Intra-operative and post-operative complications of endometriosis excision using the SOSURE approach - A single- surgeon retrospective series of 1116 procedures over 8 years.

Background: Endometriosis surgery outcomes have been widely studied, yet heterogeneity in terminology and techniques persist. Objectives: This study focuses on the perioperative outcomes of a single surgeon using the same structured approach (SOSURE: Survey & Sigmoid mobilisation, Ovarian mobilisation, Suspension of uterus and ovaries, Ureterolysis, Rectovaginal and pararectal space development, Excision of all visible disease) and adheres to the recent standardised terminology proposed by international gynaecological and endometriosis societies. Materials and Methods: A quality improvement study was conducted retrospectively from January 2015 to January 2023. Data collection involved two databases: the National British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE) database and a more comprehensive locally kept database. The methodology also integrated four endometriosis staging systems. Main outcome measures: Intra-operative and post-operative complication rates. Results: Between 2015 and 2023, 1047 women underwent 1116 endometriosis procedures in various UK hospitals with S.K. as primary surgeon. Exclusions totalled 20 due to missing records and specific surgical criteria. The rate of major post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3a and 3b) was 1.5% and minor post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and 2) were seen in 13.8%. No Clavien-Dindo grade 4 or 5 complications were noted. Conclusion: Our study has shown a low complication rate in endometriosis surgery, despite increasing complexity of surgical cases. This is likely attributed to the surgeon's learning curve, high surgical volume and adherence to a structured approach. What's new?: Our study demonstrates the learning curve of a surgeon over the course of 8 years. This series involved more than 1000 patients and to our knowledge, is the first to report the complexity of the casemix using four different endometriosis staging systems.

Recommendations for the implementation and conduct of multidisciplinary team meetings for those providing endometriosis and adenomyosis care - a Delphi consensus of the European Endometriosis League (EEL).

Background: The treatment of endometriosis and adenomyosis requires a complex, multidisciplinary approach. Some centres have established multidisciplinary teams (MDT) and regular meetings. There are currently no international data or recommendations. Objectives: To examine existing MDT meetings and define consensus recommendations to support implementation and conduct. Materials and Methods: Online questionnaires were sent through the European Endometriosis League (EEL) based on a Delphi protocol. After a literature review and assessment of existing MDT meetings, essential aspects for consensus statements were identified. The consensus statements were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale with the possibility to modify them. Results were analysed between rounds and reported to the respondents. Consensus, defined as ≥70% agreement, concluded the Delphi process when achieved in the majority of statements. Main outcome measures: Prevalence and type of existing MDT meetings and recommendations. Results: In round 1, 69 respondents participated, with 49.3% (34) having an MDT meeting at their institutions, of which 97% are multidisciplinary. 50 % meet once a month and 64.7% indicated that less than 25% of their patients are discussed. Throughout the three rounds, 47 respondents from 21 countries participated. During the process, 82 statements were defined, with an agreement of 92.7% on the statements. Conclusions: This study assessed existing MDT meetings for endometriosis and adenomyosis and developed recommendations for their implementation and conduct. The consensus group supports the strengths of MDT meetings, highlighting their role in offering guideline-based, multidisciplinary, and personalised care. What is new?: This study presents the first international data and recommendations on MDT meetings for endometriosis and adenomyosis.

Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version?

Background: Anonymized videotaped endoscopic procedures can be used for the assessment of surgical competence, but a reliable non-procedure-specific scoring system is needed for gynaecology. Objectives: To design and evaluate the validity of the Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System (GLVS), a novel tool in the assessment of various gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. Materials and Methods: Seventeen anonymized unedited video recordings of various gynaecological laparoscopic procedures and the 4-minute-long edited versions of the same videos were independently scored by two experts, twice, using GLVS. Main outcome measures: Internal consistency reliability, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability of GLVS. We also compared the scored achieved by edited videos with those of the full-length version of the same videos. Results: The mean score achieved by 4-minute-long edited videos was similar to that of the unedited version (p= 0.13 - 0.19). There was excellent correlation between the pooled scores for edited and unedited versions (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.86). GLVS had excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.92-0.97). Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were generally better for edited 4-minute-long videos compared to their full-length version. Test-retest reliability for edited videos was excellent for scorer 1 and good for scorer 2 with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.88 and 0.62 respectively. Inter-rater reliability was good for edited videos (ICC=0.64) but poor for full-length versions (ICC= -0.24). Conclusion: GLVS allows for objective surgical skills assessment using anonymized shortened self-edited videos of basic gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. Shortened video clips of procedures seem to be representative of their full-length version for the assessment of surgical skills. What's new?: We devised and undertook a validation study for a novel tool to assess surgical skills using surgical video clips. We believe this addition clearly delineates the unique contributions of our study.

