Phalangeal and Metacarpal Fractures in Children: A 10-Year Comparison of Factors Affecting Functional Outcomes in 313 Patients.

Introduction It is widely believed that fractures in children have excellent clinical outcomes due to their capacity to remodel. There are, however, certain fractures that require careful management to avoid long-lasting functional impairment. Functional outcomes following hand fractures in children are poorly studied. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive children and adolescents who had operative treatment for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures (2008-2018). Tuft fractures and replantations were excluded. Functional outcomes were measured by total active motion (TAM) scoring, where a "good" outcome = TAM > 75%. Fractures were categorized by location, classification, and by the fixation they required. Results Three hundred thirteen children were included. For proximal phalangeal fractures, those treated by manipulation under anesthesia, had a higher proportion of "good" functional outcomes than Kirschner-wire or open reduction internal fixation at discharge from hand therapy ( p = 0.043). Middle phalanx fractures had excellent functional outcomes, with no difference between fixation methods ( p = 0.81). For metacarpals, there was no statistically significant difference in functional outcomes across all managements ( p = 0.134). Fractures in the thumb had poorer postoperative function at mean 7.26 weeks than those in the long fingers ( p < 0.0001), and the data suggested a trend toward worse outcomes in the distal phalanx, pediatric Bennett fractures, Seymour fractures, and oblique fractures. Conclusions Fractures in the thumb and phalangeal fractures that require percutaneous or open fixation may need closer early postoperative monitoring in children to optimize their potential for good function.

Secondary Flexor Tendon Reconstruction: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Flexor tendon injuries of the hand and wrist involve complete or partial severance of the tendon, and primary repair is standard treatment. In cases of significantly delayed presentation, rupture of the repair or segmental tendon loss may require 1- or 2-stage secondary tendon reconstruction where a tendon graft is used. There is a risk of poor functional outcome due to stiffness and reduced range of motion which may affect patient's employment and activities of daily living. This study seeks to systematically evaluate the current evidence to determine outcomes of secondary flexor tendon reconstruction in terms of functional outcomes, complications, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and costs. Methods: This is a PROSPERO registered study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative and non-comparative studies. Outcomes of intrasynovial versus extrasynovial tendon grafting and seniority of the surgeon will be analysed in addition to comparing graft weaving at the wrist and palm for both single- and two-stage tendon reconstruction. The primary outcome is functional active range of motion. Secondary outcomes are complications, PROMs and resource use. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted from 2000 to present. All studies involving secondary flexor tendon repairs will be involved, without limitation on language, and will be screened by two independent reviewers. Tools to appraise the quality of study methodology and/or bias will be used (e.g., Cochrane Collaborative Risk of Bias tool) and if feasible, a random effects meta-analysis will be conducted. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was not required for this study. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and presented at both national and international conferences involving hand surgeons. The data collected will allow patients to be counselled more accurately by clinicians and may suggest areas where further research could be undertaken. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021296009. Highlights: Single- or two-stage secondary flexor tendon reconstruction is an important treatment modality in cases unsuitable for primary repair.This study seeks to systematically evaluate the current evidence to determine outcomes of secondary flexor tendon reconstruction in terms of functional. outcomes, complications, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and costs.This is a PROSPERO registered study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative and non-comparative studies.Outcomes of intrasynovial versus extrasynovial tendon grafting and seniority of the surgeon will be analysed in addition to comparing graft weaving at the wrist and palm for both single- and two-stage tendon reconstruction.This systematic review aims to evaluate and summarise the best current literature to determine outcomes of secondary flexor tendon reconstruction.

Management of Seymour Fractures in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Seymour fractures are injuries with a potentially high risk of infection and osteomyelitis. The optimal management of this pediatric open fracture is unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the best evidence for these fractures and determine their optional management based on primary clinical studies. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. A comprehensive search strategy was applied to the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, and gray literature databases (from May 1966 to April 15, 2020). Studies describing patients under the age of 18 years with Seymour fractures were included. Treatment was grouped based on debridement and antibiotic status as well as the timing of these interventions. The primary outcome was infection. The secondary outcomes included malunion, physeal disturbance, and nail dystrophy. RESULTS: The searches helped identify 56 records, of which 10 nonrandomized studies met our inclusion criteria, comprising 352 patients and 355 fractures. Early (<48 hours) debridement was associated with significantly less risk of infection (risk ratio [RR] = 0.28 [95% CI, 0.12-0.64]) and malunion (RR = 0.25 [95% CI, 0.07-0.99]). Prophylactic (<24 hours) antibiotics significantly reduced the risk of infection (RR = 0.21 [95% CI, 0.10-0.43]). In addition, prophylactic antibiotics and debridement were associated with a 70% reduction in the risk of infection (RR = 0.30 [95% CI, 0.11-0.83]). Over one-third of patients with delayed presentation (median 8.5 days) were infected at presentation. CONCLUSIONS: The high-risk nature of Seymour fractures may be mitigated by prompt recognition and early, basic interventions, which can usually be performed in any setting. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) vs regional or general anaesthesia for flexor tendon repair in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Flexor tendon injuries most commonly occur following a penetrating injury to the hand or wrist. These are challenging injuries and the standard treatment is surgical repair under general or regional anaesthesia. 'Wide-awake' surgery is an emerging technique in hand surgery where a conscious patient is operated on under local anaesthetic. The vasoconstrictive effect of adrenaline (epinephrine) creates a 'bloodless' operating field and a tourniquet is not required. The potential advantages include intra-operative testing of the repair; removal of the risks of general anaesthesia; reduced costs; no aerosol generation from intubation therefore reduced risk of COVID-19 spread to healthcare professionals. The aim of this study will be to systematically evaluate the evidence to determine if wide-awake surgery is superior to general/regional anaesthetic in adults who undergo flexor tendon repair. METHODS: We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative and non-comparative studies. The primary outcome will be functional active range of motion. Secondary outcomes will be complications, resource use (operative time) and patient-reported outcome measures. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted (from 1946 to present) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Grey literature will be identified through Open Grey, dissertation databases and clinical trials registers. All studies on wide-awake surgery for flexor tendon repair will be included. The comparator will be general or regional anaesthesia. No limitations will be imposed on peer review status or language of publication. Two investigators will independently screen all citations, full-text articles and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion or referral to a third author when necessary. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will conduct a random effects meta-analysis. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will summarise the best available evidence and definitively establish if function, complications, cost, or patient-reported outcomes are improved when flexor tendons are repaired using wide-awake technique. It will determine if this novel approach is superior to general or regional anaesthesia. This knowledge will help guide hand surgeons by continuing to improve outcomes from flexor tendon injuries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020182196.

