Sociodemographic factors leading to preventable emergency department visits after bariatric surgery: a single-institution analysis.

BACKGROUND: An important quality benchmark after bariatric surgery is 30-day emergency department (ED) visits. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify risk factors for ED visits not requiring readmission and thus deemed preventable. SETTING: University Hospital. METHODS: Patients who underwent a minimally invasive sleeve gastrectomy between 2017 and 2022 at a single institution were identified. Among these patients, those who presented to the ED within 30 days after surgery were matched 3:1 to controls. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database and the electronic medical record. Univariate conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictive factors of ED visits. RESULTS: Overall, 648 patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy, of which 53 (8.2%) presented to the ED within 30 days postoperatively without requiring readmission. Patients who presented to the ED were more likely to be unemployed (42% versus 24%, P = .04) and have government insurance (68% versus 41%, P = .001). Significant risk factors included lower versus upper socioeconomic bracket (odds ratio [OR] 3.6, P = .042), primary care physician (PCP) outside the health system versus within (OR 2.15, P = .032), greater number of PCP visits within the past year (OR 1.27, P < .001), and greater number of postoperative clinic phone calls (OR 2.04, P < .001). The number of ED visits within 1 year before surgery was a significant risk factor, with an OR of 1.44 for each visit (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Modifiable and unmodifiable risk factors contribute to ED visits after bariatric surgery. Identifying these risk factors can aid in the development of quality improvement initiatives.

Sleeve Gastrectomy Protects Against Hypertension in Rats due to Changes in the Gut Microbiome.

INTRODUCTION: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG), results in improvement in hypertension. We have previously published that rodent SG improves hypertension independent of weight loss associated with unique shifts in the gut microbiome. We tested if the gut microbiome directly improves blood pressure by performing fecal material transfer (FMT) from post-SG rats to surgery-naïve animals. METHODS: We performed SG or Sham surgery in male, Zucker rats (n = 6-7) with obesity. Stool was collected postop from surgical donors for treatment of recipient rats. Three nonsurgical groups received daily, oral consumption of SG stool, sham stool, or vehicle alone (Nutella) for 10 wk (n = 7-8). FMT treatment was assessed for effects on body weight, food intake, oral glucose tolerance, and blood pressure. Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid of stool from donor and recipient groups were sequenced by 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid and analyzed for diversity, abundance, and importance. RESULTS: Ten weeks of SG-FMT treatment significantly lowered systolic blood pressures in surgery-naïve, recipient rats compared to vehicle treatment alone (126.8 ± 13.3 mmHg versus 151.8 ± 12.2 mmHg, P = 0.001). SG-FMT treatment also significantly altered beta diversity metrics compared to Sham-FMT and vehicle treatment. In random forest analysis, amplicon sequence variant level significantly predicted FMT group, P = 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: We have found a direct link between gut microbial changes after SG and regulation of blood pressure. Future mechanistic studies are required to learn what specific gut microbial changes are required to induce improvements in obesity-associated hypertension and translation to clinical, metabolic surgery.

A comprehensive analysis of health care Inequities in randomized clinical trials following bariatric surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a global epidemic, leading to an increasing focus on interventions like bariatric surgeries. Despite this, there's a noticeable gap in understanding the demographic distribution of patients in clinical trials for bariatric surgery. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of 117 registered randomized clinical trials related to bariatric surgery on ClinicalTrials.gov. We extracted demographic information, including age, sex, race, and ethnicity, and performed descriptive statistical analyses. RESULTS: The analysis covered 8,418 participants. The mean age was 43.8 years, with a substantial majority (93.8 â€‹%) falling within the 18-65 age group. Females comprised 74.9 â€‹% of participants, surpassing real-world estimates. Racially, 65.3 â€‹% of participants were White, while African Americans represented 18.5 â€‹%, Asians 1.2 â€‹%, Native Hawaiians 0.2 â€‹%, and American Indians 0.1 â€‹%, indicating an underrepresentation of diverse racial groups, notably lower compared to real-world demographic data. In terms of ethnicity, only 17.6 â€‹% were Hispanic. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals significant demographic disparities in patients undergoing bariatric surgeries in clinical trials. This suggests a lack of generalizability, emphasizing the need for inclusive recruitment strategies to enhance health equity.

Diet in Food Insecurity: A Mediator of Metabolic Health?

