Factors contributing to prolonged operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by trainee surgeons: a retrospective single-center study.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for a benign disease is often the initial endoscopic surgery performed by trainee surgeons. However, a lack of surgical experience is associated with prolonged operative times, which may increase the risk of postoperative complications and poor outcomes. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with prolonged operative times for laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by inexperienced surgeons. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2023. We performed a multivariate analysis to identify the factors associated with prolonged operative time by analyzing elective cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by surgeons with limited experience. RESULTS: The study included 323 patients, subjected to a median operative time of 89 min. Multivariate analysis identified that patient characteristics such as male sex, increased body mass index, and a history of conservative treatment for cholecystitis, as well as operating surgeon's post-graduation years (< 4 years), and an attending surgeon without endoscopic surgical skill certification from the Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery, were independent risk factors for a prolonged operative time. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that endoscopic surgical skill-certified attending surgeons have excellent coaching skills and mitigate the operative time for elective cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopy-Assisted Transgastrointestinal Endoscopic Retrieval of a Denture Impacted in the Esophagus: A Case Report.

We report the management of a complex case involving a 66-year-old male with significant medical comorbidities who inadvertently swallowed a denture, leading to unsuccessful endoscopic removal attempts. CT scans revealed an esophageal perforation. Following an initial unsuccessful conventional endoscopic attempt, we employed a laparoscopy-assisted transgastrointestinal endoscopic approach. This novel technique facilitated the successful retrieval of the denture without further esophageal damage, underscoring its utility in managing challenging esophageal foreign bodies. The patient's postoperative recovery was uneventful, highlighting the safety and effectiveness of the procedure.

Prognostic impact and survival outcomes of colon perforation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Colon perforation caused by colorectal cancer (CRC) is a fatal condition requiring emergency intervention. For patients with metastatic lesions, surgeons face difficult decisions regarding whether to resect the primary and metastatic lesions. Moreover, there is currently no established treatment strategy for these patients. This study aimed to investigate the clinical practice and long-term outcomes of patients with metastatic CRC diagnosed with the onset of colon perforation. METHODS: We performed a population-based multicenter cohort study. Consecutive patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC between 2008 and 2015 at all designated cancer hospitals in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, were enrolled in this study. We evaluated the impact of colon perforation on the survival outcomes of patients with metastatic CRC. The main outcome was the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of perforation for overall survival (OS). Survival time and HRs were estimated using Kaplan‒Meier and Cox proportional regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1258 patients were enrolled (perforation: n = 46; non-perforation: n = 1212). All but one of the patients with perforation underwent primary resection or colostomy and 25 cases were able to receive chemotherapy. The median OS for the perforation and non-perforation groups was 19.0 and 20.0 months, respectively (p = 0.96). Moreover, perforation was not an independent prognostic factor (aHR: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.61-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: In metastatic CRC, perforation is not necessarily a poor prognostic factor. Patients with perforation who undergo primary tumor resection or colostomy and prompt initiation of systemic chemotherapy might be expected to have a survival time similar to that of patients with non-perforated colon.

Cephalic Vein Cut-Down Method for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Single-Institution Experience.

BACKGROUND: The widespread use of chemotherapies has increased the need for totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs). Previously, the subclavian puncture approach with the landmark technique was the most used implantation method; however, it has been related to early complications such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, and arterial puncture. Therefore, a safer implantation method is required. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the cephalic vein cut-down method used in our institution. METHODS: Patients who underwent TIVAPs implantation using the cephalic vein cut-down method as the first choice between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, were included in this study. We retrospectively evaluated the technical success rates, operation times, and early complications. RESULTS: This study included 221 adult patients (men, 129; women, 92), with a mean age of 68 ± 11 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 21 ± 4 kg/m2. A total of 213 patients (96.4%) had malignant tumors that required chemotherapy. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 659 ± 442 days (range, 5-1,698 days). A total of 127 patients (57.5%) died during the follow-up period. The technical success rate was 86.4% (191/221). There were 30 failures, 24 of which were converted to the subclavian vein puncture approach. The mean operation time was 53 ± 21 min. Early complications were observed in 4 (1.8%) patients, corresponding to an incidence of 0.028 complications/1,000 catheter days. One patient had an unintended arterial puncture; however, it was not a result of the cephalic vein cut-down method but a secondary result of the subclavian vein puncture. No complications of pneumothorax, hemothorax, or arterial puncture were observed with the cephalic vein cut-down method. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the cephalic vein cut-down method for TIVAPs had an acceptable success rate and fewer early complications than the conventional puncture techniques.

Simultaneous total robotic right hemicolectomy and right partial nephrectomy.

