Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am Surg ; 87(7): 1118-1125, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33334142

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate risk factors for wound infection in patients with lower extremity (LE) burn. METHODS: Adults presenting with LE burn from January 2014 to July 2015 were included. Data regarding demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes were obtained. The primary outcome was wound infection. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for wound infection. RESULTS: 317 patients were included with a mean age of 43 years and median total body surface area of .8%; 22 (7%) patients had a component of full-thickness (FT) burn; and 212 (67%) patients had below-the-knee (BTK) burn. The incidence of wound infection was 15%. The median time to infection was 5 days, and majority (61%) of the patients developed wound infection by day 5. Patients who developed wound infection were more likely to have an FT burn (22% vs. 5%, P < .001) and BTK burn (87% vs. 64%, P = .002), without a difference in other variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed age (Odds ratio (OR) 1.02 and CI 1.00-1.04), presence of FT burn (OR 5.33 and CI 2.09-13.62), and BTK burn (OR 3.42 and CI 1.37-8.52) as independent risk factors for wound infection (area under the curve = .72). CONCLUSION: Age, presence of FT burn, and BTK burn are independent risk factors for wound infection in outpatients with LE burns.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Quemaduras/terapia , Traumatismos de la Pierna/complicaciones , Infección de Heridas/etiología , Adulto , Vendajes , Femenino , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Pierna/terapia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Am J Surg ; 215(3): 478-481, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29089098

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether qSOFA ≥2 and an increase in SOFA (ΔSOFA) ≥2 can help predict bacteremia in a critically ill burn population. METHODS: Patients age ≥15 and TBSA ≥15% admitted between 2009 and 2015 were included. All blood cultures were recorded, and positive and negative blood culture days were defined based on the culture results. SOFA and qSOFA scores were compared between positive and negative blood culture days. RESULTS: There were 50 patients in our study with a mean age of 47yrs and mean TBSA burn of 37%. Bacteremic patients had larger TBSA and full thickness burns, higher revised Baux score, and longer hospital LOS, without a difference in mortality, compared to non-bacteremic patients. There was no difference in qSOFA and SOFA scores between positive and negative blood culture days. A ΔSOFA ≥5 was highly specific for positive blood culture days. CONCLUSIONS: SOFA and qSOFA have limited ability to predict bacteremia in critically ill burn patients.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/etiología , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/etiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
3.
Am J Surg ; 190(4): 609-13, 2005 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16164933

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Axillary presentation of occult breast cancer (OBC) is uncommon, and continues to be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to physicians. After our recent experience with a similar patient, a survey of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBS) was conducted to assess the Society's member's opinions on treatment. METHODS: A survey was sent by mail to 1837 members of the ASBS. The survey consisted of a brief case presentation after which the surgeon's preference for management of the breast was sought. The choices included "mastectomy," "whole breast radiation" or "other." RESULTS: A total of 776 (42%) responses were received. The majority of respondents, 338 or 43%, preferred "mastectomy," while 285 or 37% opted for "whole breast radiation." Twenty percent of respondents (153 responses) chose "other," of which 46 physicians (6% of total) indicated they would observe the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Although recent literature supports the use of whole breast radiation, these results demonstrate that a small majority of physicians still prefer mastectomy. The appropriate treatment of the breast after an axillary presentation of OBC continues to be a controversial issue.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Mastectomía , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/terapia , Radioterapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Axila , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA