Phase III randomized clinical studies to evaluate the immunogenicity, lot-to-lot consistency, and safety of ROTAVAC® liquid formulations (ROTAVAC 5C & 5D) and non-inferiority comparisons with licensed ROTAVAC® (frozen formulation) in healthy infants.

The WHO pre-qualified rotavirus vaccine, ROTAVAC®, is derived naturally from the neonatal 116E rotavirus strain, and stored at -20°C. As refrigerator storage is preferable, immunogenicity and safety of liquid formulations kept at 2-8°C, having excipients to stabilize the rotavirus, with or without buffers, were compared with ROTAVAC® in different clinical studies. Study-1, the pivotal trial for this entire product development work, was a randomized, single-blind trial with two operationally seamless phases: (i) an exploratory phase involving 675 infants in which two formulations, ROTAVAC 5C (LnHRV-1.5 mL and LnHRV-2.0 mL) containing buffer and excipients to stabilize the virus against gastric acidity and temperature, were compared with ROTAVAC®. As the immune response of ROTAVAC 5C (LnHRV-2.0 mL) was non-inferior to ROTAVAC®, it was selected for (ii) confirmatory phase, involving 1,302 infants randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive three lots of LnHRV-2.0 mL, or ROTAVAC®. Primary objectives were the evaluation of non-inferiority and lot-to-lot consistency. The secondary objectives were to assess the safety and interference with the concomitant pentavalent vaccine. As it was separately established that buffers are not required for ROTAVAC®, in Study-2, the safety and immunogenicity of ROTAVAC 5D® (with excipients) were compared with ROTAVAC® and lot-to-lot consistency was assessed in another study. All lots elicited consistent immune responses, did not interfere with UIP vaccines, and had reactogenicity similar to ROTAVAC®. ROTAVAC 5C and ROTAVAC 5D® were immunogenic and well tolerated as ROTAVAC®. ROTAVAC 5D® had comparable immunogenicity and safety profiles with ROTAVAC® and can be stored at 2-8°C, leading to WHO pre-qualification.Clinical Trials Registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI): CTRI/2015/02/005577CTRI/2016/11/007481 and CTRI/2019/03/017934.

Safety, immunogenicity and non-interference of concomitant Typhoid Vi capsular polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (Typbar-TCV®) and measles or measles-mumps-rubella vaccines in 8-9 months-old Indian children.

We evaluated safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity when the WHO-prequalified single-dose Typhoid Vi-polysaccharide conjugate vaccine, Typbar-TCV®, was administered concomitantly with measles (MV) or measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccines in 8- or 9-month-old children. We enrolled 493 children who were randomized 2:1:1:1 to four groups to receive either TCV (0.5 mL intramuscularly) and MV (0.5 ml subcutaneously) concomitantly at 9 months of age (Group 1) with two subgroups given TCV booster 28 days (Group 1A) or 180 days (Group 1B) later, or MV on Day 0 and TCV on Day 28 (Group 2); or TCV at 8 months of age and MV 28 days later (Group 3), or MV only at 9 months of age (Group 4). All children received MMR at 15 months of age. We observed no statistically significant differences between group rates of solicited or unsolicited adverse events assessed throughout the study. Seroconversion rates for measles, mumps, and rubella antibodies were unaffected by concomitant administration with TCV, being similar in Groups 1, 2, and 3 and comparable to Group 4 (Control). IgG anti-Vi antibody titers were similar in all groups after primary Typbar-TCV® vaccination and were not increased by a second dose 28 days later. A small response to a booster dose of Typbar-TCV® given at 180 days did not achieve the high titers observed after the first dose, suggesting that booster vaccination may be more effective after a longer interval than 6 months. Typbar-TCV® can be safely co-administered with measles and MMR vaccines in children aged ≥9 months.Clinical trial registration number: CTRI/2014/04/004532.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BBV152) in children aged 2-18 years: interim data from an open-label, non-randomised, age de-escalation phase 2/3 study.

