Secondary headaches in pregnancy and the puerperium.

Headache during pregnancy can be due to primary causes such as migraine but can also be a presenting symptom of secondary causes including life threatening conditions. This is a minireview of secondary causes of headache during pregnancy and the puerperium. Unique alterations in physiological and vascular functions as well as in the coagulation pathway which occur during pregnancy increase the risk of most of these secondary conditions which include preeclampsia, eclampsia, hemorrhagic stroke, cerebral venous, sinus thrombosis, reversible cerebral vascular syndrome, and posterior reversible encephalopathy. Marked increase in progesterone level in pregnancy is also associated with the growth of tumors such as meningiomas, as 70% of these tumors are positive for progesterone receptors and increase in size can lead to headache along with other neurological symptoms. Hemodynamic changes can lead to the growth of meningiomas as well. Although hormone producing pituitary tumors are usually not conducing to pregnancy, women with known pituitary tumors who do get pregnant may become symptomatic during pregnancy and develop secondary headache. Another rare cause of secondary headache during pregnancy is pituitary apoplexy. Although its occurrence is uncommon, it needs to be properly recognized and treated to avoid endocrine and visual complications. Other rare entities with increased incidence during the puerperium such postdural puncture headache will be also discussed. In summary, new onset headache during pregnancy deserves special attention because in the absence of proper recognition and treatment, secondary headache disorders can endanger the life of the mother and the fetus.

Case report: Neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease presenting with acute encephalopathy.

Neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease (NIID), a neurodegenerative disease previously thought to be rare, is increasingly recognized despite heterogeneous clinical presentations. NIID is pathologically characterized by ubiquitin and p-62 positive intranuclear eosinophilic inclusions that affect multiple organ systems, including the brain, skin, and other tissues. Although the diagnosis of NIID is challenging due to phenotypic heterogeneity, a greater understanding of the clinical and imaging presentations can improve accurate and early diagnosis. Here, we present three cases of pathologically proven adult-onset NIID, all presenting with episodes of acute encephalopathy with protracted workups and lengthy time between symptom onset and diagnosis. Case 1 highlights challenges in the diagnosis of NIID when MRI does not reveal classic abnormalities and provides a striking example of hyperperfusion in the setting of acute encephalopathy, as well as unique pathology with neuronal central chromatolysis, which has not been previously described. Case 2 highlights the progression of MRI findings associated with multiple NIID-related encephalopathic episodes over an extended time period, as well as the utility of skin biopsy for antemortem diagnosis.

Magnitude, impact, and stability of primary headache subtypes: 30 year prospective Swiss cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, impact, and stability of different subtypes of headache in a 30 year prospective follow-up study of a general population sample. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Canton of Zurich, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 591 people aged 19-20 from a cohort of 4547 residents of Zurich, Switzerland, interviewed seven times across 30 years of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of headache; stability of the predominant subtype of headache over time; and age of onset, severity, impact, family history, use of healthcare services, and drugs for headache subtypes. RESULTS: The average one year prevalences of subtypes of headache were 0.9% (female:male ratio of 2.8) for migraine with aura, 10.9% (female:male ratio of 2.2) for migraine without aura, and 11.5% (female:male ratio of 1.2) for tension-type headache. Cumulative 30 year prevalences of headache subtypes were 3.0% for migraine with aura, 36.0% for migraine without aura, and 29.3% for tension-type headache. Despite the high prevalence of migraine without aura, most cases were transient and only about 20% continued to have migraine for more than half of the follow-up period. 69% of participants with migraine and 58% of those with tension-type headache manifested the same predominant subtype over time. However, the prospective stability of the predominant headache subtypes was quite low, with substantial crossover among the subtypes and no specific ordinal pattern of progression. A gradient of severity of clinical correlates and service use was present across headache subtypes; the greatest effect was for migraine with aura followed by migraine without aura, and then tension-type headache and unclassified headaches. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of prospective follow-up of people with headache. The substantial longitudinal overlap among subtypes of headache shows the developmental heterogeneity of headache syndromes. Studies of the causes of headache that apply diagnostic nomenclature based on distinctions between discrete headache subtypes may not capture the true nature of headache in the general population.

