Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
2.
Obes Surg ; 31(2): 612-616, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33025538

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The presentation of leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is variable. A missed or delayed diagnosis can lead to severe consequences. This study presents our experience: the clinical presentations, laboratory, and radiological findings in patients with leak after LSG. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who were diagnosed and treated as leak after LSG at our center (January 2012-November 2019). RESULTS: Eighty patients developed leak: 68 (85%) after primary LSG, 6 (7.5%) after Re-LSG and 6 (7.5%) after band removal to revisional LSG. Mean age 35.9 ± 10 years. The diagnosis was within 18 ± 14 days after surgery. Five (6.3%) patients were diagnosed during the same admission. Only 29.3% of patients were diagnosed correctly from the first visit to the ER. Most were misdiagnosed as gastritis (49%) and pneumonia (22.6%). Thirty-four patients (45.3%) were diagnosed correctly at the third visit. The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (90%), tachycardia (71.3%), and fever (61.3%). The mean white blood cells (WBCs) count was 14700 ± 5900 (cells/mm3), c-reactive protein (CRP) 270 ± 133 mg/L, lactic acid 1.6 ± 0.85 mmol/L, and albumin 30.3 ± 6.6 g/L. The abdominal CT scans revealed intraabdominal collection in 93.7% of patients, extravasation of contrast in 75%, and pleural effusion in 52.5%. Upper gastrointestinal contrast study (UGIC) showed extravasation of contrast in 77.5% of patients. CONCLUSION: Abdominal pain, tachycardia, or fever after LSG should raise the suspicion of a leak. CT scan of the abdomen and UGIC study detected leaks in 75% and 77.5% consecutively. Only 29.3% of patients were diagnosed correctly as a leak from the first visit to the ER.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Adulto , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico por imagen , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laboratorios , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Surg Innov ; 27(3): 265-271, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32008415

RESUMEN

Background. The Single-Port Instrument Delivery Extended Reach (SPIDER) surgical system is a safe revolutionary technology that defeated difficulties of single-incision surgery. We assessed the long-term outcomes of SPIDER sleeve gastrectomy (SPIDER SG) versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in morbidly obese patients. Methods. Retrospective review of patients who underwent SPIDER SG or LSG in our center matched by the date of surgery (2012-2013). We reviewed weight loss results up to 5 years, complication rates, procedure and hospitalization durations, financial cost, and effect on comorbidities. Results. Patients underwent 200 SPIDER SG and 220 LSG. At baseline, SPIDER SG versus LSG patients had a mean body mass index of 43.8 ± 5.6 and 48.6 ± 8.1 kg/m2, respectively. At 1 year, both groups had comparable percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL). At 5 years, SPIDER SG had %EWL of 54.6 ± 24.8 compared with 57.8 ± 29.9 in LSG (P = .4). Nine SPIDER SG (4.5%) required conversion to LSG. Complications occurred in both groups: 4% versus 4.1% (P = .95). At 2-year follow-up, diabetes mellitus was reversed in 43% of SPIDER SG and 62% LSG. Despite a shorter hospital stay in SPIDER SG, the total cost was significantly higher ($2 041 477) compared with LSG ($1 773 834). The mean score of scar satisfaction was significantly more in SPIDER SG. Conclusions. SPIDER SG was safe with long-term effects on weight loss comparable to LSG. Despite the higher cost of SPIDER SG, a shorter hospital stay and better cosmesis were observed.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Índice de Masa Corporal , Comorbilidad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de Peso
4.
Obes Surg ; 30(2): 515-520, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31707571

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Gastric leak post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a severe complication that has been reported in 1.5-3% of cases. Management algorithms of leak exist; however, no known factors predict the time to resolution. This study aims to share outcomes of our management algorithm of post LSG leak, including the rate of resolution, complications, admission to the intensive care unit, conversion to other techniques, and mortality. To determine if any factors can predict the resolution time. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who had LSG leaks and was managed in the main tertiary center in Qatar (January 2012-December 2017). RESULTS: A total of seventy-three patients had post LSG leaks. Fifty-six (76.7%) underwent LSG outside our center. Thirteen leaks (17.8%) were after revisional LSG. Laparoscopic exploration was performed in twenty patients (27.4%) and feeding jejunostomy in nine patients (12.3%). Patients were followed up for 12 months. All healed within 8.8 ± 0.72 weeks. The resolution rate was (97.1%) without surgical conversion, while two patients required fistulo-jejunostomy. No patient died. Complications occurred; re-leak (14.9%) and splenic abscess (2.9%). Patients on jejunal feeding had shorter resolution time (HR = 2.7, P = 0.018), while patients on total parenteral nutrition and post-endoscopic dilatation had 66% and 50% increases in the resolution time; (HR = 0.34, P = 0.026) and (HR = 0.5, P = 0.047), respectively. CONCLUSION: Management of post-LSG leak is multimodal. Our clinical experience demonstrated less urge to perform extensive surgical interventions. Patients on enteral feeding had shorter resolution time while patients with sleeve stricture had a longer time to resolution.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/terapia , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adulto , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Femenino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Yeyunostomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/diagnóstico , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Qatar/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estómago/patología , Estómago/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab ; 9(6): 167-176, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29854386

