Efficacy and safety of aticaprant, a kappa receptor antagonist, adjunctive to oral SSRI/SNRI antidepressant in major depressive disorder: results of a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

This was a double-blind, randomized, phase 2 study of adults (18-64 years) with DSM-5 diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD), with moderate-to-severe episode severity (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] ≥25) despite an adequate course with ongoing antidepressant for ≥6 weeks to ≤12 months. Following a double-blind placebo lead-in period (up to 3 weeks), participants were randomized to receive once daily aticaprant 10 mg or continue placebo, added to their ongoing treatment, for 6 weeks. Of 184 participants enrolled, 169 were included in safety analyses (aticaprant n = 85, placebo n = 84) and 166 in full intent-to-treat (fITT) efficacy analyses; 121 placebo lead-in non-responders (<30% reduction in MADRS total score) in fITT were included in enriched ITT (eITT) analyses. Improvement (least squares mean difference [upper limit 1-sided 80% CI] versus placebo) in MADRS total score at week 6 for aticaprant was significant versus placebo (eITT: -2.1 [-1.09], 1-sided p = 0.044; effect size (ES) 0.23; fITT -3.1 [2.21], 1-sided p = 0.002; ES 0.36). The between-group difference was larger among participants with Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) score greater/equal to versus less than baseline median SHAPS. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events reported for aticaprant (versus placebo) were headache (11.8% versus 7.1%), diarrhea (8.2% versus 2.4%), nasopharyngitis (5.9% versus 2.4%), and pruritus (5.9% versus 0%). One participant (1.2%) in each arm discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. In this study of participants with MDD and inadequate response to SSRI/SNRI, adjunctive treatment with aticaprant significantly reduced depressive symptoms versus placebo, without resulting in significant safety signals, supporting further investigation in larger trials.

The selective orexin-2 receptor antagonist seltorexant improves sleep: An exploratory double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study in antidepressant-treated major depressive disorder patients with persistent insomnia.

BACKGROUND: Insomnia is common in patients with major depressive disorder. Although antidepressants improve mood, insomnia often persists as a result of physiological hyperarousal. The orexin-2 receptor is increasingly being recognized as a new target for the treatment of persistent insomnia in major depressive disorder . AIM: This exploratory study investigated the effects of seltorexant on objective sleep parameters and subjective depressive symptoms in antidepressant treated major depressive disorder patients with persistent insomnia. METHODS: Twenty male and female patients received a single dose of 10, 20, 40 mg seltorexant and placebo with a washout period of seven days in a double-blind four-way crossover study. Effects on latency to persistent sleep, total sleep time and sleep efficiency were assessed with polysomnography. Subjective changes in mood were explored by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report. Safety was recorded and suicidal ideation and behavior were assessed with the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale. RESULTS: Latency to persistent sleep was significantly shorter for all doses of seltorexant compared to placebo. Placebo least square mean was 61.05 min with least square mean ratios treatment/placebo (80% confidence interval) of 0.32 (0.24-0.44), 0.15 (0.11-0.2) and 0.17 (0.12-0.23) 19.69, 9.2, 10.15 for 10, 20 and 40 mg seltorexant respectively, (all p<0.001). Total sleep time was significantly longer for all doses of seltorexant compared to placebo. Sleep efficiency was significantly improved. The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report demonstrated a trend to mood-improvement for the 40 mg group. CONCLUSIONS: Seltorexant showed a statistically significant, dose-dependent decrease in latency to persistent sleep, and increase in total sleep time and sleep efficiency combined with a tendency toward subjectively improved mood.

A randomized Phase 2 study to evaluate the orexin-2 receptor antagonist seltorexant in individuals with insomnia without psychiatric comorbidity.

