RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulas is a fundamental practice in anterior skull base surgery due to high success rates and low morbidity profile. However, spontaneous CSF (sCSF) leaks have the highest recurrence rate compared to other etiologies. The most effective management is undetermined due to variations in graft materials and limited evidence. OBJECTIVE: We present the largest study of a standardized endoscopic repair technique for sCSF leaks. METHODS: Single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopic sCSF leak repair between October 2011 and January 2018. All patients underwent repair using a temporary lumbar drain, intrathecal fluorescein, and multilayer reconstruction using bilayered fascia lata autograft and vascularized nasoseptal flap. RESULTS: Twenty patients (100% female, mean age: 53.2 years) with 25 separate sCSF leak sites were included. Obesity was present in 15 of 20 patients (mean body mass index [BMI] = 35.3). No patients had previous sinus surgery. Locations of skull base defects included: cribriform plate (44%), ethmoid (32%), lateral sphenoid (12%), and planum sphenoidale (12%). The mean follow-up was 22.8 months and 92% of the leak sites (23/25) were successfully repaired primarily. There were no neurological complications or cases of meningitis. Two patients (mean BMI = 52) with persistent postoperative CSF leaks and elevated intracranial pressure were successfully managed with ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. BMI was associated with likelihood of repair failure (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, endoscopic repair of sCSF leaks using a composite autograft of fascia and a nasoseptal flap demonstrates high success rates. Elevated BMI was a statistically significant risk factor for revision.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Open resection (OR) of sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNM) traditionally has been the gold standard for treatment. However, endoscopic resection (ER) has recently become a surgical alternative. The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes between OR and ER of SNM. METHODS: A literature search encompassing PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar was performed. Two reviewers independently screened for original studies comparing survival outcomes between OR and ER for SNM. Data were systematically collected on study design, patient demographics, outcomes, and level of evidence. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Meta-analysis of overall survival and disease-free survival was performed using random-effects models. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 2078 abstracts, of which 9 cohort studies were included for a total of 510 patients from 6 different countries. The average quality of all included studies using the NOS was 7.7 stars. Six out of 7 studies reported no differences in the stages of SNM between patients receiving ER versus OR. Overall survival was longer in the ER group versus OR group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.95). There was no significant difference in disease-free survival between groups (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.28-1.25). CONCLUSION: Based on the available literature, an endoscopic approach for SNM resection has survival outcomes that are similar or greater compared to an open approach.
