Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34831923

RESUMEN

Many gestational exposures influence birth outcomes, yet the joint contribution of toxicant and psychosocial factors is understudied. Moreover, associated gestational epigenetic mechanisms are unknown. Lead (Pb) and depression independently influence birth outcomes and offspring NR3C1 (glucocorticoid receptor) DNA methylation. We hypothesized that gestational Pb and depression would jointly influence birth outcomes and NR3C1 methylation. Pregnancy exposure information, DNA methylation, and birth outcome data were collected prospectively from n = 272 mother-infant pairs. Factor analysis was used to reduce the dimensionality of NR3C1. Multivariable linear regressions tested for interaction effects between gestational Pb and depression exposures with birth outcomes and NR3C1. Interaction effects indicated that higher levels of Pb and depression jointly contributed to earlier gestations, smaller infant size at birth, and asymmetric fetal growth. Pb and depression were also jointly associated with the two primary factor scores explaining the most variability in NR3C1 methylation; NR3C1 scores were associated with some infant outcomes, including gestational age and asymmetric fetal growth. Pb and depression can cumulatively influence birth outcomes and epigenetic mechanisms, which may lay the foundation for later health risk. As toxicants and social adversities commonly co-occur, research should consider the life course consequences of these interconnected exposures.


Asunto(s)
Metilación de ADN , Plomo , Depresión/inducido químicamente , Depresión/epidemiología , Epigénesis Genética , Femenino , Humanos , Plomo/toxicidad , Madres , Embarazo , Receptores de Glucocorticoides
2.
Birth ; 43(4): 346-352, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27411933

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The most consistently noted difference between unplanned cesarean and vaginal births is patient dissatisfaction or regret. This has been explored in multiple quantitative studies. However, the causes of this dissatisfaction remain elusive as a result of the limitations of survey instruments that restrict possible choices. METHODS: Using open-ended, semi-structured interviews (n = 14), the purpose of this study was to identify potentially alterable factors that contribute to cesarean section regret when the surgery is performed during labor. In interviews that took place between 2 and 6 weeks postpartum, patients who had undergone an unscheduled cesarean birth during labor and had volunteered for the study were asked to share the story of their birth. Each participant was prompted to describe her understanding of the indication for her cesarean, and reflect on what felt positive and negative about her experience. Using consensus coding, three investigators independently evaluated the transcribed interviews, identifying recurring themes that were then discussed until consensus on the major themes was achieved. RESULTS: Four key themes emerged from patients' unplanned cesarean narratives: poor communication, fear of the operating room, distrust of the medical team, and loss of control. Lack of or incomplete trust in care providers was a new factor not previously recognized as a cause of distress or dissatisfaction in the literature to date. CONCLUSION: The four factors identified in this study are all potentially ameliorable, suggesting that changes in physician behavior may reduce patient dissatisfaction with unplanned cesarean birth.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/psicología , Conducta Materna/psicología , Madres/psicología , Parto/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Miedo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Confianza/psicología
3.
Obstet Gynecol ; 122(3): 684-7, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23921859

RESUMEN

The ethical obligations of an obstetrician to a patient who requests a cesarean delivery without maternal or fetal indication differ depending on whether the request is made before or during labor. Informed consent is an essential dimension of respecting patient autonomy, and the process of informed consent should be extensive for a cesarean delivery in the absence of maternal or fetal indications during active labor. For this reason, physicians should rarely grant a request for cesarean delivery made during active labor. Although physicians may think that declining a request for cesarean delivery is a violation of patient autonomy, they should also be concerned about the violation of patient autonomy that results if they are unable to adequately complete the process of informed consent during labor.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/ética , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Adulto , Cesárea/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/psicología , Consentimiento Informado/normas , Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Embarazo
6.
Lancet ; 364(9448): 1851-2; author reply 1852, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15555655
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...