BACKGROUND: Seltorexant is a potent and selective antagonist of the orexin-2 receptor that is being developed for the treatment of insomnia and major depressive disorder. AIMS: The primary objective was to investigate the effect of seltorexant on sleep efficiency after single and multiple dose administration in subjects with insomnia disorder without psychiatric comorbidity. Secondary objectives included evaluation of total sleep time, latency to persistent sleep, and wake after sleep onset. Subjects received 40 mg of seltorexant for five days during Period 1 and placebo during Period 2 or vice versa in this randomized, two-way crossover study. Objective sleep parameters were evaluated by polysomnography over 8 h on Day 1/2 (single dose) and on Day 5/6 (multiple doses). Subjective sleep parameters were assessed by questionnaires. RESULTS: Twenty-seven subjects completed the study. The mean changes in sleep efficiency (% (SD)) of seltorexant from placebo at Day 1/2 were 5.8 (9.2), and 7.9 (9.8) at Day 5/6 ( p < 0.001 at both time points); in total sleep time (min (SD)) 27.7 (44.3) and 37.9 (47.1), respectively; in latency to persistent sleep (min (SD)) -18.8 (21.3) and -29.9 (27.7), respectively; and in wake after sleep onset (min (SD)) -11.1 (36.4) and -11.3 (46.5). The most common adverse events were headache and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep efficiency was increased with seltorexant treatment compared with placebo. Treatment with seltorexant resulted in a prolonged total sleep time, shorter latency to persistent sleep and wake after sleep onset. There were no unexpected safety findings.

Efficacy and safety of an adjunctive mGlu2 receptor positive allosteric modulator to a SSRI/SNRI in anxious depression.

This phase 2a, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, proof-of-concept study was designed to evaluate, efficacy, safety and tolerability of JNJ-40411813/ADX71149, a novel metabotropic glutamate 2 receptor positive allosteric modulator as an adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) with significant anxiety symptoms. Eligible patients (18-64 years) had a DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS17) score of ≥ 18, HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor score of ≥ 7, and an insufficient response to current treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. The doubly-randomized, 8-week double-blind treatment phase was comprised of two 4-week periods, from which a combined test statistic was generated, with pre-determined weights assigned to each of the 2 treatment periods. Period 1: patients (n=121) were randomly assigned (1:1) to JNJ-40411813 (n=62; 50mg to 150 mg b.i.d, flexibly dosed) or placebo (n=59); Period 2: placebo-treated patients (n=22) who continued to meet entry severity criteria were re-randomized (1:1) to JNJ-40411813 or placebo, while other patients underwent sham re-randomization and continued on their same treatment. Of 121 randomized patients, 100 patients (82.6%) were completers. No efficacy signal was detected on the primary endpoint, the 6-item Hamilton Anxiety Subscale (HAM-A6, p=0.51). Efficacy signals (based on prespecified 1-sided p<0.20) were evident on several secondary outcome measures of both depression (HDRS17 total score, 6-item subscale of HDRS17 assessing core depressive symptoms [HAM-D6], and Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology [IDS-C30]) and anxiety (HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor, IDS-C30 anxiety subscale). Although well-tolerated, the results do not suggest efficacy for JNJ-40411813 as an adjunctive treatment for patients with MDD with significant anxious symptoms in the dose range studied.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterisation of JNJ-40411813, a positive allosteric modulator of mGluR2, in two randomised, double-blind phase-I studies.

Metabotropic glutamate receptor-2 positive allosteric modulator, JNJ-40411813 (ADX71149), was characterised for clinical effects in healthy volunteers in two phase-1 studies. In study 1, healthy men received 50-, 100-, 150- or 225 mg and women received 100 mg JNJ-40411813 (n=6, each cohort) or placebo (n=2, each cohort) twice daily for seven days; smoking men (n=30) received placebo twice daily on days 1-7, 100 mg JNJ-40411813 (n=20) or placebo (n=10) on days 8-14. In study 2, healthy men received intravenous 0.005 mg/kg S(+) ketamine over 60 min at 3 (n=24; cohort 1), 12 h (n=8; cohort 3), and 24 h (n=8; cohort 2) after a single oral dose of 500 mg JNJ-40411813 or placebo. The pharmacokinetics and effects of JNJ-40411813 on cognition and subjective awareness were evaluated. Plasma JNJ-40411813 exposure was dose-dependent, t max ranged from 3-4 h and t 1/2 19.4-34.2 h across the dose levels. JNJ-40411813 significantly (p=0.02) reduced continuity of attention score (150 mg dose) and ameliorated smoking withdrawal-induced changes in power of attention and quality of episodic memory versus placebo. A modest reduction in alertness was observed at 150-225 mg doses, JNJ-40411813 (500 mg) reduced S(+) ketamine-induced negative symptoms by approximately 43% and 30% in cohorts 1 and 3, respectively. JNJ-40411813 was generally well-tolerated.

