Differential evolution of antigenic regions of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 1 before and after vaccine introduction.

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a widespread viral pathogen that has caused tremendous economic losses throughout most pig-producing countries. Nowadays, both PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 co-circulate in Korean pig populations, and commercial modified live vaccine (MLV) is predominantly used to control PRRS. Specifically, control strategy using only PRRSV-2 MLV that was used since 1995 cannot prevent the spread of PRRSV-1 and damage from its infection, which led to the first introduction of two additional PRRSV-1 vaccines in 2014. Despite the wide implementation with PRRSV-1 vaccines, there is a lack of knowledge about the currently circulating Korean PRRSV-1 strains. Whole structural genes of PRRSV-1 before (11) and after (17) the introduction of vaccine were compared to determine the genetic evolutionary features of PRRSV. Genetic and phylogenetic analysis indicated that Korean PRRSV-1 shared 91.5 ± 1.7% nucleotide identity but formed a unique clade based on ORF2-7 phylogeny. Bioinformatics showed increased genetic heterogeneity, enhanced diversifying selection, and the emergence of novel glycosylation sites within neutralizing epitopes of minor structural proteins after vaccine introduction. Taken together, our data provide novel insight into the evolution of minor structural proteins of PRRSV-1 in the vaccination era.

Efficacy of commercial genotype 1 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccine against field isolate of genotype 2 PRRSV.

Although several recent studies have found that type 1 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) modified live virus (MLV) vaccine showed appreciable levels of cross-protection against type 2 PRRSV infection, the possibility of cross-protection between two genotype of PRRSV is still controversial. To determine potential protective efficacy against hetero-genotype field strain of PRRSV and to improve understandings of the mechanisms underlying performance improvement after infection in vaccinated animals, piglets were vaccinated with type 1 PRRSV MLV vaccine and challenged with type 2 field strain of PRRSV. As a result, vaccinated animals gained on average 8.45 kg in comparison to 4.77 kg measured in non-vaccinated animals during a 3-week period after viral challenge, which shows using a certain PRRSV vaccine could be clinically effective against heterologous genotypic virus challenge. In vaccinated animals, viremia was reduced and cleared rapidly, whilst viral load was much higher and reduced more slowly, indicating rebound viremia in non-vaccinated animals. The titers of neutralizing antibody against the type 2 PRRSV did not exceed the protective level in any animal from both vaccinated and control groups. Instead, antibody avidity of vaccinated animals was much higher than in the control group clearly. Furthermore, a strong negative correlation between antibody avidity and viremia was noted in 80% of vaccinated animals. Through those results from tests evaluating degree of antibody maturation and its relevance with clearing viremia, it could be suggested that non-neutralizing antibodies induced by vaccination prior to challenge might play a key role in protection against PRRSV infection, especially in early time course.