An Open-Label Study to Assess Monthly Risperidone Injections (180 mg) Following Switch from Daily Oral Risperidone (6 mg) in Stable Schizophrenic Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics have shown benefits over oral medications with reduced hospitalization rates and improved health-related quality of life. RBP-7000 (PERSERIS®) is a monthly risperidone formulation (90 or 120 mg) for the treatment of schizophrenia administered by subcutaneous abdominal injection. The objective of this study was to assess a higher dose of 180 mg RBP-7000 and an alternate injection site. METHODS: Following stabilization on 6 mg/day (3 mg twice daily) oral risperidone, clinically stable schizophrenic participants received 3 monthly doses of 180 mg RBP-7000 in the abdomen followed by a fourth monthly dose of 180 mg RBP-7000 in the upper arm (each dose administered as two 90-mg injections). The primary endpoint was the steady-state average plasma concentration (Cavg(ss)) of risperidone and total active moiety after oral and RBP-7000 administration. Secondary endpoints included measures of clinical efficacy (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression Scale for Severity of Illness), safety, and local injection-site tolerability to assess the switch from oral risperidone and compare injection sites. RESULTS: In all, 23 participants received at least one dose of RBP-7000, 16 received all four doses, and 15 completed the study. Monthly doses of 180 mg RBP-7000 provided similar Cavg(ss) of total active moiety compared with 6 mg/day oral risperidone. The pharmacokinetics of RBP-7000 were similar after injection in the abdomen versus upper arm. Clinical efficacy measures remained stable throughout the study. All RBP-7000 injections were well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the use of 180 mg RBP-7000 in schizophrenic patients stable on 6 mg/day oral risperidone and a second injection site in the upper arm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03978832.

Evaluation of Drug-Drug Interaction Liability for Buprenorphine Extended-Release Monthly Injection Administered by Subcutaneous Route.

Buprenorphine extended-release (BUP-XR) formulation is a once-monthly subcutaneous injection for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine undergoes extensive cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 metabolism, leading to potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) as reported for sublingual buprenorphine. Sublingual buprenorphine is subject to first-pass extraction, as a significant proportion of the dose is swallowed. Because subcutaneous administration avoids first-pass extraction, the DDI with CYP3A4 inhibitors is expected to be less than the 2-fold increase reported for the sublingual route. The objective of this analysis was to predict the magnitude of DDI following coadministration of BUP-XR with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor or inducer using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Models were developed and verified by comparing predicted and observed data for buprenorphine following intravenous and sublingual dosing. Comparison of predicted and observed pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and PK parameters demonstrated acceptable predictive performance of the models (within 1.5-fold). Buprenorphine plasma concentrations following administration of a single dose of BUP-XR (300 mg) were simulated using a series of intravenous infusions. Daily coadministration of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors with BUP-XR predicted mild increases in buprenorphine exposures (AUC, 33%-44%; Cmax , 17-28%). Daily coadministration of a strong CYP3A4 inducer was also associated with mild decreases in buprenorphine AUC (28%) and Cmax (22%). In addition, the model predicted minimal increases in buprenorphine AUC (8%-11%) under clinical conditions of 2 weeks' treatment with CYP3A4 inhibitors administered after initiation of BUP-XR. In conclusion, the PBPK predictions indicate that coadministration of BUP-XR with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers would not result in clinically meaningful interactions.

Duvelisib, an oral dual PI3K-δ, γ inhibitor, shows clinical activity in indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a phase 1 study.

Duvelisib (IPI-145) is an oral dual inhibitor of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)-δ and -γ in clinical development for the treatment of hematologic malignancies, including indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). In a Phase 1, open-label study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical activity, and safety of duvelisib monotherapy in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies, duvelisib was administered at eight dose levels (8-100 mg BID) in a dose-escalation phase (n = 31 evaluable patients). Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), Grade 3 transaminase elevations and Grade 3 rash, occurred at 100 mg BID, and the MTD was determined to be 75 mg BID. Across all doses, 58.1% of iNHL patients had a response (19.4% complete, 35.5% partial, and 3.2% minor); median time to response was 1.84 months and duration of response was 16.9 months. Median progression-free survival was 14.7 months, and the probability of overall survival at 24 months was 71.7%. Severe (Grade ≥ 3) adverse events included elevated liver enzymes (38.7%), diarrhea (25.8%), and neutropenia (29.0%). Three patients, all in the 75 mg BID cohort, experienced fatal AEs: E. coli sepsis, acute respiratory failure, and fungal pneumonia. No iNHL patients experienced Pneumocystis pneumonia. Duvelisib demonstrated favorable clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in these high-risk, heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory iNHL patients, with 25 mg BID selected for further clinical development.

Evidence for a pharmacokinetic interaction between eslicarbazepine and rosuvastatin: Potential effects on xenobiotic transporters.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with partial-onset seizures and comorbid cardiovascular disease may concomitantly receive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), an antiepileptic drug, and rosuvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. This study evaluated the effect of multiple-dose ESL on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of a single dose of rosuvastatin in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was a Phase I, single-center, fixed-sequence, open-label study. Healthy subjects received two treatments, in sequence. Treatment A: a single 40mg oral dose of rosuvastatin on Day 1, followed by a washout period (Days 1-4); treatment B: titration of ESL (400-800mg once daily) on Days 5-18, followed by ESL 1200mg once daily on Days 19-35, with a single dose of rosuvastatin (40mg) on Day 32. Subjects then entered a 2-week follow-up period. Plasma concentrations of rosuvastatin were quantified for PK analyses. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Thirty-three healthy subjects were enrolled and 30 completed the study. Mean rosuvastatin (standard deviation) t1/2 was similar when rosuvastatin was used concomitantly with ESL and when it was used alone (26.5 [16.3]h, and 22.4 [9.5]h, respectively). The geometric least squares mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of rosuvastatin exposure levels between rosuvastatin used concomitantly with ESL and rosuvastatin used alone were as follows: Cmax, 64.0% (55.9-73.3%); AUC(0-∞), 63.0% (57.1-69.4%); and AUC(0-last), 60.9% (55.2-67.1%). Concomitant use of ESL and rosuvastatin was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Rosuvastatin exposure was 36-39% lower with steady-state administration of ESL, potentially due to reduced oral bioavailability of rosuvastatin. Consequently, when rosuvastatin is used with ESL, a rosuvastatin dose adjustment may be necessary if a clinically significant change in lipids is noted.

A Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing Eslicarbazepine Acetate Administered Orally as a Crushed or Intact Tablet in Healthy Volunteers.

The relative bioequivalence of crushed versus intact eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) tablets (800 mg) administered orally in healthy adults was evaluated in an open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover study with a 5-day washout between treatments. Sample blood levels of eslicarbazepine and (R)-licarbazepine were determined; pharmacokinetic parameters were derived for eslicarbazepine. Bioequivalence was established if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean treatment ratios of eslicarbazepine AUC(0-∞) and Cmax were within the prespecified 80%-125% range. Twenty-seven subjects in the intent-to-treat population (n = 28) completed both treatment periods. Eslicarbazepine exposure measures were similar for crushed versus intact ESL tablets: average Cmax , 11 700 versus 11 500 ng/mL; AUC(0-∞) , 225 000 versus 234 000 ng·h/mL; AUC(0-last) , 222 000 versus 231 000 ng·h/mL, respectively. Geometric least squares mean ratios (90%CIs) comparing eslicarbazepine exposure measures were within the 80%-125% range (Cmax , 102.63% [97.07%-108.51%]; AUC(0-∞) , 96.72% [94.36%-99.13%]; AUC0-last , 96.69% [94.24%-99.21%]). In conclusion, ESL administered orally as a crushed tablet sprinkled on applesauce, or intact were bioequivalent in healthy subjects. Eslicarbazepine bioavailability was not significantly altered by crushing, indicating that ESL tablets can be administered intact or crushed.

Exploratory Biomarker Study of the Triple Reuptake Inhibitor SEP-432 Compared to the Dual Reuptake Inhibitor Duloxetine in Healthy Normal Subjects.

INTRODUCTION: SEP-432 is a triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor of norepinephrine (NE), serotonin (5-HT), and dopamine (DA), based on in vitro binding studies. We sought evidence that SEP-432 engages these monoamine systems by measuring concentrations of monoamines and/or their main metabolites in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma and comparing results to duloxetine, a dual reuptake inhibitor of NE and 5-HT. METHODS: Eighteen healthy normal subjects received either SEP-432 (300 mg/day), duloxetine (60 mg/day), or placebo for 14 days in-clinic (double blind) with CSF and plasma collections at baseline (single lumbar puncture) and Day 14 (24-h CSF and plasma collection). Concentrations of monoamines and their metabolites, as well as pharmacokinetic concentrations of SEP-432 and metabolite, were quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Compared to placebo in the Day 14 area under the curve 24-h (AUC0-24 h ) analysis, SEP-432 significantly (P < 0.05) decreased the NE metabolite dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) in CSF and plasma, decreased 5-HT in plasma, and did not affect DA metabolites, while duloxetine had significant effects on DHPG and 5-HT. Time-matched baseline to Day 14 biomarker comparisons confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION: CSF monoamine biomarkers confirmed central NET activity for SEP-432 and duloxetine's dual reuptake inhibition.

SEP-225289 serotonin and dopamine transporter occupancy: a PET study.

UNLABELLED: SEP-225289 is a novel compound that, based on in vitro potencies for transporter function, potentially inhibits reuptake at dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters. An open-label PET study was conducted during the development of SEP-225289 to investigate its dopamine and serotonin transporter occupancy. METHODS: Different single doses of SEP-225289 were administered to healthy volunteers in 3 cohorts: 8 mg (n = 7), 12 mg (n = 5), and 16 mg (n = 7). PET was performed before and approximately 24 h after oral administration of SEP-225289, to assess occupancy at trough levels. Dopamine and serotonin transporter occupancies were estimated from PET using (11)C-N-(3-iodoprop-2E-enyl)-2ß-carbomethoxy-3ß-(4-methylphenyl)nortropane ((11)C-PE2I) and (11)C-N,N-dimethyl-2-(2-amino-4-cyanophenylthio)benzylamine ((11)C-DASB), respectively. Plasma concentration of SEP-225289 was assessed before ligand injection, and subjects were monitored for adverse events. RESULTS: Average dopamine and serotonin transporter occupancies increased with increasing doses of SEP-225289. Mean dopamine and serotonin transporter occupancies were 33% ± 11% and 2% ± 13%, respectively, for 8 mg; 44% ± 4% and 9% ± 10%, respectively, for 12 mg; and 49% ± 7% and 14% ± 15%, respectively, for 16 mg. On the basis of the relationship between occupancy and plasma concentration, dopamine transporter IC(50) (the plasma concentration of drug at 50% occupancy) was determined (4.5 ng/mL) and maximum dopamine transporter occupancy was extrapolated (85%); however, low serotonin transporter occupancy prevented similar serotonin transporter calculations. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: At the doses evaluated, occupancy of the dopamine transporter was significantly higher than that of the serotonin transporter, despite similar in vitro potencies, confirming that, in addition to in vitro assays, PET occupancy studies can be instrumental to the drug development process by informing early decisions about indication, dose, and therapeutic potential.