Headache and biomarkers predictive of vascular disease in a representative sample of US children.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of childhood headache disorders with markers of risk for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. DESIGN: Information was collected on severe or recurrent headache or migraine in childhood or adolescence and on biomarkers predictive of vascular disease. SETTING: The National Health and Nutrition Survey, a nationally representative health survey. PARTICIPANTS: Children or adolescents aged 4 to 19 years (n = 11 770) who took part in the National Health and Nutrition Survey in 1999 through 2004. MAIN EXPOSURE: Headache. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Body mass index; levels of C-reactive protein, homocysteine, serum and red blood cell folate, vitamin B(12), methylmalonic acid, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and uric acid; and platelet count. RESULTS: Mean values for body mass index, C-reactive protein, and homocysteine were higher in children with than without headaches, and more children with headaches were in the highest quintile of risk for these factors. Serum and red blood cell folate levels were lower in children with headache. More children with headache were in the highest quintile of risk for 3 or more of these factors. CONCLUSIONS: Several important risk factors for long-term vascular morbidity cluster in children and adolescents with severe or recurrent headache or migraine. Further study and screening of children with headaches may permit improved preventive management.

Headache in a national sample of American children: prevalence and comorbidity.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, sociodemographic correlates, and comorbidity of recurrent headache in children in the United States. Participants were individuals aged 4 to 18 years (n = 10,198) who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Data on recurrent and other health conditions were analyzed. Frequent or severe headaches including migraine in the past 12 months were reported in 17.1% of children. Asthma, hay fever, and frequent ear infections were more common in children with headache, with at least 1 of these occurring in 41.6% of children with headache versus 25.0% of children free of headache. Other medical problems associated with childhood headaches include anemia, overweight, abdominal illnesses, and early menarche. Recurrent headache in childhood is common and has significant medical comorbidity. Further research is needed to understand biologic mechanisms and identify more homogeneous subgroups in clinical and genetic studies.

Low intensity permanent magnets in the treatment of chronic lumbar radicular pain.

We assessed the pain-relieving efficacy of static magnetic fields produced by 200 Gauss (G) magnets compared with 50G magnets in a double-blind, randomized, two-phase crossover study in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain. The surface field strengths of the magnets were 200 and 50G. Phase I included four random periods of two-week duration: two periods with 200G, one period with 50G, and one period of "no treatment." The magnets were positioned either vertically or horizontally in standard lumbosacral elastic corsets. Phase II consisted of two five-week periods with the most effective magnet from Phase I and its corresponding 50 or 200G device. The primary outcome was average daily leg pain score (0-10 scale) in each period of Phase II. Thirty-eight of 40 randomized patients completed Phase I, and 28 of 31 Phase II participants completed the study. In Phase I, pain scores did not differ significantly between 200 and 50G magnets. Phase II average leg pain scores tended to be lower with 200 vs. 50G magnets (3.2+/-2.1 for 200G vs. 3.9+/-2.2 for 50G magnets [P=0.08]) after excluding one unblinded patient. The relative treatment effect of the 200G magnets appeared to increase throughout the five-week period. Although these data cannot rule out a chance effect, the positive trends suggest that larger, longer-duration, sham-controlled trials with 200G magnets be considered in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain.

Morphine, nortriptyline and their combination vs. placebo in patients with chronic lumbar root pain.

