated atherosclerosis and premature cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in younger patients with BD. However, oxidative stress-generated nucleoside damage has not been studied in young BD patients and their unaffected relatives (UR). Therefore, we compared oxidative stress-generated damage to DNA and RNA in young patients newly diagnosed with BD, UR, and healthy control individuals (HC). Systemic oxidative stress-generated DNA and RNA damage levels were compared by analyzing urinary levels of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanosine in participants aged 15-25 years, including 133 patients newly diagnosed with BD, 57 UR, and 83 HC. Compared with HC, damage to DNA was 21.8% higher in BD patients (B = 1.218, 95% CI = 1.111-1.335, p = <0.001) and 22.5% higher in UR (B = 1.225, 95% CI = 1.090-1.377, p = <0.002), while damage to RNA was 14.8% higher in BD patients (B = 1.148, 95% CI = 1.082-1.219, p = <0.001) and 14.0% higher in UR (B = 1.140, 95% CI = 1.055-1.230, p = < 0.001) in models adjusted for sex and age after correction for multiple comparison. Levels did not differ between patients with BD and UR. Our findings support higher oxidative stress-generated nucleoside damage being a trait phenomenon in BD associated with familial risk and highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment to prevent illness progression and development of premature CVD.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/genética , Nucleósidos , ARN , ADN , Predisposición Genética a la EnfermedadRESUMEN
The aims were to investigate 1) differences in smartphone-based data on phone usage between bipolar disorder (BD) and unipolar disorder (UD) and 2) by using machine learning models, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the combined smartphone data in classifying BD and UD. Daily smartphone-based self-assessments of mood and same-time passively collected smartphone data on smartphone usage was available for six months. A total of 64 patients with BD and 74 patients with UD were included. Patients with BD during euthymic states compared with UD in euthymic states had a lower number of incoming phone calls/ day (B: -0.70, 95%CI: -1.37; -0.70, p=0.040). Patients with BD during depressive states had a lower number of incoming and outgoing phone calls/ day as compared with patients with UD in depressive states. In classification by using machine learning models, 1) overall (regardless of the affective state), patients with BD were classified with an AUC of 0.84, which reduced to 0.48 when using a leave-one-patient-out crossvalidation (LOOCV) approach; similarly 2) during a depressive state, patients with BD were classified with an AUC of 0.86, which reduced to 0.42 with LOOCV; 3) during a euthymic state, patients with BD were classified with an AUC of 0.87, which reduced to 0.46 with LOOCV. While digital phenotyping shows promise in differentiating between patients with BD and UD, it highlights the challenge of generalizing to unseen individuals. It should serve as an complement to comprehensive clinical evaluation by clinicians.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Emociones , Aprendizaje Automático , AfectoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-term studies comparing nonresponse to antidepressants for major depressive disorder (MDD) are lacking. AIMS: To present systematic population-based nation-wide register data on comparative 2-year non-response within six antidepressant drug classes and 17 different antidepressants in patients with MDD. METHOD: The study included all 106,920 patients in Denmark with a first main index diagnosis of MDD at a psychiatric hospital inpatient or outpatient contact and who subsequently had a purchase of an antidepressant in the period from 1995 to 2018. Non-response to first antidepressant within a 2-year study period was defined as switch to or add-on of another antidepressant, antipsychotic medication, lithium, or hospitalization. Analyses emulated a targeted trial in populations standardized according to age, sex, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity with psychiatric and physical disorders. RESULTS: Compared with sertraline, there was no difference for citalopram (RR: 1.00 [95% CI: 0.98-1.02]) but fluoxetine (1.13 [95% CI: 1.10-1.17]), paroxetine (1.06 [95% CI: 1.01-1.10]) and escitalopram (1.22 [95% CI: 1.18-1.25]) were associated with higher risk ratio of non-responses. Within selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, sertraline outperformed reboxetine; within serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, venlafaxine outperformed duloxetine; within noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants, mirtazapine outperformed mianserin and within the class of other antidepressants, sertraline outperformed agomelatine and vortioxetine. Within tricyclic antidepressants, compared to amitriptyline, nortriptyline, dosulepin, and clomipramine had higher non-response, whereas there was no difference for imipramine. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses emulating a randomized trial of "real world" observational register-based data show that 2-year long-term non-responses to some antidepressants within six different drug classes are increased over others.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Humanos , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Fluoxetina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina , Sertralina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIM: This naturalistic clinical study aims to investigate differences between newly diagnosed patients with bipolar type I (BDI) and bipolar type II (BDII) disorders in socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, affective symptoms, cognition, functioning and comorbidity with personality disorders. METHODS: The BD diagnosis and type were confirmed using the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. Affective symptoms were assessed with the Young Mania Rating Scale, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Major Depressive Index, and the Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale. Functional impairment was assessed with the Functional Assessment Short Test. Cognitive impairment was evaluated by the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry and the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment. Finally, comorbid personality disorders were assessed with the Standardized Assessment of Personality-Abbreviated Scale and structured interview Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-disorders. RESULTS: 383 newly diagnosed patients were included (BDI: n = 125; BDII: n = 258). Against expectations, we found no more depressive symptoms in BDII compared with BDI nor any differences in cognitive, childhood trauma or overall functional impairment. The only difference was lower occupational impairment in the BDII group. LIMITATIONS: The self-reported measures of cognitive difficulties and childhood trauma involved potential bias (recall or other). Despite BD being newly diagnosed a diagnostic delay was observed. CONCLUSION: Patients newly diagnosed with BDII and BDI had similar burdens of depressive symptoms and cognitive and overall functional impairment, however patients with BDI had lower occupational functioning. No statistically significant difference was found in prevalence of comorbid personality disorders between patients with BDI and BDII.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Diagnóstico Tardío , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Manía/epidemiología , ComorbilidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorders (BD) figures on top of the World Health Organization classification of disabling disorders. It is unclear if there are socioeconomic, functioning, and cognition differences in young patients newly diagnosed with BD and whether these are different for young and adult patients newly diagnosed with BD. Understanding these differences is important for tailored treatment and support. METHODS: Participant groups included 401 patients newly diagnosed with BD, 145 of their unaffected first-degree relatives (UR) and 209 healthy control individuals (HC). First, we compared socio-economic status, functioning and cognition between young patients newly diagnosed with BD (150), UR (61) and HC (92) (15-25 years) and adult patients newly diagnosed with BD (251), UR (84) and HC (117) (>25 years), respectively. Second, within patients, we compared functioning and cognition between young and adult patients newly diagnosed with BD. RESULTS: In both participant groups, patients newly diagnosed with BD, and to a lesser degree UR, had lower socio-economic status and impaired functioning and cognition compared with HC. Further, young patients newly diagnosed with BD were less functionally impaired, than adults newly diagnosed with BD, whereas cognition did not differ between groups. LIMITATIONS: Applied tools for assessments of functioning and cognition are not validated below age 18. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, lower socio-economic status and impaired functioning and cognition were found both in young and adult patients newly diagnosed with BD and their UR compared with young and adult HC, respectively. Young patients were less functionally impaired than adults, but cognition was similarly impaired.