Visualizing and Evaluating Finger Movement Using Combined Acceleration and Contact-Force Sensors: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

The 10-s grip and release is a method to evaluate hand dexterity. Current evaluations only visually determine the presence or absence of a disability, but experienced physicians may also make other diagnoses. In this study, we investigated a method for evaluating hand movement function by acquiring and analyzing fingertip data during a 10-s grip and release using a wearable sensor that can measure triaxial acceleration and strain. The subjects were two healthy females. The analysis was performed on the x-, y-, and z-axis data, and absolute acceleration and contact force of all fingertips. We calculated the variability of the data, the number of grip and release, the frequency response, and each finger's correlation. Experiments with some grip-and-release patterns have resulted in different characteristics for each. It was suggested that this could be expressed in radar charts to intuitively know the state of grip and release. Contact-force data of each finger were found to be useful for understanding the characteristics of grip and release and improving the accuracy of calculating the number of times to grip and release. Frequency analysis suggests that knowing the periodicity of grip and release can detect unnatural grip and release and tremor states. The correlations between the fingers allow us to consider the finger's grip-and-release characteristics, considering the hand's anatomy. By taking these factors into account, it is thought that the 10-s grip-and-release test could give us a new value by objectively assessing the motor functions of the hands other than the number of times of grip and release.

Therapeutic strategy for acute spinal cord paralysis by epidural hematoma derived from the application of non-operative observation and the optimal timing to convert to surgical intervention.

Some cases of acute spinal cord paralysis by epidural hematoma have made complete recovery through natural progression. This group cannot be ignored in choosing a therapy. We have considered the applications of non-operative observation and the optimal timing to convert to surgical intervention. Of the 454 cases reported, cases that were of trauma/post-operative, undergone epidural block, lumbosacral level, paralysis-free, were excluded. 10 clinical items were identified as factors related to the outcome of therapy, and a total of 142 cases (73 surgical and 69 non-surgical/observation cases) which included all items in its record, were extracted for this study. 104 cases that made complete recovery from spinal paralysis (CR) includes 65 cases without surgical intervention (NOP-CR). Using "paralysis recovery start time (PRST)", ROC analysis was conducted to show the diagnostic time needed to detect the cases of CR and NOP-CR. Clinical characteristics of CR and NOP-CR were identified using multiple logistics regression analysis. CR probability were higher at PRST < 15 h from the onset and NOP-CR was even higher at < 11 h. Three clinical items: incomplete motor paralysis, no use of anti-coagulant therapy, and PRST within 15 h were found to be the characteristics of CR and NOP-CR. The case with all 3 items; especially PRST within 11 h from onset, is applicable to non-operative observation. Immediate surgical intervention at 6-hours is recommended in cases that presented with unchanged complete motor paralysis. Observation treatment is discontinued and converted to surgery if motor usefulness is not regained at 15-hours.