Objective: Food insecurity (FI) is associated with poor metabolic health. It is assumed that energy intake and diet quality underlie this association. We tested the hypothesis that dietary factors (quantity and quality) mediate the association of FI with excess weight, waist circumference and glycemic control [glycohemoglobin (A1C)]. Methods: A mediation analysis was performed on data from the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey using FI as an independent variable; body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and A1C as metabolic outcome variables and total energy intake, macronutrients, and diet quality measured by the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) as potential mediators. Results: Despite a greater prevalence of obesity in participants experiencing FI, daily reported energy intake was similar in food-secure and -insecure subjects. In adjusted analyses of the overall cohort, none of the examined dietary factors mediated associations between FI and metabolic outcomes. In race-stratified analyses, total sugar consumption was a partial mediator of BMI in non-Hispanic Whites, while diet quality measures (HEI-2015 total score and added sugar subscore) were partial mediators of waist circumference and BMI, respectively, for those in the "other" ethnic group. Conclusion: Dietary factors are not the main factors underlying the association of FI with metabolic health. Future studies should investigate whether other social determinants of health commonly present in the context of FI play a role in this association.

Bariatric Surgeon Ergonomics: A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Robotics.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery is routinely performed using laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Musculoskeletal injuries are prevalent among both robotic and laparoscopic bariatric surgeons. Studies evaluating ergonomic differences between laparoscopic and robotic bariatric surgery are limited. This study aims to analyze the ergonomic, physical, and mental workload differences among surgeons performing robotic and laparoscopic bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All primary laparoscopic and robotic bariatric surgeries, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and sleeve gastrectomy between May and August 2022 were included in this study. Objective ergonomic analysis was performed by an observer evaluating each surgeon intraoperatively according to the validated Rapid Entire Body Assessment tool, with a higher score indicating more ergonomic strain. After each operation, surgeons subjectively evaluated their physical workload using the body part discomfort scale, and their mental workload using the surgery task load index. RESULTS: Five bariatric surgeons participated in this study. In total, 50 operative cases were observed, 37 laparoscopic and 13 robotic. The median total Rapid Entire Body Assessmentscore as a primary surgeon was significantly higher in laparoscopic (6.0) compared to robotic (3.0) cases (P < 0.01). The laparoscopic and robotic approaches had no significant differences in the surgeons' physical (body part discomfort scale) or mental workload (surgery task load index). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified low-risk ergonomic stress in surgeons performing bariatric surgery robotically compared to medium-risk stress laparoscopically. Since ergonomic stress can exist even without the perception of physical or mental stress, this highlights the importance of external observations to optimize ergonomics for surgeons in the operating room.

Inpatient opioid use and pain control after robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: During the past decade, the proportion of bariatric surgery performed robotically has been rising. However, the clinical benefits of the robotic approach over laparoscopy are uncertain. One area in need of further investigation is pain control after robotic versus laparoscopic bariatric surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of bariatric surgery patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic sleeve gastrectomy at a single institution from October 2019 to August 2022. Inpatient opioid use was measured in morphine milliequivalents. Pain scores were collected by the nursing staff. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients were included: 286 laparoscopic and 82 robotic surgery patients. The groups shared similar demographics. For the entire cohort, the mean age was 42 years, the body mass index was 50 kg/m2, and 79% were female. Mean operative time was significantly lower for laparoscopic surgeries (87.5 ± 47.3 minutes vs 109.3 ± 30.3 minutes; P < .01). The median total inpatient morphine milligram equivalents used was similar for both groups: 52.3 (31.5-77.0) for the laparoscopic group versus 40 (24-74.5) for robotic (P = .13). Mean postoperative pain scores (scale out of 10) were not significantly different between groups: 5.2 ± 1.7 (postoperative day 0) and 4.5 ± 1.7 (day 1) for laparoscopic patients versus 5.1 ± 2.0 (day 0) and 4.4 ± 1.8 (day 1) for robotic. The proportion of patients prescribed opioids at discharge was significantly higher for the laparoscopic group (75.2% vs 62.2%; P = .02). Other clinical outcomes, including duration of stay, 30-day readmissions, and visits to the emergency department, were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in inpatient opioid use or pain scores between patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic sleeve gastrectomy.

