RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare volumetric results from NeuroQuant® and FreeSurfer in a service member setting. Since the advent of medical imaging, quantification of brain anatomy has been a major research and clinical effort. Rapid advancement of methods to automate quantification and to deploy this information into clinical practice has surfaced in recent years. NeuroQuant® is one such tool that has recently been used in clinical settings. Accurate volumetric data are useful in many clinical indications; therefore, it is important to assess the intermethod reliability and concurrent validity of similar volume quantifying tools. METHODS: Volumetric data from 148 U.S. service members across three different experimental groups participating in a study of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) were examined. Groups included mTBI (n = 71), posttraumatic stress disorder (n = 22), or a noncranial orthopedic injury (n = 55). Correlation coefficients and nonparametric group mean comparisons were used to assess reliability and concurrent validity, respectively. RESULTS: Comparison of these methods across our entire sample demonstrates generally fair to excellent reliability as evidenced by large intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC = .4 to .99), but little concurrent validity as evidenced by significantly different Mann-Whitney U comparisons for 26 of 30 brain structures measured. CONCLUSION: While reliability between the two segmenting tools is fair to excellent, volumetric outcomes are statistically different between the two methods. As suggested by both developers, structure segmentation should be visually verified prior to clinical use and rigor should be used when interpreting results generated by either method.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de los Órganos/fisiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Ophthalmologists perform a wide array of interventions on the orbital contents. The surgical treatment of glaucoma, cataracts, retinal detachment, and ocular trauma or malignancy results in alteration of the standard anatomy, which is often readily evident at radiologic examinations. The ability to accurately recognize the various imaging manifestations after orbital surgery is critical for radiologists to avoid misdiagnosis. Of particular importance is familiarity with the numerous types of implanted devices, such as glaucoma drainage devices, orbital implants, and eyelid weights. Although knowledge of patients' surgical history is helpful, this information is often not available at the time of interpretation. Fortunately, there are characteristic posttreatment findings that enable diagnosis. The imaging features of the most commonly performed ophthalmologic procedures are highlighted, with emphasis on computed tomography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, because they are currently the primary modalities involved in evaluating the orbits. Glaucoma drainage devices and orbital implants after enucleation are two of the more pertinent implanted devices because their composition has substantially evolved over the past 2 decades, which affects their imaging appearance. Some devices, such as the Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant and platinum-weighted eyelid implants, may distort radiologic images. The MR imaging safety profiles of numerous implanted devices are also reported.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen , Oftalmopatías/diagnóstico , Oftalmopatías/cirugía , Enfermedades del Nervio Facial/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Nervio Facial/cirugía , Cuerpos Extraños/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Prótesis e Implantes , Humanos , Implantes Orbitales , Instrumentos QuirúrgicosRESUMEN
An expansive array of materials exists within the armamentarium of craniofacial surgeons. For patients undergoing repair of posttraumatic injuries, computed tomography is the imaging modality of choice in the postoperative setting. Therefore, radiologists will invariably encounter implants constructed with various materials, depending on the surgeon's preference. The appearance of these materials on computed tomography is broad, ranging from hyperdense to radiolucent. To avoid misdiagnosis, radiologists should be familiar with all of the materials currently in use.
Asunto(s)
Sustitutos de Huesos , Huesos Faciales/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos Faciales/cirugía , Prótesis e Implantes , Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Cráneo/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Huesos Faciales/lesiones , Humanos , Metales , Polietileno , Diseño de Prótesis , Cráneo/lesionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This article reviews brachial plexus anatomy in the context of key landmarks, illustrates common findings of traumatic and nontraumatic causes of brachial plexopathies, describes symptoms associated with these maladies, and explains how proper diagnosis impacts clinical decisions. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of brachial plexus anatomy and of the imaging sequelae of traumatic and nontraumatic plexopathies enables the radiologist to more easily identify these afflictions, thereby facilitating a multidisciplinary treatment plan and improving patient outcome.
Asunto(s)
Neuropatías del Plexo Braquial/diagnóstico , Neuropatías del Plexo Braquial/etiología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Plexo Braquial/anatomía & histología , Plexo Braquial/lesiones , HumanosRESUMEN
We present the computed tomographic findings of pulmonary involvement by granulomatous Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in a 73-year-old woman recently tapered from a high-dose long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy for Factor VII deficiency.