Seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is protective against severe COVID-19 disease in heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant (HTX) recipients are prone to develop complications after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Vaccination is often ineffective due to weaker immunogenicity. In this high-volume single-center study, we aimed to determine factors influencing seroconversion after vaccination and predictors of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-nine HTX recipients were enrolled. Type of the first two vaccine doses included messenger RNA (mRNA), vector, and inactivated vaccines. We carried out analyses on seroconversion after the second and third doses of vaccination and on severity of infection. Antispike protein SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) was measured after the second and third vaccines and serostatus was defined. Effect of the first two vaccine doses was studied on patients who did not suffer SARS-CoV-2 infection before antibody measurement (n = 175). The effectivity of the third vaccine was evaluated among seronegative recipients after the second vaccine (n = 53). Predictors for severe infection defined as pneumonia, hospitalization or death were assessed in all patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 92). RESULTS: 62% of the recipients became seropositive after the second vaccination. Longer time between HTX and vaccination (odds ratio [OR]: 2.35) and mRNA vaccine (OR: 4.83) were predictors of seroconversion. 58% of the nonresponsive patients became seropositive after receiving the third vaccine. Male sex increased the chance of IgG production after the third dose (OR: 5.65). Clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection was severe in 32%. Of all parameters assessed, only seropositivity before infection was proven to have a protective effect against severe infection (OR: 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: We found that longer time since HTX, mRNA vaccine type, and male sex promoted seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in HTX recipients. Seropositivity-but not the number of vaccine doses-seemed to be protective against severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Screening of HTX patients for anti-SARS-COV-2 antibodies may help to identify patients at risk for severe infection.

Extracorporeal photopheresis in the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection: A single-centre experience.

Despite novel immunosuppressive (IS) protocols, adverse effects of IS drugs continue to have notable negative impact on patient and cardiac allograft survival after heart transplantation (HTx). Therefore, IS regimens with less toxic side effects are sorely needed. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in combination with tacrolimus-based maintenance IS therapy in the treatment of allograft rejection in adult HTx recipients. Indications for ECP included acute moderate-to-severe or persistent mild cellular rejection, or mixed rejection. Twenty-two patients underwent a median of 22(2-44) ECP treatments after HTx. Median duration of ECP course was 173.5(2-466) days. No relevant adverse effects of ECP were noted. Reduction of methylprednisolone doses was safe throughout the ECP course. ECP, used in conjunction with pharmacological anti-rejection therapy, had a successful reversal of cardiac allograft rejection, decreased the rates of subsequential rejection episodes and normalized the allograft function in patients completing the ECP course. Short- and long-term survivals were excellent (91% at 1 and 5 years post-ECP) and comparable to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry data on HTx recipient overall survival. In conclusion, ECP can be safely used for the treatment and prevention of cardiac allograft rejection in conjunction with traditional IS regimen.

Pseudoaneurysm of the ascending aorta: case report of a donor-derived Pseudomonas infection in a heart transplant recipient.

BACKGROUND: Mycotic aortic pseudoaneurysm is a rare complication after heart transplantation (HTX) with remarkable mortality. Intrathoracic infection is a well-documented predisposing factor for this disease. Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Candida species are commonly isolated from resected specimens of the pseudoaneurysms. We demonstrate a unique case of mycotic pseudoaneurysm caused by presumably donor-derived Pseudomonas infection in a heart transplant recipient. CASE PRESENTATION: Our 67-year-old male patient treated with diabetes mellitus underwent HTX. The donor suffered from epiglottic abscess and pneumonia with known microorganisms including Pseudomonas, therefore both the donor and recipient received targeted antimicrobial therapy and prophylaxis. Five months after the uneventful HTX, lab test of the asymptomatic patient showed moderate, increasing C-reactive protein level without obviuos source of infection. Chest computed tomography showed a large (90 mm) saccular dilatation of the tubular portion of ascending aorta. Urgent surgical intervention identified a pseudoaneurysm, histological examinations and cultures of the resected aorta verified Pseudomonas aeruginosa aortitis, while all blood cultures remained negative. Retrospective interrogation of other transplanted organs of the donor supported donor-derived infection as the transport fluid of the right kidney grew Pseudomonas. The patient received 3 weeks of ceftazidime followed by 7 months of oral ciprofloxacin therapy. One year after the operation the patient was asymptomatic with normal inflammatory markers. CONCLUSIONS: Donor-derived infection is a rare but potential cause of aortitis. Early diagnosis, surgical intervention and adjuvant antibiotic therapy seem to be the keys to successful management of mycotic pseudoaneurysms after HTX.

Long-term survival following upgrade compared with de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation: a single-centre, high-volume experience.