The Association of Preoperative Food Insecurity With Early Postoperative Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the rate of food insecurity in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. To compare the rates of 30-d postoperative complications based on food security status. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between 7/2020 - 3/2022 were screened for food insecurity via telephone using questions from the Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool. Screens were matched to patient data and 30-d outcomes from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. RESULTS: In total, 213 (59%) of the 359 bariatric surgery patients were screened with 81 (38%) screening positive for food insecurity. Evaluation of preoperative variables based on food security status showed comparable age, body mass index, and comorbidity status. Food insecure patients were found to have an increased length of stay following surgery compared to food secure patients (P = 0.003). Food insecurity was not associated with higher rates of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program reported 30-d postoperative complications including emergency department/urgent care visits (P = 0.34) and hospital readmissions (P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity was prevalent at 38% of the bariatric surgical population. Food insecure patients had a statistically longer length of stay after primary bariatric surgery but were not associated with an increased risk of 30-d complications. Future studies are needed to determine the mid-term and long-term effects of food insecurity status on bariatric surgical outcomes and the potential impact of food insecurity on length of stay.

Sleeve Gastrectomy Provides Cardioprotection from Oxidative Stress In Vitro Due to Reduction of Circulating Myeloperoxidase.

Bariatric surgery, including sleeve gastrectomy (SG), improves systolic and diastolic function, which is independent of weight loss in rodent models. The cause of weight loss-independent improvements in cardiac function are unknown but may originate from the gastrointestinal tract. In this study, we investigated whether a circulating blood factor is a mechanism for acute cardioprotection after SG by testing the utility of rodent SG plasma to reduce metabolic stress in vitro. For the initial experiment, obese male Zucker rats underwent SG, ad lib sham, or pair-fed sham surgeries (n = six SG, n = eight SH, n = eight PF). For all other studies, a second group of Zucker rats underwent SG or ad lib sham surgeries (n = eight SH, n = six SG). Six weeks following surgery, plasma was collected from each group, both in the fasting and post-prandial (pp) state. This plasma was then pooled per surgical group and nutrient state and tested in multiple in vitro cell culture and extra-cellular assays to determine the effect of SG on myotubular metabolic stress compared to the sham surgeries. Post-prandial SG plasma (ppSG), but not fasting SG, pp, or fasting sham plasma, reduced the metabolic stress of the H9c2 cells as measured by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release (p < 0.01). Unlike SG, weight reduction through pair-feeding did not prevent H9c2 metabolic stress. The PpSG plasma had the slowest rate of extracellular hydrogen peroxide consumption and peroxidatic activity compared to the pp sham, fasting SG, and fasting sham groups. Redox testing of plasma with aminiobenzoic acid hydrazide and edaravone suggested a pattern supporting myeloperoxidase (MPO), or other peroxidases, as the primary component responsible for reduced metabolic stress with ppSG plasma. The PpSG plasma contained 35% less circulating MPO protein as compared to the pp sham and fasting SG plasma. The plasma from an MPO global knockout rat also prevented metabolic stress of the H9c2 cells, compared to the significant increase in LDH release from the plasma of the WT controls (p < 0.01). The MPO global knockout plasma also had a rate of extracellular hydrogen peroxide consumption and peroxidatic activity comparable to the ppSG plasma. These studies suggest that one of the weight loss-independent mechanisms by which SG improves myocellular function could be a reduced pro-oxidative environment due to lower circulating levels of MPO. It appears that the gastrointestinal tract is of critical importance to these findings, as the MPO levels were only lowered after enteral, nutrient stimulation in the SG rats. If this surgical effect is confirmed in humans, SG may be a unique surgical treatment for multiple diseases with a pathogenesis of inflammation and oxidative damage, including obesity-associated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The role of weight control in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Bariatric surgery.

Diabetes mellitus is one of the major epidemics in the United States. It is heavily associated with obesity and multiple metabolic derangements that lead to long term morbidity, mortality as well as financial burden. Although medical therapy has been the mainstay in the management of diabetes mellitus, there remains a large portion of this patient population which struggles to obtain adequate glycemic control and long-term weight control with medical management alone. Bariatric surgery is a powerful tool in combating diabetes mellitus and affects glucose homeostasis through a variety of pathways. While it does provide a durable pathway for weight loss, improvement in glucose homeostasis is not only affected by the weight loss seen after bariatric surgery. Changes in gut hormone secretion, insulin regulation, and gut microbial composition also affect how these operations improve glucose homeostasis. Through improvement in the management of diabetes mellitus, comorbidities including cardiovascular disease, in turn demonstrate improvement. In this article, we will discuss the role of bariatric (metabolic) surgery as it relates to long term weight loss and the impact that weight loss has on improvement in diabetes mellitus.

