The Impact of Borderline Quantiferon-TB Gold Plus Results for Latent Tuberculosis Screening under Routine Conditions in a Low-Endemicity Setting.

Quantiferon-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is an interferon gamma release assay used to diagnose latent tuberculosis (LTB). A borderline range (0.20 to 0.99 IU/ml) around the cutoff (0.35 IU/ml) has been suggested for the earlier QFT version. Our aims were to evaluate the borderline range for QFT-Plus and the contribution of the new TB2 antigen tube. QFT-Plus results were collected from clinical laboratories in Sweden and linked to incident active TB within 3 to 24 months using the national TB registry. Among QFT-Plus results from 58,539 patients, 83% were negative (<0.20 IU/ml), 2.4% were borderline negative (0.20 to 0.34 IU/ml), 3.4% were borderline positive (0.35 to 0.99 IU/ml), 9.6% were positive (≥1.0 IU/ml), and 1.6% were indeterminate. Follow-up tests after initial borderline results were negative (<0.20 IU/ml) in 38.3%, without any cases of incident active TB within 2 years. Applying the 0.35-IU/ml cutoff, 1.5% of TB1 and TB2 results were discrepant, of which 52% were within the borderline range. A TB2 result of ≥0.35 IU/ml with a TB1 result of <0.20 IU/ml was found in 0.4% (231/58,539) of all included baseline QFT-Plus test results, including 1.8% (1/55) of incident TB cases. A borderline range for QFT-Plus is clinically useful as more than one-third of those with borderline results are convincingly negative upon retesting, without developing incident active TB. The TB2 tube contribution to LTB diagnosis appears limited.

[Radiologic evaluation of the invasiveness of obliterative esophageal tumors]. / Rentgenologicheskoe opredelenie protiazhennosti obturiruiushchikh rakovykh opukholei pishchevoda.

An original method of double contrast staining of the esophagus performed at the height of Muller's test has been developed and tried in 170 patients with obturating cancer of the esophagus. The composition and preparation of the mixture used is described, as well as the steps of the technique. The advantages of the new method in comparison with routine double contrast staining are demonstrated, for the extent of cancerous process in the caudal direction was accurately determined in each case. The authors recommend their method for surgical clinics and radiological departments to be used for determining the scope of surgical intervention and specifying the topometry before radiotherapy.