Acellular dermal matrix reconstruction of a nail bed avulsion in a 13-year-old child.

Nail bed avulsion injuries often require reconstruction, particularly in cases where the avulsed fragment is lost. We describe a simple way to reconstruct a large nail bed defect, with no donor site. A 13-year-old boy with a hypoplastic left heart and autism accidentally sustained a left little distal phalanx injury with an avulsion of 60% of the nail bed, exposing the distal phalanx. This boy had a history of poor compliance, qualifying the need to find a technique that would minimise operative time and dressing changes. As such, it was elected to use an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) (Matriderm) as a one-step reconstruction. Signs of vascularisation of the ADM were noted at 2 weeks, and 3-month follow-up demonstrated integration, with normal nail growth. We found that Matriderm was able to support the regeneration of a full thickness wound in a simple one-step procedure.

The optimal management of Seymour fractures in children and adolescents: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Seymour fractures are open, displaced juxta-epiphyseal fractures of the distal phalanx, with an overlying nail bed laceration that occur in children and adolescents with an open physis. This fracture occurs rarely, but its potential consequences are clinically significant. Due to anatomical particulars and proximity to the growth plate, this open fracture may result in soft tissue infection and osteomyelitis, leading to growth arrest and persistent mallet deformity. At present, there is no consensus as to the optimal management of Seymour fractures. The objective of this study will be to systematically evaluate the existing evidence on the management of Seymour fractures in children and adolescents and to establish what are the most important factors pertaining to an uncomplicated recovery. METHODS: We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted (from inception to present) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library databases. Grey literature will be identified through searching Open Grey and dissertation databases using an exhaustive search strategy. All clinical studies examining the management of Seymour fractures will be included. The interventions (irrigation and debridement; prophylactic antibiotics) and their timings (early vs late) will be compared to no antibiotics and no debridement. Primary outcome measures will be the incidence of superficial and deep infection. Secondary outcomes will include other adverse events such mal-union, non-union, need for re-operation, physeal disturbance and nail dystrophy/atrophy. Two independent reviewers will screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. Conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. A narrative synthesis will be performed. If data permits, we will conduct random-effects meta-analysis where appropriate. DISCUSSION: This review will provide evidence for the management of Seymour fractures, based on a cumulation of existing smaller studies. Due to the rarity of this fracture pattern, included studies are expected to be mainly observational and prone to bias; however, there is value in summarising the evidence to guide clinicians. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020153726.

Global incidence of incomplete surgical excision in adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Non-melanoma skin cancer, which includes basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, is the commonest malignancy worldwide. The mainstay of treatment is surgical excision. Despite this being an exceptionally common procedure, it is not known what the accepted standard is for incomplete excision. Multiple single-centre, regional and national studies have previously reported their incidence of incomplete excision in isolation. Furthermore, is it not known what effect potential risk factors such as the operating group, location of lesions, type of reconstruction, histological components or use of loupe magnification have on the incidence of incomplete excisions. The objective of this study will be to systematically evaluate observational data that present incidence of incomplete surgical excision amongst adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer worldwide. METHODS: We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of descriptive epidemiology data. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted (from January 2000 onwards) in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, EMCare and Cochrane Library. Grey literature will be identified through searching Open Grey, dissertation databases (e.g. Open Access Theses and Dissertations) and clinical trial registers (e.g. WHO ICTRP). Observational studies (cohort, cross-sectional, case series and clinical audits) reporting the incidence of incomplete surgical excision and conducted in adult patients with non-melanoma skin cancer will be included. The primary outcome will be the incidence of incomplete surgical excision (defined as residual tumour at either the peripheral or deep margin). Secondary outcomes will be risk factors that may affect incomplete excision (e.g. operating group, location of lesions, types of reconstruction, histological components). Data will not be extracted if the study uses other surgical techniques such as Mohs micrographic surgery, intra-operative frozen section, incision, shave or punch biopsies. Two investigators will independently screen all citations, full-text articles and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. No limitations will be imposed on publication status or language of publication. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will conduct a random effect meta-analysis of observational data. Incidence estimates will be stratified according to cancer type (e.g. basal cell carcinoma vs squamous cell carcinoma) and operating group (e.g. dermatology, plastic surgery and general practice). Additional analyses will be conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity (e.g. methodological quality, sample size). DISCUSSION: This systematic review will summarise the best available evidence and definitively establish the incidence of incomplete surgical excision in non-melanoma skin cancer. It will determine if there is variation observed amongst different operating groups and provide some evidence for potential other factors causing this difference. This knowledge will provide a standard for future audits and will contribute to improving the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer treatment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019157936.