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Overweight and obesity are significant public health concerns that are prevalent in younger age cohorts. Preventive or therapeutic interventions are difficult to implement and maintain over time. On the other hand, the majority of adolescents in the United States have a smartphone, representing a huge potential for innovative digitized interventions, such as weight loss programs delivered via smartphone applications. Although the number of available smartphone applications is increasing, evidence for their effectiveness in weight loss is insufficient. Therefore, the proposed study aims to assess the efficacy of a gamification-based smartphone application for weight loss in overweight and obese adolescents. The trial is designed to be a phase II, single-centre, two-arm, triple-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a duration of 6 months. METHOD: The intervention consists of a smartphone application that provides both tracking and gamification elements, while the control arm consists of an identically designed application solely with tracking features of health information. The proposed trial will be conducted in an urban primary care clinic of an academic centre in the United States of America, with expertise in the management of overweight and obese adolescents. Eligible adolescents will be followed for 6 months. Changes in body mass index z score from baseline to 6 months will be the primary outcome. Secondary objectives will explore the effects of the gamification-based application on adherence, as well as anthropometric, metabolic and behavioural changes. A required sample size of 108 participants (54 participants per group) was calculated. DISCUSSION: The benefits of the proposed study include mid-term effects in weight reduction for overweight and obese adolescents. The current proposal will contribute to fill a gap in the literature on the mid-term effects of gamification-based interventions to control weight in adolescents. This trial is a well-designed RCT that is in line with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement.

6.
Obes Surg ; 28(10): 3125-3130, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29905881

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs de novo or intensifies after sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Endoscopic radiofrequency (Stretta) is a minimally invasive, effective tool to treat GERD. However, Stretta safety and efficacy are unknown in patients with GERD after LSG. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Stretta treatment post-LSG GERD, quality of life, and PPI dose up to 6 months. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients' data who underwent Stretta procedure in our center. Demographics, pre-Stretta lower esophageal manometry, 24-h pH monitoring, endoscopic and radiological findings, GERD symptoms using Quality of Life (HR-QoL) questionnaire, and PPI doses at 0, 3, and 6 months were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients had an initial BMI of 44.4 ± 9 kg/m2. Pre-Stretta BMI was 29.7 ± 6.3 kg/m2 with an EWL% of 44 ± 21.4%. Pre-Stretta endoscopic reflux esophagitis was found in 26.7%, and barium imaging showed severe reflux in 40%. The mean DeMeester score was 27.9 ± 6.7. Hypotensive LES pressure occurred in 93.3% of patients. Patients' mean HR-QoL scores were 42.7 ± 8.9 pre-Stretta and 41.8 ± 11 at 6 months (P = 0.8). One case (6.7%) was complicated by hematemesis. At 6 months, 66.7% of patients were not satisfied, though the PPI medications were ceased in 20%. Two patients (13.3%) underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at 8 months post-Stretta to relieve symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Stretta did not improve GERD symptoms in patients post-LSG at short-term follow-up, and about 6.7% complication rate was reported. Patients were not satisfied despite the decrease in PPI dose.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/cirugía , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Humanos , Terapia por Radiofrecuencia , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Obes Surg ; 28(9): 2603-2608, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29616465

