Comparison of two different 360-degree intrastromal corneal rings combined with simultaneous accelerated-corneal cross-linking.

PURPOSE: to compare five-year outcomes of two complete intracorneal implants (MyoRing versus annular-shaped intracorneal implant [AICI]) combined with accelerated corneal cross-linking (A-CXL) in progressive KCN. METHODS: In this historical cohort study, preoperative and postoperative visual, refractive, tomographic, biomechanical, and aberrometric parameters of 27 eyes of 27 patients who underwent implantation of two complete rings (13 AICI and 14 MyoRing) combined with A-CXL were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age of patients in "AICI plus A-CXL" and "MyoRing plus A-CXL" groups were 28.1 ± 4.6 and 26.3 ± 3.8 years, respectively. All pre- and postoperative visual and refractive parameters between the two groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Comparing pre- and postoperative tomographic measurements showed that anterior corneal surface (ACS) flat-K and corneal thickness at pachymetric apex significantly improved for MyoRing plus A-CXL group after five years (p < 0.05). On the other hand, ACS K-max and mean-K values were significantly improved for AICI plus A-CXL group after five years (p < 0.05). Both groups revealed significant improvements in ACS steep-K and corneal astigmatism (p < 0.05). Five years after surgery, the high order aberration in the AICI group (2.60 ± 0.83) was significantly better than the MyoRing group (1.70 ± 0.43) (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Both complete intrastromal rings (MyoRing or AICI) combined with A-CXL significantly Improved visual, refractive, and corneal aberrometric, biomechanical, and tomographic parameters and halt the progression of KCN with comparable long-term outcomes.

Comparison of Visual, Tomographic, and Biomechanical Outcomes of 360 Degrees Intracorneal Ring Implantation With and Without Corneal Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus: A 5-Year Follow-up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term (5 years) results of 360 degrees intracorneal ring (ICR) implantation with and without corneal crosslinking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus (KCN). METHOD: This historical cohort study was performed on 35 eyes with progressive KCN, which was randomly divided into 2 groups. Fourteen patients were implanted only with ICR, and 21 patients with KCN were treated with ICR plus CXL simultaneously. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and refractive components were collected from patients' medical records. The biomechanical properties of patients were measured using the Corvis ST (Oculus, Inc, Weltzar, Germany). Corneal topography and aberrometry parameters were also recorded from the Pentacam HR device (Oculus). RESULTS: Both UCVA and CDVA increased in both groups after ICR implantation; however, this improvement was more significant in the ICR plus CXL group (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively). The mean improvement of CDVA in patients with ICR implantation with and without CXL was 0.56 ± 0.67 and 0.33 ± 0.61, respectively. A comparison of the long-term postoperative Tomographic and Biomechanical Index between 2 groups showed a better result in the ICR plus CXL group (P = 0.012). Topographic findings of the anterior corneal surface (flat-K, steep-K, mean-K, and astigmatism) after surgery were significantly better than before surgery in both groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although ICR implantation alone might halt the KCN progression with acceptable visual, topographic, and biomechanical outcomes, the combination of ICR and CXL has an adjuvant and synergistic effect, especially in long-term follow-up.