The incidence of synchronous colorectal and renal cancers is reportedly as low as 0.33%. Simultaneous surgery for multi-organ cancers has been reported to have several advantages if tolerated by the patient. In addition, robotic surgery has gained wide application in various fields, but few reports exist on total robotic surgery involving multiple organ resections. We performed simultaneous total robotic surgery on a patient with combined colorectal and renal cancers. Before surgery, we examined the procedure with the surgical team, shared a portion of the trocar site without impairing the operability of the robotic surgery and performed the surgery safely. Further examinations are required to standardize the procedure for simultaneous robotic surgery for multi-organ cancers.

A case of inferior phrenic artery injury after chest drainage treated laparoscopically.

Chest drainage is a commonly performed surgical procedure. However, caution is required when performing this procedure because of its serious complications. One complication is vascular injury. Endovascular treatment has been prioritized in patients requiring hemostasis. We report the case of an 87-year-old woman, who presented to our hospital with dyspnea caused by massive pleural effusion. We decided to perform chest tube placement for the purpose of diagnosis and treatment. The inferior phrenic artery was injured during chest drainage, resulting in hemorrhagic shock. Catheter embolization was considered, but it was deemed difficult due to the patient's abnormal blood vessel. Instead, hemostasis was induced via laparoscopy. This is the first report on the safety of laparoscopic hemostasis for inferior phrenic artery bleeding. By devising, we were able to perform hemostatsis safely under laparoscopy.

Prognostic Role of Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We investigated the association of the levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) with prognosis in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients with serum CEA and CA19-9 measured at diagnosis of stage IV colorectal cancer were included. The cutoff values were 5 ng/ml for CEA and 37 U/ml for CA19-9. Patients were categorized into four groups: those with normal levels for both CEA and CA19-9; those with only an elevated CEA level; those with only an elevated CA19-9 level; and those with elevated levels of both. RESULTS: A total of 825 patients were included. Among them, 132 (16.0%) had normal levels for both markers, 258 (31.3%) had an elevated CEA level only, 33 (4.0%) had an elevated CA19-9 level only, and 402 (48.7%) had elevated levels of both CEA and CA19-9. Compared with patients with normal levels for both CEA and CA19-9, the multivariate hazard ratio for overall survival was 1.24 (95% confidence interval=0.95-1.62, p=0.12) for those with elevated CEA only, 2.04 (95% confidence interval=1.31-3.17, p=0.002) for those with elevated CA19-9 only, and 1.82 (95% confidence interval=1.41-2.32, p<0.001) in those with elevation of both CEA and CA19-9. CONCLUSION: Elevation of CEA alone was not prognostic. Elevation of only CA19-9 at diagnosis was associated with a worse prognosis in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. The combined measurement of CEA and CA19-9 can be helpful as a predictive tool for the prognosis of stage IV colorectal cancer.

Impact of histological subtype on prognosis in stage IV colorectal cancer: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are a few established prognostic factors for stage IV colorectal cancer. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of histological subtypes on prognosis and metastatic patterns in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. METHODS: This was a population-based, multicenter, cohort study. We included consecutive patients diagnosed with stage IV colorectal cancer between 2008 and 2015 at all designated cancer hospitals in Fukushima prefecture, Japan. Patients were classified into two groups according to histological subtypes as follows: poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (Por), mucinous adenocarcinoma (Muc), or signet-ring cell carcinoma (Sig) and well (Wel) or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (Mod). We evaluated the relationship between these histological groups and survival time. After adjusting for other clinical factors, we calculated the hazard ratio for Por/Muc/Sig. RESULTS: A total of 1,151 patients were enrolled, and 1,031 and 120 had Wel/Mod and Por/Muc/Sig, respectively. The median overall survival was 19.2 and 11.9 months for Wel/Mod and Por/Muc/Sig, respectively (p < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio for Por/Muc/Sig with regard to survival time was 1.42 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.77). Por/Muc/Sig had a lower incidence of liver and lung metastases and a higher incidence of peritoneal dissemination and metastasis to rare organs, such as the bone and brain. CONCLUSIONS: The Por/Muc/Sig histological subtype was an independent prognostic factor for poor prognosis among patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. The histological subtype may be useful for predicting the prognosis of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer and designing the treatment strategy.

Idiopathic perforation of acalculous gallbladder after insertion of a transpapillary pancreatic stent.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde pancreatocholangiography (ERCP) is associated with many types of adverse events (AEs) but idiopathic perforation of the gallbladder (IPGB) is very rare. Pancreatobiliary reflux is one of the factors involved with occurrence of IPGB 1. Here we present a case of acalculous gallbladder perforation as an AE following the insertion of an indwelling endoscopic nasal pancreatic drainage (ENPD) tube (a pancreatic stent) to obtain pancreatic fluid. In this case, acute pancreatobiliary reflux might have been caused by the insertion of the ENPD-tube.