AIMS: Patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator are often considered for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, limited comprehensive data are available regarding their long-term outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our retrospective registry included 2524 patients [1977 (78%) de novo, 547 (22%) upgrade patients] with mild to severe symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and QRS ≥ 130ms. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation (HTX), or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation; secondary endpoints were death from any cause and post-procedural complications. In our cohort, upgrade patients were older [71 (65-77) vs. 67 (59-73) years; P < 0.001], were less frequently females (20% vs. 27%; P = 0.002) and had more comorbidities than de novo patients. During the median follow-up time of 3.7 years, 1091 (55%) de novo and 342 (63%) upgrade patients reached the primary endpoint. In univariable analysis, upgrade patients exhibited a higher risk of mortality/HTX/LVAD than the de novo group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-1.61; P < 0.001]. However, this difference disappeared after adjusting for covariates (adjusted HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.86-1.48; P = 0.402), or propensity score matching (propensity score-matched HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.95-1.29; P = 0.215). From device-related complications, lead dysfunction (3.1% vs. 1%; P < 0.001) and pocket infections (3.7% vs. 1.8%; P = 0.014) were more frequent in the upgrade group compared to de novo patients. CONCLUSION: In our retrospective analysis, upgrade patients had a higher risk of all-cause mortality than de novo patients, which might be attributable to their more significant comorbidity burden. The occurrence of lead dysfunction and pocket infections was more frequent in the upgrade group.

Acute heart transplantation from mechanical circulatory support in a human immunodeficiency virus-positive patient with fulminant myocarditis.

Since the establishment of highly active antiretroviral therapy, survival rates have improved among patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection giving them the possibility to become transplant candidates. Recent publications revealed that human immunodeficiency virus-positive heart transplant recipients' survival is similar to non-infected patients. We present the case of a 40-year-old human immunodeficiency virus infected patient, who was hospitalized due to severely decreased left ventricular function with a possible aetiology of acute myocarditis, that has later been confirmed by histological investigation of myocardial biopsy. Due to rapid progression to refractory cardiogenic shock, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implantation had been initiated, which was upgraded to biventricular assist device later. On the 35th day of upgraded support, the patient underwent heart transplantation uneventfully. Our clinical experience confirms that implementation of temporary mechanical circulatory support and subsequent cardiac transplantation might be successful in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients even in case of new onset, irreversible acute heart failure.

Usefulness of electroanatomical mapping during transseptal endocardial left ventricular lead implantation.

AIM: Failure rate to implant left ventricular (LV) lead transvenously is 4-8% in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients. Epicardial lead placement is an alternative method and if not applicable case reports and small series showed the feasibility of endocardial LV lead implantation. Electroanatomical mapping might be a useful tool to guide this procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four patients had undergone endocardial LV lead implantation after unsuccessful transvenous implantation or epicardial LV lead dysfunction using the transseptal approach. Electroanatomical mapping was used to mark the location of the transseptal puncture. This location point guided the mapping catheter from the subclavian access and facilitated positioning of the LV lead at the adjacent latest activation area of the left ventricle detected by activation mapping. Endocardial active fixation LV leads were successfully implanted in all patients with stable electrical parameters immediately after implantation and over a mean follow-up of 18.3 months (lead impedance 520 ± 177 vs. 439 ± 119 Ω and pacing threshold 0.8 ± 0.2 V, 0.5 ms vs. 0.6 ± 0.1 V, 0.5 ms, respectively). Patients were maintained on anticoagulation therapy with a target international normalized ratio of 3.5-4.5 and did not show any thromboembolic, haemorrhagic events, or infection. Echocardiography showed significant improvement of LV systolic function with marked improvement of the functional status. CONCLUSIONS: Electroanatomical mapping is a useful technical tool to guide endocardial LV lead implantation. It helps to identify the location of the transseptal puncture and the use of activation mapping might facilitate location of the optimal lead positions during CRT.

[Physiologic effects of hypothermia]. / A hypothermia élettani hatásai.

Therapeutic use of hypothermia has come to the frontline in the past decade again in the prevention and in mitigation of neurologic impairment. The application of hypothermia is considered as a successful therapeutic measure not just in neuro- or cardiac surgery, but also in states causing brain injury or damage. According to our present knowledge this is the only proven therapeutic tool, which improves the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest, decreasing the oxygen demand of the brain. Besides influencing the nervous system, hypothermia influences the function of the whole organ system. Beside its beneficial effects, it has many side-effects, which may be harmful to the patient. Before using it for a therapeutic purpose, it is very important to be familiar with the physiology and complications of hypothermia, to know, how to prevent and treat its side-effects. The purpose of this article is to summarize the physiologic and pathophysiologic effects of hypothermia.