Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Burns ; 49(6): 1267-1271, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36813603

RESUMEN

Burn patients with concomitant traumatic injuries suffer increased morbidity and mortality. Complex care coordination is necessary for these patients, and the prevalence of resulting inter-facility transfers has not yet been quantified by literature. This study examined the outcomes for traumatically injured burn patients to identify the occurrence of trauma system transfers in this group. The National Trauma Data Bank was reviewed from the years 2007-2016 for 6,565,577 patients with traumatic, burn, and concomitant burn & traumatic injuries. There were 5068 patients with both traumatic and burn injuries, 145,890 patients with burn injuries, and 6,414,619 patients with traumatic injuries. Trauma/burn patients were more often admitted to the ICU from the ED at a rate of 35.5% compared to 27.1% for burn and 19.4% for trauma (P < 0.001). For disposition when discharged from the hospital, trauma/burn patients required more inter-facility transfers at a rate of 2.5% compared to 1.7% for burn and 1.3% for trauma (P < 0.001). For level I trauma centers, 5.5% of trauma/burn, 7.1% of burn, and 0.5% of trauma patients required inter-facility transfers. For level II trauma centers, 29.1% of trauma/burn, 47.0% of burn, and 2.8% of trauma patients required inter-facility transfers. Among level I and level II trauma centers, patients with only burns and burn patients with concomitant traumatic injuries required more inter-facility transfers, and level II trauma centers required more inter-facility transfers for all patients. Quantifying these findings is the first step toward improving triage decisions and allocation of health care resources while expediting appropriate care.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Humanos , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Quemaduras/epidemiología , Quemaduras/terapia , Centros Traumatológicos , Triaje , Bases de Datos Factuales , Transferencia de Pacientes , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Am Surg ; 88(5): 1016-1017, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35272531

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is linked with a hypercoagulable state called COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC). Due to elevated levels of factor VIII and fibrinogen as well as inflammation-linked hyperviscosity of blood, the risk for venous thromboembolism is increased in patients who have CAC. We report the case of a patient with recent COVID-19 infection and no other past medical history who presented after a motorcycle collision with left middle and distal femur fractures, who underwent retrograde intramedullary nailing, and then developed immediate massive bilateral pulmonary emboli. The patient was treated with tissue plasminogen activator administration via bilateral pulmonary artery thrombolysis catheters without improvement, and was then placed on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for subsequent cardiogenic shock. During a 58-day hospital stay, the patient recovered and was discharged with a good long-term prognosis. In this report, we discuss CAC, the role of surgical critical care in the management of the disease, and issues specific to this patient's disease process and treatment.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea , COVID-19 , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/etiología , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/terapia , COVID-19/complicaciones , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Humanos , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno
3.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 39(3): 270-273, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34235976

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated patient outcomes of care before and after transitioning to a surgical intensivist-led trauma-intensive care unit (ICU) team. The intensivist team provided daily multidisciplinary rounds and continuity of care. Prior to an intensivist model, general surgeons cared for trauma patients admitted to the unit. METHODS: Outcomes of 1,078 trauma patients, admitted to the ICU at a Level II trauma center, under care of general surgeons (1/2011-8/2012, n = 449) were retrospectively compared with care managed by a surgical intensivist team (1/2013-5/2015, n = 629) by Pearson Chi-squared and Wilcoxon tests. A multivariable logistic regression technique was used to control for covariates. Demographics and injury severity were analyzed. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. The secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), ventilator-free and ICU-free days, and ICU readmission rate. Other data collected included palliative care consultation. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in ICU mortality (P = 0.055), hospital LOS (P = 0.481), ventilator-free days (P = 0.174), or ICU readmission rate (P = 0.587). The surgical intensivist team consulted palliative care more frequently (4.0% vs 13.5%, P < 0.001), while managing more trauma patients who were older than 65 years (P < 0.001) with lower Glasgow Coma Scale (P = 0.048) and higher injury severity (P = 0.025) and abbreviated injury scale (P < 0.001) scores. DISCUSSION: There were no differences in outcomes. However, incorporating palliative care consultation in the ICU is essential in the support of critically ill patients and their families. These data demonstrate that a surgical intensivist team utilized palliative care more often in the management of trauma patients admitted to the ICU.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cuidados Paliativos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...