Indocyanine Green tattooing for marking the caudal excision margin of a full-thickness vaginal endometriotic nodule.

Background: The use of Indocyanine Green (ICG) is well-described in oncology and more recently in benign gynaecological surgery. In this article we describe submucosal transvaginal ICG infiltration caudal to a vaginal endometriotic nodule to visualise the lower margin of excision laparoscopically. Objectives: To demonstrates the use of submucosal ICG tattooing to mark and delineate the caudal margin of an ultra-low full thickness vaginal nodule and aid its excision laparoscopically. Materials and Methods: A stepwise approach highlighting the "SOSURE" surgical technique for the excision of endometriosis and the practical use of the ICG to delineate the lowest margin of the full thickness vaginal nodule. Main outcome measures: Laparoscopic complete excision of a 5 cm full-thickness vaginal nodule invading the right parametrium and involving the superficial muscularis layer of the rectum. Result: ICG tattooing was helpful in identifying the lower margin of dissection of the rectovaginal space. Conclusion: ICG tattooing of the margins of full-thickness vaginal nodules could be another use of ICG in benign gynaecology to complement the surgeon's tactile and visual identification of the lower edge of dissection.

Pelvic congestion syndrome and May-Thurner syndrome as causes for chronic pelvic pain syndrome: neuropelveological diagnosis and corresponding therapeutic options.

OBJECTIVE: To report on diagnosis and management of pelvic congestion including the May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) as potential etiologies for intractable pelvic neuropathic pain. DESIGN: Retrospective study of women presented with intractable pelvic neuropathic pain, who had left sided venous uterine plexus above 6mm with reversed and slow flow on Doppler, with dilated arcuate veins passing through the uterine muscle. Those with suspicion of MTS underwent further radiological investigations and if applicable, endovascular interventions. SETTING: Tertiary referral unit specialized in advanced gynaecological surgery and neuropelveology. INTERVENTION: 61 consecutive patients were included. 14 with visceral pain presumed to be caused by Pelvic Congestion Syndrome were treated by ovarian vein embolization. An improvement of pain was observed in all patients - mean pain reduction of 3.93 points, from 7.21 (±1.42; 4-10) to 3.28 pts (±1.54; 1-6) over 6 months (p<0.01). 47 presented with pelvic somatic neuropathic pain; 19 underwent endovascular intervention (angioplasty, stenting) and finally all of them a laparoscopic exploration/decompression of the sacral plexus and the endopelvic portion of the pudendal nerves, with an overall VAS reduction from 8.56 (±1.1712;7-10) to 2.63 (±1.53; 0-6) at one-year-follow-up (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic exploration/decompression of the nerves seems to be effective in a carefully selected group of patients. Endovascular interventions for pelvic somatic neuropathies may not be an effective treatment. We recommend that Doppler studies of the uterine vessels are performed as an extension to gynaecological examination in women with intractable pelvic pain.

Transversus abdominis plane block under laparoscopic guide versus port-site local anaesthetic infiltration in laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficiency of laparoscopically guided transversus abdominis plane block (LTAP) versus port-site local anaesthetic infiltration (LAI) in reducing postoperative pain following laparoscopic excision of endometriosis. DESIGN: A prospective, double-blind randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A tertiary referral centre for endometriosis and minimally invasive gynaecological surgery. POPULATION: Women undergoing laparoscopic excision of endometriosis from December 2015 through July 2016. METHODS: Participants were randomised to receive: port-site infiltration with bupivacaine and placebo LTAP (LAI group, n = 21); placebo port-site infiltration and LTAP with bupivacaine (LTAP group, n = 24); placebo port-site infiltration and placebo LTAP (placebo group, n = 25). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Post-operative pain at 2-4, 6-8, 10-12 and 24 hours, analgesic requirements, TAP block-related complications and opioid-related adverse effects. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient characteristics between the groups. In comparison with placebo, both LTAP and LAI groups had significantly less pain at 2-4, 6-8, and 10-12 hours (median 3, 3, 3.5 versus 3, 6, 4 versus 8, 8, 7 for LTAP, LAI, and placebo, respectively, P < 0.05). Median differences (and 95% confidence intervals) were as follows; LTAP versus placebo -5 (-6 to -4), -4 (-5 to -3), -3 (-4 to -0.5); LAI versus placebo -4 (-5 to -2), -2 (-3 to -0.5), -1 (-4 to -0.5) at 2-4, 6-8 and 10-12 hours, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the LTAP and LAI groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopically guided transversus abdominis plane block and LAI both reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic excision of endometriosis, compared with placebo. We found no differences in effect between LTAP and LAI. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: TAP block and port-site local infiltration are both effective in reducing postoperative pain in major gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.