Bariatric Surgeon Perspective on Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) for Weight Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Weight recurrence (WR) after bariatric surgery occurs in nearly 20% of patients. Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) may benefit this population but remains controversial among surgeons. OBJECTIVES: Explore surgeon perspectives and practices for patients with WR after primary bariatric surgery (PBS). SETTING: Web-based survey of bariatric surgeons. METHODS: A 21-item survey was piloted and posted on social media closed groups (Facebook) utilized by bariatric surgeons. Survey items included demographic information, questions pertaining to the definition of suboptimal and satisfactory response to bariatric surgery, and general questions related to different WR management options. RESULTS: One hundred ten surgeons from 19 countries responded to the survey. Ninety-eight percent responded that WR was multifactorial, including behavioral and biological factors. Failure of PBS was defined as excess weight loss < 50% by 31.4%, as excess weight loss <25% by 12.8%, and as comorbidity recurrence by 17.4%. Surgeon responses differed significantly by gender (P = .036). 29.4% believed RBS was not successful, while 14.1% were unsure. Nevertheless, 73% reported that they would perform RBS if sufficient evidence of benefit existed. Most frequently performed revisional procedures included conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), adjustable gastric band to RYGB, and RYGB revision (21.9% versus 18.2% versus 15.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrates significant variability in surgeon perception regarding causes and the effectiveness of RBS. Moreover, they disagree on what constitutes a nonsatisfactory response to PBS and to whom they offer RBS. These findings may relate to limited available clinical evidence on best management options for this patient population. Clinical trials investigating the comparative effectiveness of various treatment options are needed.

Effectiveness of Body Mass Index-Based Prophylactic Enoxaparin Dosing in Bariatric Surgery Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Enoxaparin is administered for venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis in bariatric surgery patients. There is concern whether body mass index (BMI)-based enoxaparin dosing consistently achieves prophylactic targets in patients with severe obesity. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent bariatric surgery at an academic medical center from Jan 2015-May 2021 and had an anti-Xa level drawn 2.5-6 h after ≥3 doses of BMI-based prophylactic enoxaparin. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved a target anti-Xa level. Secondary outcomes were prevalence of venous thromboembolic and bleeding events within 30 d post-operatively. RESULTS: Overall, 137 patients were included. Mean BMI was 59.1 ± 10.4 kg/m2, mean age was 43.9 ± 13.3 y and 110 patients (80.3%) were female. Target anti-Xa levels were achieved in 116 patients (84.7%); 14 (10.2%) were above target and 7 (5.1%) were below target. Patients with above target anti-Xa levels were significantly shorter in height than those within target range (167.1 versus 159.8 cm, P = 0.003). Five patients (3.6%) had a bleeding event; no thromboembolisms occurred. Anti-Xa levels correlated more strongly with enoxaparin dose per unit estimated blood volume (EBV) than dose per unit BMI (Rho = 0.54 versus Rho = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Target range anti-Xa levels were achieved in 85% of patients using BMI-based enoxaparin dosing. Patients with above target anti-Xa levels were significantly shorter by nearly 3 inches, suggesting an increased risk of overdosing enoxaparin in shorter, obese patients. An EBV-based dosing regimen may better account for patient height and is supported by a greater correlation with anti-Xa levels with dosing based on EBV than BMI.

Bariatric surgeon perceptions of the safety of same-day sleeve gastrectomy in the state of Massachusetts.

BACKGROUND: During the past 2.5 years, select bariatric surgeons in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts have been implementing same-day sleeve gastrectomy (SDSG). Key reasons for this change have been to reduce risks associated with hospitalization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and to comply with third-party payer preference to reduce costs. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate bariatric surgeons' attitudes about outcomes and morbidity between patients who are hospitalized after sleeve gastrectomy and patients who undergo SDSG. SETTING: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts (teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School). METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted among bariatric surgeons practicing in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. An anonymous web-based questionnaire was distributed using the Research Electronic Data Capture software. A total of 58 bariatric surgeons in Massachusetts were identified and successfully contacted based on registration with the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine, membership in the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, and internet search. RESULTS: A total of 33 bariatric surgeons in Massachusetts completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 56.9%. Among the respondents, 75.76% have not performed SDSG, reporting patient safety as the major concern, and 24.24% had performed SDSG in the past. CONCLUSION: Survey responses showed no significant differences in surgeon perception between SDSG and hospitalization after surgery. Optimal patient selection was an important factor influencing surgeons' decisions with regard to performing SDSG. However, bariatric surgeons in Massachusetts are reluctant to perform SDSG.

