Acoustic characteristics of Arabic pharyngealized obstruents in children with cochlear implants.

Speech production of children with cochlear implants (CIs) is generally characterized by low intelligibility and reduced phoneme accuracy. However, limited research investigated their speech production using acoustic measures. The current study examined voice onset time (VOT) for pharyngealized plosives [t,d], and spectral moments and noise duration for pharyngealized fricatives [s,ð] produced by Arabic speaking children with CIs. Productions from children with CIs were compared with both chronological age-matched and hearing experience-matched normal hearing children. Results showed that children with CIs exhibited difficulty producing distinct VOTs between plosives and produced different spectral patterns of both fricatives relative to both comparison groups; however, they were able to produce an acoustic distinction between both fricatives. Children with CIs produced the fricatives with lower spectral mean and higher skewness and kurtosis. The sources for inter-group differences in the acoustic measures appeared to be due in part to limitations in the quality of auditory input provided by CIs as well as reduced motor experience in speech production. Results suggest that VOT and spectral moments are sensitive to changes in perceived sound quality. Spectral moments analysis appears to give details on subtle aspects of fricative production at the phonetic level beyond that available using perceptual judgments.

Normal Patterns of Nasometric Values in Adult Jordanian Speakers of Arabic.

PURPOSE: The study sought to establish normative nasometric values for adult Jordanian speakers of Arabic. Gender-related differences and intraspeaker variability of nasalance scores were investigated. METHODS: A total of 113 adult speakers of Jordanian Arabic (56 men and 57 women) without speech-language and hearing impairments or craniofacial anomalies ranging in age between 18 and 55 participated in the study. Nasometer II, Model 6400 was used to obtain nasalance scores as speakers produced 3 recitations for each of the 3 standardized passages consisting of an oral passage, an oronasal passage, and nasal sentences. Descriptive statistics of nasalance scores for each passage were obtained and gender-related differences were determined by ANOVA. Standard deviation for the 3 repetitions for each passage was considered an index for intraspeaker variability. RESULTS: Average nasalance for each passage was (11.23%) for the oral passage, (25.48%) for the oronasal passage, and (51.92%) for the nasal sentence. There was no gender effect on nasalance on the oral passage, however women exhibited higher nasalance scores than men on the both oronasal passage (P = 0.002) and nasal sentences (P = 0.017). Intraspeaker variability for all speakers fell below 4.5% with repeated readings. CONCLUSION: The study provides normative nasometric data for Arabic speaking Jordanian adults to serve as references for the assessment of velopharyngeal dysfunction in craniofacial clinics. Arabic speakers demonstrated different nasalance scores than speakers of other languages. Gender differences can be attributed to variations in anatomical structure and velopharyngeal function between men and women.

Validity of test stimuli for nasalance measurement in speakers of Jordanian Arabic.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to establish the validity of passages for measuring nasalance of Jordanian speakers of Arabic. DESIGN: Two Arabic text passages were constructed; the Spring Passage is devoid of nasal consonants and the Home Passage contains both oral and nasal consonants. Nasalance was measured for participants while reciting each passage three times. Perceptual ratings of hypernasality were also obtained for each participant on each passage using a 5-point equal-appearing rating scale. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-seven children and adults ranging in age between 9 and 26 years participated in the study. Twenty-three participants had no history of communication disorders, and 24 had repaired cleft palate. RESULTS: Correlation coefficient between ratings of hypernasality and the nasalance scores was significant for the Spring Passage (r = 0.88, p > 0.001) and for the Home Passage (r = 0.78, p > .001). Using cutoff scores of 17% and 36% of nasalance for the Spring and the Home Passages, respectively, and a threshold score of 1.5 for hypernasality, sensitivity for the Spring Passage was 88% and the Home Passage was 78%. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed the validity of the Spring Passage and the Home Passage in measuring nasalance scores as proved by their high sensitivity and strong correlation with perceptual rating of hypernasality.

Cleft Lip and Palate: Demographic Patterns and the Associated Communication Disorders.

PURPOSE: This study investigated demographical characteristics, health status, and associated communication disorders in patients with orofacial clefts (OFCs) in Northern Jordan. METHODS: A retrospective study of 226 cleft patients and their families was carried out between March 2012 and September 2016 at the Speech and Hearing Clinic and the Maxillofacial Center at King Abdullah University Hospital. Data were collected by interviewing patients and caregivers, having patients or caregiver to complete a questionnaire and reviewing the patient's medical records. The frequencies of OFC type, demographic, health status, and communication disorders variables were calculated. χ analysis was used to test for significance of associated demographic and communication disorders variables with OFC type. RESULTS: Results revealed higher percentage of males compared with female patients. The majority of OFC patients were born to families who lived in urban areas, obtained high school diploma or lower educational level, lived below poverty cutoff, and showed nonconsanguineous marriages. Most mothers took the prescribed pregnancy supplements. Only one-third of the families received health education and reported other incidences of OFCs. Twenty percent of the patients had other congenital anomalies, 80% experienced dysphagia prior to the cleft repair, dropped to 14% after the repair. Higher percentage of patients with isolated cleft palate and cleft lip and palate exhibited hearing loss, hypernasality, articulation and phonological disorders, and dysphagia compared with those with cleft lip only. None of the demographic variables was associated with OFC type. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggested that families who had children with OFCs displayed poor socioeconomic status and low educational level which may impede the delivery of health education by health practitioners. Increased risk of comorbid communication disorders and malformations in OFC patients must be emphasized and disseminated to health professionals involved in the management of patients with OFC.

Single word and sentence intelligibility in children with cochlear implants.

This study examined the intelligibility of speech produced by 17 children (aged 4-11 years) with cochlear implants. Stimulus items included sentences from the Beginners' Intelligibility Test (BIT) and words from the Children Speech Intelligibility Measure (CSIM). Naïve listeners responded by writing sentences heard or with two types of responses to the word recordings; open transcription (CSIM-T) and closed set multiple choice (CSIM-MC). Percentage of items understood, averaged across three naïve judges, were compared across the three measures. Additionally, scores were examined for any relationships with chronological age, age of implantation, and amount of implant experience. Strong positive correlations were observed among all three intelligibility tasks. Scores on all three tasks were found to be significantly different from each other. A significant correlation was obtained between intelligibility and amount of implant experience, but not with chronological age or age of implantation. Results suggest that judging the intelligibility of speech produced by children with cochlear implants using both single word and sentence levels would provide a better overall estimate of their intelligibility. The results also emphasize the vital role of auditory input in the development of intelligible speech.