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obesity affects the elderly, leading to increased prevalence of age- and obesity-associated comorbidities. There are no guidelines for indications and risk assessment for the elderly undergoing bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence, indications, and outcomes of planned ICU admission in elderly, high-risk patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and to assess if preoperative risk factors for planned postoperative ICU admission in elderly patients undergoing LSG could be predicted preoperatively. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data for all patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent LSG (2011-2016) at Hamad General Hospital in Qatar. RESULTS: We followed up 58 patients aged 60-75 years for 28 ± 17 months. About 77.6% of patients were in the intermediate-risk group of the Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS). Fourteen patients (24%) required ICU admission for 2 ± 1.2 days; all patients belonged to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III class and intermediate to high risk on OS-MRS. There were no reported mortalities. The mean body mass index (BMI) decreased from 49 ± 10.6 to 37.6 ± 10.1 kg/m2. The number of patient comorbidities (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.03-1.99) and the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA; OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.92-31.68) were associated with planned ICU admission. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients undergoing LSG usually have excellent postoperative course despite the associated high risk and the required ICU admission. The number of comorbidities, diagnosis of OSA, and ASA score are possible clinically significant predictive factors for the need of post-LSG ICU admission.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Gastrectomía , Obesidad Mórbida , Anciano , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Cirugía Bariátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Qatar/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Obes Surg ; 28(7): 2040-2045, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29430596

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery in adolescents is still under debate. Literature about the long-term impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on adolescents' obesity and associated morbidities is scarce. It is unknown if LSG shows better long-term results in the adolescent or adult group. AIM: To compare the long-term effectiveness of LSG on obesity and associated comorbidities between adolescents and adults. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed all patients with morbid obesity who underwent LSG in (2011-2012) and were followed for up to 5 years. Patients were divided into two groups: adolescents and adults. Data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: LSG was performed in 139 adults and 91 adolescents. The mean ages of the adults and adolescents were 37.4 ± 11.4 and 17 ± 1.5 years, respectively. The preoperative body mass index values of the adults and adolescents were 48.4 ± 8.7 and 47.6 ± 7.5 kg/m2, respectively (P = 0.95). At 5 years, percentage of total weight loss increased in adolescents (to 35.8 ± 11.5%), while it remained almost the same in adults (26.3 ± 10%). At 1 year, about 68.2% of adults and 62.5% of adolescents were cured from diabetes though, 13% of diabetic adults had relapse at 5 years and none of the adolescents relapsed. Postoperative complications occurred in both groups. CONCLUSION: LSG showed comparable weight loss results in adults and adolescents, with better results in adolescents. LSG is more effective in preventing and treating diabetes/prediabetes in the adolescent group.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Pérdida de Peso , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus/cirugía , Femenino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Infantil/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estado Prediabético/complicaciones , Qatar/epidemiología , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
Obes Surg ; 28(2): 513-519, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28815383

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is widely used, and it is important to examine its physiologic and psychological efficacy among adolescents. We assessed LSG's efficacy for weight loss, its short- and long-term effects on resolving and improving obesity-related comorbidities, and its psychological outcomes among morbidly obese adolescents. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 91 morbidly obese adolescents in Qatar who underwent LSG (2011-2014), with 1- and 5-year follow-ups. RESULTS: The mean preoperative weight and body mass index (BMI) were 132.5 ± 25.3 kg and 48 ± 7.5 kg/m2, respectively. Postoperatively, mean weight and BMI decreased to 101 ± 22 kg and 36.4 ± 7.2 kg/m2, respectively. At 1 year, the mean excess weight loss (%EWL), percent total weight loss (%TWL), and percent BMI loss (%BMIL) were 49.48 ± 25.8, 23.1 ± 11.9, and 23.16 ± 11.8%, respectively. At 5 years, %EWL, %TWL, and %BML were 78 ± 12, 35.8 ± 11.5, and 36 ± 12%, respectively. No patients developed postoperative leaks, and three patients had endoscopic dilatation due to stenosis. Overall, 64% of obstructive sleep apnea patients were cured, all prediabetic patients had total remission, and 50% of the diabetic patients were cured. The overall mean HBA1c level was 6 mmol/L, which significantly decreased to 5.1 mmol/L postoperatively (P = 0.0001). At 5 years, there was no relapse of diabetes, and 75% of the diabetic adolescents had complete remission. The only patient with hypertension showed complete resolution with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Postoperatively, overall body image satisfaction significantly improved (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: LSG significantly ameliorated short- and long-term obesity-related comorbidities and body image dissatisfaction among Qatari adolescents.


Asunto(s)
Imagen Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus/cirugía , Gastrectomía , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Obesidad Infantil/cirugía , Adolescente , Imagen Corporal/psicología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Niño , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Obesidad Mórbida/psicología , Obesidad Infantil/complicaciones , Obesidad Infantil/epidemiología , Obesidad Infantil/psicología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estado Prediabético/complicaciones , Estado Prediabético/epidemiología , Estado Prediabético/cirugía , Qatar/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de Peso/fisiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...