A single, peri-operative antibiotic can persistently alter the post-operative gut microbiome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

INTRODUCTION: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) significantly alters the gut microbiome and may be a mechanism for post-operative cardiovascular disease improvement. We have previously found an association between the class of peri-operative, intravenous antibiotic administered at the time of RYGB and the resolution rate of hypertension suggesting the gut microbiome as a mechanism. In this study, we performed a prospective study of RYGB to determine if a single intravenous antibiotic could alter the gastrointestinal microbial composition. METHODS: Patients undergoing RYGB were randomized to a single, peri-operative antibiotic of intravenous cefazolin (n = 8) or clindamycin (n = 8). Stool samples were collected from four-time points: 2 weeks pre-op (- 2w), 2 days pre-op (- 2d), 2 weeks post-op (+ 2w) and 3 months post-op (+ 3m). Stool samples were processed for genomic DNA followed by Illumina 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing (MGS). RESULTS: A total of 60 stool samples (- 2w, n = 16; - 2d, n = 15; + 2w, n = 16; + 3m, n = 13) from 16 patients were analyzed. 87.5% of patients were female with an average age of 48.6 ± 12.2 years and pre-operative BMI of 50.9 ± 23.3 kg/m2. RYGB induced statistically significant differences in alpha and beta diversity. There were statistically significant differences in alpha diversity at + 2w and beta diversity at + 3m due to antibiotic treatment. MGS revealed significantly distinct gut microbiota with 11 discriminatory metagenomic assembled genomes driven by antibiotic treatment at 3 months post-op, including increased Bifidobacterium spp. with clindamycin. CONCLUSION: RYGB induces significant changes in the gut microbiome at 2 weeks that are maintained 3 months after surgery. However, the single peri-operative dose of antibiotic administered at the time of RYGB induces unique and persisting changes to the gut microbiome that are antibiotic-specific. Increased Bifidobacterium spp. with clindamycin administration may improve the metabolic efficacy of RYGB when considering gut-microbiome driven mechanisms for blood pressure resolution.

Implementation of a standardized multimodal pain regimen significantly reduces postoperative inpatient opioid utilization in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Routine opioid use in surgical patients has received attention given the opioid epidemic and a renewed focus on the dangers and drawbacks of opioids in the postoperative setting. Little is known about opioid use in bariatric surgery, especially in the inpatient setting. We hypothesize that a standardized opioid-sparing protocol reduces postoperative inpatient opioid use in bariatric surgery patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of bariatric surgery patients at a single institution. From March to September 2019, a standardized intraoperative and postoperative opioid-sparing protocol was designed and implemented along with an educational program for patients regarding safe pain management. Inpatient opioid utilization in patients undergoing surgery in the preintervention phase between April and March 2019 was compared to patients from a postintervention phase of October 2019 to December 2020. Opioid utilization was measured in morphine milliequivalents (MME). RESULTS: A total of 359 patients were included; 192 preintervention and 167 postintervention. Patients were similar demographically. For all patients, mean age was 44.1 years, mean BMI 49.2 kg/m2, and 80% were female. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was performed in 48%, laparoscopic gastric bypass in 34%, robotic sleeve gastrectomy in 17%, and robotic gastric bypass in 1%. In the postintervention phase inpatient opioid utilization was significantly lower [median 134.8 [79.0-240.8] MME preintervention vs. 61.5 [35.5-150.0] MME postintervention (p < 0.001)]. MME prescribed at discharge decreased from a median of 300 MME preintervention to 75 MME postintervention (p < 0.001). In the postintervention phase, 16% of patients did not receive an opioid prescription at discharge compared to 0% preintervention (p < 0.001). When examining by procedure, statistically significant reductions in opioid utilization were seen for each operation. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a standardized intraoperative and postoperative multimodal pain regimen and educational program significantly reduces inpatient opioid utilization in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.