Effects of nicotine withdrawal on cognition in a clinical trial setting.

RATIONALE: Smoking withdrawal has been widely established to produce a range of impairments to the quality of several major domains of cognitive function including attention, working memory and episodic memory. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine the degree to which smoking withdrawal will produce impairments in cognitive function in phase I clinical trials. METHODS: Healthy male volunteers who were housed in a clinical trial facility for 16 days underwent periods of ad libitum smoking and smoking withdrawal. RESULTS: Smoking withdrawal disrupted aspects of attention and episodic verbal recall and recognition. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms previous work showing cognitive declines in smoking withdrawal and illustrates that such effects occur in ongoing safety and tolerability studies of new medicines and thus require careful consideration for the assessment of cognitive function in such trials as well as the accurate attribution of adverse events to the safety profiles of the medicines.

Preoperative radiotherapy with capecitabine and mitomycin C in locally advanced rectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative radiotherapy with capecitabine and mitomycin C in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, non-randomized, phase II study was performed on 49 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Preoperative radiotherapy was conducted on linear accelerators (15 or 18 MV) with a tumor dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, combined with mitomycin C 7 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 29 and oral capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-35. Surgery was performed 5-6 weeks after the end of chemoradiation. The primary study endpoint was histopathological complete regression rate (pCR; Dworak grade 4). RESULTS: Disease stage at diagnosis was T3 in 34 patients (69%) and T4 in 15 patients (31%). Positive lymph nodes were diagnosed in 28 patients (57%). Toxicity (all grades) was documented in 35 patients (71%). Grade 3 toxicities were radiation dermatitis (25%), diarrhea (2%), neutropenia (2%), and granulocytopenia (2%). No patient experienced grade 4 toxicity. A pCR was seen in 8 (16%, 95% CI 9-29%) patients, a major response was noted in 24 (49%) patients and a minor response in 14 (29%) patients. R0 resection was performed in 46 patients (93.9%) and R1 in 3 patients (6.1%). Histopathological tumor downstaging was documented in 26 patients (53%). One-year disease-free survival was 93.3% and 1-year survival was 97.7%. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine and mitomycin C appeared to be effective with low toxicity in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Platinum - sensitive relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer: not all the patients benefit from reinduction with carboplatin and paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that patients with ovarian cancer relapsing 6 to 12 months after completion of a platinum-based regimen are considered to be partially platinum-sensitive. The aim of this study was to evaluate and correlate the efficacy and toxicity of reinduction with paclitaxel-carboplatin in a platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer patient cohort with previous platinum-free interval (PFI). MATERIAL/METHODS: We studied retrospectively 39 patients with platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer, who received primary chemotherapy at the Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, between January 2002 and May 2008. All patients were treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin for metastatic disease. Subsequent to progression, patients were re-treated with the same chemotherapy in group A (PFI 6-12 months) or group B (PFI ≥12 months). RESULTS: The number of patients in group A was 14, and in group B it was 25. Response rate to reinduction in group A was 36% (partial response, 36%; stable disease, 0%; progressive disease, 64%) and in group B was 68% (complete response, 60%; partial response, 8%; stable disease, 4%; progressive disease, 28%; P=.05). The median response duration of the patients in group A arm was 20 months, whereas it was 17 months for those in group B (P=.721). There were no significant differences in the toxicity profile between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of objective response rate this study supports the reinduction of carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with a prior PFI of at least 12 months only. To define the best approach and the optimal treatment of patients with partially platinum-sensitive disease more precisely, future studies should apply treatment-free interval as a stratification criterion.