BACKGROUND: Despite having milder symptoms than adults, children are still susceptible to and can transmit SARS-CoV-2. Vaccination across all age groups is therefore necessary to curtail the pandemic. Among the available COVID-19 vaccine platforms, an inactivated vaccine platform has the advantage of excellent safety profile across all age groups; hence, we conducted an age de-escalation study to assess the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, BBV152 (COVAXIN; Bharat Biotech International, Hyderabad, India), in children aged 2-18 years. METHODS: In this phase 2/3 open-label, non-randomised, multicentre study done in six hospitals in India, healthy children (male or female) aged 2-18 years were eligible for inclusion into the study. Children who had positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid and serology tests at baseline, or any history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, or with known immunosuppressive condition were excluded. Children were sequentially enrolled into one of three groups (>12 to ≤18 years [group 1], >6 to 12 years [group 2], or ≥2 to 6 years [group 3]) and administered with adult formulation of BBV152 as two 0·5 mL intramuscular doses on days 0 and 28. Co-primary endpoints were solicited adverse events for 7 days post-vaccination and neutralising antibody titres on day 56, 28 days after the second dose. Immunogenicity endpoints were compared with Biodefense and Emerging Infections, Research Resources Repository (BEI) reference serum samples and from adults who received two doses of BBV152 in the same schedule in a previously reported phase 2 study. The trial is registered with the Clinical Trials Registry, India (CTRI/2021/05/033752) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04918797). FINDINGS: From May 27, 2021, to July 10, 2021, we enrolled 526 children sequentially into groups 1 (n=176), 2 (n=175), and 3 (n=175). Vaccination was well tolerated, with no differences in reactogenicity between the three age groups, and no serious adverse events, deaths, or withdrawals due to an adverse event. Local reactions mainly consisted of mild injection site pain in 46 (26%) of 176 participants in group 1, 61 (35%) of 175 in group 2, and 39 (22%) of 175 in group 3 after dose 1; and 39 (22%) of 176 in group 1, 43 of 175 (25%) in group 2, and 14 of 175 (8%) in group 3 after dose 2; there were no cases of severe pain and few reports of other local reactions. After dose 1, the most frequent solicited systemic adverse event was mild-to-moderate fever, reported in eight (5%) of 176 participants in group 1, 17 (10%) of 175 in group 2, and 22 (13%) of 175 in group 3. No case of severe fever was reported, and rates of all fever were all 4% or less after dose 2. Geometric mean titres (GMTs) of microneutralisation antibodies at day 56 in groups 1 (138·8 [95% CI 111·0-173·6]), 2 (137·4 [99·1-167·5]), and 3 (197·6 [176·4-221·4]) were similar to titres in vaccinated adults (160·1 [135·8-188·8]) and with BEI reference serum samples (103·3 [50·3-202·1]). Similar results were obtained using the plaque reduction neutralisation test (PRNT), in which 166 (95%) of 175 participants in group 1, 165 (98%) of 168 in group 2, and 169 (98%) of 172 in group 3 seroconverted at day 56. The GMT ratio of PRNT titres in children and adults was 1·76 (95% CI 1·32-2·33), indicating a superior response in children compared with adults. INTERPRETATION: BBV152 was well tolerated in children aged 2-18 years, and induced higher neutralising antibody responses than those observed in adults, in whom the efficacy (ie, the prevention or decrease in the severity of COVID-19 infection) has been demonstrated. FUNDING: Bharat Biotech International.

Persistence of Immune Responses With an Inactivated Japanese Encephalitis Single-Dose Vaccine, JENVAC and Interchangeability With a Live-Attenuated Vaccine.

BACKGROUND: This study reports immunogenicity, safety, and interchangeability of a single-dose, inactivated, Vero-cell derived, JENVAC to the live-attenuated SA 14-14-2 vaccine in healthy children. METHODS: This phase 4, multicenter, open-label, randomized, control trial enrolled 360 children who were equally randomized to receive a single dose of either JENVAC or SA 14-14-2. Children were followed at various time points, until 2 years (day 720) postvaccination, upon which a subset from each group was divided and allocated to a receive a booster dose or the other vaccine. RESULTS: At all time points, immunological measures were statistically higher in the JENVAC group. In the interchangeability study, children receiving 2 doses of JENVAC reported significantly higher response compared with 2 doses of SA 14-14-2. No difference in adverse events was observed. These corroborate with excellent seroprotection after the first dose of an earlier JENVAC study. CONCLUSIONS: A single-dose vaccination with JENVAC induces protective titers that persist up to 1 year. We report appreciable interchangeability between both vaccines, with JENVAC/JENVAC combination exhibiting the highest immune response. JENVAC is now licensed as a single-dose Japanese encephalitis vaccine.

A Case of Sirenomelia: A Mermaid Baby.

INTRODUCTION: Sirenomelia, also known as mermaid syndrome, is a very rare fatal congenital abnormality in which the legs are fused together, giving them the appearance of a mermaid's tail. It is commonly associated with abnormal kidney development, genital and rectal abnormalities. Only a handful of cases have been reported in other parts of the world and is very rare in India too. This case was diagnosed postnatal in a tertiary hospital in Nagpur city of central India. CASE PRESENTATION: A preterm male baby of weight 1.1 kg was delivered by lower-segment caesarean section to a primigravida of age 26 years. Baby presented with fusion of the entire lower limbs, imperforate anus, indiscernible genital structures, single umbilical artery and a neural tube defect. He cried spontaneously with APGAR scores 5 at 0 and 8 at 5 min and expired after 4 h. His mother had a family history of diabetes in her paternal side. The post-mortem chromosomal studies depicted 47XXY, i.e., Klinefelter's syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Sirenomelia is a rare occurrence and this case gives us valuable information about the clinical presentation of it at birth and subsequent post-mortem chromosomal findings could indicate a possible genetic association.