Although lumbar radicular pain is the most common chronic neuropathic pain syndrome, there have been few randomized studies of drug treatments. We compared the efficacy of morphine (15-90 mg), nortriptyline (25-100 mg), their combination, and a benztropine "active placebo" (0.25-1 mg) in patients with chronic sciatica. Each period consisted of 5 weeks of dose escalation, 2 weeks of maintenance at the highest tolerated doses, and 2 weeks of dose tapering. The primary outcome was the mean daily leg pain score on a 0-10 scale during the maintenance period. Secondary outcomes included a 6-point ordinal global pain relief scale, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Oswestry Back Pain Disability Index (ODI) and the SF-36. In the 28 out of 61 patients who completed the study, none of the treatments produced significant reductions in average leg pain or other leg or back pain scores. Pain reduction, relative to placebo treatment was, 14% for nortriptyline (95% CI=[-2%, 30%]), 7% for morphine (95% CI=[-8%, 22%]), and 7% for the combination treatment (95% CI=[-4%, 18%]). Mean doses were: nortriptyline alone, 84+/-24.44 (SD) mg/day; morphine alone, 62+/-29 mg/day; and combination, morphine, 49+/-27 mg/day plus nortriptyline, 55 mg+/-33.18 mg/day. Over half of the study completers reported some adverse effect with morphine, nortriptyline or their combination. Within the limitations of the modest sample size and high dropout rate, these results suggest that nortriptyline, morphine and their combination may have limited effectiveness in the treatment of chronic sciatica.

Effects of chronic osteoarthritis pain on neuroendocrine function in men.

CONTEXT: Chronic pain has been associated with elevated cortisol, reduced LH and testosterone (T), and/or augmented circulating or excreted catecholamines. Most endocrine studies have been conducted in patients in whom the potentially confounding effects of depression, inflammatory disease, or coexistent medication use have not been controlled. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that chronic pain activates ACTH-cortisol and suppresses LH-T. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a case control study conducted at a clinical research center. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 16 opioid-naive men with chronic osteoarthritis pain, aged 35-65 yr with body mass index 20-30 kg/m2, and 12 healthy, opioid- and pain-free men of similar ages and body mass indexes. METHODS: We compared circulating concentrations of ACTH, cortisol, LH, and T derived from every 20-min blood sampling (2000-0800 h), and 24-h urinary excretion of cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dopamine. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in mean or integrated concentrations of ACTH, cortisol, LH, or T, or in the corresponding approximate entropy scores in osteoarthritis patients, compared with control subjects. The 0800-h serum LH concentrations were elevated in patients vs. controls (6.42 +/- 1.65 vs. 3.99 +/- 1.54 IU/liter, mean +/- sd, P = 0.02), whereas there were no significant group differences in total or free T, SHBG, cortisol binding globulin, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, or urinary cortisol and catecholamines. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that neuroendocrine function is not significantly altered in otherwise healthy men with chronic musculoskeletal pain and that prior reports of such hormonal abnormalities may have resulted from the confounding effects of coexistent illness or medication use.

Topiramate in chronic lumbar radicular pain.

UNLABELLED: Chronic lumbar radicular pain is the most common neuropathic pain syndrome. This was a double-blind, randomized, 2-period crossover trial of topiramate (50 to 400 mg) and diphenhydramine (6.25 to 50 mg) as active placebo to assess the efficacy of topiramate. Each period consisted of a 4-week escalation, a 2-week maintenance at the highest tolerated dose, and a 2-week taper. Main outcome was the mean daily leg pain score on a 0 to 10 scale during the maintenance period. Global pain relief was assessed on a 6-level category scale. In the 29 of 42 patients who completed the study, topiramate reduced leg pain by a mean of 19% (P = .065). Global pain relief scores were significantly better on topiramate (P < .005). Mean doses were topiramate 200 mg and diphenhydramine 40 mg. We concluded that topiramate treatment might reduce chronic sciatica in some patients but causes frequent side effects and dropouts. We would not recommend topiramate unless studies of alternative regimens showed a better therapeutic ratio. PERSPECTIVE: The anticonvulsant topiramate might reduce chronic lumbar nerve root pain through effects such as blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels and AMPA/kainite glutamate receptors, modulation of voltage-gated calcium channels, and gamma-aminobutyric acid agonist-like effects.